1
|
Galloway LAS, Luckenbaugh AN. Preparing Trainees to Rebound from Surgical Complications. Curr Urol Rep 2024; 25:169-172. [PMID: 38797800 PMCID: PMC11224096 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-024-01207-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In this review, we aim to summarize the impact of surgical complications and adverse events on surgeons, including psychiatric illnesses. We evaluate current programs to develop trainee well-being and investigate research within the field of urology. RECENT FINDINGS Surgical complications and adverse events affect all surgeons, including surgical trainees. Research estimates that 80% of healthcare professionals have been involved in an event that affected them emotionally. These events can affect physicians in many ways, ranging from negatively impacting their quality of life to leading to psychiatric disorders such as acute stress reactions and post-traumatic stress disorder. Unfortunately, there is no standardized preparation to equip trainees to manage and rebound from the profound emotional impact of surgical complications. Data in this realm is insufficient, especially in urology, and we need more research in order to better evaluate emotional implications of complications on trainees and how we can prepare trainees to handle them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lan Anh S Galloway
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
| | - Amy N Luckenbaugh
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ginzberg SP, Gasior JA, Passman JE, Stein J, Keddem S, Soegaard Ballester JM, Finn CB, Myers JS, Kelz RR, Shea JA, Wachtel H. Surgeon and Surgical Trainee Experiences After Adverse Patient Events. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2414329. [PMID: 38829617 PMCID: PMC11148685 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.14329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Adverse patient events are inevitable in surgical practice. Objectives To characterize the impact of adverse patient events on surgeons and trainees, identify coping mechanisms, and assess whether current forms of support are sufficient. Design, Setting, and Participants In this mixed-methods study, a validated survey instrument was adapted and distributed to surgical trainees from 7 programs, and qualitative interviews were conducted with faculty from 4 surgical departments in an urban academic health system. Main Outcomes and Measures The personal impact of adverse patient events, current coping mechanisms, and desired forms of support. Results Of 216 invited trainees, 93 (43.1%) completed the survey (49 [52.7%] male; 60 [64.5%] in third postgraduate year or higher; 23 [24.7%] Asian or Pacific Islander, 6 [6.5%] Black, 51 [54.8%] White, and 8 [8.6%] other race; 13 [14.0%] Hispanic or Latinx ethnicity). Twenty-three of 29 (79.3%) invited faculty completed interviews (13 [56.5%] male; median [IQR] years in practice, 11.0 [7.5-20.0]). Of the trainees, 77 (82.8%) endorsed involvement in at least 1 recent adverse event. Most reported embarrassment (67 of 79 trainees [84.8%]), rumination (64 of 78 trainees [82.1%]), and fear of attempting future procedures (51 of 78 trainees [65.4%]); 28 of 78 trainees (35.9%) had considered quitting. Female trainees and trainees who identified as having a race and/or ethnicity other than non-Hispanic White consistently reported more negative consequences compared with male and White trainees. The most desired form of support was the opportunity to discuss the incident with an attending physician (76 of 78 respondents [97.4%]). Similarly, faculty described feelings of guilt and shame, loss of confidence, and distraction after adverse events. Most described the utility of confiding in peers and senior colleagues, although some expressed unwillingness to reach out. Several suggested designating a departmental point person for event debriefing. Conclusions and Relevance In this mixed-methods study of the personal impact of adverse events on surgeons and trainees, these events were nearly universally experienced and caused significant distress. Providing formal support mechanisms for both surgical trainees and faculty may decrease stigma and restore confidence, particularly for underrepresented groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara P. Ginzberg
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia
- Center for Healthcare Improvement and Patient Safety, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Julia A. Gasior
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Jesse E. Passman
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia
- Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Jacob Stein
- Sackler School of Medicine New York State/American Program, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Shimrit Keddem
- Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia
| | | | - Caitlin B. Finn
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jennifer S. Myers
- Center for Healthcare Improvement and Patient Safety, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia
| | - Rachel R. Kelz
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia
- Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Judy A. Shea
- Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia
| | - Heather Wachtel
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yaow CYL, Ng QX, Chong RIH, Ong C, Chong NZY, Yap NLX, Hong ASY, Tan BKT, Loh AHP, Wong ASY, Tan HK. Intraoperative adverse events among surgeons in Singapore: a multicentre cross-sectional study on impact and support. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:512. [PMID: 38659030 PMCID: PMC11040834 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10998-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is known that many surgeons encounter intraoperative adverse events which can result in Second Victim Syndrome (SVS), with significant detriment to their emotional and physical health. There is, however, a paucity of Asian studies in this space. The present study thus aimed to explore the degree to which the experience of an adverse event is common among surgeons in Singapore, as well as its impact, and factors affecting their responses and perceived support systems. METHODS A self-administered survey was sent to surgeons at four large tertiary hospitals. The 42-item questionnaire used a systematic closed and open approach, to assess: Personal experience with intraoperative adverse events, emotional, psychological and physical impact of these events and perceived support systems. RESULTS The response rate was 57.5% (n = 196). Most respondents were male (54.8%), between 35 and 44 years old, and holding the senior consultant position. In the past 12 months alone, 68.9% recalled an adverse event. The emotional impact was significant, including sadness (63.1%), guilt (53.1%) and anxiety (45.4%). Speaking to colleagues was the most helpful support source (66.7%) and almost all surgeons did not receive counselling (93.3%), with the majority deeming it unnecessary (72.2%). Notably, 68.1% of the surgeons had positive takeaways, gaining new insight and improving vigilance towards errors. Both gender and surgeon experience did not affect the likelihood of errors and emotional impact, but more experienced surgeons were less likely to have positive takeaways (p = 0.035). Individuals may become advocates for patient safety, while simultaneously championing the cause of psychological support for others. CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative adverse events are prevalent and its emotional impact is significant, regardless of the surgeon's experience or gender. While colleagues and peer discussions are a pillar of support, healthcare institutions should do more to address the impact and ensuing consequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clyve Yu Leon Yaow
- NUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Qin Xiang Ng
- Health Services Research Unit, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Ryan Ian Houe Chong
- NUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Clarence Ong
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nicolette Zy-Yin Chong
- NUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nicole Li Xian Yap
- NUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ashley Shuen Ying Hong
- NUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Benita Kiat Tee Tan
- Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Amos Hong Pheng Loh
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Hiang Khoon Tan
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Singhealth Duke-NUS Global Health Institute, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chong RIH, Yaow CYL, Chong NZY, Yap NLX, Hong ASY, Ng QX, Tan HK. Scoping review of the second victim syndrome among surgeons: Understanding the impact, responses, and support systems. Am J Surg 2024; 229:5-14. [PMID: 37838505 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.09.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is thought that 50% of healthcare providers experience Second Victim Syndrome (SVS) in the course of their practice. The manifestations of SVS varies between individuals, with potential long-lasting emotional effects that impact both the personal lives and professional clinical practice of affected persons. Although surgeons are known to face challenging and high-stress situations in their profession, which can increase their vulnerability to SVS, majority of studies and reviews have focused squarely on nonsurgical physicians. METHODS This scoping review aimed to consolidate existing studies pertaining to a surgeon's experience with SVS, by broadly examining the prevalence and impact, identifying the types of responses, and evaluating factors that could influence these responses. The scoping review protocol was guided by the framework outlined by Arksey and O'Malley and ensuing recommendations made by Levac and colleagues. Three databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library) were searched from inception till March 19, 2023. RESULTS A total of 13 articles were eligible for thematic analysis based on pre-defined inclusion criteria. Effects of SVS were categorized into Psychological, Physical and Professional impacts, of which Psychological and Professional impacts were particularly significant. Factors affecting the response were categorized into complication type, surgeon factors and support systems. CONCLUSION SVS adds immense psychological, emotional and physical burden to the individual surgeon. There are key personal, interpersonal and environmental factors that can mitigate or exacerbate the effects of SVS, and greater emphasis needs to be placed on improving availability and access to services to help surgeons at risk of SVS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Ian Houe Chong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Clyve Yu Leon Yaow
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Nicole Li Xian Yap
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Qin Xiang Ng
- Health Services Research Unit, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; MOH Holdings Pte Ltd., Singapore.
| | - Hiang Khoon Tan
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shah HP, Salehi PP, Ihnat J, Kim DD, Salehi P, Judson BL, Azizzadeh B, Lee YH. Resident Burnout and Well-being in Otolaryngology and Other Surgical Specialties: Strategies for Change. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 168:165-179. [PMID: 35133919 DOI: 10.1177/01945998221076482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To perform a literature review on burnout prevalence, factors that affect burnout and well-being, and solutions to address burnout in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OTO-HNS) residents and residents in other surgical specialties. DATA SOURCES Ovid Medline, Embase, and article reference lists. REVIEW METHODS A literature search was performed to identify articles on resident burnout, distress, wellness, well-being, and quality of life. Articles deemed outside the scope of the current work were excluded. Search was limited to the past 5 years. CONCLUSIONS Moderate to high burnout has been reported in 35% to 86% of OTO-HNS residents. Among other surgical specialties, resident burnout ranges between 58% and 66% in plastics, 11% and 67% in neurosurgery, 38% and 68% in urology, and 31% and 56% in orthopedics. Highest burnout rates were seen in postgraduate year 2 residents. Factors significantly associated with burnout included hours worked (>80 h/wk), level of autonomy, exercise, and program support. Reported resident work hours have steadily increased: 8% of OTO-HNS residents in 2005 vs 26% in 2019 reported averaging >80 h/wk. Practical implications of resident burnout include decreased empathy, moral distress and injury, poor health, decreased quality of life, increased attrition, decreased desire to pursue fellowship, and increased likelihood of medical errors. Structured mentorship programs, wellness initiatives, and increased ancillary support have been associated with lower burnout rates and improvements in resident well-being across specialties. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Addressing burnout, which is prevalent in OTO-HNS residents, is critical to improving patient care and physician well-being. Surgical specialties can share strategies to effectively address resident burnout through institutional interventions, which can be essential quality improvement initiatives, to promote well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hemali P Shah
- Connecticut Department of Surgery, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Parsa P Salehi
- Connecticut Department of Surgery, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Jacqueline Ihnat
- Connecticut Department of Surgery, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - David D Kim
- Connecticut Department of Surgery, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Pauniz Salehi
- College of Human Ecology, Department of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - Benjamin L Judson
- Connecticut Department of Surgery, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Babak Azizzadeh
- Center for Advanced Facial Plastic Surgery, Beverly Hills, California, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Yan Ho Lee
- Connecticut Department of Surgery, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Trainees and complications of surgery, burnout and recruitment. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology 2021; 135:283. [PMID: 33955349 DOI: 10.1017/s0022215121001018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|