A 1.5 kb repeat sequence flanks the suppressor of forked gene at the euchromatin-heterochromatin boundary of the Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome

Low occurrence of gene transposition events during the evolution of the genus Drosophila

The role played by gene transpositions during the evolution of eukaryotic genomes is still poorly understood and indeed has been analyzed in detail only in nematodes. In Drosophila, a limited number of transpositions have been detected by comparing the chromosomal location of genes between different species. The relative importance of gene transposition versus other types of chromosomal rearrangements, for example, inversions, has not yet been evaluated. Here, we use physical mapping to perform an extensive search for long-distance gene transpositions and assess their impact during the evolution of the Drosophila genome. We compare the relative order of 297 molecular markers that cover 60% of the euchromatic fraction of the genome between two related Drosophila species and conclude that the frequency of gene transpositions is very low, namely one order of magnitude lower than that of nematodes. In addition, gene transpositions seem to be events almost exclusively associated with genes of repetitive nature such as the Histone gene complex (HIS-C).

Chromosomal elements evolve at different rates in the Drosophila genome

Recent results indicate that the rate of chromosomal rearrangement in the genus Drosophila is the highest found so far in any eukaryote. This conclusion is based chiefly on the comparative mapping analysis of a single chromosomal element (Muller's element E) in two species, D. melanogaster and D. repleta, representing the two farthest lineages within the genus (the Sophophora and Drosophila subgenera, respectively). We have extended the analysis to two other chromosomal elements (Muller's elements A and D) and tested for differences in rate of evolution among chromosomes. With this purpose, detailed physical maps of chromosomes X and 4 of D. repleta were constructed by in situ hybridization of 145 DNA probes (gene clones, cosmids, and P1 phages) and their gene arrangements compared with those of the homologous chromosomes X and 3L of D. melanogaster. Both chromosomal elements have been extensively reshuffled over their entire length. The number of paracentric inversions fixed has been estimated as 118 +/- 17 for element A and 56 +/- 8 for element D. Comparison with previous data for elements E and B shows that there are fourfold differences in evolution rate among chromosomal elements, with chromosome X exhibiting the highest rate of rearrangement. Combining all results, we estimated that 393 paracentric inversions have been fixed in the whole genome since the divergence between D. repleta and D. melanogaster. This amounts to an average rate of 0.053 disruptions/Mb/myr, corroborating the high rate of rearrangement in the genus Drosophila.

Characterization of the flamenco region of the Drosophila melanogaster genome

The flamenco gene, located at 20A1-3 in the beta-heterochromatin of the Drosophila X chromosome, is a major regulator of the gypsy/mdg4 endogenous retrovirus. As a first step to characterize this gene, approximately 100 kb of genomic DNA flanking a P-element-induced mutation of flamenco was isolated. This DNA is located in a sequencing gap of the Celera Genomics project, i.e., one of those parts of the genome in which the "shotgun" sequence could not be assembled, probably because it contains long stretches of repetitive DNA, especially on the proximal side of the P insertion point. Deficiency mapping indicated that sequences required for the normal flamenco function are located >130 kb proximal to the insertion site. The distal part of the cloned DNA does, nevertheless, contain several unique sequences, including at least four different transcription units. Dip1, the closest one to the P-element insertion point, might be a good candidate for a gypsy regulator, since it putatively encodes a nuclear protein containing two double-stranded RNA-binding domains. However, transgenes containing dip1 genomic DNA were not able to rescue flamenco mutant flies. The possible nature of the missing flamenco sequences is discussed.

The suppressor of forked gene of Drosophila, which encodes a homologue of human CstF-77K involved in mRNA 3'-end processing, is required for progression through mitosis

The Suppressor of forked (Su(f)) protein of Drosophila melanogaster is a homologue of the 77K subunit of human cleavage stimulation factor required for cleavage of pre-mRNAs before addition of poly(A). We have previously shown that the Su(f) protein is not ubiquitously distributed: it accumulates in dividing cells at various stages of Drosophila development. In this paper, we show that phenotypes of su(f) temperature-sensitive mutants result from a defect in cell proliferation. Analysis of the mitotic phenotype of su(f) temperature-sensitive alleles in larval brain and in imaginal discs reveals an increase in the number of metaphases with overcondensed chromosomes and asymmetric or reduced mitotic spindles. In contrast, neural differentiation in eye imaginal discs of the same mutant flies does not appear to be affected. These results indicate that su(f) is required during cell division for progression through metaphase. Taken together, these data suggest that a decrease in su(f) activity preferentially affects 3'-end formation of particular mRNAs, some of which are involved in mitosis, and are in agreement with a role of su(f) in the regulation of poly(A) site utilization.

Autoregulation at the level of mRNA 3' end formation of the suppressor of forked gene of Drosophila melanogaster is conserved in Drosophila virilis

The Drosophila melanogaster Suppressor of forked [Su(f)] protein shares homology with the yeast RNA14 protein and the 77-kDa subunit of human cleavage stimulation factor, which are proteins involved in mRNA 3' end formation. This suggests a role for Su(f) in mRNA 3' end formation in Drosophila. The su(f) gene produces three transcripts; two of them are polyadenylated at the end of the transcription unit, and one is a truncated transcript, polyadenylated in intron 4. Using temperature-sensitive su(f) mutants, we show that accumulation of the truncated transcript requires wild-type Su(f) protein. This suggests that the Su(f) protein autoregulates negatively its accumulation by stimulating 3' end formation of the truncated su(f) RNA. Cloning of su(f) from Drosophila virilis and analysis of its RNA profile suggest that su(f) autoregulation is conserved in this species. Sequence comparison between su(f) from both species allows us to point out three conserved regions in intron 4 downstream of the truncated RNA poly(A) site. These conserved regions include the GU-rich downstream sequence involved in poly(A) site definition. Using transgenes truncated within intron 4, we show that sequence up to the conserved GU-rich domain is sufficient for production of the truncated RNA and for regulation of this production by su(f). Our results indicate a role of su(f) in the regulation of poly(A) site utilization and an important role of the GU-rich sequence for this regulation to occur.