Congenital cholesteatoma in identical twins

The Risk of Cholesteatoma in Individuals With First-degree Relatives Surgically Treated for the Disease

Importance

Cholesteatoma in the middle ear is not regarded as a hereditary disease, but case reports of familial clustering exist in the literature, as well as observed familial cases in the clinical work. However, the knowledge regarding cholesteatoma as a hereditary disease is lacking in the literature.

Objective

To assess the risk of cholesteatoma in individuals with a first-degree relative surgically treated for the same disease.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this nested case-control study in the Swedish population between 1987 and 2018 of first-time cholesteatoma surgery identified from the Swedish National Patient Register, 2 controls per case were randomly selected from the population register through incidence density sampling, and all first-degree relatives for cases and controls were identified. Data were received in April 2022, and analyses were conducted between April and September 2022.

Exposure

Cholesteatoma surgery in a first-degree relative.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome was first-time cholesteatoma surgery. The association between having a first-degree relative with cholesteatoma and the risk of cholesteatoma surgery in the index persons was estimated by odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs through conditional logistic regression analysis.

Results

Between 1987 and 2018, 10 618 individuals with a first-time cholesteatoma surgery (mean [SD] age at surgery, 35.6 [21.5] years; 6302 [59.4%] men) were identified in the Swedish National Patient Register. The risk of having a cholesteatoma surgery was almost 4 times higher in individuals having a first-degree relative surgically treated for the disease (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 3.1-4.8), but few cases were exposed overall. Among the 10 105 cases with at least 1 control included in the main analysis, 227 (2.2%) had at least 1 first-degree relative treated for cholesteatoma, while the corresponding numbers for controls were 118 of 19 553 control patients (0.6%). The association was stronger for individuals under the age of 20 years at first surgery (OR, 5.2; 95% CI, 3.6-7.6) and for a surgery involving the atticus and/or mastoid region (OR, 4.8; 95% CI, 3.4-6.2). There was no difference in the prevalence of having a partner with cholesteatoma between cases and controls (10 cases [0.3%] and 16 controls [0.3%]; OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.41-2.05), which implies that increased awareness does not explain the association.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this Swedish case-control study using nationwide register data with high coverage and completeness, the findings suggest that the risk of cholesteatoma in the middle ear is strongly associated with a family history of the condition. Family history was nevertheless quite rare and can therefore only explain a limited number of all cases; these families could be an important source for information regarding the genetic background for cholesteatoma disease.

Congenital cholesteatoma in identical twins

Congenital cholesteatoma in identical twins has only been described once in Otolaryngology literature thus far^. This report describes a case of monozygotic twins with a history of recurrent acute otitis media and bilateral middle ear effusions without tympanic membrane perforation. Upon myringotomy with pressure equalization tube insertion, both were found to have right-sided cholesteatoma with nearly identical location and pattern of progression. In the context of previous case series demonstrating familial clustering and reports of possible genetic associations of this condition, the authors present an important addition to the current understanding of congenital cholesteatoma disorder.

Malformations Associated With Pediatric Congenital Cholesteatomas

OBJECTIVE

To describe malformations associated with pediatric congenital cholesteatomas of the middle ear.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

One hundred and seventy-three cases of middle ear congenital cholesteatoma (CC) in 171 children operated between 2007 and 2017.

INTERVENTIONS

Demographic, clinical, and surgical data were collected from operative reports.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We first described the type and rate of malformations associated with CC. Secondly, we compared cholesteatoma features in two subgroups: anterior superior (AS) versus posterior superior (PS) starting point. Third, we compared demographic, clinical, and surgical data between patients with and without malformation.

RESULTS

CC was associated with malformations in 17 cases (17/173; 9.8%). The main malformation was preauricular fistula (8/173; 4.6%). Other malformations were: one first branchial cleft, two labio palatine cleft, one nasal cyst, two preauricular fibrochondroma, and five other malformations. PS congenital cholesteatomas were diagnosed in older children (4.6 versus 8.6 years, p < 0.05) and had greater extension in middle ear than the AS cholesteatoma (39.7% versus 95.8%, p < 0.05). We did not find any significant difference between these two groups regarding the associated malformations. We did not find a difference in clinical presentation of CC between patients with and without associated malformation.

CONCLUSIONS

We found various associated malformations in 9.8% of CC cases with no statistical difference in the malformation rate between AS and PS groups. All the malformations were located in the craniofacial region suggesting that genes implicated in craniofacial development may play a role in the pathophysiology of CC.

Middle ear congenital cholesteatoma: systematic review, meta-analysis and insights on its pathogenesis

PURPOSE

Congenital cholesteatoma (CC) presents as a white pearl-like lesion behind a normal tympanic membrane (TM), without a history of otorrhea, infection, perforation or previous otologic surgery. Several recent studies provided new data improving this pathology characterization. The aim of this paper is to expand the knowledge about CC and to provide new insights on its pathogenesis.

METHODS

The study consisted of two main research parts: (1) systematic review and meta-analysis; (2) medical literature review englobing anatomy, histology, embryology and congenital pathology of the ear.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified a total of 636 papers. Seventy retrospective studies were included. A total of 1497 cases were studied and the mean age was 6.58 years, with a male-female ratio of 3:1, 34% were asymptomatic, 26% had hearing loss and 2% had facial dysfunction/paralysis. The overall estimate for antero-superior quadrant involvement was 0.70 [95% confident interval (CI) 0.64-0.76], in the postero-superior quadrant was 0.60 (95% CI 0.52-0.69), in the antero-inferior quadrant was 0.32 (95% CI 0.23-0.41), in the postero-inferior quadrant was 0.38 (95% CI 0.29-0.47), in the attic was 0.53 (95% CI 0.43-0.63) and in the mastoid was 0.33 (95% CI 0.26-0.41). More advanced Potsic stages were present in older patients. The most likely inclusion place seems to be between the pars flaccida and the upper quadrants of the pars tensa.

CONCLUSIONS

During the last decades, a substantial improvement in CC diagnosis and management had been achieved. The presented mechanism seems to explain most of middle ear CC.