Abortion care seeking in India: patterns and predictors

Revisiting the predisposing, enabling, and need factors of unsafe abortion in India using the Heckman Probit model

Unsafe abortion refers to induced abortions performed without trained medical assistance. While previous studies have investigated predictors of unsafe abortion in India, none have addressed these factors with accounting sample selection bias. This study aims to evaluate the contributors to unsafe abortion in India by using the latest National Family Health Survey data conducted during 2019-2021, incorporating the adjustment of sample selection bias. The study included women aged 15 to 49 who had terminated their most recent pregnancy within five years prior to the survey (total weighted sample (N) = 4,810). Descriptive and bivariate statistics and the Heckman Probit model were employed. The prevalence of unsafe abortion in India was 31%. Key predictors of unsafe abortion included women's age, the gender composition of their living children, gestation stage, family planning status, and geographical region. Unsafe abortions were typically performed in the early stages of gestation, often involving self-administered medication. The primary reasons cited were unintended pregnancies and health complications. This study underscores the urgent need for targeted interventions that take into account regional, demographic, and social dynamics influencing abortion practices in India.

Patterns and Predictors of Abortion Care-Seeking Practices in India: Evidence From a Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Survey (2019-2021)

Background India continues to have unsafe abortions despite progressive legislation since the past five decades facilitating ease of access to abortion services. This study describes abortion care-seeking patterns (social/therapeutic/humanitarian/sex-selective/safe/unsafe), preferences (public/private/at home), and their determinants among Indian women. Methods Data were taken from the Indian National Family and Health Survey (NFHS-5) (2019-2021) including women aged 15-49 years, who had terminated their last pregnancy by induced abortion within five years prior to the survey (N = 5,856). A bivariate analysis, followed by a multinomial logistic regression model, was performed to assess the predictors affecting the choice of healthcare facility type for an abortion. Predictors of unsafe and self-managed abortions were examined using binary logistic regression. Results About 665,671 women in the reproductive age group responded to the survey, of which 3.42% (n=22,767) reported their most recent pregnancy within the last five years terminated in either a miscarriage, stillbirth or abortion, of which 5,856 (25.72%) underwent an induced abortion. Women undergoing surgical abortion were more likely to avail of either a public (adjusted relative risk ratio (aRRR)=38.06 (23.62, 61.35)) or a private facility (aRRR=44.53 (28.11,70.53)) compared to at-home abortions. Women reporting a social and humanitarian reason for abortion were less likely to undergo an abortion at a public (aRRR=0.25 (0.17,0.35)) or private facility (aRRR=0.32 (0.23,0.44)) than at home. Furthermore, a total of 147 (2.43%) abortions were classified as unsafe. Women reporting sex-selective reasons for abortion were observed to have a higher likelihood of engaging in an unsafe abortion (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)= 1.61 (0.70, 3.70)) compared to those citing a therapeutic reason. Conclusions Self-managed abortions at home were more prevalent in women of lower socioeconomic status, adolescent girls, and those reporting sex-selective reasons for abortion. Furthermore, the reproductive-health program in India should enhance capacity-building initiatives for primary-care healthcare providers, including doctors, nurses, and pharmacists, to effectively prescribe and supervise abortion through medication methods.

Examining the rural-urban divide in predisposing, enabling, and need factors of unsafe abortion in India using Andersen's behavioral model

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of unsafe abortions significantly varies with geography; therefore, more research is needed to understand the rural-urban differences in unsafe abortion practices in India. The present study aims to explore the rural-urban differences in predisposing, enabling, and need factors of unsafe abortion in India.

METHODS

The present study used the fourth round of the National Family Health Survey (2015-16) and included the women aged 15-49 who terminated pregnancies by induced abortion during the 5 years prior to the survey (N = 9113) as the study sample. Descriptive statistics, bivariate chi-square significance test and multivariate logistic regression model were used to accomplish the study objectives.

RESULTS

The findings revealed that almost one-third of pregnancies were terminated through unsafe measures with sharp rural-urban contrast. The likelihood of unsafe abortions increases with decreasing women's age and spousal level of education. Younger women in urban settings were more vulnerable to unsafe abortion practices. In rural settings, women with an uneducated spouse are more likely to have unsafe abortions (OR: 1.92). Poor households were more likely to undergo unsafe abortions, which were more common in rural settings (OR: 1.26). The unmet need for family planning was revealed to be a significant need factor for unsafe abortion, particularly in rural settings.

CONCLUSION

Although abortion is legal, India's high estimated frequency of unsafe abortions reveals a serious public health issue. Due to socio-economic vulnerability, unmet family planning needs, and a lack of awareness, significant numbers of women still practice unsafe abortions in India.