Subjective morbidity following radial free flap reconstruction in head and neck tumour patients

Comparison of patient-reported upper extremity disability following free flaps in head and neck reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Comparisons of patient-reported donor site morbidity based on the Disabilities in Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) instrument across upper trunk free flaps in head and neck surgery, including radial forearm (RFFF), osteocutaneous radial forearm (OCRFF), scapular tip (STFF), and serratus anterior (SAFF) free flaps, may help inform donor tissue selection.

METHODS

In this meta-analysis, 12 studies were included and the primary outcome was average DASH score.

RESULTS

The pooled DASH scores were 12.14 (95% CI: 7.40-16.88) for RFFF (5 studies), 17.99 (11.87-24.12) for OCRFF (2 studies), 12.19 (8.74-15.64) for STFF (3 studies), and 16.49 (5.92-27.05) for SAFF (2 studies) and were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that patients generally function well, with minimal to mild donor site morbidity, when assessed at an average of 20 months after flap harvest. These results are based on few effects from primarily retrospective studies of fair quality, and further research is needed.

The profunda artery perforator flap for head and neck reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

The profunda artery perforator (PAP) fasciocutaneous flap is underutilized in head and neck reconstruction, with advantages including ease of harvest and minimal donor site morbidity.

METHODS

Cadaveric dissection of cutaneous perforators to origin at profunda femoris system to characterize vascular anatomy.

RESULTS

22 PAP flaps were studied. Each contained 1-6 cutaneous perforators originating from the profunda system, designated into A, B, or C vascular pedicle systems. Muscular perforators did not consistently extend to skin in systems A and C, but all dissections demonstrated myocutaneous perforator in system B. Average distance from groin crease to cutaneous perforators of A, B, and C respectively was 8 cm (range 3-15 cm), 11.4 cm (range 5-17 cm), and 17.5 cm (range 12.5-22 cm). Average pedicle length was 11.07 cm (range 7-16 cm), 11.78 cm (range 9-16 cm), and 11.23 cm (range 9-15 cm). Average vena comitans diameter at origin was 3.14 mm (range 1.27-4.46 mm). Average arterial diameter at origin was 2.07 mm (range 1.27-3.82 mm). Range of maximal primary closure was 6-11 cm.

CONCLUSION

PAP free flap demonstrates reliable vascular anatomy in cadavers, with adequate pedicle length and vessel diameter. All specimens contained adequate myocutaneous perforator to support free tissue transfer.

Risk Factors for and Cost Implications of Free Flap Take-backs: A Single Institution Review

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS

For patients undergoing microvascular free tissue transfer (MFTT), we evaluated risk factors and financial implications of operating room (OR) take-back procedures.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review at a tertiary care center.

METHODS

Patients who underwent MFTT for head and neck reconstruction from 2011 to 2018 were identified. We compared hospital length of stay and overall costs associated with OR take-back procedures. Multivariable regression analysis evaluated factors associated with OR take-backs during the same hospitalization.

RESULTS

A total of 727 free flaps were reviewed, and 70 OR take-backs (9.6%) were identified. Mean total length of stay (LOS) in the ICU was 3.4 days versus 6.7 days for non-take-back and take-back flaps, respectively (P < .001). Mean total LOS on the regular floor was 6.3 days versus 13.1 days, respectively (P < .001). This resulted in a cost differential of $33,507 (94.3% increase relative to non-take-back flaps). The total cost associated with an OR take-back was $39,786. Hematomas were the most common cause of take-backs and wound dehiscence was associated with the highest costs. On multivariable analysis, higher ASA class (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.11-3.99; P = .026) and shorter ischemia times (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.29-0.95; P = .030) were independently associated with increased risk of take-backs.

CONCLUSIONS

OR take-backs infrequently occur but are associated with a significant increase in financial burden when compared to free flap cases not requiring OR take-back. The large majority of the cost differential lies in a substantial increase of ICU and floor LOS for take-back flaps when compared to non-take-back flaps.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 131:E1821-E1829, 2021.

Short-Term Quality of Life, Functional Status, and Their Predictors in Tongue Cancer Patients After Anterolateral Thigh Free Flap Reconstruction: A Single-Center, Prospective, Comparative Study

Purpose

To assess the quality of life, functional status, and their predictors in tongue cancer patients up to three months after anterolateral thigh free flap (ALTFF) reconstruction.

Patients and Methods

Tongue cancer patients were examined before and one and three months after ALTFF reconstruction using three validated questionnaires: the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10), and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck (FACT-H&N). Mean scores were compared using the Friedman test. Forward selection and backward elimination methods of multiple linear regression analysis were used to identify the predictors of quality of life and functional status using SPSS at a 95% significance level.

Results

The present study included 265 participants (88.68% males, mean age 46.7 ± 11.05 years). The mean MDADI and EAT-10 scores were highest at one month after the surgery and lowest at three months after the surgery (p < 0.05). The mean FACT-H&N score was lowest at one month after the surgery (p < 0.05); however, post hoc analysis revealed that the difference in the scores before and three months after the surgery was non significant (p > 0.05). Denture use, occupation, age, tumor site, illness duration, drinking habit, and diet predicted the patients' quality of life, while denture use, betel nut consumption, age, marital status, and diet predicted their functional status.

Conclusion

Although tongue cancer patients have a poor quality of life and functional status in the first month after ALTFF reconstruction, their quality of life and functional status improve thereafter. We recommend the implementation of swallowing training programs and case-oriented psychological interventions to assist patients in coping with temporary deterioration during the first month after the surgery.