Problems in the examination of nasal smears in allergic rhinitis

Nasal provocation testing: a review

OBJECTIVE

This review focuses on the uses of nasal provocation testing (NPT) for scientific investigations of the mechanisms of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis. It also describes the use of NPT as a diagnostic tool in clinical practice. The indications, contraindications, advantages, and limitations of different techniques for evaluation of nasal responses are reviewed. The paper familiarizes investigators with particulars of different nasal delivery systems, provocation agents, nasal patency measurements, secretion collection, and nasal lavage techniques.

DATA SOURCES

Relevant publications obtained from a literature review.

STUDY SELECTION

Relevant publications on the topics of NPT, allergic, and nonallergic rhinitis were critically evaluated.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

To date, NPT has been used primarily as a research tool for the investigation of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis with a wide variety of techniques depending on the specific scientific purposes. NPT will continue to provide useful information about the pathogenesis of airway diseases. Standardized nasal provocation testing has the potential to become a more frequently used clinical test in the diagnosis of allergic and occupational rhinitis and for determination of the appropriate and focused therapy.

Various methods for testing nasal responses in vivo: a critical review

Mucosal responses in the airway can ideally be studied in the nose. It is a readily accessible organ and can be provoked repeatedly. Likewise, mucosal responses to certain provocations can be easily monitored. Different methods for the provocation and measurement of nasal responses have been used in recent years. Each technique has its own advantage and restrictions. In order to make a correct interpretation of the results achieved, however, it is important that the investigator is familiar and comfortable with the methods used. For clinical purposes, techniques for qualitative measurements may be appropriate, but for experimental research, quantitative measurements with high reproducibility are essential. The present paper critically discusses current techniques for provocation and assessment of nasal responses, which may improve both the techniques used and the understanding of nasal physiology.

The cellular response of the human allergic mucosa to natural allergen exposure

It has been suggested that the IgE-dependent late-phase reaction to allergen exposure, with the features of an inflammatory cellular infiltration and airway hyperreactivity, is a link between anaphylaxis and continuous allergic airway disease. Our main knowledge of the cellular response to allergen in sensitized individuals has been derived from allergen-challenge models. To explore the dynamics of the cellular response during the actual disease, patients with a strictly seasonal allergic rhinitis were studied during natural allergen exposure. Ten patients suffering from an isolated birch-pollen allergy were followed from a symptom-free state before, during, and to the height of the birch-pollen season. Repeated parallel cell samplings from the nasal mucosa were performed with cytologic imprints on plastic strips, nasal lavages with the recovery of the cells in the lavage fluid with cytocentrifugation on object slides for cytologic study, and scrapings from the nasal surface with a curette for histologic and ultrastructural evaluation. The histamine content was determined in lavage fluid and cell pellets. The tosyl-alpha-tosyl-L-arginine methyl esterase activity of the nasal lavage fluid was also determined as a biochemical marker of the allergic inflammatory reaction. The birch-pollen season was moderate in terms of pollen counts, and this resulted in mild to moderate nasal symptoms that ran parallel to the birch-pollen counts. The total number of cells recovered in the lavage fluid was 1.2 +/- 0.4 (SEM) x 10(6) before and 3.2 +/- 2.0 per 10(6) cells (not significant) during pollen exposure. Most cells were neutrophils and mononuclear cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A brush method to harvest cells from the nasal mucosa for microscopic and biochemical analysis

A method is described for the sampling of epithelial cells and other effector cells from the human airway mucosa for structural and biochemical analysis. The cell samples are obtained from the nasal mucosa using a small nylon brush which is rotated over the epithelium and soaked and shaken in a small volume of a balanced salt solution. Morphological evaluation using light microscopy and transmission electron microscopy revealed excellently preserved cytological detail. In asymptomatic individuals the cells harvested were as follows: 45 +/- 5.9% (mean +/- SEM) epithelial cells, 38 +/- 7.1% granulocytes, 16 +/- 2.3% large mononuclear cells (monocytes), and 1.3 +/- 2.3% eosinophils. Repeated measurements in the same individual revealed a coefficient of variation of the order of 40% for the proportions of cells harvested. In comparison with nasal airway lavage, a higher proportion of epithelial cells and monocytes were obtained with the brush method. The cells harvested could also be used for biochemical analysis. The histamine content of the cell pellets was found to be strongly correlated with the mast cell count (r = 0.93) and was estimated to about 10 pg/cell, which is higher than previously reported for mast cells obtained from human lung tissue dispersed by an enzymatic method. The present method appears to be appropriate for the study of cellular events in the nasal mucosal epithelium.