Comparative risk of self-harm hospitalization amongst depressive disorder patients using different antidepressants: a population-based cohort study in Taiwan

Treatment patterns and healthcare utilization of patients with treatment-resistant depression estimated using health insurance database: A population-based study from Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Determining the proportion of patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) among patients with unipolar depression receiving adequate pharmacological treatment (pharmaceutically treated depression [PTD]) is clinically important and may affect health care utilization. In Taiwan, these issues can be assessed by analyzing population-based data.

METHODS

The present study included data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database from 2010 to 2017. Among patients with depression, PTD was defined by the receipt of at least one adequate antidepressant treatment, and TRD was defined as receiving a third adequate antidepressant treatment after failure to respond to two prior treatments. Time of progression from PTD to TRD was estimated via the Kaplan-Meier function. A propensity-matched case-comparison cohort approach was used to compare resource utilization between patients with non-TRD PTD and TRD.

RESULTS

TRD was defined in 11.2 % of patients with unipolar depression and 37.1 % of PTD patients. The time of progression from PTD to TRD was approximately 1 year. Most TRD patients were women, middle-aged, and treated in general practice clinics. Antidepressant monotherapy, followed by antidepressant with augmentation, was the most common treatment strategy applied to TRD patients. Medical utilization was significantly higher in patients with TRD than those with non-TRD PTD across most aspects.

LIMITATIONS

TRD was defined based on pharmacological treatment patterns, as the reasons for changes in antidepressant regimens were not available.

CONCLUSION

Approximately one-third of patients with PTD developed TRD, often soon after receiving adequate pharmacological treatment. Patients with TRD used more medical resources than patients with non-TRD PTD.

Antidepressant use and risk of self-harm among people aged 40 years or older: A population-based cohort and self-controlled case series study

BACKGROUND

Studies on the association between antidepressants and self-harm in adults were mostly conducted over a decade ago and have inconsistent findings. We aimed to compare self-harm risks by antidepressant classes among people aged 40 years or older with depression.

METHODS

Individuals aged ≥40 years with depression who initiated antidepressant treatment between 2001 and 2015 were retrieved from the Hong Kong Clinical Data Analysis & Reporting system, and were followed up until December 31, 2016. We conducted self-controlled case series (SCCS) analyses to estimate the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of self-harm comparing the pre-exposure (90 days before the first antidepressant use), index exposure (the first antidepressant use), and subsequent exposure (subsequent antidepressant use) periods to nonexposed periods. We applied Cox proportional hazard regressions to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of self-harm comparing five antidepressant classes (tricyclic and related antidepressant drugs [TCAs], selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs], noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants [NaSSAs], serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors [SNRIs], and others).

FINDINGS

A total of 48,724 individuals were identified. SCCS analyses (N = 3,846) found that the increased self-harm risk occurred during the pre-exposure (IRR: 22.24; 95% CI, 20.25-24.42), index exposure (7.03; 6.34-7.80), and subsequent exposure periods (2.47; 2.18-2.79) compared to the unexposed period. Cohort analyses (N = 48,724) found an association of higher self-harm risks in short-term (one year) for NaSSAs vs. TCAs (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.53-2.96), SNRIs vs. TCAs (1.64; 1.01-2.68), and NaSSAs vs. SSRIs (1.75; 1.29-2.36) in the 40-64 years group. The higher risk remained significant in long-term (> one year) for NaSSAs vs. TCAs (1.55; 1.26-1.91) and NaSSAs vs. SSRIs (1.53; 1.26-1.87). In the 65+ group, only short-term differences were observed (SSRIs vs. TCAs [1.31; 1.03-1.66], SNRIs vs. SSRIs [0.44; 0.22-0.87], and SNRIs vs. NaSSAs [0.43; 0.21-0.87]).

INTERPRETATION

Within-person comparisons did not suggest that antidepressant exposure is causally associated with an increased risk of self-harm in people with depression. Between-person comparisons revealed differences in self-harm risks between certain pairs of antidepressant classes. These findings may inform clinicians' benefit-risk assessments when prescribing antidepressants.

FUNDING

Nil.

The comparative effectiveness of antidepressants for youths with major depressive disorder: a nationwide population-based study in Taiwan

Background:

Guidelines recommend fluoxetine as a first-line medication for youths diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD). However, little is known about the long-term effectiveness of different antidepressants in juveniles in the real world. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of antidepressants in youths with MDD.

Methods:

Youths (<20 years old) with a diagnosis of MDD who were new users of antidepressants were selected from a nationwide population-based cohort in Taiwan between 1997 and 2013. We divided a total of 16,981 users (39.9% male; mean age: 16.6 years) into 10 different antidepressant groups (fluoxetine, sertraline, paroxetine, venlafaxine, citalopram, escitalopram, bupropion, fluvoxamine, mirtazapine and moclobemide). Regarding treatment outcomes (hospitalisation and medication discontinuation), Cox proportional hazards regression models were applied to estimate the hazards of such outcomes.

Results:

Compared with the youths treated with fluoxetine, the bupropion-treated group demonstrated lower rates of hospitalisation and discontinuation. Mirtazapine-treated group demonstrated a higher hospitalisation risk mainly when administered for single depressive episodes. Furthermore, patients treated with sertraline and fluvoxamine had higher discontinuation rates. Among the younger teenage subgroups (< 16 years), significantly higher rates of discontinuation were observed in those treated with sertraline, escitalopram and fluvoxamine. Among the older teenage subgroups (⩾ 16 years), bupropion was superior to fluoxetine in preventing hospitalisation and discontinuation.

Conclusion:

We concluded that bupropion might surpass fluoxetine with regard to hospitalisation prevention and drug therapy maintenance among youths with MDD, while mirtazapine users demonstrated a higher hospitalisation risk. Our findings might serve as a reference for clinicians in future studies.

Association between mirtazapine use and serious self-harm in people with depression: an active comparator cohort study using UK electronic health records

Background

Studies report an increased risk of self-harm or suicide in people prescribed mirtazapine compared with other antidepressants.

Objectives

To compare the risk of serious self-harm in people prescribed mirtazapine versus other antidepressants as second-line treatments.

Design and setting

Cohort study using anonymised English primary care electronic health records, hospital admission data and mortality data with study window 1 January 2005 to 30 November 2018.

Participants

24 516 people diagnosed with depression, aged 18–99 years, initially prescribed a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and then prescribed mirtazapine, a different SSRI, amitriptyline or venlafaxine.

Main outcome measures

Hospitalisation or death due to deliberate self-harm. Age–sex standardised rates were calculated and survival analyses were performed using inverse probability of treatment weighting to account for baseline covariates.

Results

Standardised rates of serious self-harm ranged from 3.8/1000 person-years (amitriptyline) to 14.1/1000 person-years (mirtazapine). After weighting, the risk of serious self-harm did not differ significantly between the mirtazapine group and the SSRI or venlafaxine groups (HRs (95% CI) 1.18 (0.84 to 1.65) and 0.85 (0.51 to 1.41) respectively). The risk was significantly higher in the mirtazapine than the amitriptyline group (3.04 (1.36 to 6.79)) but was attenuated after adjusting for dose.

Conclusions

There was no evidence for a difference in risk between mirtazapine and SSRIs or venlafaxine after accounting for baseline characteristics. The higher risk in the mirtazapine versus the amitriptyline group might reflect residual confounding if amitriptyline is avoided in people considered at risk of self-harm.

Clinical implications

Addressing baseline risk factors and careful monitoring might improve outcomes for people at risk of serious self-harm.

Paths to the first-time diagnoses of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa in Taiwan

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the characteristics of psychiatrists and the hospital settings in relation to the first-time diagnoses of anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN) and depict medical utilization and the detection rate before diagnosis of patients with AN and BN.

METHOD

We extracted data of individuals with AN or BN, as defined by the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, from a national health insurance database. Individuals with AN (n = 1,893) or BN (n = 10,542) who were first-time diagnosed by psychiatrists from 2002 to 2013 were included. Individuals with schizophrenia were selected as control groups that were matched with the incident AN and BN cases for sex, age stratum, and year of diagnosis.

RESULTS

AN was more likely to be diagnosed by female psychiatrists. Patients with AN were more frequently diagnosed in medical centers while patients with BN were mostly diagnosed in primary care clinics. Nearly all patients with AN and BN had sought treatment for physical problems but less than half had sought help for mental health problems in the year preceding the diagnosis. Individuals with AN, BN, and schizophrenia were all under-detected by nonpsychiatric medical professionals. Notably, BN was least likely to be recognized by both psychiatrists and other medical professionals.

DISCUSSION

Our findings underscore the importance of educational programs that are designed to improve the detection and management of eating disorders by medical professionals in Taiwan. Advanced educational programs that target differential diagnosis and the tailored management of different eating disorders should be highlighted among psychiatrists.

Mortality during US FDA clinical trials in patients with diabetes, hypertension, depression and schizophrenia

Objectives: To evaluate the relationship between the mortality rates associated with psychiatric conditions like depression and schizophrenia compared with chronic medical conditions like hypertension and diabetes.Methods: Examined clinical trial safety data from New Drug Approval programmes reviewed by the US Food and Drug Administration and calculated all-cause and suicide/non-suicide mortality rates per 100,000 patient-exposure-years (PEY) for seven diabetes, 12 hypertension, 11 depression, and nine schizophrenia programmes (126,151 patients, 63,106.3 PEY).Results: Depression (894.8 ± 201.2) and schizophrenia (935.3 ± 214.6) had significantly higher all-cause mortality rates than diabetes (462.8 ± 70.8) and hypertension (448.4 ± 123.1). Psychiatric conditions had 1.9-2.1× the medical conditions' mortality (p < 0.001). Non-suicide mortality rates for depression (506.2 ± 151.3), schizophrenia (550.9 ± 164.7), diabetes (457.2 ± 70.4) and hypertension (430.8 ± 120.6) were comparable. Only antidiabetics showed a signal for all-cause mortality (reduction of 37%, p = 0.008).Conclusions: Depression and schizophrenia trial patients had comparable (if not higher) all-cause mortality rates as older populations in diabetes and hypertension trials, even when excluding suicides. While generalizability of the rates themselves is limited, this study can adequately estimate the relational mortality among these conditions because of the high internal consistency of clinical trials. Potential signals for mortality reduction with active treatment should be considered for all investigational medications for chronic conditions with increased mortality, including psychotropics.

Effects of antidepressant treatments on health service utilization and medical costs among patients with depression: a nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study in Taiwan

This study aimed to assess the associations between the use of different types of antidepressants and health service utilization and costs among depressed patients. Data used in this study were retrieved from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. We identified 447 411 new antidepressant users during the study period (2011-2015) and they were individually followed for a 1-year period. Two-part generalized estimating equation models were conducted. Results demonstrated that there was a substantial decrease in outpatient service utilized by patients undertaking serotonin antagonists and reuptake inhibitors (β = -0.2074), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (β = -0.0452), tricyclic antidepressants (β = -0.1308), or other antidepressants (β = -0.0637), compared with their counterparts in the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors group (all P < 0.05). Compared with patients who were treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, those who were prescribed serotonin antagonists and reuptake inhibitors (β = -0.4934, P < 0.05) or tricyclic antidepressants (β = -0.4194, P < 0.05) had incurred lower costs pertaining to outpatient service, while considerably higher costs were borne by those patients embarked on the treatment of serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (β = 0.3228, P < 0.05) or other antidepressants (β = 0.1118, P < 0.05). We concluded that the initiation of various classes of antidepressants led to significant variations in health service utilization and costs among depressed patients.

Comparisons of the risk of medication noncompliance and suicidal behavior among patients with depressive disorders using different monotherapy antidepressants in Taiwan: A nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the association between various classes of antidepressants and the risk of medication noncompliance as well as suicidal behavior among depressed patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted utilizing two nationwide population-based datasets in Taiwan from 2010 to 2016. The outcome measures included the risk of medication noncompliance, attempted suicide, and completed suicide. Cox proportional hazards models with stratification of the propensity score deciles were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 447,411 new antidepressant users were identified. Compared to SSRIs, patients who received SARIs [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.124, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.108-1.142], SNRIs (aHR = 1.049, 95% CI = 1.033-1.065), and other classes of antidepressants (aHR = 1.037, 95% CI = 1.024-1.051) were more likely to exhibit poor medication noncompliance. Patients who received SNRIs had a higher risk of attempted suicide (aHR = 1.294, 95% CI = 1.114-1.513), compared to SSRIs. However, patents in the TCAs group revealed the opposite result (aHR = 0.543, 95% CI = 0.387-0.762). Concerning the risk of completed suicide, this analysis detected no statistical significance across different types of antidepressants.

LIMITATIONS

Although the universal coverage of Taiwan's national health insurance program tends to minimize the risk of selection and recall bias, it is difficult to rule out medical surveillance bias by using claim data.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that classes of antidepressants exert different degrees of impact on the risk of medication noncompliance and attempted suicide, but not completed suicide, among depressed patients.

Comparative effect of antipsychotics on risk of self-harm among patients with schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of different antipsychotic treatments with hospitalization due to self-harm among patients with schizophrenia.

METHOD

This retrospective cohort study was based on Taiwan's universal health insurance database. Patients aged 15-45 years with a newly diagnosed schizophrenic disorder in 2001-2012 were included. The study outcome was the first hospitalization due to self-harm or undetermined injury after the diagnosis of schizophrenic disorders. The exposure status of antipsychotics was modeled as a time-dependent variable. The analyses were stratified by antipsychotic dosage based on defined daily dose (DDD).

RESULTS

Among 70 380 patients with a follow-up of 500 355 person-years, 2272 self-harm hospitalization episodes were identified. Compared with none or former use, current use of several second-generation antipsychotics with a dose of one DDD or above, including amisulpride, aripiprazole, clozapine, risperidone, and sulpiride, was associated with decreased risk of self-harm hospitalization, with clozapine showing the strongest effect (adjusted rate ratio = 0.26, 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.47).

CONCLUSION

The protective effect on self-harm may vary across different antipsychotics. Further studies are needed to replicate the findings.