Diurnal variation in egg excretion by Heterakis gallinarum

Periodicity of Ascaridia galli egg excretion in experimentally infected chicken in the Philippines

The periodicity of parasite egg excretion refers to variations in the number of eggs produced across time, with significant implications in optimizing diagnostic procedures and conducting the Fecal Egg Count Reduction Test (FECRT). Here, we explore whether Ascaridia galli egg excretion varies across time under Philippine conditions, thus informing the best time to collect fecal samples during flock health examination. A time-course analysis was performed in chickens (N = 12) experimentally infected with A. galli, isolated from a naturally infected Philippine native chicken. We examined the fecal egg per gram (EPG) count at 3-h intervals for 3 days, starting from 5:00-6:00 h AM to the following day at 1:00-2:00 h AM. Our results showed a consistent daily egg excretion pattern with a peak EPG count in the morning that abruptly declined in the afternoon and lowest in the evening. The EPG counts correlated with the amount of excreta produced, suggesting that A. galli fecundity corresponds to the timing of host defecation. Our results imply that the best time to collect fecal samples for A. galli diagnosis and FECRT in Philippine conditions should be from sunrise until late morning when parasite EPG count and host excreta production are at their highest.

Pattern and repeatability of ascarid-specific antigen excretion through chicken faeces, and the diagnostic accuracy of coproantigen measurements as compared with McMaster egg counts and plasma and egg yolk antibody measurements in laying hens

BACKGROUND

A coproantigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has recently been proposed for detecting ascarid infections in chickens. The excretion pattern of ascarid antigens through chicken faeces and the consistency of measurements over the course of infections are currently unknown. This study evaluates the pattern and repeatability of worm antigen per gram of faeces (APG) and compares the diagnostic performance of the coproantigen ELISA with a plasma and egg yolk antibody ELISA and McMaster faecal egg counts (M-FEC) at different weeks post-infection (wpi).

METHODS

Faecal, blood and egg yolk samples were collected from laying hens that were orally infected with a mix of Ascaridia galli and Heterakis gallinarum eggs (N = 108) or kept as uninfected controls (N = 71). Measurements including (a) APG using a coproantigen ELISA, (b) eggs per gram of faeces (EPG) using the McMaster technique and (c) ascarid-specific IgY in plasma and in egg yolks using an ascarid-specific antibody ELISA) were performed between wpi 2 and 18.

RESULTS

Time-dependent significant differences in APG between infected and non-infected laying hens were quantified. At wpi 2 (t₍₁₆₄₎ = 0.66, P = 1.00) and 4 (t₍₁₆₄₎ = -3.09, P = 0.094) no significant differences were observed between the groups, whereas infected hens had significantly higher levels of APG than controls by wpi 6 (t₍₁₆₄₎ =  -6.74, P < 0.001). As indicated by a high overall repeatability estimate of 0.91 (CI = 0.89-0.93), APG could be measured consistently from the same individual. Compared to McMaster and antibody ELISA, coproantigen ELISA showed the highest overall diagnostic performance (area under curve, AUC = 0.93), although the differences were time-dependent. From wpi 6 to 18 coproantigen ELISA had an AUC > 0.95, while plasma IgY ELISA showed the highest diagnostic performance in wpi 2 (AUC = 0.95). M-FEC had the highest correlation with total worm burden, while APG had highest correlations with weights and lengths of A. galli.

CONCLUSION

Ascarid antigen excretion through chicken faeces can be measured with high accuracy and repeatability using a coproantigen ELISA. The antigen excretion increases over time, and is associated with worm maturation, particularly with the size of A. galli. Our results suggest the necessity of complementary use of different diagnostic tools for a more accurate diagnosis of infections.

A copro-antigen ELISA for the detection of ascarid infections in chickens

A reliable method of diagnosing the most prevalent helminth infections in chickens is vital for developing effective control strategies. Ascaridia galli and Heterakisgallinarum are phylogenetically close nematode species that can elicit the development of cross-reactive antibodies in chickens. Therefore, an enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) based on Ascaridia galli antigens in faeces of chickens to detect and quantify infections with both A. galli and H. gallinarum was developed. The ELISA utilised polyclonal antibodies that were obtained from rabbits immunised with soluble antigens isolated from A. galli. In two separate experiments, chickens were kept as uninfected controls or were orally infected with either 100 or 1000 of embryonated eggs of A. galli or H.gallinarum. Faecal samples were collected after 28-30 weeks post-infection. The ELISA was then used to quantify the concentration of soluble worm antigens in faecal samples, i.e., the amount of antigen per gram faeces, APG. The APG from infected chickens was significantly higher than non-infected groups in both experiments (P 0.001). Both 100 and 1000 infection dose groups were not significantly different (P = 0.999) in the experiment with H. gallinarum, whereas in the experiment with A. galli, APG was significantly higher in the 1000 infection group (P 0.001). A receiver operation characteristics (ROC) analysis that evaluates the qualitative performance of diagnostics tests was used to calculate the assay parameters within each mono-infection experiment. The result showed that the assay had a high diagnostics accuracy with an area-under-curve (AUC) of 0.99 in detecting infection in A. galli infected chickens and a moderate-high accuracy (AUC = 0.89) in birds infected with H. gallinarum. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the assay at the optimal cut-off point equivalent to Youden index were 93% and 100% for detecting infections in A. galli experiment and 85% and 92% in H. gallinarum experiment, respectively. The correlation between faecal antigen concentration and all worm burden parameters was positive but generally low (r < 0.33), which provided less information about infection intensities. Nonetheless, these results indicate that a reliable and accurate qualitative diagnosis of the two most prevalent intestinal nematodes in chickens can be achieved using a non-invasive copro-antigen ELISA assay.

In addition to birds' age and outdoor access, the detection method is of high importance to determine the prevalence of gastrointestinal helminths in laying hens kept in alternative husbandry systems

The prevalence of gastrointestinal helminths was investigated in sixty-six commercial non-caged layer flocks. Twenty-nine flocks were housed indoors in aviaries or floor systems, nineteen flocks were kept in conventional free-range systems with outdoor access, and eighteen flocks in organic free-range systems. Flocks were investigated at end of rearing (mean age 17 weeks), peak of egg production (mean age 38 weeks) and before slaughter (mean age 74 weeks). Four different methods were applied to determine worm infestation. During necropsies, worm infestations were recorded and mucosal scrapings were evaluated for the presence of worm eggs. Faecal samples from each flock were investigated by simple flotation method and McMaster counting technique. No gastrointestinal helminths were found in pullets. During production, 87.9 % of the layer flocks were infected with at least one nematode species at the peak of production. The prevalence further increased significantly up to 98.5 % at the end of production (p=0.05). This increase could be ascribed mainly to infections with Ascaridia (A.) galli and/or Heterakis (H.) gallinarum which were most prevalent in all husbandry systems. Furthermore, their prevalence increased significantly with the age of birds (p=0.023; p < 0.001). With regard to the husbandry system, the prevalence of Capillaria spp. was significantly higher in flocks from outdoor systems compared to flocks that were kept indoors. Cestodes were only detected at the end of production with a prevalence of 15.2 % and significantly more flocks with access to outdoor run were found positive. Interestingly, H. gallinarum was found with a high prevalence indoor and in outdoor systems. Anthelminthic treatment did not impact the prevalence of nematode infections. Comparing four different methods for the detection of helminths it was revealed that their efficiencies varied depending on the worm species. Overall, the simple flotation method was superior to detect A. galli and Capillaria spp. This method proved also very efficient for the detection of H. gallinarum but the additional evaluation of the worm infestation during necropsy increased the level of prevalence. Cestodes were mainly found during necropsies when the worm infestation was evaluated. The detection of parasite eggs in mucosal scrapings from the intestines was the least effective method for all helminths. These findings lead to the recommendation to combine faecal investigations with an evaluation of the worm infestation during necropsy of at least five birds.

Accuracy and precision of McMaster and Mini-FLOTAC egg counting techniques using egg-spiked faeces of chickens and two different flotation fluids

Faecal egg counting techniques (ECTs) are useful tools for assessing anthelmintic efficacy and selecting hosts resistant to parasite infection. McMaster (MM) is one of the most commonly used ECTs, but it suffers from low sensitivity and precision. Mini-FLOTAC (MF) has been proposed to replace MM, but so far has not been evaluated for gastro-intestinal nematode infections in chickens. This study compared sensitivity, precision, and accuracy of MM and MF with two trials using egg-spiked faecal samples ranging from 50-1250 eggs per gram of faeces (EPG). In addition, effects of two flotation fluids with different specific gravities (SG), namely salt (SG = 1.20) and sucrose solutions (SG = 1.32), on accuracy and time-spent for both ECTs were evaluated. Overall sensitivity based on the composite reads across all EPG-levels was 97.1 % for MM and 100 % for MF. MF was, however, more sensitive (P = 0.003) or tended to (P = 0.087) be more sensitive than MM at only the lowest EPG-level (i.e. 50 EPG) using one of the duplicate reads, whereas there was no significant difference at any EPG-level using composite reads. Overall average precision of MF (79.5 %) was higher (P < 0.001) than that of MM (63.4 %) across all EPG-levels. Precision of MM increased from 22 to 87 % with increasing EPG-levels from 50-1250 EPG. Corresponding precision estimates for MF ranged from 76 to 91 %. Overall recovery rate of MM (74.6 %) was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than that of MF (60.1 %). There was no significant difference in recovery rate of spiked-eggs among different EPG-levels (P = 0.833). Recovery rate of MM ranged from 64 % to 79 % across different EPG-levels, while it ranged from 54 % to 64 % with MF without an interaction between ECT and EPG-level (P = 0.701). It took more time (P < 0.001) to process (prepare and read) samples with MF than with MM using the same flotation fluid. The sugar solution tended to (P = 0.100) increase egg-recovery with both ECTs, while increasing (P < 0.001) time-spent for processing the samples. Our data collectively suggest that MM is less sensitive than MF only at around minimum detection level of MM when using unrepeated reads. We conclude that McMaster is faster, relatively more accurate but less precise than Mini-FLOTAC. The sugar solution with higher SG increases accuracy of both techniques at the expense of increased labour time.