Carcinoma of the maxillary antrum treated by pre-operative radiotherapy or radical radiotherapy alone

Select Neoplasms of the Sinonasal Tract

The sinonasal tract (SNT) includes the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses (maxillary, ethmoid, frontal, and sphenoid) and may give rise to a variety of nonneoplastic and neoplastic proliferations, including benign and malignant neoplasms. The benign neoplasms of the SNT include epithelial neoplasms of surface epithelial origin, minor salivary gland origin, and mesenchymal origin. The spectrum of malignant neoplasms of the SNT includes epithelial malignancies, sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma, malignant salivary gland neoplasms, neuroectodermal neoplasms, neuroendocrine neoplasms, melanocytic neoplasm, and sarcomas. This article concentrates on some of the more common types of benign and malignant neoplasms.

Management of paranasal sinus malignancy

Malignancies of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses represent a wide spectrum of histologies, tissues of origin, and anatomic primary sites. The inherent difficulty in generalizing treatment approaches is obvious, given the numerous variables associated with the broadly-based term, paranasal sinus malignancy (PNSCa). Nevertheless, the majority of epithelial and salivary malignancies of this region (ie, squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma, and esthesioneuroblastoma) require surgical intervention as part of any treatment regimen. Recent trends have broadened the indications for chemotherapeutic and radiotherapeutic options in the management of advanced PNSCa. Nonepithelial malignancies, including the wide variety of sarcomas arising in this region, most commonly require multimodality treatment including chemotherapy, radiation, and/or surgery for definitive treatment. Moreover, the proximity of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses to structures including the orbit, dura, brain, cranial nerves, and carotid arteries mandates careful radiologic and neurologic evaluations throughout the course of the disease. Surgical advances now permit complex tumor removal and reconstruction surrounding these structures resulting in functional and cosmetic improvements when compared to earlier techniques. However, additional clinical trials are necessary to systematically evaluate the locoregional control, organ-preservation strategies, and survival related to the variety of treatments currently available.

Treatment of head and neck cancer with bone or cartilage invasion by surgery and postoperative radiotherapy

PURPOSE

The study goal was to review our experience with patients with bone or cartilage invasion (BCI) by adjacent head and neck cancer (HNC) who were treated with curative surgery and postoperative radiotherapy (SPR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight individuals treated with SPR for HNC with BCI were identified after review of the radiation oncology charts and pathology reports for the period 1981 through 2000.

RESULTS

The thyroid cartilage and mandible were predominantly invaded by HNC. The follow-up time for the surviving patients was 65.5 months (range, 17 to 106 months). The local, regional, and distant relapse rates were 5%, 11%, and 13%, respectively. The overall disease-free survival rates at 3 and 5 years were 54% and 41%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although these results were not obtained from a randomized trial, the present observations may be beneficial in clinical decision making concerning patients with HNC and contiguous invasion of bone or cartilage.

Nasal and paranasal sinus carcinoma: are we making progress? A series of 220 patients and a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The authors reviewed treatment results in patients with nasal and paranasal sinus carcinoma from a large retrospective cohort and conducted a systematic literature review.

METHODS

Two hundred twenty patients who were treated between 1975 and 1994 with a minimum follow-up of 4 years were reviewed retrospectively. A systematic review of published articles on patients with malignancies of the nasal and paranasal sinuses during the preceding 40 years was performed.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rate was 40%, and the local control rate was 59%. The 5-year actuarial survival rate was 63%, and the local control rate was 57%. Factors that were associated statistically with a worse prognosis, with results expressed as 5-year actuarial specific survival rates, included the following: 1) histology, with rates of 79% for patients with glandular carcinoma, 78% for patients with adenocarcinoma, 60% for patients with squamous cell carcinoma, and 40% for patients with undifferentiated carcinoma; 2) T classification, with rates of 91%, 64%, 72%, and 49% for patients with T1, T2, T3, and T4 tumors, respectively; 3) localization, with rates of 77% for patients with tumors of the nasal cavity, 62% for patients with tumors of the maxillary sinus, and 48% for patients with tumors of the ethmoid sinus; 4) treatment, with rates of 79% for patients who underwent surgery alone, 66% for patients who were treated with a combination of surgery and radiation, and 57% for patients who were treated exclusively with radiotherapy. Local extension factors that were associated with a worse prognosis included extension to the pterygomaxillary fossa, extension to the frontal and sphenoid sinuses, the erosion of the cribriform plate, and invasion of the dura. In the presence of an intraorbital invasion, enucleation was associated with better survival. In multivariate analysis, tumor histology, extension to the pterygomaxillary fossa, and invasion of the dura remained significant. Systematic review data demonstrated a progressive improvement of results for patients with squamous cell and glandular carcinoma, maxillary and ethmoid sinus primary tumors, and most treatment modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Progress in outcome for patients with nasal and paranasal carcinoma has been made during the last 40 years. These data may be used to make baseline comparisons for evaluating newer treatment strategies.

Carcinoma of the maxillary antrum: a retrospective analysis of 110 cases

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Cancer of the maxillary antrum is a rare disease with a variety of treatment options. The present study was undertaken to review the outcome of patients with carcinoma of the maxillary antrum managed at a single institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 110 cases of carcinoma of the maxillary antrum managed with curative intent during the time period 1976-1993 was performed. There were 33 females and 77 males; the median age was 64 years (range 38-89). The median follow-up time was 4 years (range from 2 months to 17 years). The majority of patients presented with locally advanced disease (78 T4 tumours); nodal involvement was observed in 17/110 cases. Histologic subtypes included in the analysis were limited to squamous cell carcinoma (95 cases) and undifferentiated carcinoma (15 cases). Patients were managed with either primary radiation therapy with surgery reserved for salvage (83/110) or with a planned combined approach with surgery and either pre or postoperative radiation (27/110).

RESULTS

The actuarial 5-year cause-specific survival rate was 43%. The 5-year local control rate was 42%. Of 63 patients with local failure, 25 underwent salvage surgery with a subsequent 5-year cause-specific survival of 31%. Multiple regression analysis of patient, disease and treatment related variables identified local disease extent and nodal disease at presentation as the only variables independently associated with cause-specific survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis indicates that survival from carcinoma of the maxillary antrum is poor with outcome strongly related to local disease extent. The best treatment strategy for this disease remains undefined. Salvage surgery can result in prolonged survival in selected patients experiencing local failure.

Factors in the pathogenesis of tumors of the sphenoid and maxillary sinuses: a comparative study

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To explain the processes that lead to the development of tumors in the maxillary and sphenoid sinuses.

STUDY DESIGN

A 32-year review of the world's literature on neoplasms of these two sinuses and a randomized case-controlled study comparing the normal mucosal architecture of the maxillary to the sphenoid sinus.

METHODS

Analysis of a 32-year world literature review reporting series of cases of maxillary and sphenoid sinus tumors. Tumors were classified by histological type and separated into subgroups if an individual incidence rate was reported. Histomorphometry of normal maxillary and sphenoid sinus mucosa was performed in 14 randomly selected patients (10 sphenoid and 4 maxillary specimens). Specimens were fixed in 10% formalin, embedded in paraffin, and stained with periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) and hematoxylin. Histomorphometric analysis was performed with a Zeiss Axioscope light microscope (Carl Zeiss Inc., Thornwood, NY) mounted with a Hamamatsu (Hamamatsu Photonics, Tokyo, Japan) color-chilled 3 charge coupled device digital camera. The images were captured on a 17-inch Sony (Sony Corp., Tokyo, Japan) multiscan monitor and analyzed with a Samba 4000 Image Analysis Program (Samba Corp., Los Angeles, CA). Five random areas were selected from strips of epithelium removed from each sinus, and goblet and basal cell measurements were made at magnifications x 100 and x 400.

RESULTS

The literature review revealed that the number and variety of tumors in the maxillary sinus are much greater than those in the sphenoid. The incidence of metastatic lesions to each sinus is approximately equal. No recognized pattern of spread from any particular organ system could be determined. On histomorphometric study there were no statistically significant differences between the sinuses in the concentration of goblet cells, basal cells, or seromucinous glands.

CONCLUSIONS

Factors involved in the pathogenesis of tumors of the maxillary and sphenoid sinuses include differences in nasal physiology, embryology, morphology, and topography. There are no significant histological differences in the epithelium and submucous glands between the two sinuses to explain the dissimilar formation of neoplasms.

Clinical significance of neck node metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the maxillary antrum

PURPOSE

To further clarify the clinical significance of neck node metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the maxillary sinus (maxillary SCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical charts of the 116 patients with maxillary SCC were retrospectively reviewed. Twelve patients (10.3%) presented initially with neck node metastases, and 14 (13.5%) of 104 node-negative patients subsequently developed regional recurrence during the follow-up period. The high-risk factors for neck node metastasis, patterns of regional failure, and survival for node-positive patients were analyzed with the patient cohort that had largely been treated with radiation alone.

RESULTS

Of the various factors, the tumor extension to the nasopharynx or oral cavity was the statistically significant determinants predictive of neck node metastasis at the initial diagnosis. During the follow-up period, regional failure was far less common than local failure (19.0% v 68.1%), and the majority of regional failures were accompanied by local recurrences. The oral cavity extension and control status of local disease were the high-risk factors for subsequent development of regional recurrence in node-negative patients. The overall 5-year survival rate for node-positive patients (16.7%) showed a poorer outcome compared with that for node-negative patients (31.3%), but it was similar to that of T4N0 patients (26.6%). Although patients who subsequently developed neck node recurrence during follow-up represented a dismal prognosis, uncontrolled local diseases in these patients still remained a major problem, resulting in a poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite an unfavorable prognosis of patients with neck node metastasis, an aggressive trial to achieve maximum local control of the primary tumor was considered to be more important than elective neck treatments.

Malignant tumours of the maxillary complex: an 18-year review

Over an 18-year period, 147 patients with malignant tumours involving the maxillary complex were treated in a combined head and neck clinic, of whom 50 underwent surgery. There were 33 males and 17 females, the mean age was 57 years (range 11-87 years). The most common clinical presentations were either painful facial swelling, infraorbital anaesthesia, palatal ulceration or nasal obstruction. Preoperative investigations included EUA, biopsy and either CT or MRI scans. Of the 50 tumours, 62% were squamous cell carcinomas. Surgery consisted of either partial or total maxillectomy including craniofacial resection in nine patients. Reconstruction was by either split skin grafting or by free tissue transfer when the cranial contents had been exposed. Adjuvant radiotherapy was given in 82% of the patients. The mean follow-up was 5 years and 59% of patients are alive and disease free. The 5-year local control rate was 67%; it was greatly influenced by histological evidence of nerve invasion, local recurrence being the major cause of death. It was concluded that adequate surgical clearance, followed by planned postoperative radiotherapy, is the most effective treatment for malignant disease of the maxillary complex.

Is prophylactic neck irradiation indicated in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the maxillary sinus?

PURPOSE

To determine the proportion of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the maxillary sinus who will fail in regional nodes without elective neck treatment and to identify any prognostic factors that may influence neck control.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1971-1995, 42 consecutive patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the maxillary sinus were seen at our department for curative treatment. There were 35 males and 7 females, with a median age at diagnosis of 63.5 years (range, 42-77 years). One tumor was classified as T1, 5 had T2, 15 had T3, and 21 had T4 disease. Four of 42 patients (9.5%) had cervical lymphadenopathy at initial presentation. Thirty-three patients had surgical resection and radiotherapy and nine had radiotherapy alone. None of the 38 patients with clinical N0 necks received elective treatment to the cervical nodes.

RESULTS

Median overall survival was 30 months for all patients. Of the 38 patients with N0 disease, 11 (28.9%) had neck recurrence. Of the 11 neck failures, 9 were ipsilateral only, 1 was contralateral, and 1 had bilateral neck recurrence. The most common site of neck failure was in the upper neck (submandibular and jugulodigastric lymph nodes). Four of the 38 patients (10.5%) had isolated neck failure. Only tumor stage was found to be significant for neck relapse, with T1 and T2 doing worse compared to T3 and T4 tumors. Location of tumor (infrastructure vs. suprastructure), involvement of the oral cavity/oropharynx, nasal cavity, nasopharynx or orbit did not predict for cervical node relapse. Local control at the primary site was likewise not prognostic. The median overall survival for patients who remained N0 was 80 months and for those with initial cervical involvement or recurred in the neck without elective neck irradiation was 25 months (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Based on the 28.9% rate of neck recurrence and the poor median survival of patients who recur in the neck, we recommend prophylactic ipsilateral neck irradiation in patients with T1-T4 squamous cell carcinoma of the maxillary sinus.