Clinical validation of the Psychotic Depression Assessment Scale (PDAS) against independent global severity ratings in older adults

Cross-cultural evaluation of the French version of the Delusion Assessment Scale (DAS) and Psychotic Depression Assessment Scale (PDAS)

BACKGROUND

Major depressive disorder with psychotic features (MDDPsy), compared to nonpsychotic MDD, involves an increased risk of suicide and failure to achieve treatment response. Symptom scales can be useful to assess patients with MDDPsy. The aim of the present study was to validate French versions of the Delusion Assessment Scale (DAS) and Psychotic Depression Assessment Scale (PDAS).

METHODS

One hundred patients were included. The scales were filled out by psychiatrists. Data from participants who accepted a second interview were used for inter-judge reliability. The scalability and psychometric properties of both scales were assessed.

RESULTS

Data from 94 patients were used. Owing to low score variability between patients, the predefined threshold for scalability (≥0.40) was not reached for both scales. Factorial analysis of the DAS identified five factors, different from those of the original version. Five factors were also identified in the PDAS, of which two comprised items from the HDRS and the other three items from the BPRS. Floor and ceiling effects were observed in both scales, due in part to the construction of certain subscales. Unlike the PDAS, the DAS had good internal consistency. Multiple correlations were observed between the DAS dimensions but none between those of the PDAS. Both scales showed good inter-judge reliability. Convergent validity analyses showed correlations with HDRS, BPRS and CGI.

LIMITATIONS

Inter-judge reliability was calculated from a relatively small number of volunteers.

CONCLUSIONS

The good psychometric properties of the French versions of the DAS and PDAS could help in assessing MDDPsy, in particular its psychotic features, and hence improve response to treatment and prognosis.

Cognitive Deficits in Older Adults With Psychotic Depression: A Meta-Analysis

A major depressive disorder with psychotic features, that is, psychotic depression (PD), is often accompanied by cognitive deficits, particularly in older patients. We aimed to assess to what extent various cognitive domains are affected in older patients with PD compared to those with nonpsychotic depression (NPD). Therefore, a systematic search was conducted in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Literature (CINAHL), Google Scholar, and Cochrane for all relevant studies. Hereafter, we conducted a meta-analysis of seven studies on cognitive deficits in older adults (55+ years), comparing patients with PD and patients with NPD. Compared to patients with NPD, those with PD not only showed a significantly poorer performance on overall cognitive function, with a Hedges' g effect size of -0.34 (95% confidence interval: -0.56; -0.12; p = 0.003), but also on nearly all separate cognitive domains, with Hedges' g effect sizes ranging from -0.26 to -0.64 (all p's <0.003), of which attention was most adversely affected. Verbal fluency showed no significant effect, although this analysis may have been underpowered. The funnel plot suggested no significant publication bias (Egger test intercept: -2.47; 95% confidence interval: -5.50; 0.55; p = 0.09). We conclude that older patients with PD show more cognitive deficits on all cognitive domains, except for verbal fluency, compared to patients with NPD. It is crucial that clinicians and researchers take cognitive deficits into consideration in older adults with PD.