Primate handedness: The other theory, the other hand and the other attitude

Limb Preference in Animals: New Insights into the Evolution of Manual Laterality in Hominids

Until the 1990s, the notion of brain lateralization—the division of labor between the two hemispheres—and its more visible behavioral manifestation, handedness, remained fiercely defined as a human specific trait. Since then, many studies have evidenced lateralized functions in a wide range of species, including both vertebrates and invertebrates. In this review, we highlight the great contribution of comparative research to the understanding of human handedness’ evolutionary and developmental pathways, by distinguishing animal forelimb asymmetries for functionally different actions—i.e., potentially depending on different hemispheric specializations. Firstly, lateralization for the manipulation of inanimate objects has been associated with genetic and ontogenetic factors, with specific brain regions’ activity, and with morphological limb specializations. These could have emerged under selective pressures notably related to the animal locomotion and social styles. Secondly, lateralization for actions directed to living targets (to self or conspecifics) seems to be in relationship with the brain lateralization for emotion processing. Thirdly, findings on primates’ hand preferences for communicative gestures accounts for a link between gestural laterality and a left-hemispheric specialization for intentional communication and language. Throughout this review, we highlight the value of functional neuroimaging and developmental approaches to shed light on the mechanisms underlying human handedness.

Manual exploratory procedures and asymmetries for a haptic search task: a comparison between capuchins (Cebus apella) and humans

Left-hand preferences in monkeys (capuchins, macaques) for haptic discriminations have been taken to indicate that the right hemisphere is more involved than the left hemisphere in solving these tasks. We confirmed this left-hand bias in a group of 21 capuchins haptically searching for sunflower seeds located in crevices in 12 different objects (Lacreuse & Fragaszy, 1996). In an attempt to specify the relations of the left-hand bias to hand performance and hemispheric lateralisation, we analysed the manual exploratory procedures used by the subjects when exploring the objects, and compared them to those of humans confronted with the same task. All the hand-movement patterns displayed by humans were also observed in capuchins, but humans performed exhaustive explorations, whereas capuchins restricted their haptic investigations to limited portions of the objects. Both species adopted several ''exploratory procedures'' to investigate particular objects. Although capuchins showed a left-hand preference to perform the task, finer analyses of haptic exploratory procedures revealed no difference in the way the left and right hands explored the objects, nor in the efficiency with which each hand solved the task. Nor was any measurable difference in manual exploratory procedure and efficiency found in humans. The discussion emphasises the need to complement measures of manual preference with finer indices of hemispheric lateralisation, for a better understanding of functional asymmetries in primates.

Skeletal biology, functional asymmetry and the origins of "Handedness"

The past decade has witnessed the (re)emergence of a debate as to whether handedness is apomorphic within hominins. There are both qualitative and quantitative arguments, some which draw non-human primates into the handed sphere and others which exclude them. Ultimate questions concern origins of structural asymmetry of both brain and body and lateralized behaviours with implications for tool use and language. Lateralization is thus an important realm of phylogenetic study, and archaeologists and psychologists alike have sought to identify handedness within material culture. However, hand preference for tool manufacture and use among extant non-human primates, such as Cebus and Pan, suggests that the archaeological record may well be mute regarding the origins of laterality. In this paper, an argument is put forward positioning skeletal biology as a viable approach to the handedness origins issue. Behaviour is a mediator of the complementary processes of geometric modelling (change in size and shape) and histological remodelling (disuse osteopenia; microfracture repair); therefore, directional asymmetry in the pattern of skeletal modelling and remodelling is a putative signal of lateralized activity.

Differences between Caucasians and American Indians on the cognitive laterality battery

Caucasians scored significantly better than American Indian college students on verbal-sequential tests, but not on visuospatial tests, of Gordon's Cognitive Laterality Battery (CLB). Caucasians scored more right-biased than American Indians on the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI). The effects of percentage of Native American ancestry, strategy employed to recall serial sounds, bilingualism, familial sinistrality and handedness laterality on test performance were also analyzed. Results are consistent with hypotheses drawn from Annett's genetic theory of human laterality, if frequency distributions for the hypothesized rs+ gene are assumed to vary across the parent populations from which the samples were drawn.