Conditioned responses are indeed conditioned

Classical conditioning: The new hegemony

Converging data from different disciplines are showing the role of classical conditioning processes in the elaboration of human and animal behavior to be larger than previously supposed. Restricted views of classically conditioned responses as merely secretory, reflexive, or emotional are giving way to a broader conception that includes problem-solving, and other rule-governed behavior thought to be the exclusive province of either operant conditiońing or cognitive psychology. These new views have been accompanied by changes in the way conditioning is conducted and evaluated. Data from a number of seemingly unrelated phenomena such as relapse to drug abuse by postaddicts, the placebo effect, and the immune response appear to involve classical conditioning processes. Classical conditioning, moreover, has been found to occur in simpler and simpler organisms and recently even demonstrated in brain slices and in utero. This target article will integrate the several research areas that have used the classical conditioning process as an explanatory model; it will challenge teleological interpretations of the classically conditioned CR and offer some basic principles for testing conditioning in diverse areas.

Classical Conditioning: Still Going Strong

This paper summarizes developments in the field of classical conditioning. Attention is paid to four common misconceptions of what is classical conditioning. First, classical conditioning does not ensue as a simple result of temporal pairing of conditioned and unconditioned stimuli. Rather, conditioned reacting occurs if and to the degree that the subject is able to predict the occurrence of one stimulus from the presence of another one. Second, what is learned during classical conditioning is not necessarily a response to a cue, but rather a probabilistic relationship between various stimuli. Third, classical conditioning is not only manifested in responses mediated by the autonomic nervous system, but also in immunological parameters, in motoric behaviour and in evaluative judgments. Fourth, the nature of the conditioned and the unconditioned stimulus is (often) not a matter of indifference: particular combinations of CS and US produce more powerful conditioning effects than do other combinations. In the second part of the paper, the potential relevance of these developments is illustrated. Discussions are included about anxiety, addictions and food aversions/conditioned nausea.

Behaviorally conditioned immunosuppression using cyclosporine A: central nervous system reduces IL-2 production via splenic innervation

Bi-directional interactions between the central nervous system (CNS) and immune system are demonstrated by the modification of immune function using behavioral conditioning. However, the mechanisms by which the CNS achieves conditioned immunomodulation are still in question. Here, we report that the immunosuppressive effects of cyclosporine A (CsA) can be behaviorally conditioned in rats using saccharin as a gustatory conditioned stimulus. The conditioned effects were compared to control groups that received CsA paired with water (sham-conditioned), CsA injection on test days (CsA-treated), and unhandled rats (untreated). In conditioned animals, the mitogen-induced lymphocyte proliferation in the spleen is significantly suppressed, and the survival time of heterotopic heart allografts prolonged. These effects are paralleled by conditioned inhibition of IL-2 and IFN-gamma synthesis by splenocytes. Furthermore, the CNS-induced immunosuppression is mediated neuronally and not via the blood, since the conditioned reduction of proliferation and cytokine production is completely abrogated after surgical denervation of the spleen. Thus, during conditioning, the CNS learns to reinstate at demand a CsA-like immunosuppression via splenic innervation. This might be used as a supportive therapy for controlling immune functions.

Conditioned taste aversion produced by cyclosporine A: concomitant reduction in lymphoid organ weight and splenocyte proliferation

The classical conditioning of immune parameters is commonly conducted within a conditioned taste aversion (CTA) paradigm. In this study, the immunosuppressive drug cyclosporine A (CsA) was investigated for its ability to produce both taste aversion to a novel stimulus and conditioned alterations in immune functioning. The paradigm comprised the pairing of a 0.2% saccharin solution (the conditioned stimulus; CS) with an intraperitoneal injection of 20 mg/kg CsA (the unconditioned stimulus; UCS). Upon saccharin re-presentation, a marked reduction in fluid consumption was observed, indicating aversion to the novel substance (=CTA). By using a single CsA/saccharin pairing the CTA lasted for one CS representation. However, by implementing three pairings, this effect could be extended for up to seven representations. No noticeable difference was recorded by adjusting the saccharin representation from every consecutive day to every second day. The most effective paradigm in creating CTA was subsequently investigated for its effectiveness in producing conditioned immune alterations. Animals were killed on the day of the third CS re-presentation, and immune functions assessed. Conditioned animals displayed a significant reduction in thymus and spleen weights. Effects on the spleen were further investigated, revealing a significantly reduced proliferative ability of isolated splenocytes to concanavalin A. These results demonstrate that the physiological effects produced by CsA are sufficiently salient to elicit CTA. Furthermore, the reduction in lymphoid organ weight and splenocyte proliferation induced by CsA are also conditionable using this paradigm.

Stress, distress, and immunity

Since psychoimmunology is now 10 to 20 years of age, it seems appropriate to expect a certain maturity in the field. It seems reasonably well established that there really is neuroimmunomodulation. The biological and medical importance of this is the possible influence of psychological factors on immune competence. Inasmuch as it is reasonably well established that psychological factors do have such an influence, the field must now endeavor to establish how important this influence is. It no longer suffices to show that some sort of stressor has some sort of action on some part of the immune cascade of responses. "Stressors" do not act indiscriminately; they are filtered and interpreted by the brain following psychological principles that again are reasonably well known. The distinction between "stress" and "distress" is important for the health consequences of how and with what success an individual is handling a stressful situation. Concepts such as coping, control, helplessness, and hopelessness are required to understand how immune responses are influenced by the brain and to establish the extent to which these mechanisms have clinical validity in man and animals.

A behavioral augmentation of natural immunity: odor specificity supports a Pavlovian conditioning model

BALB/c mice were conditioned by pairing an odor to an injection of poly-inosinic:poly-cytidylic acid (poly I:C), a strong inducer of natural killer (NK) cell activity as the unconditioned stimulus (US). When later reexposed to the odor conditioning stimulus (CS), these mice showed a conditioned augmentation of the NK cell response to a suboptimal dose of 1 microgram poly I:C. The two stimuli used in these studies were camphor (Ca) and citronella oil (Cr) odors, two chemically-related but distinct odor stimuli. The conditioned mice demonstrated the ability to discriminate between Ca and Cr, such that the conditioned response (CR) was only elicited by the odor CS used in the formation of the conditioned association. Exposure of conditioned mice to the non-associated odor stimulus on the test day did not elicit a change in the NK cell response to the suboptimal dose of poly I:C when compared to mice in the US group that had been given the US on day 0 without pairing to either odor stimulus. This specificity of the CR for the odor CS and not the unassociated odor stimulus supports the interpretation that the elevation of NK cell activity in this paradigm is due to Pavlovian conditioning and therefore dependent on central nervous system (CNS) associative processes.