Strategies to improve ingestive behaviour with reference to critical illness

Noninvasive Nutritional Management of Ovarian Cancer Patients: Beyond Intestinal Obstruction

Objective

Malnutrition, suffered by more than 50% of patients with ovarian cancer during the course of their disease, significantly compromises the effectiveness of treatment, causes distress, and increases morbidity and mortality. This review outlines the nutritional challenges faced by women with ovarian cancer and evaluates the evidence base for current practice and possible opportunities for intervention in clinical settings.

Methods

PubMed and MetaLib databases were searched for literature on nutrition and cancer/ovarian cancer using terms and truncations covering cancer, cachexia, mouse models, malnutrition, and nutrition intervention. MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were separately searched for interventional studies and clinical and randomized controlled trials published in English (UK/United States) that involved oral nutrition and/or supplementation/intervention in ovarian cancer patients.

Results

Malnutrition continues to be a significant challenge in ovarian cancer management despite significant improvement in treatment pathways and understanding of metabolic pathways and the role of inflammation. There is little evidence of studies designed to evaluate the impact of additional oral nutrients in this population. Seven studies found compared “early” versus “traditional” postoperative oral feeding after major gynecological/oncological surgery, and 1 study evaluated the impact of nutritional status on survival. The 7 studies found evidence of safety, tolerability, reduction in length of hospitalization, and rapid recovery after early feeding. There is no evidence of benefit of additional oral nutrients in this population.

Conclusions

Current guidelines and protocols of nutritional management of ovarian cancer seem to be based on expert opinion. There is need for extensive collaborative evidence for nutritional management decisions made in the treatment of patients. Prospective cohort studies could help evaluate the impact of changes in nutritional status on health/nutritional outcomes, disease recurrence, quality of life, and survival. These would form a basis for well-designed, targeted, randomized controlled trials with specific and controlled nutrients/counseling aimed at preventing rather than treating nutritional complications.

Ghrelin, appetite and critical illness

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recovery and rehabilitation after critical illness is a vital part of intensive care management. The role of feeding and nutritional intervention is the subject of many recent studies. The gastric hormone ghrelin has effects on appetite and food intake and on immunomodulatory functions. Here we review the interactions between critical illness, appetite regulation, nutrition and ghrelin.

RECENT FINDINGS

Critical illness results in significant loss of lean body mass; strategies to prevent this have so far proven unsuccessful. Ghrelin has been shown to reduce catabolic protein loss in animal models of critical illness and improve body composition in chronic cachectic illnesses in humans.

SUMMARY

Enhancing recovery from critical illness will improve both short-term and long-term outcomes. Ghrelin may offer an important means of improving appetite, muscle mass and rehabilitation in the period after critical illness, although studies are needed to see whether this potential is realized.