Antioxidant-enriched enteral nutrition and immuno-inflammatory response after major gastrointestinal tract surgery

Glutamine effects on heat shock protein 70 and interleukines 6 and 10: Randomized trial of glutamine supplementation versus standard parenteral nutrition in critically ill children

BACKGROUND & AIMS

To determine whether glutamine (Gln) supplementation would have a role modifying both the oxidative stress and the inflammatory response of critically ill children.

METHODS

Prospective, randomized, double-blind, interventional clinical trial. Selection criteria were children requiring parenteral nutrition for at least 5 days diagnosed with severe sepsis or post major surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to standard parenteral nutrition (SPN, 49 subjects) or standard parenteral nutrition with glutamine supplementation (SPN + Gln, 49 subjects).

RESULTS

Glutamine levels failed to show statistical differences between groups. At day 5, patients in the SPN + Gln group had significantly higher levels of HSP-70 (heat shock protein 70) as compared with the SPN group (68.6 vs 5.4, p = 0.014). In both groups, IL-6 (interleukine 6) levels showed a remarkable descent from baseline and day 2 (SPN: 42.24 vs 9.39, p < 0.001; SPN + Gln: 35.20 vs 13.80, p < 0.001) but only the treatment group showed a statistically significant decrease between day 2 and day 5 (13.80 vs 10.55, p = 0.013). Levels of IL-10 (interleukine 10) did not vary among visits except in the SPN between baseline and day 2 (9.55 vs 5.356, p < 0.001). At the end of the study, no significant differences between groups for PICU and hospital stay were observed. No adverse events were detected in any group.

CONCLUSIONS

Glutamine supplementation in critically-ill children contributed to maintain high HSP-70 levels for longer. Glutamine supplementation had no influence on IL-10 and failed to show a significant reduction of IL-6 levels.

Nutritional considerations after gastrectomy and esophagectomy for malignancy

This article reviews various methods of assessing and managing post-gastrectomy or esophagectomy patients from a nutritional standpoint, by examining recent research focusing on assessment models, components of enteral feeding, timing of feeding, safety of enteral nutrition (EN) vs total parenteral nutrition (TPN), appetite stimulants, alternative treatments, and long-term care. Pre-, peri-, and post-operative nutrition represent a major prognostic indicator in patients undergoing a gastrectomy or esophagectomy for malignant cancer. An accurate initial nutrition assessment to determine risk, followed by close monitoring pre-operatively and early enteral feeding post-operatively, has been shown to have the most beneficial effects. The optimal delivery route for nutrition involves the use of EN with immune enhancing nutrients while avoiding TPN. In practice, TPN is reserved for patients with post-operative complications that delay enteral feeding for an extended time. While megace is commonly used as an appetite stimulant, the hormone ghrelin is another novel, safe, and efficacious treatment to improve appetite, increase by mouth (PO) intake, and minimize loss of weight and lean body mass. Although use of ghrelin is not yet common practice, as more studies are published, we predict that this will become a more common treatment. While complementary and alternative therapies are commonly employed in this patient population, more research needs to be done before incorporation into our mainstay of treatment. Long term, these patients continue to be at nutritional risk and therefore should be followed to optimize weight maintenance and prevent micronutrient deficiencies.