The effect of botulinum toxin type A injection for intrinsic rhinitis

The pluripotential evolution and journey of Botox (onabotulinumtoxinA)

Clinical use of onabotulinumtoxinA evolved based on strategic, hypothesis-driven applications, as well as serendipitous observations by physicians and patients. The success of onabotulinumtoxinA in blepharospasm and strabismus led to its study in other head and neck dystonias, followed by limb dystonia, tremor, and spasticity. The aesthetic use of onabotulinumtoxinA followed initial reports from patients of improved facial lines after injections for facial dystonias and hemifacial spasm. Although patients with dystonias and spasticity regularly reported that their local pain improved after injections, onabotulinumtoxinA was not systematically explored for chronic migraine until patients began reporting headache improvements following aesthetic injections. Clinicians began assessing onabotulinumtoxinA for facial sweating and hyperhidrosis based on its inhibition of acetylcholine from sympathetic cholinergic nerves. Yet another line of research grew out of injections for laryngeal dystonia, whereby clinicians began to explore other sphincters in the gastrointestinal tract and eventually to treatment of pelvic sphincters; many of these sphincters are innervated by autonomic nerves. Additional investigations in other autonomically mediated conditions were conducted, including overactive bladder and neurogenic detrusor overactivity, achalasia, obesity, and postoperative atrial fibrillation. The study of onabotulinumtoxinA for depression also grew out of the cosmetic experience and the observation that relaxing facial muscle contractions associated with negative emotions may improve mood. For approved indications, the safety profile of onabotulinumtoxinA has been demonstrated in the formal development programs and post-marketing reports. Over time, evidence has accumulated suggesting clinical manifestations of systemic effects, albeit uncommon, particularly with high doses and in vulnerable populations. Although onabotulinumtoxinA is approved for approximately 26 indications across multiple local regions, there are 15 primary indication uses that have been approved in most regions, including the United States, Europe, South America, and Asia. This review describes many uses for which AbbVie has not sought and/or received regulatory approval and are mentioned for historical context only.

Comparing The Effects of Botulinum toxin-A and multiple surgical parasympathectomy on treatment of allergic rhinitis

OBJECTIVE

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common disease with a recent increasing in prevalence. Traditional treatment strategies of AR, sometimes, show limited effectiveness and side effects. Intranasal injection of Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) and multiple postganglionic parasympathectomy of pterygopalatine ganglion (PPG) are among the increasingly used alternative treatment options of AR. In this study, we compared the early efficacy of BTX-A and multiple surgical parasympathectomy (MSP) on treatment of uncontrolled AR.

METHODS

Sixty patients who were diagnosed with uncontrolled AR, were recruited to the study. Participants randomly underwent either intranasal injection of BTX-A (45 IU in each nostril) (Group A) or bilateral MSP (Group B). All patients were evaluated in terms of nasal hypersecretions, congestion and sneezing with visual analogue scale prior to treatment and at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 6 months during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

A significant difference in the degree of nasal hypersecretions and sneezing could be identified in both groups before and after the interventions. Although the significant efficacy on sneezing was documented in group A and B only in the first 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, such efficacy on nasal hypersecretions extended for 12 weeks in group A and throughout the follow-up period in group B. Nasal congestion did not differ significantly in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Both BTX-A and MSP, in patients with uncontrolled AR, may be a long-lasting therapeutic option for the treatment of nasal hypersecretions, but not as effective as for sneezing and nasal congestion.

Comparison between botulinum toxin and steroid septal injection in the treatment of allergic rhinitis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of botulinum toxin and steroid septal injections in treating allergic rhinitis (AR) by evaluating improvements in the rhinitis control assessment test (RCAT), visual analog scale (VAS), nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scores, and active anterior rhinomanometry (RMM) measurements.

METHODS

This prospective, single-blinded cohort study was conducted at the Department of Otolaryngology, Taipei City Hospital between January 2017 and December 2018. Ninety-five patients were randomized to receive botulinum toxin, dexamethasone, or normal saline (group A, group B, and placebo, respectively). The main outcome measures were pretreatment subjective nasal symptoms (RCAT, VAS, and NOSE) and active anterior RMM measurements. All measurements were repeated during posttreatment 1, 2, and 3 months.

RESULTS

No significant difference was observed in pretreatment questionnaire scores and RMM values between the study and placebo groups. The mean posttreatment RCAT, VAS, and NOSE scores after 1 and 2 months significantly improved in the treatment groups compared to placebo. The VAS and NOSE at posttreatment 2 months and RCAT, VAS, and NOSE at posttreatment 3 months were significantly different comparing group A to group B. All RMM parameters showed better values in group A than in group B at 1, 2, and 3 months posttreatment, with significant differences in four parameters in posttreatment 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Botulinum toxin septal injection is a safe treatment option for AR and improves subjective nasal symptoms for 3 months. Botulinum toxin A injection tended to be more effective than steroid septal injection in terms of duration and degree.Level of Evidence: 2b, individual cohort study.

The Effect of Turbinate Injection of Botulinum Toxin A on the Symptoms of Idiopathic Rhinitis

Introduction  Idiopathic rhinitis is a nonallergic and noninfectious rhinitis characterized mainly by nasal obstruction and rhinorrhea, resulting from an autonomic imbalance. Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) demonstrated its action in reducing rhinorrhea and nasal obstruction when injected into the nasal turbinates or septum.

Objective  To analyze the effects of intranasal BTX-A injection to control the symptoms of idiopathic rhinitis and its possible adverse effects.

Method  Patients with idiopathic rhinitis were divided into two groups. Group A had 15 participants (8 female and 6 male), of ages from 47 to 84 years (mean 66.57 years), and these received 60 U of Dysport (Ipsen Ltd, Maidenhead, Berkshire, UK) in each inferior nasal turbinate; group B had 12 participants (1 male and 11 female), of ages from 50 to 76 years (mean 60 years), and they received 1 ml of 0.9% saline. The individuals were reevaluated in the 1 ^st , 2 ^nd , 4 ^th , 8 ^th , and 12 ^th weeks after injection by a questionnaire, accompanied by nasal inspiratory peak flow and acoustic rhinometry.

Results  Group A showed significant improvement, mainly regarding the symptoms of sneezing/itching and nasal obstruction, over time and when compared to group B. Acoustic rhinometry confirmed the improvement in nasal obstruction. There was no relationship between the nasal peak flow data and the nasal obstruction score. No major adverse effects have been reported.

Conclusion  The injection of botulinum toxin in the inferior nasal turbinates of patients with idiopathic rhinitis reduces the symptoms of sneezing, itching, nasal obstruction, and runny nose without significant adverse effects, suggesting that it is an option in the treatment of these patients.

Botulinum toxin for chronic rhinitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) is a potential treatment for chronic rhinitis. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of BTX-A in treating patients with chronic rhinitis.

METHODS

Systematic searches of MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE databases were performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the efficacy of BTX-A in allergic rhinitis and/or nonallergic rhinitis patients, compared with either placebo or active treatment, were included. The outcomes were total nasal symptom (TNSS), disease-specific quality of life (QOL), and adverse events.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs (340 patients) met the eligibility criteria. Compared with placebo, the ≤ 12-week effects favored BTX-A injection on TNSS (standardized mean difference [SMD] -2.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.27 to -1.17, p < 0.01, four RCTs). Beneficial effects > 12 weeks over placebo (MD -9.69, 95% CI -11.29 to -8.09, p < 0.01, one RCT) were demonstrated up to 24 weeks. However, the benefits were not shown on nasal congestion and individual nasal symptoms. Compared with active comparators (triamcinolone injection, ipratropium bromide, and cetirizine), there was no difference in the < 12-week effect between groups on TNSS. There was no difference between BTX-A and cetirizine on QOL (one RCT). The > 12-week effects on TNSS and individual nasal symptoms favored BTX-A over triamcinolone injection (one RCT). The risk ratio of adverse events favored BTX-A over cetirizine (one RCT).

CONCLUSIONS

BTX-A improved TNSS and QOL in patients with chronic rhinitis. These effects were demonstrated up to 24 weeks post treatment. BTX-A was safe, well tolerated, and may be considered in patients who are refractory to current standard-of-care therapies.

The minimum effective dose of abobotulinum toxin A injection for allergic rhinitis: A dose-escalation randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To find the lowest effective injection dose of abobotulinum toxin A (Dysport) for allergic rhinitis.

STUDY DESIGN

Dose-escalation randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

We included all patients aged 18 years or older who had persistent allergic rhinitis and positive allergy skin prick test. The patients were randomly allocated to receive 40, 30, or 20 U of abobotulinum toxin A by injection at the inferior turbinate. We followed up on patients for 12 weeks to evaluate nasal symptoms, ocular symptoms, minimum nasal cross-sectional area as measured using acoustic rhinometry, and complications.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were included in this study, with 7 receiving 20 U of abobotulinum toxin A and 5 each receiving 30 U and 40 U. Abobotulinum toxin A significantly improved nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, sneezing, and loss of smell at 40 U (P < .05) and nasal congestion, sneezing, and loss of smell at 30 U (P < .05). However, at a dose of 20 U, only nasal congestion and loss of smell improved (P < .05). Nasal patency had also significantly improved two weeks after treatment at doses of 40 and 30 U (P < .05). Complications included epistaxis (11.8%) and nasal dryness (23.5%).

CONCLUSION

Abobotulinum toxin A at a dose of at least 30 U effectively reduced most nasal symptoms.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.in.th/ TCTR20200526014.

Cryosurgical ablation for treatment of rhinitis: A prospective multicenter study

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of cryoablation of the posterior nasal nerve (PNN) for treatment of chronic rhinitis.

Methods

This was a prospective single‐arm trial of 98 adult patients at six U.S. centers with chronic allergic and nonallergic rhinitis. PNN cryoablation was performed in‐office under local anesthesia using a handheld device. Patients discontinued use of intranasal ipratropium 3 days prior to treatment and throughout the study period. Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) was measured at pretreatment baseline and posttreatment at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 9 months. The Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) was completed at pretreatment and 3 months posttreatment. Adverse effects and postprocedure medication usage were recorded.

Results

Ninety‐eight procedures (100%) were successfully completed. rTNSS significantly improved over pretreatment baseline (6.1 ± 1.9) at 1 month (2.9 ± 1.9, P < 0.001), 3 months (3.0 ± 2.3, P < 0.001), 6 months (3.0 ± 2.1, P < 0.001), and 9 months (3.0 ± 2.4, P < 0.001) postprocedure. Nasal congestion and rhinorrhea subscores improved significantly at all time points (P < 0.001). Both allergic and nonallergic rhinitis subcohorts showed improvement (P < 0.001), with a comparable degree of improvement between groups. RQLQ significantly improved over pretreatment baseline (3.0 ± 1.0) at 3 months (1.5 ± 1.0, P < 0.001), and all RQLQ subdomains demonstrated improvement. Of 54 patients using intranasal medication at baseline, 19 (35.2%) were able to discontinue use. Twenty‐nine adverse effects were reported, including headache, epistaxis, and sinusitis.

Conclusion

Cryoablation of the PNN for chronic rhinitis is safe and can result in relief of nasal symptoms and improvements in quality of life.

Level of Evidence

4 Laryngoscope, 130: 1877–1884, 2020

Surgical Management of Nonallergic Rhinitis

Nonallergic rhinitis (NAR) describes chronic symptoms of nasal congestion, obstruction, and rhinorrhea unrelated to a specific allergen based on skin or serum testing. Vasomotor rhinitis is the most frequent subtype of NAR. Although medical management is the first-line treatment of NAR, there is a role for surgical therapy when medications fail to improve symptoms. Surgical options for NAR include inferior turbinate reduction and botulinum toxin injection as well as more directed targeting of the autonomic nerve supply to the nasal cavity through vidian neurectomy, posterior nasal neurectomy, and cryoablation of the posterior nerve.

Medical Treatment of Nasal Airway Obstruction

Nasal obstruction is a common, and potentially debilitating, problem. It is caused by a combination of structural factors and/or mucosal swelling/inflammation. The medical treatment of nasal obstruction is aimed at decreasing mucosal inflammation and edema and is generally guided by the underlying cause. Several different drug classes are commonly used in the treatment of nasal obstruction, each with different indications, and pros and cons to their use. This article discusses the most commonly used therapies for nasal obstruction. Current evidence on the efficacy and side effect profile of each therapy is reviewed.

Evaluation of the protective effect of Botulinum toxin type A injection on otitis media with effusion. Acta Otolaryngol 2017;137:917-922. [PMID: 28434389 DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2017.1314008]

OBJECTIVE

This study makes an analysis of the effect of Botulinum toxin type A on otitis media with effusion in rats.

METHOD

As part of the study, 24 male Wistar Albino rats were divided into three groups: Group 1: Botulinum toxin Type A and Histamıne (intratympanic 0.2 ml = 20 unit BTA); Group 2: Saline and Histamine (intratympanic 0.2 ml 0.9%); Group 3: Histamine (intratympanic 0.2 ml). Histamine (intratympanic 0.2 ml) was administered into the right ear for all groups. DPOAE and ABR tests were carried out on days 5, 10, 15 and 20 from the beginning of the study.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between DPOAE and ABR scores of the groups. In each group, the DPOAE scores for the right ear significantly decreased on day 5 when compared to the basal scores. In each group, there was no significant difference between days 5, 10 and 15 for the right ear.

CONCLUSIONS

Botulinum toxin type A blocked the secretion of glands in the middle ear and showed no effect to prevent the formation of serous otitis. In addition, it was found out that Botulinum toxin did not lead to any morphological change in the cochlea.

Botulinum Toxin for Rhinitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Rhinitis is a common clinical entity. Besides nasal obstruction, itching, and sneezing, one of the most important symptoms of rhinitis is nasal hypersecretion produced by nasal glands and exudate from the nasal vascular bed. Allergic rhinitis is an IgE-mediated inflammatory reaction of nasal mucosa after exposure to environmental allergens. Idiopathic rhinitis describes rhinitis symptoms that occur after non-allergic, noninfectious irritants. Specific allergen avoidance, topical nasal decongestants, nasal corticosteroids, immunotherapy, and sinonasal surgery are the main treatment options. Because the current treatment modalities are not enough for reducing rhinorrhea in some patients, novel treatment options are required to solve this problem.

RECENT FINDINGS

Botulinum toxin is an exotoxin generated by Clostridium botulinum. It disturbs the signal transmission at the neuromuscular and neuroglandular junction by inhibiting the acetylcholine release from the presynaptic nerve terminal. It has been widely used in neuromuscular, hypersecretory, and autonomic nerve system disorders. There have been a lot of published articles concerning the effect of this toxin on rhinitis symptoms. Based on the results of these reports, intranasal botulinum toxin A administration appears to be a safe and effective treatment method for decreasing rhinitis symptoms in rhinitis patients with a long-lasting effect. Botulinum toxin type A will be a good treatment option for the chronic rhinitis patients who are resistant to other treatment methods.

Botolinum toxin in rhinitis: Literature review and posterior nasal injection in allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Current pharmacological management of allergic rhinitis (AR) varies in onset, duration, symptom control, and requires frequent administration. Single-dose botulinum toxin (BTX) has been documented in various trials as a treatment option in rhinitis.

OBJECTIVE

We review the current literature on the use of BTX in rhinitis and investigate the efficacy and safety profile of a novel intranasal injection site for AR control.

STUDY DESIGN

Single-arm pilot study.

METHODS

Ten adult patients having moderate to severe AR with proven house dust-mite allergy were recruited. Each patient received 12.5 units of Botox injected to the posterior lateral wall of each side of the nose under endoscopic guidance. Immediate postprocedural discomfort and Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) at 2 and 4 weeks were used as primary outcome measures. Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) was used as secondary outcome measure.

RESULTS

Overall TNSS (minimum = 0; maximum = 20) showed an improvement from a mean of 15.1 (preinjection) to 7.6 (2 weeks) and 7.7 (4 weeks). Greatest effect was seen in subscales of rhinorrhea (4.0-1.7) followed by sneeze, nasal congestion, and itch. Mean discomfort of the procedure was scored 5.7 over 10. RQLQ scores similarly showed an improvement in all domains of quality of life. Two subjects complained of mild headache not requiring any medical intervention.

CONCLUSION

Based on our review of current literature, BTX shows clear efficacy on symptoms of both intrinsic and allergic rhinitis, with a good safety profile. Single-dose posterior nasal injection demonstrates good efficacy and duration of action, with moderate discomfort.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4. Laryngoscope, 127:2447-2454, 2017.

Evaluation of the effect of intranasal infiltrated botulinum toxin-A on a model of allergic rhinitis in rabbits: An Experimental Study

INTRODUCTION

Allergic Rhinitis (AR) effects 20-40% of the global population and its prevalance increases. Medical treatment and immunotherapy could be used in AR management. But they are not definitive solution. Medical treatment must be used a long time and has side effects. Immunotherapy cannot be applied to every patient and it also takes a long time. The aim of this study is to evaluate symptomatic and histopathological effects of intranasal infiltrated Botulinum Toxin-A (Btx-A) on an animal model of AR.

MATERIAL-METHOD

15 rabbits were divided into 3 groups as control, disease and treatment. AR was formed in disease and treatment groups by intraperitoneal and intranasal ovalbumine. Allergic symptoms were observed and serum IgE levels were estimated to prove forming of AR. Btx-A was infiltrated in inferior turbinates of rabbits in treatment group. Rabbits were sacrified on 32nd day. Paranasal structures were disected and investigated histopathologically.

RESULTS

Serous nasal discharge and sneezing were observed after ovalbumine applying in disease and treatment groups. Serum IgE levels on 21st day were higher than 1st day and this difference was significant statistically in disease and treatment groups. Serous discharge and sneezing decreased after Btx-A infiltration in treatment group. In histopathological examination, there were significant difference between disease and treatment group in terms of some histopathological findings.

CONCLUSION

Considering the effect of Btx-A on AR in animal, it can be said that Btx-A can decrease symptoms and reorganize histopathological findings of AR.

Novel, Alternative, and Controversial Therapies of Rhinitis

Rhinitis is a multifactorial disease characterized by sneezing, rhinorrhea, postnasal drip, and nasal congestion. This condition affects 10% to 40% of the population and is responsible for billions of spent health care dollars and impairment in quality of life for those affected. Currently available medical and vaccine therapies are effective for a large segment of this population; however, a subset of patients still has difficult-to-control rhinitis. This article reviews the current progress being made in novel drug and vaccine development and delves into alternative medical, surgical, and homeopathic strategies that may be promising adjunctive treatments for the difficult-to-treat rhinitis patient.

Treatment of allergic rhinitis with intranasal infusion of botulinum toxin type A in mice

AIMS

To determine whether intranasal infusion of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) relieves symptoms of ovalbumin (OVA)-induced allergic rhinitis (AR) and reduces nasal inflammation in mice.

MAIN METHODS

AR was induced via intraperitoneal injection of OVA followed by daily intranasal challenge with OVA. Five weeks after the initiation of OVA sensitization, nasal cavities were exposed to a single intranasal infusion of BTX-A. The behavior of mice was observed before and 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, 21, and 28days after infusion. Mice were sacrificed after 28days and late histological findings were examined. PBS was administered to control mice.

RESULTS

On Day 3, the frequency of typical AR symptoms, including sneezing and nose scratching, significantly decreased in the BTX-A-treated group (n=6) compared to the control group (n=6). Although the AR-inhibiting effects of BTX-A persisted until Day 21, AR symptoms re-appeared in response to daily OVA stimulation. Histological findings of the nasal mucosa also improved following BTX-A administration. Although capillary dilatation and eosinophil infiltration decreased by Day 3, these effects disappeared by Day 28. In contrast, the number and size of the secretary glands in the nasal mucosa did not change following BTX-A administration. PBS had no effect on nasal symptoms or histology.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical treatment with BTX-A efficiently and temporarily ameliorates AR symptoms. Intranasal infusion does not cause pain or bleeding, and the effects of a single infusion of BTX-A last for at least three weeks. This treatment might be a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of AR.

[Rhinorrhea following laryngectomy : Treatment with botulinum toxin type A.]

After laryngectomy, the transport of intranasal secretions is often inadequate due to the lack of the nasal ventilation. Consequently, persistent and disruptive anterior rhinorrhea may occur. We report the case of a 61-year-old man who had recently undergone a laryngectomy and who was successfully treated with bilateral injections of botulinum toxin into the anterior portion of the inferior turbinates. After treatment, rhinorrhea was clearly reduced. Therefore, symptomatic treatment of anterior rhinorrhea with local injections of botulinum toxin type A should be considered as an option to improve the quality of life in laryngectomized patients.

A novel botulinum neurotoxin topical gel: Treatment of allergic rhinitis in rats and comparative safety profile

BACKGROUND

Rhinitis affects a significant proportion of adults and children with typically seasonal or chronic symptoms. Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNTA) is a well-known cholinergic antagonist widely used in a number of approved neurological and esthetic indications. This study was designed to assess the therapeutic effect of RT001, a novel topical gel formulation of BoNTA, in the treatment of allergic rhinitis using a rat model and to compare its safety profile with that of an aqueous formulation of BoNTA complex.

METHODS

A rat model of allergic rhinitis was used involving induction of classic rhinitis signs (sneezing and nasal itch) in addition to nasal inflammatory pathology to assess the degree of therapeutic effect of RT001. Comparative safety of RT001 and BoNTA complex was assessed in guinea pigs based on lethality and body weight gain.

RESULTS

Clinical signs of rhinitis were significantly (p < 0.01) relieved after a single intranasal administration of RT001 and resolved to normal baseline levels within 5 days after treatment. Mucosal inflammation characterized by edema, congestion, and vascular dilatation along with increased expression of vasoactive intestinal peptide was noted in control animals after allergy induction, whereas RT001 treatment resolved inflammation to essentially normal baseline levels. Safety studies in guinea pigs via intranasal dosing revealed ∼31-fold greater safety factor for RT001 when compared with BoNTA complex.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that topical intranasal application of RT001 is effective in relief of clinical signs and inflammatory pathology associated with allergic rhinitis in a rodent model and may provide a safe treatment for rhinitis.

Comparing the effects of Botulinum Toxin-A and cetirizine on the treatment of allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

There are few reports on the effects of intranasal Botulinum Toxin-A (BTX-A) as a treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR). In this study, we compared the efficacy of intranasal BTX-A to cetirizine in the treatment of AR.

METHODS

Fifty AR patients at the age of 26.2 ± 9.1 years (64% females), were recruited to the trial according to the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) criteria. Participants randomly received either intranasal injection of BTX-A (75IU Dysport®) or cetirizine (10mg/day). Symptoms (based on the ARIA) and side effects were assessed every two weeks for two months. Quality of life was evaluated before and after the study using the Rhinasthma questionnaire.

RESULTS

Total symptom severity score of patients significantly decreased (P < 0.001) and quality of life significantly improved (P < 0.001) at the same level in both groups. Side effects included nasal dryness (4%) and epistaxis (4%) in the BTX-A group. In the cetirizine group 44% sleepiness and 4% blurred vision was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Nasal injection of BTX-A shows the same therapeutic effects as cetirizine in the management of AR. Since BTX is expensive, we do not suggest it in the first line of treatment for AR. However, BTX-A is a potential treatment for patients who are resistant or not compliant to the routine medications of AR. Further studies are required to investigate implications and limitations of BTX-A in the treatment of AR.

Septal injection of botulinum neurotoxin A for idiopathic rhinitis: a pilot study

PURPOSE

Botulinum neurotoxin A (BTA) is a promising therapeutic option in the treatment of idiopathic rhinitis (IR), a disease characterized by nasal obstruction and hydrous rhinorrhea. The conventional localization for the injection of BTA in IR is the nasal turbinates. In our own clinical experience, submucoperichondrial injection of BTA in the nasal septum is an alternative that is easy to perform for the therapist and also well tolerated by the patient.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Five patients received an injection of in total 80 mouse units Dysport (Ipsen Pharma, Ettlingen, Germany) in the nasal septum. The unpleasantness of the nasal injection of BTA was measured on a visual analogue scale. Over the course of 14 days, nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal obstruction, urge to sneeze, nasal pruritus), the number of facial tissues used daily, and possible complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

The unpleasantness of the injection of BTA into the nasal septum after local anesthesia was rated low (visual analogue scale, 0.76 on average). A good subjective symptom control was achieved in 3 patients concerning rhinorrhea and in all patients concerning nasal obstruction. The number of facial tissues used daily as a parameter for rhinorrhea was on average 21.0 before the injection of BTA, decreased in 4 patients over the course of time, and was on average 5.8 after 14 days. No patient reported any adverse effects after the injection of BTA.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study demonstrates that septal injection of BTA in patients with IR can achieve good symptom control and patient comfort and should be compared in further studies to the conventional turbinal injection technique.

[Application of botulinum toxin A in chronic intrinsic rhinitis]

Persistent, intrinsic rhinitis is common disease of heterogeneous etiology, often not responsive or poorly responsive to standard medical therapy. To assess the action of botulinum toxin type A--strong and long-acting cholinergic blocker--administered intranasally in the form of injection to the nasal turbinates or influenced Merocel to diminish the symptoms of patients reporting symptoms such as stuffy nose, sneezing, runny nose.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 17 patients with chronic intrinsic rhinitis. Five patients received injections of Botox in a dose of 10 U the lower and the middle nasal concha, ten patients are in the same way 20 U of Botox, two patients were applied to 40 U of Botox in the influenced Merocel.

RESULTS

All patients had an improvement, which concerned all the previously reported symptoms associated with rhinitis, the full effect of the toxin appeared in these patients within 1-2 weeks after application and lasted, depending on the dose of 8-12 weeks. After this time, the effect of explicitly and has declined sharply, which is sometimes associated with the activity of natural toxins.

CONCLUSIONS

Botulinum toxin type A used intranasally in intrinsic rhinitis is a new, effective method that allows good control of symptoms of the patient. The only limitation of its use is the high price of botulinum.

Minimally invasive application of botulinum toxin A in patients with idiopathic rhinitis

Background

Nasal hypersecretion due to idiopathic rhinitis can often not be treated sufficiently by conventional medication. Botulinum toxin A (BTA) has been injected into the nasal mucosa in patients with nasal hypersecretion with a reduction of rhinorrhea lasting for about 4 to 8 weeks. Since the nasal mucosa is well supplied with glands and vessels, the aim of this study was to find out if the distribution of BTA in the nasal mucosa and a reduction of nasal hypersecretion can also be reached by a minimally invasive application by sponges without an injection.

Methods

Patients were randomly divided into two groups. The effect of BTA (group A, C, D) or saline as placebo (group B) was investigated in 20 patients with idiopathic rhinitis by applying it with a sponge soaked with BTA (40 units each nostril) or saline. Subgroups C and D contained these patients of group A and B who did not improve in symptoms one week after the original treatment (either BTA or saline) who then received the alternative medication. Changes of symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal obstruction) were scored by the patients in a four point scale and counted (consumption of tissues, sneezing) in a diary. The patients were followed up weeks 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12.

Results

There was a clear reduction of the amount of secretion in group A compared to group B, C and D. This did not correlate with the tissue consumption, which was comparably reduced in group A and B, but reduced less in group C and D. Sneezing was clearly reduced in group A but comparably unchanged in group B and C and increased in group D. Nasal congestion remained unchanged.

Conclusion

In some patients with therapy-resistant idiopathic rhinitis BTA applied with a sponge is a long-lasting and minimal invasive therapy to reduce nasal hypersecretion.

Anticholinergic drugs in nonallergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

The parasympathetic nervous system contributes to the pathophysiology of multiple forms of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis. Stimulation of the parasympathetic nervous system leads to glandular activation, which produces watery secretions. In excess, these secretions discharge from the anterior Nares and produce the symptom of watery anterior rhinorrhea.

METHOD

Review of literature.

RESULTS

Treatment with topical, intranasal anticholinergic drugs inhibits activation of the nasal mucosal glands and is effective in reducing the watery secretions associated with parasympathetic stimulation of the glands with little, if any, effect on the symptoms of congestion and sneezing. In general, these drugs have no systemic adverse effects, but can cause crusting and local irritation.

CONCLUSION

Anticholinergic drugs are useful for the treatment of anterior rhinorrhea associated with allergic and nonallergic rhinitis.

A comparison of the effects of botulinum toxin A and steroid injection on nasal allergy

Objectives

To compare the effects of botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) with intranasal steroid injections on nasal symptoms in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR).

Study Design

A randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blinded clinical trial (patients were blinded).

Material and Methods

Thirty-nine patients were included in the study. AR was diagnosed by means of history, clinical examination, and skin prick test. Patients were randomly divided into three subgroups as follows: in group A, 25 units of BTX-A were injected into each inferior turbinate (total 50 units); in group B, 1 cc (20 mg/mL) of triamcinolone was injected into each inferior turbinate; and in group C, 1 cc of isotonic saline was injected as placebo. The symptoms of AR were scored by the patient on a six-point scale.

Results

At all time points, group A was significantly better than group C. In the nasal obstruction and rhinorrhea scores, group A was significantly better than group B after 8 weeks.

Conclusion

BTX-A may provide better AR symptom relief in terms of duration and degree than a steroid injection. © 2008 American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. All rights reserved.

Botulinum toxin: Clinical use

Since its development for the use of blepharospasm and strabismus more than 2.5 decades ago, botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) has become a versatile drug in various fields of medicine. It is the standard of care in different disorders such as cervical dystonia, hemifacial spasm, focal spasticity, hyperhidrosis, ophthalmological and otolaryngeal disorders. It has also found widespread use in cosmetic applications. Many other indications are currently under investigation, including gastroenterologic and urologic indications, analgesic management and migraine. This paper is an extensive review of the spectrum of BoNT clinical applications.

The effect of intranasal injection of botulinum toxin A on the symptoms of vasomotor rhinitis

PURPOSE

Vasomotor rhinitis (VMR) is a common disease that is unrelated to allergy, infection, structural abnormalities, and systemic diseases. Patients with VMR usually complain of nasal obstruction accompanied by profuse watery nasal discharge. The exact pathophysiologic mechanisms of VMR are not known. Some studies suggested that it results from an autonomic nervous system dysfunction. No effective long-term treatment modalities exist for the VMR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients with VMR were randomly and equally divided into 2 groups. The mean age was 38.46 years (range, 18-59 years; 1 men, 14 women) for group 1 and 41.60 (range, 29-62 years; 4 men, 11 women) for group 2. Five patients with VMR were accepted as a control group. Fifteen patients were injected 10 U of botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) (group 1) and patients in group 2 were injected 20 U to inferior and middle turbinates. Control patients were injected with saline solution into the inferior and middle turbinates.

RESULTS

Total symptom scores generally decreased after the first week and increased after the eighth week. The symptoms of patients (nasal obstruction, sneezing, nasal discharge, and nasal itching) were scored from 1 to 5, with 1 as less severe and 5 as most severe. The statistical significance of the results was analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test. When total symptom scores of group 1 (10 U BTX-A) were compared with the control group, there was a statistically significant difference regarding symptoms scores at all control weeks. There was also a statistically significant difference for total symptom scores between group 2 and control group, except for the first control week.

CONCLUSION

Intranasal injection of BTX-A is a highly effective, safe, and simple symptomatic treatment modality with a long-lasting effect for patients with VMR. Botulinum toxin A may be a good alternative especially for the treatment of resistant VMR cases.

Botulinum toxin in dermatology - beyond wrinkles and sweat

Botulinum toxin (BTX) types A and B have been used with success in cosmetic dermatology and hyperhidrosis treatment. The present review focuses on other uses of BTX in dermatology. Discussed in particular are the available data on BTX in inflammatory diseases, proctology, and some other indications. From studies in various types of eczema, it seems that BTX-A not only acts as a potent inhibitor of acetylcholine but also as an inhibitor of substance P and of glutamate as well. By those mechanisms, BTX-A may be antipruritic, which may help explain the benefits of BTX-A in lichen simplex and dyshidrotic hand eczema. In Hailey-Hailey disease, facial eccrine hidrocystomas, salivary fistulas, and intrinsic rhinitis, BTX-A blocks the secretion of sweat/saliva/mucus. BTX-A has important applications in proctology where it has become the most powerful nonsurgical therapy for anal fissures. In proctalgia fugax and after hemorrhoidectomy, BTX-A is analgesic. Current treatment applications of BTX-A and its limitations are reviewed in this paper.

[Botulinum toxin in otorhinolaryngology]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Through its anticholinergic effect, botulinum toxin is a suitable therapeutic option for dysfunctions of the muscular and the autonomic nervous system.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Beside the classical indications like facial hyperkinesis (i.e. blepharospasm, hemifacial spasm), the treatment of complex dystonias (oromandibular dystonia, spasmodic dystonia, cervical dystonia), gustatory sweating, hypersalivation and crocodile tears is successful. Botulinum toxin is an alternative treatment of tension type headache and migraine. A new indication of botulinum toxin application may involve the treatment of nasal hypersecretion through the effect on the nasal glands.

RESULTS

The positive therapeutic effect starts a few days after treatment and lasts longer in disorders of the autonomic nervous system. Because of its temporally limited therapeutic effect, the patients need further treatment. Side-effects are rare.

CONCLUSIONS

Botulinum toxin is an effective treatment for a variety disorders with different etiologies and has very few side effects.

Botulinum toxin treatment of secretory disorders

Botulinum neurotoxin serotype A (BoNT/A) has revolutionised the treatment of a variety of autonomic hypersecretory disorders. Several open and controlled studies indicate that BoNT/A is a safe and effective treatment for focal hyperhidrosis of the axillae and palms, for gustatory sweating, and for some other rare conditions associated with focal hyperhidrosis. There is class I evidence for the efficacy of botulinum toxin in axillary hyperhidrosis and class II evidence for palmar hyperhidrosis and gustatory sweating. BoNT/A has the potential to replace current invasive and surgical techniques and should at least be considered as a viable alternative. The results of pilot studies to treat sialorrhea are encouraging. However, the optimal dose, best mode of application, side effects, and duration of BoNT/A action in this condition remain uncertain. We need further formal clinical trials to evaluate risks and benefits of BoNT/A for palliative treatment in of sialorrhea in Parkinson's disease and in bulbar amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Based on the few reports published, BoNT/A injections into the lacrimal gland for hyperlacrimation may be an elegant method to treat this sometimes disabling condition. Again, larger studies are needed to evaluate the risks and long-term benefits of this treatment option.

Approach to the rehabilitation of spasticity and neuromuscular disorders in children

The management of children and adults with upper motor neuron disorder is complex and multifaceted. This article reviews new information and potential treatment. As part of the upper motor neuron syndrome (UMNS), spasticity may occur in cerebral palsy, congenital brain malformation, head injury, or other etiologies. Within the UMNS the most recognizable clinical concern is the frequent abnormality of tone, which may have a significant functional impact. Tone reduction is not itself a goal, but is performed for the functional benefits it may allow. New approaches to treatment and management of hypertonia recently have become available. There are many other associated features of the UMNS that affect patient functioning. Ones that frequently occur are abnormalities of speech and other areas of oral motor control. A new area of intervention combines the use of botulinum toxin and ultrasonography to address the common problem of slalorrhea, which is a potential medical issue and a substantial social barrier in affected patients. This article also reviews new information and potential treatment for neuromuscular disorders.

Clinical study of botulinum-A toxin in the treatment of sialorrhea in children with cerebral palsy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and efficacy of intraglandular (parotid and submandibular) botulinum-A toxin (BTX-A) in the treatment of sialorrhea in children with cerebral palsy (CP).

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, open-label, dose-escalation study.

SETTING

Tertiary care Children's Hospital.

PATIENTS

Twenty-two subjects between 8 and 21 years of age with CP and significant sialorrhea.

INTERVENTION/TECHNIQUE

The first 12 subjects were injected in only the submandibular gland and the second 10 in the submandibular and parotid glands. Injections were performed under ultrasound localization. The first group (divided into 3) received a total of 10, 20, or 30 units of BTX-A. The second group (divided into 3) received a standard of 30 units in the submandibular gland and 20, 30, or 40 units in the parotid glands.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Drool quantification using a pre- and postinjection "drool rating scale," dental roll weights, and "drool quotient." Swallowing was evaluated pre- and postinjection with a formal speech therapy evaluation.

RESULTS

All subjects successfully underwent BTX-A injections without local or systemic complications. There were no adverse effects on swallowing. Objective "drool quantification" with dental rolls was extremely difficult in this population. Most indicative of results was the "drool rating" questionnaire and the "drool quotient."

CONCLUSIONS

BTX-A is a potentially safe and promising, minimally invasive treatment for sialorrhea in children with cerebral palsy.

Botulinum toxin type A induces apoptosis in nasal glands of guinea pigs

Nasal hypersecretion is predominantly caused by overaction of nasal glands, which are mainly under cholinergic control. In this work, we investigated the influence of botulinum toxin A (BTA) on the nasal mucosal tissue of the maxillary sinus turbinates of guinea pigs (n = 10) that were painlessly sacrificed 10 days (short-term group) or 3 months (long-term group) after local treatment with 20 units of BTA (Botox) or 0.2 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride (control). Histologic investigation of the nasal mucosal tissue of the BTA-treated animals (short-term group) showed degeneration of glands and ducts and apoptotic nuclei on TUNEL staining of these structures. The control animals revealed normal glandular tissue and no apoptosis. The animals of the long-term group showed almost normal glandular tissue and only a few apoptotic nuclei. In conclusion, BTA induces temporary apoptosis in the nasal glandular compartment of guinea pigs.

Botulinum toxin in motor disorders

Advances in the clinical use of botulinum neurotoxins continue. Of interest to the neurologist is the advanced practice in the treatment of focal dystonia and the new developments on other dyskinesias and on autonomic control of smooth muscle motility. New toxin serotypes are now being tested; their availability will improve clinical practice and will possibly lead to combined treatments. Indications in spasticity and in juvenile cerebral palsy are now under scrutiny. The combination of focal chemodenervation with specific rehabilitation procedures enables new development in this field.