Lateral sagittal infraclavicular block is a clinically effective block in children:

Sedoanalgesia Versus Infraclavicular Block for Closed Reduction of Pediatric Forearm Fracture in Emergency Department: Prospective Randomized Study

OBJECTIVE

Procedural sedoanalgesia is commonly used in pediatric patients in the emergency department (ED) for interventional procedures, diagnosis, and treatment. However, this method causes serious systemic complications, such as respiratory and cardiac depression. To minimize these complications, ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia methods have been used in recent years. We aimed to compare the use of procedural sedoanalgesia (PSA) and infraclavicular block (ICB) in the pain management of pediatric patients who underwent closed reductions of forearm fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, randomized, clinical study included patients aged 3 to 15 years who presented to the ED with forearm fractures. The patients were divided into 2 groups: the procedural sedoanalgesia group (group PSA, n = 30) and ultrasound-guided ICB group (group ICB, n = 30). Pain scores of the patients were evaluated using the Wong-Baker FACES Scale before and during the procedure. Pain scores and parental and operator satisfaction were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

There was no statistical significance in terms of demographic data. The pain scores observed during the procedures were significantly higher in the group PSA than in the group ICB (3.07 ± 1.55 vs 0.47 ± 0.86, respectively; P < 0.001). The parental and operator satisfaction of the ICB group was significantly higher than that of the PSA group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided ICB is a safe and effective method in the management of pain during closed reduction of forearm fracture in pediatric patients in EDs. It can be used safely in emergency rooms and has a high level of both parental and operator satisfaction.

Ultrasound guidance for deep peripheral nerve blocks: a brief review

Nerve stimulation and ultrasound have been introduced to the practice of regional anesthesia mostly in the last two decades. Ultrasound did not gain as much popularity as the nerve stimulation until a decade ago because of the simplicity, accuracy and portability of the nerve stimulator. Ultrasound is now available in most academic centers practicing regional anesthesia and is a popular tool amongst trainees for performance of nerve blocks. This review article specifically discusses the role of ultrasonography for deeply situated nerves or plexuses such as the infraclavicular block for the upper extremity and lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve blocks for the lower extremity. Transitioning from nerve stimulation to ultrasound-guided blocks alone or in combination is beneficial in certain scenarios. However, not every patient undergoing regional anesthesia technique benefits from the use of ultrasound, especially when circumstances resulting in difficult visualization such as deep nerve blocks and/or block performed by inexperienced ultrasonographers. The use of ultrasound does not replace experience and knowledge of relevant anatomy, especially for visualization of deep structures. In certain scenarios, ultrasound may not offer additional value and substantial amount of time may be spent trying to find relevant structures or even provide a false sense of security, especially to an inexperienced operator. We look at available literature on the role of ultrasound for the performance of deep peripheral nerve blocks and its benefits.