What does body configuration in microgravity tell us about the contribution of intra- and extrapersonal frames of reference for motor control?

Exploration and motor activity in juvenile and adult rats exposed to hypergravity at 1.8 G during development: a preliminary report

Pups from gestating rats exposed to hypergravity (1.8 G) or to normal gravity at the perinatal period were evaluated for motor activity, exploration and social interactions during juvenile and adult stages. By comparison to controls, the hypergravity group had shorter latencies before choosing a maze arm in a T-maze and a lower number of exploratory pokes in a hole board. During dyadic encounters, the hypergravity group had a lower number of self-grooming episodes and shorter latencies before crossing under the opposing rat. In contrast, no intergroup differences were observed during exploration of an elevated plus-maze and a light-dark box. These results indicate that exposure to 1.8 G during development appears to decrease exploratory tendencies in the hole board and fear-related responses in T-maze and social interaction tests.

Motor coordination in weightless conditions revealed by long-term microgravity adaptation

The functional approach to studying human motor systems attempts to give a better understanding of the processes behind planning movements and their coordinated performance by relying on weightlessness as a particularly enlightening experimental condition. Indeed, quantitative monitoring of sensorimotor adaptation of subjects exposed to weightlessness outlines the functional role of gravity in motor and postural organization. The recent accessibility of the MIR Space Station has allowed for the first time experimental quantitative kinematic analysis of long-term sensorimotor and postural adaptation to the weightless environment though opto-electronic techniques. In the frame of the EUROMIR'95 Mission, two protocols of voluntary posture perturbation (erect posture, EP; forward trunk bending, FTB) were carried out during four months of microgravity exposure. Results show that postural strategies for quasistatic body orientation in weightlessness are based on the alignment of geometrical body axes (head and trunk) along external references. A proper whole body positioning appears to be recovered only after months of microgravity exposure. By contrast, typically, terrestrial strategies of co-ordination between movement and posture are promptly restored and used when performing motor activities in the weightless environment. This result is explained under the assumption that there may be different sensorimotor integration processes for static and dynamic postural function and that the organisation of coordinated movement might rely stably on egocentric references and kinematics synergies for motor control.