Diagnostic vetting of individuals with asymmetric sensorineural hearing impairments

The auditory brainstem responses in patients with unilateral cochlear hearing loss

The aim of our study is to analyze changes occurring in the auditory brainstem response (ABR) according to stimulus parameters in unilateral cochlear hearing loss cases. Twenty-nine cases (14 male, 15 female) with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) were investigated. All cases had cochlear SNHL on one side whereas normal hearing on the other side. All cases underwent ABR testing with varying stimulus intensity levels and stimulus repetition rates (SRRs). Results were compared and their correlation with audiogram shapes investigated. As stimulus intensity levels decreased on both ears, latencies expanded and amplitudes decreased in all traces of ABR. Latencies of ears with cochlear hearing loss were observed to be longer than those in normal ears. Responses to SRR increases were similar on both ears. Audiogram shapes should be taken into consideration while performing ABR in order to address asymmetric SNHL. The interpretation of ABR changes with various stimulus levels may provide a better understanding of cochlear pathologies associated with hearing loss in the future.

Galvanic-induced body sway in vestibular schwannoma patients: evidence for stimulation of the central vestibular system

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the various possible sites of excitation by galvanic stimulation by comparing the galvanic-induced body sway (GBS) in vestibular schwannoma (VS) patients with that in healthy subjects.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a prospective experimental study conducted in a tertiary referral centre. In a previous study we developed a standardized procedure for reproducible quantification of GBS using a monaural continuous 1-cosinusoidal stimulus (0.5 Hz; 2 mA). In this study, 23 VS patients were tested before and 12 VS patients were also tested after surgical intervention (extirpation of tumour with concomitant vestibular neurectomy) and the results were compared with those obtained in 47 healthy subjects.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in mean total GBS gain between VS patients and healthy subjects (p>0.05) before surgical intervention. After vestibular neurectomy a significant difference in the mean total GBS gain was observed, but GBS was still present after surgery.

CONCLUSION

These results prove that galvanic vestibular stimulation excites the central vestibular system even when conduction via the vestibular nerve is hampered.

MRI in the detection of acoustic neuromas--a suggested protocol for screening

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the definitive investigation in the detection of an acoustic neuroma and its use is becoming increasingly widespread for this purpose. In the Oxford region, this facility has been available for 3 years, resulting in the scanning of the internal auditory meati and cerebellopontine angles of 892 patients and the detection of 38 acoustic neuromas. Based on our use of this investigation over this time period, we have attempted to rationalize our entry protocol for screening by limiting the availability of the test to those patients up to 70 years of age presenting with unilateral audiovestibular symptoms in the absence of significant neurological symptoms or signs, with an average difference in hearing threshold of 15 dB between normal and symptomatic ears or unilateral tinnitus with normal hearing. By following these entry criteria, we would hope to maximize the available resources.

Efficiency of tests used to screen for cerebello-pontine angle tumours: a prospective study

With increasing use of imaging in the investigation of cerebello-pontine angle (CPA) tumours, the role of audio-vestibular and electrophysiological testing has changed. Field performance data on the efficiencies of these tests to screen for CPA tumours are lacking, but must be known to choose an appropriate testing strategy. A prospective observational study of 237 patients attending a neuro-otology clinic for audio-vestibular investigation was carried out. The aim was to provide field performance data on which to base an effective protocol to screen for CPA tumours. All patients presenting at the ENT department and meeting any of the following criteria were referred to the neuro-otology clinic and included in the study: (1) asymmetrical sensorineural hearing loss, (2) unexplained asymmetrical tinnitus with normal bearing thresholds, (3) unilateral bearing difficulties with normal hearing thresholds and (4) other neurological indications. In addition to audio-vestibular and auditory brainstem response (ABR) investigation, every patient underwent computed tomography (CT), with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in cases having marginal results on CT, to exclude or confirm the presence of a tumour. Pass or fail on each test was based on a priori criteria from other studies. Eighteen patients were found to have CPA tumours. ABR testing was the only effective procedure for screening, but had some limitations. A contingent protocol using ABR in all cases except those with asymmetrical tinnitus and normal bearing thresholds, those with severe hearing loss, and those with neurological signs, was retrospectively defined: the exceptions would go straight to CT. This protocol would have missed two of the 18 tumour patients. CT scanning alone would have missed one small intra-canalicular tumour, which was picked up on MRI triggered by abnormal ABR. Based on the results from the present study we conclude there is no effective screening protocol for detecting CPA tumours, as MRI scanning with gadolinium enhancement will identify virtually all tumours. Where MRI is available but waiting lists are long, the described strategy using ABR to select priority referrals for MRI scanning is recommended.

MRI as a Single Screening Procedure for Acoustic Neuroma: A Cost Effective Protocol

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is accepted as the ‘gold standard’ in diagnosing acoustic neuromas. Limited availability and perceived high costs have prevented clinicians from using it as a first-line investigation. A prospective study was set up in a specially designated screening session to audit the cost effectiveness and accuracy of audiovestibular investigations compared to MRI. Ninety-nine patients with asymmetrical audiovestibular symptoms or signs were investigated. Of these 54 evoked response audiometry tests, and 39 calorics were either not performed or were inconclusive. One patient refused to enter the MRI machine. All others received an unequivocal report after MRI and four tumours (three intracanalicular) were detected. The total cost of the audiovestibular protocol was £12 545 compared to £12 900 for the MRI protocol, which is a diagnostic and well-tolerated procedure. This study shows that MRI can be cost effective, as well as accurate, when used as a single screening procedure for acoustic neuromas.