Treatment outcomes of laryngectomy compared to non-surgical management of T3 laryngeal carcinomas: a 10-year multicentre audit of 179 patients in the northeast of England

Laryngectomy plus postoperative radio(system)therapy versus primary radio(system) therapy for the treatment of locally advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer - results from the University Clinical Cancer Registry Regensburg

BACKGROUND

There are few adequate randomized clinical trials directly comparing the therapeutic options of primary laryngectomy (pLE) vs. primary radio(system)therapy (pR(S)T) in patients with locally advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma and thus little clear scientific evidence to decide which patients will benefit most from which procedure.

AIMS/OBJECTIVES

Aim was to compare survival between the therapeutic options and to learn from the limitations of this study, especially in the context of improved clinical assessment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The clinical data of patients treated between January 2010 and February 2022 were obtained from the electronic database of the University Hospital Regensburg. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between the treatment groups.

RESULTS

The study included 193 patients (pLE n = 68, pR(S)T, n = 125). Median OS was 31.2 months and median PFS was 24.7 months with no significant difference between the treatment groups (p > .050). Patients who did not receive complete treatment as recommended by the tumor conference (n = 47, 24.4%) had a higher risk of death (p = .024).

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

The results of our study are consistent with the survival data reported in the literature. More detailed systematic data in clinical routine (e.g. relevant comorbidities) are required to ensure guideline-based recommended therapy.

[Larynx preservation: recommendations for decision-making in T3 laryngeal cancer patients]

BACKGROUND

By today's standard, the optimal treatment of every individual tumor patient is discussed and determined in an interdisciplinary tumor board. According to the new S3 guidelines, larger volume T3 laryngeal cancers which are no longer safely resectable with larynx-sparing surgery are ideal candidates for a larynx preservation approach using primary chemoradiation (pCRT). So far, no clear criteria have been defined under what circumstances primary radiotherapy alone (pRT) might be acceptable in case chemotherapy (CT) is prohibited or in what cases, even in T3, upfront total laryngectomy with risk-adapted adjuvant treatment (TL±a[C]RT) should be recommended.

METHOD

The literature was searched for parameters chosen as criteria for an inclusion in the surgical rather than the conservative arm in non-randomized LP studies or which proved to be significant prognostic markers after conservative treatment. Development of a counselling tool for therapeutic decision making.

RESULTS

Significant prognostic markers were tumor volume (< 3.5 ccm/< 6 ccm vs. 6-12 ccm vs. > 12 ccm), presence and kind of vocal cord fixation (none vs. Succo I/II vs. Succo III/IV), extent of cartilage infiltration (none vs. minimal vs. multiple/gross), nodal status (N0‑1 vs. N2-3), and laryngeal dysfunction (pretreatment necessity of feeding tube or tracheostomy).

CONCLUSION

For T3 laryngeal cancers, pRT could be acceptable when the tumor volume is < 3.5 ccm for glottic and < 6 ccm for supraglottic tumors and there are no further risk factors. pCRT can be regarded as the standard for LP for tumors between 6 ccm and 12 ccm, vocal cord fixation Succo pattern I/II, only minimal cartilage infiltration and a high nodal burden. For tumor > 12 ccm, vocal cord fixation Succo pattern III/IV, gross or multiple cartilage infiltration or clinically relevant laryngeal dysfunction, upfront TL±a[C]RT should be considered.