Intra-operative skull X-ray for misdirection of the cochlear implant array into the vestibular labyrinth

Utility of Intraoperative Radiographs in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of intraoperative radiographs to confirm electrode position following pediatric cochlear implantation (CI).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Single tertiary care pediatric center.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted, including all pediatric patients undergoing CI at UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh over a 13-year period.

RESULTS

We identified 326 patients undergoing 492 procedures. Across the cohort, there were 7 cases that required intraoperative electrode reinsertion due to malposition or presumed malposition. For 6 of the 7 cases, intraoperative X-ray identified electrode malposition. Neural response telemetry (NRT) testing was also abnormal for 4 of these cases prior to reinsertion. Implantation of Cochlear's Slim Modiolar electrode was associated with an abnormal perioperative X-ray (odds ratio [OR]: 9.2, p = 0.03) and increased change in management (OR: 9.2, p = 0.03) compared to Cochlear's Contour Advance (CA). Incidence of abnormal X-rays was 1.24% overall, 4% in the Slim Modiolar group, and 0.3% in the CA group. The Slim Modiolar electrode accounted for 4 of 7 cases requiring reinsertion, and in all 4 of these cases, electrode fold-over was identified on the X-ray. NRT was normal in 1 of these 4 cases.

CONCLUSION

The use of Cochlear's Slim Modiolar electrode was associated with a significantly increased risk of abnormal intraoperative X-ray compared to the CA electrode. Given the risk of fold-over with routine insertion and normal electrical testing using the Slim Modiolar electrode, we recommend routine use of intraoperative skull X-ray to confirm electrode position.

New hybrid multiplanar cone beam computed tomography-laser-fluoroscopic-guided approach in cochlear implant surgery

PURPOSE

Cochlea implant surgery with proper positioning of the cochlear electrode can be challenging. Intraoperative real-time hybrid laser-fluoroscopic-guided navigation based on a multiplanar cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) dataset opens up the opportunity to immediate radiological control of primary electrode misalignments and offering new insights into the cochlea electrode insertion routes and favorable cochlear implant-insertion angle.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 50 cases (29 males, 18 females) of conventional electrode implantation (without intraoperative image control; group A) and nine cases (7 males, 2 females) of CBCT-laser-fluoroscopic-guided surgery (group B) were included in the present study. CBCT-laser-guided surgery under real-time fluoroscopic control was conducted using an intraoperative C-arm CBCT. All patients received preoperative cross-sectional imaging (CT and MRI), in which cochlear malformation could be excluded. Postoperatively, we looked for electrode misplacements.

RESULTS

In group A, electrode misalignment was detected postoperatively in 14 of 50 cases (28.0%). In group B, primary electrode misalignment was detected intraoperatively in two patients (22.2%). In both patients, the misalignments were corrected in the same session. The comparison of cochlear insertion angles showed significant differences. Group A: 47.5 ± 2.6° (actual conventional surgery) vs 17.6 ± 2.8° (theoretical CBCT-laser-fluoroscopic-guided surgery) P < 0.001. Group A vs group B: 47.5 ± 2.6° (actual conventional surgery; Group A) vs 17.9 ± 2.5° (actual CBCT-laser-fluoroscopic-guided surgery; Group B) P < 0.001.

CONCLUSION

We consider that an intraoperative hybrid CBCT-laser-fluoroscopic-controlled approach in cochlear implant surgery using a C-arm CT can be beneficial, because electrode misalignments can be reduced and if it does occur, remedied in the same surgical session.

Cochlear Implant Electrode Misplacement: A Case Series and Contemporary Review

OBJECTIVE

To determine root causes leading to misplaced cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays and discuss their management using a case series and contemporary literature review.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case review and contemporary literature review.

SETTING

Single tertiary-referral center.

PATIENTS

Adult and pediatric patients who were diagnosed with a misplaced CI electrode array, excluding tip-foldover. Literature review was performed via a MEDLINE database PubMed query. All articles that described at least one case of extracochlear electrode array misplacement were included; partial insertions and extrusions were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Extracochlear misplacement.

RESULTS

A total of 61 cases were reviewed, including 4 new cases and 57 cases from 29 previously published articles. We discuss management of CI arrays in the carotid canal, the vestibule, and the modiolus. The rate of CI misplacement is estimated to be 0.49%. The most frequent location of misplacement CI was the vestibular system (50.8%) followed by the internal carotid canal (11.5%). Normal cochlear anatomy was noted on preoperative computer tomography (CT) in 59.0% of patients; abnormalities were noted in 27.9%. The most common technical issue was misidentification or poor visualization of the round window.

CONCLUSION

CI electrode misplacement is rare but can cause postoperative complications and may result in permanently diminished CI performance and hearing outcomes, even after revision surgery. Failure to identify the round window is the most common reason for CI misplacement, despite most patients having normal cochlear anatomy. Surgical strategies to localize the round window and basal turn are imperative for proper electrode placement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Misplaced Cochlear Implant Electrodes Outside the Cochlea: A Literature Review and Presentation of Radiological and Electrophysiological Findings

HYPOTHESIS

It is possible to detect when misplacement and malposition of the cochlear implant (CI) electrode array has occurred intraoperatively through different investigations. We aim to explore the literature surrounding cochlear implant misplacements and share our personal experience with such cases to formulate a quick-reference guide that may be able to help cochlear implant teams detect misplacements early.

BACKGROUND

Misplacement and malposition of a cochlear implant array can lead to poor hearing outcomes. Where misplacements go undetected during the primary surgery, patients may undergo further surgery to replace the implant array into the correct intracochlear position.

METHODS

Systematic literature review on cochlear implant misplacements and malpositions and a retrospective review of our program's cases in over 6,000 CI procedures.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine cases of CI misplacements are reported in the English literature. Sixteen cases of cochlear implant misplacements are reported from our institution with a rate of 0.28%. A further 12 cases of intracochlear malpositions are presented. The electrophysiological (CI electrically evoked auditory brainstem response, transimpedance matrix) and radiological (X-ray and computed tomography scan) findings from our experience are displayed in a tabulated quick-reference guide to show the possible characteristics of misplaced and malpositioned cochlear implant electrode arrays.

CONCLUSION

Both intraoperative electrophysiological and radiological tests can show when the array has been misplaced or if there is an intracochlear malposition, to prompt timely intra-operative reinsertion to yield better outcomes for patients.

Effectiveness of skull X-RAY to determine cochlear implant insertion depth

BACKGROUND

Cochlear implant (CI) insertion depth can affect residual hearing preservation, tonotopic range coverage, and Mapping. Therefore, determining insertion depth has the potential to maximize CI performance. A post-op skull X-RAY is commonly used to assess insertion depth, however its effectiveness has not been well established. Our primary objective was to assess the accuracy of post-op skull X-RAYs to determine insertion depth, compared to CT as the gold standard. Secondary objectives were to compare experience level of raters and different skull X-RAY views.

METHODS

Thirteen patients with Advanced Bionic HiRes 90 K implants, and post-operative temporal bone CT scans were selected from the CI database at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. Medical students, otology fellows, and CI surgeons evaluated insertion depths on post-op skull X-RAYs, while neuroradiologists evaluated CT scans. Descriptive statistics, regression analysis, and paired t-tests were used to compare the two types of imaging.

RESULTS

X-RAYs and CTs provided an equivalent mean insertion depth of 337 degrees (p = 0.93), a mean difference of - 0.9 degrees and a standard deviation of paired differences of 43 degrees. Although means were similar across rater groups, CI surgeons (45 degrees) had the lowest standard deviation of paired differences. Comparing X-RAY views, Caldwell (29 degrees) had less variation than Towne (59 degrees) for standard deviation of paired differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Skull X-RAYs provide accurate and reliable measurements for CI insertion depth. The Caldwell view alone may be sufficient for evaluations of insertion depth, and experience has a minor impact on the variability of estimates.

Intraoperative Conebeam CT for Assessment of Intracochlear Positioning of Electrode Arrays in Adult Recipients of Cochlear Implants

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Intraoperative conebeam CT has been introduced into the operating room and provides quick radiologic feedback. This study aimed to investigate its utility in the assessment of the positioning of the electrode array after cochlear implantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 51 patients (65 ears) with intraoperative imaging by conebeam CT (O-arm) after cochlear implantation between 2013 and 2017. Correct placement into the cochlea was immediately identified. Positioning assessments were later analyzed with OsiriX software.

RESULTS

Intraoperative imaging was quickly performed in all cases. No misplacement into the vestibule or semicircular canals was found. A foldover of the implanted array was identified in 1 patient. Secondary analysis by 2 raters showed excellent agreement on insertion depth angle (intraclass correlation = 0.96, P < .001) and length of insertion of the electrode array (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.93, P = .04) measurements. The evaluation of the number of extracochlear electrodes was identical between the 2 raters in 78% of cases (Cohen κ = 0.55, P < .001). The scalar position was inconsistent between raters. When we compared O-arm and high-resolution CT images in 14 cases, the agreement was excellent for insertion depth angle (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.97, P < .001) and insertion length (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.98, P < .001), good for the number of extracochlear electrodes (Cohen κ = 0.63, P = .01), but moderate for the scalar position (Cohen κ = 0.59, P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative conebeam CT using the O-arm is a safe, rapid, easy, and reliable procedure to immediately identify a misplacement or foldover of an electrode array. The insertion depth angle, insertion length, and number of electrodes inserted can be accurately assessed.

[The modern view of the radiodiagnostic methods applied for determining the position of the electrode array in cochlear implantation surgery]

The objective of the present work was to overview the currently available literature publications dealing with the radiodiagnostic techniques applied to evaluate the position of the electrode array used for the purpose of cochlear implantation surgery including both the conventional methods and the recently proposed approaches. It is shown that the intraoperative control guarantees the timely identification of the possible complications and should meet both the safety criteria and the requirements for obtaining high-quality images and intraoperative usability of the surgical instruments being employed. Moreover, the intraoperative monitoring can be exercised under control of fluoroscopy as well as with the use of the portable computed radiography scanners and navigation systems. The postoperative monitoring is carried out with the use of transorbital X ray visualization, multi-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography, and digital tomosynthesis. Each of the listed methods has specific advantages and disadvantages, but there is yet neither a universally recognized systematic approach to the assessment of their effectiveness nor the generally acceptable criteria for the evaluation of the image quality.

Utility of intraoperative computed tomography for cochlear implantation in patients with difficult anatomy

OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE

To describe cases that illustrate the utility of intraoperative computed tomography (CT) in cochlear implantation of patients with difficult temporal bone anatomy.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

A 2-year-old male with congenital X-linked stapes gusher syndrome and a 2-year-old female with enlarged vestibular aqueduct underwent successful cochlear implantation with the help of intraoperative CT. In the latter case, the initial intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy suggested malposition of the electrode, however, was not able to provide details for adjustments. In both cases, intraoperative CT changed the insertion technique of the operating surgeon and allowed for improved electrode positioning. A 47-year-old female with polyostotic fibrous dysplasia and a 55-year-old male with post-meningitis near-total cochlear obliteration underwent successful cochlear implantation with confirmation of electrode position with intraoperative CT. In the former case, the image-guided navigation system was also implemented. Finally, a 72-year-old female underwent cochlear implantation during which intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy suggested intra-cochlear insertion. However, postoperative CT showed the electrode extending into the internal auditory canal (IAC), illustrating the limitations of C-arm fluoroscopy.

INTERVENTION

Intraoperative CT imaging and image-guided navigation system.

CONCLUSION

When faced with challenging temporal bone anatomy, intraoperative CT can provide critical details of the patient's microanatomy that allows for improved localization of the electrode and adjustments in operative techniques for successful cochlear implantation.