Eustachian tube balloon dilatation: a cross-sectional, survey-based study of 137 UK consultants

Dilatation Eustachian tuboplasty with a Eustachian tube video endoscope and supporting balloon

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of employing a Eustachian tube video endoscope with a supporting balloon as a viable treatment and examination option for patients with Eustachian tube dysfunction.

METHODS

A study involving nine fresh human cadaver heads was conducted to investigate the potential of balloon dilatation Eustachian tuboplasty using a Eustachian tube video endoscope and a supporting balloon catheter. The Eustachian tube cavity was examined with the Eustachian tube video endoscope during the procedure, which involved the dilatation of the cartilaginous portion of the Eustachian tube with the supporting balloon catheter.

RESULTS

The utilisation of the Eustachian tube video endoscope in conjunction with the supporting balloon catheter demonstrated technical ease during the procedure, with no observed damage to essential structures, particularly the Eustachian tube cavity.

CONCLUSION

This newly introduced method of dilatation and examination of the Eustachian tube cavity using a Eustachian tube video endoscope and the supporting balloon is a feasible, safe procedure.

Management of retraction pockets: historic and novel approaches

Background

Retraction pockets are collapsed segments of the tympanic membrane. Their formation is associated with a disruption in middle-ear ventilation pathways, leading to the loss of organised collagen of the tympanic membrane. There are several approaches in treating retraction pockets, which aim either to improve ventilation or repair the retraction pockets themselves.

Methods

A review of the literature regarding the classification and associated management of retraction pockets was conducted, using Medline and Cochrane Library databases, with the addition of our institution's experience in undertaking novel techniques.

Results

All the current classification systems fail to guide treatment or prognosticate the disease. Commonly, an initial conservative approach is suggested for early stages, with no clear indication regarding when a surgical solution should be offered. There are conflicting data concerning the effectiveness of these treatments in terms of disease prevention, recurrence and hearing outcomes.

Conclusion

Minimally invasive approaches utilising novel techniques may be key to reducing peri-operative morbidity and improving the overall patient experience.