Does methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus have a significant role in the peri-operative course of patients undergoing rhinological surgery?

Comparing Rates of Postoperative Meningitis After Endoscopic Endonasal Procedures Based on Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Colonization and Antibiotic Prophylaxis

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) procedures are inherently contaminated due to direct access through the nasopharyngeal mucosa. The reported rate of postoperative meningitis in EEA procedures is 0.7%-3%. A variety of methods exist to minimize the risk of meningitis with antibiotic prophylaxis, although their value is not completely understood. This study investigated whether there is a difference in rates of postoperative meningitis based on Staphylococcus aureus colonization and use of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis.

METHODS

All adult patients who underwent EEA resection at our institution from 2013 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with preoperative cerebrospinal fluid infections were excluded. Data including recent preoperative infections, preoperative colonization status, antibiotic administration, and postoperative outcomes were recorded for each patient.

RESULTS

Of 483 patients identified (mean age, 51 years; range, 18-90 years; 274 [56.7%] female), 80 (16.6%) had a positive preoperative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)/methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) screening swab. Twenty-one (26.3%) colonized patients were treated with preoperative decolonizing antibiotics. Within 30 days of surgery, 13 (2.7%) patients developed culture-positive meningitis. There was no significant difference in meningitis rates based on MRSA/MSSA colonization status. Among colonized patients, there was no significant difference in rates of MRSA/MSSA meningitis based on preoperative antibiotic decolonization.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative rates of meningitis after EEA surgery were not significantly changed based on MRSA/MSSA colonization status of the patient or preoperative decolonization. The utility of preoperative testing of MRSA/MSSA status and antibiotics for decolonization to prevent postoperative meningitis should be further investigated.

Post-operative MRSA infections in head and neck surgery

PURPOSE

Surgical site infection (SSI) with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a serious post-operative complication, with head and neck cancer patients at greater risk due to the nature of their disease. Infection with MRSA has been shown to be costly and impart worse outcomes on patients who are affected. This study investigates incidence and risks for MRSA SSIs at a tertiary medical institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study reviewed 577 head and neck procedures from 2008 to 2013. Twenty-one variables (i.e. tumor characteristics, patient demographics, operative course, cultures) were analyzed with SPSS to identify trends. A multivariate analysis controlled for confounders (age, BMI, ASA class, length of stay) was completed.

RESULTS

We identified 113 SSIs of 577 procedures, 24 (21.23%) of which were MRSA. Of all analyzed variables, hospital exposure within the preceding year was a significant risk factor for MRSA SSI development (OR 2.665, 95% CI: 1.06-6.69, z statistic 2.086, p=0.0369). Immunosuppressed patients were more prone to MRSA infections (OR 14.1250, 95%CI: 3.8133-52.3217, p<0.001), and patients with a history of chemotherapy (OR 3.0268, 95% CI: 1.1750-7.7968, p=0.0218). Furthermore, MRSA SSI resulted in extended post-operative hospital stays (20.8±4.72days, p=0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who have a history of chemotherapy, immunosuppression, or recent hospital exposure prior to their surgery are at higher risk of developing MRSA-specific SSI and may benefit from prophylactic antibiotic therapy with appropriate coverage. Additionally, patients who develop MRSA SSIs are likely to have an extended postoperative inpatient stay.