Epistaxis: Examination of hospitalized patients

[Current aspects in epistaxis]

A survey of current literature on the topic of epistaxis revealed only a circumscript number of publications with a high methodologic value. The analysis of these publications showed that there is a controversy on the necessity of routine coagulation tests in epistaxis patients. These tests should only be performed in cases with clinical evidence of a coagulation disorder. Also, there is an ongoing controversy on the value of local cooling with ice or cold packs. Nasal creams and decongestive nose drops have been found to be effective in uncomplicated epistaxis. Rhinoscopically and endoscopically targeted coagulation of bleeding vessels and nasal packing are recommended treatment options. There is a debate on discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy, if INR is within normal limits in Cumadin patients. Intractable epistaxis requires a broad armamentarium of different diagnostic and therapeutic options. Recurrent epistaxis in hereditary syndromes remains to be a challenge, although some advances have been made in diagnosis and symptomatic treatment. Some new medical drugs, as Viagra or Cialis may have nosebleeds as side-effects.

Absence of association between hypertension and epistaxis: a population-based study

The association between epistaxis and hypertension is still disputed. In a cross-sectional study, we evaluated this association in a sample of 1174 individuals older than 18 years, representative of inhabitants of Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. Epistaxis was defined as any episode of non-traumatic nosebleeding after 18 years of age. Hypertension was defined as the mean of two blood pressure readings > or = 160/95 mmHg or the use of antihypertensive drugs. The prevalence of epistaxis and hypertension were 14.7% (95% confidence interval, CI 12.7-16.7) and 24.1% (95% CI 21.7-26.6), respectively. History of epistaxis in the adulthood (risk ratio = 1.24, 95% CI 0.83-1.85), and in the previous 6 months (risk ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.40-1.56; p = 0.510) were not associated with hypertension after controlling for gender, age, race, history of allergic rhinitis or nasal abnormalities, alcohol abuse, smoking and years of study. History of epistaxis was positively associated with history of allergic rhinitis and inversely associated with years at school. In conclusion, we demonstrated that hypertension is not associated with history of epistaxis in the adulthood in free-living individuals.

Is epistaxis evidence of end-organ damage in patients with hypertension?

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To study the association between history of mild to severe epistaxis with different stages of hypertension and with other evidence of target organ damage in a sample of patients attending an outpatient hypertension clinic, controlling for potential confounding factors.

STUDY DESIGN

A survey of adult patients with hypertension.

METHODS

A consecutive sample of 323 adults with hypertension was studied. The main outcome measures were history of adult epistaxis, high blood pressure, duration of hypertension, nasal abnormalities, and fundoscopic and electrocardiogram abnormalities.

RESULTS

Ninety-four patients (29.1% of the whole sample) reported at least one episode of nosebleed after 18 years of age. Of these, 59 (62.8%) needed medical assistance to control at least one of the episodes. The history of epistaxis was not associated with blood pressure classified according to the World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension paradigm or classified as severe or not severe. There was a trend of an association between history of epistaxis and duration of hypertension. The history of severe epistaxis (epistaxis that needed medical assistance) was not associated with blood pressure classified as severe or not severe and with duration of hypertension. More patients with left ventricular hypertrophy had a positive history of adult epistaxis. There was no association between history of epistaxis or history of severe epistaxis and fundoscopic abnormalities. Among the abnormalities detected at rhinoscopy, only the presence of enlarged septal vessels was associated with history of epistaxis. The presence of enlarged septal vessels was strongly and independently associated with history of epistaxis in the logistic regression model. Duration of hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy showed a trend for an association with the history of epistaxis in the adult life.

CONCLUSIONS

A definite association between blood pressure and history of adult epistaxis in hypertensive patients was not found. The evidence for an association of duration of hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy with epistaxis suggests that epistaxis might be a consequence of long-lasting hypertension. The association between the presence of enlarged vessels at rhinoscopy with history of epistaxis in hypertensive patients is a novel observation that needs to be addressed in future observations.