1
|
Pagkalidou E, Doundoulakis I, Apostolidou-Kiouti F, Bougioukas KI, Papadopoulos K, Tsapas A, Farmakis IT, Antonopoulos AS, Giannakoulas G, Haidich AB. An overview of systematic reviews on imaging tests for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism applying different network meta-analytic methods. Hellenic J Cardiol 2024; 76:88-98. [PMID: 37271191 DOI: 10.1016/j.hjc.2023.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to apply different methods of diagnostic test accuracy network meta-analysis (DTA-NMA) for studies reporting results of five imaging tests for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism (PE): pulmonary angiography (PA), computed tomography angiography (CTPA), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), planar ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy and single-photon emission computed tomography ventilation/perfusion (SPECT V/Q). METHODS We searched four databases (MEDLINE [via PubMed], Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and Epistemonikos) from inception until June 2, 2022 to identify systematic reviews (SRs) describing diagnostic accuracy of PA, CTPA, MRA, V/Q scan and SPECT V/Q for suspected PE. Study-level data were extracted and pooled using a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) meta-regression approach and two DTA-NMA models to compare accuracy estimates of different imaging tests. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2) tool and certainty of evidence using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) framework. RESULTS We identified 13 SRs, synthesizing data from 33 primary studies and for four imaging tests (PA, CTPA, MRA and V/Q scan). The HSROC meta-regression model using PA as the reference standard showed that MRA had the best overall diagnostic performance with sensitivity of 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76, 1.00) and specificity of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.99). However, DTA-NMA models indicated that V/Q scan had the highest sensitivity, while CTPA was most specific. CONCLUSION Selecting a different DTA-NMA method to assess multiple diagnostic tests can affect estimates of diagnostic accuracy. There is no established method, but the choice depends on the data and familiarity with Bayesian statistics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eirini Pagkalidou
- Department of Hygiene, Social-Preventive Medicine and Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, University Campus, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Ioannis Doundoulakis
- First Department of Cardiology, Hippokration Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University, Athens, Greece
| | - Fani Apostolidou-Kiouti
- Department of Hygiene, Social-Preventive Medicine and Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, University Campus, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Konstantinos I Bougioukas
- Department of Hygiene, Social-Preventive Medicine and Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, University Campus, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Apostolos Tsapas
- Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine Unit, Second Medical Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece; Diabetes Centre, Second Medical Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece; Harris Manchester College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Ioannis T Farmakis
- Centre for Thrombosis and Haemostasis, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany; First Department of Cardiology, AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Alexios S Antonopoulos
- First Department of Cardiology, Hippokration Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University, Athens, Greece
| | - George Giannakoulas
- First Department of Cardiology, AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Anna-Bettina Haidich
- Department of Hygiene, Social-Preventive Medicine and Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, University Campus, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
O'Caoimh R. Informant-Administered Cognitive Screening as a Component of Memory Clinic Assessment: Overcoming Ethical and Practical Challenges. J Alzheimers Dis 2022; 90:1433-1436. [PMID: 36404552 DOI: 10.3233/jad-220989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Possin and Rosen provide a robust commentary exploring the challenges of using caregivers as cognitive testers. Informants have an important and often overlooked role in diagnosing cognitive impairment. O'Caoimh et al. show they can support cognitive screening in advance of clinic, suggesting new research avenues including the potential for home-monitoring. Although concerns testing may engender bias, introduce practice effects, and impact patient autonomy are valid and require examination, these should be viewed in light of patient preference, clinical need, and the broader ethics of assessing dementia. The importance of distinguishing concerns over accuracy and ethical appropriateness is also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rónán O'Caoimh
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Mercy University Hospital, Grenville Place, Cork City, Ireland.,Health Research Board Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Cork City, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Taylor‐Rowan M, McGuire L, Hafdi M, Evans J, Stott DJ, Wetherall K, Elliott E, Drozdowska B, Quinn TJ. Comparative validity of informant tools for assessing pre-stroke cognitive impairment. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2022; 37:10.1002/gps.5700. [PMID: 35278006 PMCID: PMC9310907 DOI: 10.1002/gps.5700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Various informant-based questionnaires are used in clinical practice to screen for pre-stroke cognitive problems. However, there is no guidance on which tool should be preferred. We compared the validity of the two most commonly used informant-based tools. METHODS We recruited consecutively admitted stroke patients. Patients' informants completed the Informant Questionnaire for Cognitive Decline in the Elderly Short Form (IQCODE-SF, 16-item) and Ascertain Dementia 8 (AD8). We assessed construct validity (accuracy) against a semi-structured clinical interview for dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI), describing test accuracy metrics and comparing area under ROC curves (AUROC). We described criterion validity by evaluating associations between test scores and neuroimaging markers of dementia and overall 'brain frailty'. Finally, we described prognostic validity comparing ROC curves for 18-month clinical outcomes of dementia, death, stroke, and disability. RESULTS One-hundred-thirty-seven patient-informant dyads were recruited. At usual clinical cut-points, the IQCODE-SF had comparable sensitivity to the AD8 (both = 92%) for pre-stroke dementia, but superior specificity (IQCODE-SF: 82% vs. AD8: 58%). Youden index suggested that the optimal AD8 threshold for diagnosis of dementia is ≥4. The IQCODE-SF demonstrated stronger associations with markers of generalised and medial-temporal lobe atrophy, neurovascular disease, and overall brain frailty. IQCODE-SF also demonstrated greater accuracy for predicting future dementia (IQCODE-SF AUROC = 0.903, 95% CI = 0.798-1.00; AD8 AUROC = 0.821, 95% CI = 0.664-0.977). CONCLUSIONS Both IQCODE-SF and AD8 are valid measures of pre-stroke dementia. Higher cut points for AD8 may improve performance in the acute stroke setting. Based on consistent superiority across a range of validity analyses, IQCODE-SF may be preferable to AD8 for pre-stroke dementia screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Taylor‐Rowan
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical SciencesUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
| | - Lucy McGuire
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical SciencesUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
| | - Melanie Hafdi
- Department of NeurologyUniversity of AmsterdamDuivendrechtUK
| | - Jonathan Evans
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and NursingUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
| | - David J. Stott
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical SciencesUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
| | - Kirsty Wetherall
- Robertson Centre for BiostatisticsUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
| | - Emma Elliott
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical SciencesUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
| | - Bogna Drozdowska
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical SciencesUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
| | - Terence J. Quinn
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical SciencesUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
| |
Collapse
|