1
|
Anderson M, Pitchforth E, Asaria M, Brayne C, Casadei B, Charlesworth A, Coulter A, Franklin BD, Donaldson C, Drummond M, Dunnell K, Foster M, Hussey R, Johnson P, Johnston-Webber C, Knapp M, Lavery G, Longley M, Clark JM, Majeed A, McKee M, Newton JN, O'Neill C, Raine R, Richards M, Sheikh A, Smith P, Street A, Taylor D, Watt RG, Whyte M, Woods M, McGuire A, Mossialos E. LSE-Lancet Commission on the future of the NHS: re-laying the foundations for an equitable and efficient health and care service after COVID-19. Lancet 2021; 397:1915-1978. [PMID: 33965070 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00232-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Anderson
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Emma Pitchforth
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Miqdad Asaria
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Carol Brayne
- Cambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Barbara Casadei
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, BHF Centre of Research Excellence, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Anita Charlesworth
- The Health Foundation, London, UK; College of Social Sciences, Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Angela Coulter
- Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Department of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Bryony Dean Franklin
- UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK; NIHR Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Cam Donaldson
- Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | | | | | - Margaret Foster
- National Health Service Wales Shared Services Partnership, Cardiff, UK
| | | | | | | | - Martin Knapp
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Gavin Lavery
- Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Marcus Longley
- Welsh Institute for Health and Social Care, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK
| | | | - Azeem Majeed
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Martin McKee
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Ciaran O'Neill
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Rosalind Raine
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mike Richards
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK; The Health Foundation, London, UK
| | - Aziz Sheikh
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Peter Smith
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK; Centre for Health Economics and Policy Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Andrew Street
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - David Taylor
- UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK
| | - Richard G Watt
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Moira Whyte
- College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Michael Woods
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Alistair McGuire
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Elias Mossialos
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK; Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sustainable Care in a Familialist Regime: Coping with Elderly Care in Slovenia. SUSTAINABILITY 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/su12208498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
In countries with prevalent family care and less developed care services, it is important to understand the ways families cope with the care needs of their frail family members as part of policy learning to make care systems more sustainable. Filial care is a vital element of family care, yet is significantly restrained by the involvement of carers in the labour market; unequal gender distribution of the care burden; and insufficient recognition of, and policy support, for family care. This article considered the issue of the sustainability of elderly care in a familialist country, Slovenia, by identifying the coping strategies families adopt for the provision of care. To this end, in-depth qualitative data based on a purposeful sample of 55 community-resident users of social home care services and their 55 family carers were used. We identified five external coping strategies: use of formal care services, use of extended family network, use of wider community network, cohabitation, and home adjustments. Among internal strategies, we detected work-related adjustments; abandoning leisure activities; abandoning vacations; establishing new routines; accepting and finding satisfaction in care; increased psychological distress, such as worries and overburdening; and some unmet care recipient needs. Very few strategies may be described as supported by policy actions, despite such support being essential for increasing the sustainability of the family-based care model.
Collapse
|
3
|
Spann A, Vicente J, Allard C, Hawley M, Spreeuwenberg M, de Witte L. Challenges of combining work and unpaid care, and solutions: A scoping review. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2020; 28:699-715. [PMID: 31845451 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2019] [Revised: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 11/21/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
The number of people who combine work and unpaid care is increasing rapidly as more people need care, public and private care systems are progressively under pressure and more people are required to work for longer. Without adequate support, these working carers may experience detrimental effects on their well-being. To adequately support working carers, it is important to first understand the challenges they face. A scoping review was carried out, using Arksey and O'Malley's framework, to map the challenges of combining work and care and solutions described in the literature to address these challenges. The search included academic and grey literature between 2008 and 2018 and was conducted in April 2018, using electronic academic databases and reference list checks. Ninety-two publications were mapped, and the content analysed thematically. A conceptual framework was derived from the analysis which identified primary challenges (C1), directly resulting from combining work and care, primary solutions (S1) aiming to address these, secondary challenges (C2) resulting from solutions and secondary solutions (S2) aiming to address secondary challenges. Primary challenges were: (a) high and/or competing demands; (b) psychosocial/-emotional stressors; (c) distance; (d) carer's health; (e) returning to work; and (f) financial pressure. This framework serves to help those aiming to support working carers to better understand the challenges they face and those developing solutions for the challenges of combining work and care to consider potential consequences or barriers. Gaps in the literature have been identified and discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Spann
- Centre for Assistive Technology and Connected Healthcare, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Joana Vicente
- Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden
| | - Camille Allard
- Department of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Mark Hawley
- Centre for Assistive Technology and Connected Healthcare, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Marieke Spreeuwenberg
- Research Centre Technology in Care, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Luc de Witte
- Centre for Assistive Technology and Connected Healthcare, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Diminic S, Hielscher E, Harris MG. Caring hours and possible need for employment support among primary carers for adults with mental illness: Results from an Australian household survey. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2019; 27:e837-e849. [PMID: 31298456 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2018] [Revised: 05/30/2019] [Accepted: 06/20/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Intensive unpaid caring is associated with greater likelihood of not being employed, but impacts for mental health carers specifically remain unknown. This study aimed to: (a) examine the association between caring intensity and not being employed for primary mental health carers, (b) ascertain whether this relationship differs from that for other disability carers, (c) enumerate Australian primary mental health carers with a possible need for employment support and (d) describe these carers' unmet support needs and barriers to employment. Co-resident, working age primary mental health (n = 137) and other disability carers (n = 821) were identified in the Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers (collected July-December 2015). Multiple logistic regression analyses examined associations between levels of caring intensity (1-9, 10-19, 20-39, 40+ hr/week) and not being employed. A 'possible need for employment support' indicator was derived from information about current employment status, caring hours, past impact of caring on employment and desire for more work or workplace accommodations. After controlling for demographic and caring role factors, mental health carers providing 40+ hr of care weekly had greater odds of not being employed compared to carers providing <10 hr (AOR 13.38, 95% CI: 2.17-82.39). For other disability carers, the odds of not being employed were also higher among those providing 20-39 hr of care (AOR 3.21, 95% CI: 2.18-4.73). An estimated 54.1% (95% CI: 43.1-64.8) of carers had a possible need for employment support, with the proportion increasing as level of caring intensity increased. Of carers who were not employed, 42.2% (95% CI: 30.3-55.0) reported a desire to work, and the main reported barrier was no alternative care arrangements or disruption to the person supported. Findings suggest that improving employment participation for mental health carers requires a greater balance between unpaid care and access to formal services for people with mental illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Diminic
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Policy and Epidemiology Group, Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Emily Hielscher
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Policy and Epidemiology Group, Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Brisbane, Australia
- Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Meredith G Harris
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Policy and Epidemiology Group, Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Oliva-Moreno J, Peña-Longobardo LM, García-Mochón L, del Río Lozano M, Mosquera Metcalfe I, García-Calvente MDM. The economic value of time of informal care and its determinants (The CUIDARSE Study). PLoS One 2019; 14:e0217016. [PMID: 31112587 PMCID: PMC6529156 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The main aims of this paper are to analyse the monetary value of informal care time using different techniques and to identify significant variables associated with the number of caregiving hours. Data and methods A multicentre study in two Spanish regions in adult caregivers was conducted. A total sample of 604 people was available. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify the variables associated with the number of hours of caregiving time. In the monetary valuation of informal care provided, three approaches were used: replacement cost method, opportunity cost and contingent valuation (willingness to pay and willingness to accept). Results The main determinants of the amount of time of informal care provided were age, gender, the level of care receiver´s dependence and the professional care services received (at home and out of home). The value estimated for informal care time ranges from EUROS 80,247 (replacement cost method) to EUROS 14,325 (willingness to pay), with intermediate values of EUROS 27,140 and EUROS 29,343 (opportunity cost and willingness to accept, respectively). Several sensitivity analyses were performed over the base cases, confirming the previous results. Conclusions Time of informal care represents a great social value, regardless of the applied technique. However, the results can differ strongly depending on the technique chosen. Therefore, the choice of technique of valuation is not neutral. Among the determinants of informal care time, the professional care received at home has a complementary character to informal care, while the formal care outside the home has a substitute character.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Oliva-Moreno
- University of Castilla-La Mancha, Department of Economic Analysis and Seminar of Research on Economics and Health (SIES), Toledo, Spain
| | - Luz María Peña-Longobardo
- University of Castilla-La Mancha, Department of Economic Analysis and Seminar of Research on Economics and Health (SIES), Toledo, Spain
- * E-mail:
| | - Leticia García-Mochón
- Andalusian School of Public Health (EASP), Granada, Spain
- Biomedical Research Centre (ibs.GRANADA), Granada, Spain
| | - María del Río Lozano
- Andalusian School of Public Health (EASP), Granada, Spain
- Biomedical Research Centre (ibs.GRANADA), Granada, Spain
| | - Isabel Mosquera Metcalfe
- University of Basque Country, Department of Sociology and Research Group on social determinants of health and demographic change (OPIK), Gipuzkoa, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Diminic S, Hielscher E, Harris MG. Employment disadvantage and associated factors for informal carers of adults with mental illness: are they like other disability carers? BMC Public Health 2019; 19:587. [PMID: 31096961 PMCID: PMC6524279 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-6822-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2018] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Providing unpaid support to family and friends with disabling health conditions can limit a carer's capacity to participate in employment. The emotional support needs and unpredictability of caring for people with mental illness may be particularly demanding. While previous research suggests variable employment rates across carers for different conditions, there are limited data on mental health carers specifically. METHODS This study analysed employment patterns for working-age, co-resident carers of adults with mental illness in an Australian cross-sectional household survey, the 2015 Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers. RESULTS Significantly more mental health carers were not employed (42.3%, 95% CI: 36.6-48.1) compared to non-carers (24.0%, 95% CI: 23.5-24.6). Employed mental health carers were more likely to work fewer than 16 h per week (carers: 17.2%, 95% CI: 12.8-22.8, vs. non-carers: 11.7%, 95% CI: 11.3-12.1) and in lower skilled occupations (carers: 22.6, 95% CI: 17.5-28.7, vs. non-carers: 15.7, 95% CI: 15.1-16.2). Among the sub-group of primary mental health carers, 25.8% (95% CI: 15.6-39.5) had reduced their working hours to care and a further 26.4% (95% CI: 17.2-38.2) stopped working altogether. In corresponding comparisons between mental health carers and carers for people with other cognitive/behavioural conditions, and physical conditions with or without secondary mental illness, there were no differences except that mental health carers were more likely to be working in a lower skilled occupation than other cognitive/behavioural condition carers (14.8% of the latter, 95% CI 10.1-21.2). Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that female mental health carers were less likely to be employed if they were aged 35-54, had no post-secondary education, had a disability, or cared for someone with severe activity limitations. For male mental health carers, having a disability or caring for someone with severe limitations or who did not receive paid assistance were significantly associated with not being employed. CONCLUSIONS These results highlight the employment disadvantage experienced by mental health carers compared to non-carers, and similarities in employment patterns across carers for different conditions. Improving the availability of paid support services for people with mental illness may be an important target to assist carers to maintain their own employment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Diminic
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. .,Policy and Epidemiology Group, Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, The Park - Centre for Mental Health, Locked Bag 500, Archerfield QLD, Brisbane, 4108, Australia.
| | - Emily Hielscher
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Policy and Epidemiology Group, Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, The Park - Centre for Mental Health, Locked Bag 500, Archerfield QLD, Brisbane, 4108, Australia.,Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Meredith G Harris
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Policy and Epidemiology Group, Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, The Park - Centre for Mental Health, Locked Bag 500, Archerfield QLD, Brisbane, 4108, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pickard L, King D, Brimblecombe N, Knapp M. Public expenditure costs of carers leaving employment in England, 2015/2016. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2018; 26:e132-e142. [PMID: 28905485 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/29/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
In the context of global population ageing, the reconciliation of employment and unpaid caring is becoming an important social issue. The estimation of the public expenditure costs of carers leaving employment is a valuable measure that is of considerable interest to policy makers. In 2012, the Personal Social Services Research Unit estimated that the public expenditure costs of unpaid carers leaving employment in England were approximately £1.3 billion a year, based on the costs of Carer's Allowance and lost tax revenues on forgone incomes. However, this figure was known to be an underestimate partly because it did not include other key benefits that carers who have given up work to care may receive. This paper presents a new estimate of the public expenditure costs of carers leaving employment. Key sources of information are the 2009/2010 Survey of Carers in Households, 2011 Census and 2015/2016 costs data. As well as Carer's Allowance, the estimate also now includes the costs of other benefits that carers leaving work may receive, namely, Income Support and Housing Benefit. The results show that the estimated numbers of carers who have left employment because of caring have increased from approximately 315,000 to 345,000. Due mainly to the inclusion of a wider range of benefits, the public expenditure costs of carers leaving employment in England are now estimated at £2.9 billion a year. The new estimate comprises £1.7 billion in social security benefits paid to people who have left their jobs because of unpaid caring, plus another £1.2 billion in taxes forgone on this group's lost earnings. The paper concludes that, if there was greater public investment in social care, such as "replacement care" to support carers in employment, and fewer carers then left employment, public spending on benefits would be lower and revenues from taxation would be higher.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Pickard
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), London, UK
| | - Derek King
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), London, UK
| | - Nicola Brimblecombe
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), London, UK
| | - Martin Knapp
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yeandle S, Buckner L. Older Workers and Care-Giving in England: the Policy Context for Older Workers' Employment Patterns. J Cross Cult Gerontol 2017; 32:303-321. [PMID: 28776116 PMCID: PMC5557863 DOI: 10.1007/s10823-017-9332-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
This article considers recent changes in the incidence of caring among people aged 50-64 in England and the policy context in which these have occurred. After introducing the topic, research questions addressed and methods used, it outlines findings from other research on how older workers experience and manage caring roles. It then sets out relevant public policy developments since carers were first accorded rights to recognition and services in 1995, focusing on workplace support, local services and financial help for people who reduce or quit their paid work to care. The article presents new analyses of the population censuses conducted in England in 2001 and 2011, focusing on people aged 50-64 and especially on those aged 60-64, the group in which the largest changes were seen. Theses show growth in caring at higher levels of intensity for older workers, and increases in the incidence of caring alongside paid work. To deepen understanding of these changes, the analysis also draws on data from a government survey of carers conducted in 2009-10. The concluding discussion argues that although the modest policy changes implemented since 1995 have provided some support to older workers managing work and care, more policy attention needs to be given following the sharp increase in the incidence of caring seen among people aged 50-64 in England between 2001 and 2011.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue Yeandle
- Department of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield, Elmfield, Northumberland Road, Sheffield, S10 2TU, UK.
| | - Lisa Buckner
- School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Al-Janabi H, Carmichael F, Oyebode J. Informal care: choice or constraint? Scand J Caring Sci 2017; 32:157-167. [PMID: 28401583 PMCID: PMC5873411 DOI: 10.1111/scs.12441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2016] [Accepted: 01/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background ‘Choice’ is increasingly pursued as a goal of social policy. However, the degree to which choice is exercised when entering an informal caring role is open to debate. Aim In this study, we examined the degree of choice and constraint in entering a caring role, and the relationship between choice and carers’ well‐being. Methods Data were derived from 1100 responses to a postal survey conducted in a British city. Statistical tests of association and multivariable regression modelling were applied to study the factors associated with choice in entering a caring role and the association that choice in entering a caring role had with carers’ well‐being. Results We found that informal care was generally perceived to be a free choice, albeit in most cases, a choice was also constrained by duty, financial or social resources. Having a sense of free choice in entering care was strongly and positively associated with the carer's well‐being. Conclusion The study findings are consistent with a view that enabling individuals to have more choice in their caring roles may be beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hareth Al-Janabi
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Jan Oyebode
- Faculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Brimblecombe N, Pickard L, King D, Knapp M. Perceptions of unmet needs for community social care services in England. A comparison of working carers and the people they care for. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2017; 25:435-446. [PMID: 26806296 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/26/2015] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Previous UK research has found expressed unmet need for services by unpaid working carers and among disabled and older people. There are, however, suggestions from research that views on unmet needs for services differ between carers and care-recipients. Working carers in the UK say that the care-recipient is sometimes reluctant to accept services and the few international comparative dyad studies that have been carried out find that carers perceive higher unmet need than care-recipients. Recent policy discussions in England have also recognised that there may be differences of opinion. We collected data in 2013 from working carer/care-recipient dyads in England about perceived need for services for the care-recipient, disability, unpaid care hour provision and individual and socio-demographic characteristics. We find that care-recipients as well as their carers perceive high unmet need for services, although carers perceive higher unmet need. For carers, unmet need is associated with the disability of the carer-recipient and being the daughter or son of the care-recipient; for care-recipients it is associated with unpaid care hours, carers' employment status and carers' health. The majority of dyads agree on need for services, and agreement is higher when the working carer provides care for 10 hours or more hours a week. Services for care-recipients may enable working carers to remain in employment so agreement on needs for services supports the implementation of legislation, policy and practice that has a duty to, or aims to, support carer's employment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Brimblecombe
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics & Political Science, London, UK
| | - Linda Pickard
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics & Political Science, London, UK
| | - Derek King
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics & Political Science, London, UK
| | - Martin Knapp
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics & Political Science, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|