1
|
Sena Silva V, Morilla Romero de la Osa R, Cabezón Ruiz S. Clinical research focused in European adult women with minority diseases: Do we try hard enough? Health Care Women Int 2023; 44:46-60. [PMID: 34635029 DOI: 10.1080/07399332.2021.1944151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
We analyzed the European countries participation in clinical trials addressing to new drug development focused on rare diseases in women comparing to more prevalent diseases as breast cancer. Participation was not associated with type of healthcare system neither socio-economic features, but it was associated with population size. Protocol ratios focused on breast cancer vs. orphan drugs and rare diseases was 15:1 and 9:1, respectively, mainly focused on ovarian cancer. Protocol number was insufficient to evaluate the success of Regulation (EC) 141/2000, it is necessary to increase the scientific quality and the number of really new molecules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rubén Morilla Romero de la Osa
- Department of Nursing, University of Seville, Seville, Andalucía, Spain.,Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío/Superior Council of Scientific Investigations (CSIC)/University of Seville, Seville, Andalucía, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Broadening the application of health technology assessment in the Netherlands: a worthwhile destination but not an easy ride? HEALTH ECONOMICS, POLICY, AND LAW 2021; 16:440-456. [PMID: 32758331 PMCID: PMC8460451 DOI: 10.1017/s1744133120000237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Currently, reimbursement decisions based on health technology assessments (HTA) in the Netherlands mostly concern outpatient pharmaceuticals. The Dutch government aspires to broaden the systematic application of full HTA towards other types of health care in order to optimise the content of the basic benefit package. This paper identifies important challenges for broadening the scope of full HTA to other types of health care. Based on a description of the Dutch reimbursement decision-making process, five important characteristics of outpatient pharmaceuticals were identified, which are all relevant to the successful application of HTA: (i) closed reimbursement system, (ii) absence of alternative policy measures, (iii) existence of marketing authorisation, (iv) identifiable and accountable counterparty, and (v) product characteristics. For a selection of other types of health care, which may be subject to HTA more frequently in the future, deviations from these characteristics of outpatient pharmaceuticals are discussed. The implications of such deviations for performing HTA and the decision-making process are highlighted. It is concluded that broadening the application of HTA will require policy makers to meet both important policy-related and methodological challenges. These challenges differ per health care domain, which may inform policy makers which expansions of the current use of HTA are most feasible.
Collapse
|
3
|
Enzing JJ, Vijgen S, Knies S, Boer B, Brouwer WB. Do economic evaluations of TAVI deal with learning effects, innovation, and context dependency? A review. HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
4
|
Blüher M, Saunders SJ, Mittard V, Torrejon Torres R, Davis JA, Saunders R. Critical Review of European Health-Economic Guidelines for the Health Technology Assessment of Medical Devices. Front Med (Lausanne) 2019; 6:278. [PMID: 31850356 PMCID: PMC6895571 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Accepted: 11/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Health-technology assessment (HTA) is a recognized mechanism to determine the relative benefits of innovative medical technologies. One aspect is their health-economic impact. While the process and methodology for pharmaceuticals is well-established, guidance for medical devices is sparse. Aim: To provide an overview of the health-economic aspect in current European HTA guidelines concerning medical devices and identifying issues raised and potential improvements proposed in recent literature. Methodology: Available guidelines by European agencies were each reviewed and summarized. To complement this, a full systematic review of current literature concerning potential improvements to existing HTA practices for medical devices, from PubMed and EMBASE, was conducted; the focus was on health economics. Authors could only review documents in English, French, or German. The systematic review yielded 518 unique articles concerning HTA for medical devices, 32 of which were considered for full-text review after screening of all abstracts. Results: There is very limited consensus in—and mostly a complete lack of—guidance specific to medical devices in official HTA guidelines, for both clinical and economic analyses. Twenty two of 41 European countries had published official HTA guidance in English, French, or German. Among these only 4 (England, France, the Netherlands, and Sweden) dedicated a chapter or separate document to medical devices. In the literature, there is sufficient evidence to suggest medical devices need to be addressed separately from pharmaceuticals. However, mostly challenges are discussed rather than implementable solutions offered. We present the following set of frequently discussed issues and summarize any solutions that pertain to them: a weak evidence base, learning-curve effects, organizational impact, incremental innovation, diversity of devices, dynamic pricing, and transferability. We further combine reviewed information to suggest a set of possible best practices for health-economic assessment of medical devices. Conclusion: For greater efficiency in medical-device innovation, European agencies should look to (re-)address the specific requirements of medical devices in their HTA guidelines. When both the health-economic and data requirements for the HTA of medical devices are defined, the development of practical solutions will likely follow.
Collapse
|
5
|
How to Deal with the Inevitable: Generating Real-World Data and Using Real-World Evidence for HTA Purposes – From Theory to Action. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2019; 35:346-350. [DOI: 10.1017/s0266462319000400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
AbstractObjectivesReal-world evidence (RWE), derived from real-world data (RWD), is already used, to some extent, for health technology assessment (HTA) purposes. With the increased availability of RWD, there is potential for more widespread use but also challenges ensuring reliable RWE for HTA. Opportunities to overcome key challenges, identified at a scoping meeting, were discussed during the 2019 HTA international (HTAi) Global Policy Forum (GPF).MethodsReflection of discussions using Design Thinking (an interactive process aimed to solve complex problems) between seventy-three representatives from not-for-profit, for-profit organizations, and HTAi leadership. The discussions were informed by a background paper, and presentations from three invited keynote speakers and eleven GPF members.ResultsSeveral options were listed for addressing the identified key challenges: quality and acceptability, governance and accountability, transferability, and informing decision making. The GPF emphasized that the HTA community should first understand what questions could be answered with RWE. Additionally, more clarity on methods, standards, streamlining RWD collection, data sharing across jurisdictions, replication of RWD, and expert analysis were mentioned as important priorities.ConclusionsThe HTA community is currently standing at a cross-road as it is not yet fully equipped to address these key challenges. It is, therefore, time for action. The community should start aligning on what is the best source of evidence according to purpose and how the data should be collected to create reliable evidence. It should also initiate the development of actions and guidance to properly develop and manage RWD/RWE to inform decision making across the technology lifecycle.
Collapse
|
6
|
Sanyal C, Stolee P, Juzwishin D, Husereau D. Economic evaluations of eHealth technologies: A systematic review. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0198112. [PMID: 29897921 PMCID: PMC5999277 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2017] [Accepted: 05/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Innovations in eHealth technologies have the potential to help older adults live independently, maintain their quality of life, and to reduce their health system dependency and health care expenditure. The objective of this study was to systematically review and appraise the quality of cost-effectiveness or utility studies assessing eHealth technologies in study populations involving older adults. METHODS We systematically searched multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, NHS EED, and PsycINFO) for peer-reviewed studies published in English from 2000 to 2016 that examined cost-effectiveness (or utility) of eHealth technologies. The reporting quality of included studies was appraised using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement. RESULTS Eleven full text articles met the inclusion criteria representing public and private health care systems. eHealth technologies evaluated by these studies includes computerized decision support system, a web-based physical activity intervention, internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy, telecare, and telehealth. Overall, the reporting quality of the studies included in the review was varied. Most studies demonstrated efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an intervention using a randomized control trial and statistical modeling, respectively. This review found limited information on the feasibility of adopting these technologies based on economic and organizational factors. CONCLUSIONS This review identified few economic evaluations of eHealth technologies that included older adults. The quality of the current evidence is limited and further research is warranted to clearly demonstrate the long-term cost-effectiveness of eHealth technologies from the health care system and societal perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiranjeev Sanyal
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
| | - Paul Stolee
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
| | - Don Juzwishin
- Health Technology Assessment and Innovation, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Don Husereau
- Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Papadaki M. Adaptation through Collaboration: Developing Novel Platforms to Advance the Delivery of Advanced Therapies to Patients. Front Med (Lausanne) 2017; 4:56. [PMID: 28611985 PMCID: PMC5447030 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2017] [Accepted: 04/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
For the nascent field of advanced therapies, collaboration will be a game-changer, turning scientific progress that was once unimaginable into transformative medical practice. Despite promise for lifelong management and even cure of disease, skepticism remains about the feasibility of their delivery to patients, fueling investment risks. With the potential for long-term effectiveness in need of frequent reassessment, current approaches to predict real-life drug performance bear little relevance, necessitating novel and iterative schemes to monitoring the benefit–risk profiles throughout the life span of advanced therapies. This work explains that reinventing an adoption route for Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products is as much about the scientific and clinical components, as it is about the organizational structures, requiring an unprecedented level of interactions between stakeholders not traditionally connected; from developers and regulators, to payers, patients, and funders. By reflecting on the successes and lessons learned from the growing space of global precompetitive consortia and public–private partnerships, as well as a number of emerging accelerated development pathways, this work aims to inform the foundations for a future roadmap that can smooth the path to approval, reimbursement, and access, while delivering value to all stakeholders. Echoing the growing demands to bring these transformative products to patients, it provides critical insights to enhance our capacity in three fundamental domains: deploying the operational flexibilities offered by the growing space of collaborations, utilizing emerging flexible and accelerated pathways to tackle challenges in quantifying long-term effectiveness, and building the necessary digital and clinical infrastructure for knowledge development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalini Papadaki
- Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Some countries make considerable effort to involve patients and patient groups in their health technology assessment (HTA) processes; others are only just considering or are yet to consider patient involvement in HTA. METHODS This commentary offers four arguments why patient involvement should be prioritized by those HTA agencies that do not yet involve patients: (1) from a patients' rights perspective, (2) based on patient and community values, (3) centering on evidentiary contributions, and (4) from a methodological perspective. RESULTS The first argument builds on the Alma-Ata Declaration, which holds that patients have a right and duty to have a say in the planning and delivery of their health care, individually and collectively. Where HTA is used to determine access to technologies and services, we argue that patients have a right to be heard. The second argues that decisions about treatments and services need to be aligned with the core values and morals of the patients whom the health system serves. The third argues that patients have unique knowledge and insights about living with a health condition and their needs for services and treatments regarding that condition, which can add to the knowledge base and value of the HTA process. The fourth argues that involvement of patients can facilitate methodological advancement of HTA, in areas such as early scientific advice and managed entry with evidence development. CONCLUSIONS An HTA process that includes patient perspectives can, therefore, provide added value to patients, policy makers and healthcare professionals alike.
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Objectives: Health technology assessment (HTA) has to innovate to best support changing health system environments and to help provide access to valuable innovation under fiscal constraint.Methods: Issues associated with changing HTA paradigms were identified through scoping and explored through deliberation at a meeting of industry and HTA leaders.Results: Five broad areas of change (engagement, scientific dialogue, research prioritization, adaptive approaches, and real world data) were identified. The meeting focused on two themes derived from these: re-thinking scientific dialogue and multi-stakeholder engagement, and re-thinking value, affordability, and access. Earlier and ongoing engagement to steer the innovation process and help achieve appropriate use across the technology lifecycle was perceived as important but would be resource intensive and would require priority setting. Patients need to be involved throughout, and particularly at the early stages. Further discussion is needed on the type of body best suited to convening the dialogue required. There was agreement that HTA must continue to assess value, but views differed on the role that HTA should play in assessing affordability and on appropriate responses to challenges around affordability. Enhanced horizon scanning could play an important role in preparing for significant future investments.Conclusions: Early and ongoing multi-stakeholder engagement and revisiting approaches to valuing innovation are required. Questions remain as to the most appropriate role for HTA bodies. Changing HTA paradigms extend HTA's traditional remit of being responsive to decision-makers demands to being more proactive and considering whole system value.
Collapse
|
10
|
Bouvy JC, Jonsson P, Longson C, Crabb N, Garner S. Health Technology Assessment in the Context of Adaptive Pathways for Medicines in Europe: Challenges and Opportunities. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2016; 100:594-597. [DOI: 10.1002/cpt.448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2016] [Revised: 08/09/2016] [Accepted: 08/10/2016] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- JC Bouvy
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); London England United Kingdom
| | - P Jonsson
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); London England United Kingdom
| | - C Longson
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); London England United Kingdom
| | - N Crabb
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); London England United Kingdom
| | - S Garner
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); London England United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ermisch M, Bucsics A, Vella Bonanno P, Arickx F, Bybau A, Bochenek T, van de Casteele M, Diogene E, Fürst J, Garuolienė K, van der Graaff M, Gulbinovič J, Haycox A, Jones J, Joppi R, Laius O, Langner I, Martin AP, Markovic-Pekovic V, McCullagh L, Magnusson E, Nilsen E, Selke G, Sermet C, Simoens S, Sauermann R, Schuurman A, Ramos R, Vlahovic-Palcevski V, Zara C, Godman B. Payers' Views of the Changes Arising through the Possible Adoption of Adaptive Pathways. Front Pharmacol 2016; 7:305. [PMID: 27733828 PMCID: PMC5039228 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2016] [Accepted: 08/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Payers are a major stakeholder in any considerations and initiatives concerning adaptive licensing of new medicinal products, also referred to as Medicines Adaptive Pathways to patients (MAPPs). Firstly, the scope and necessity of MAPPs need further scrutiny, especially with regard to the definition of unmet need. Conditional approval pathways already exist for new medicines for seriously debilitating or life-threatening diseases and only a limited number of new medicines are innovative. Secondly, MAPPs will result in new medicines on the market with limited evidence about their effectiveness and safety. Additional data are to be collected after approval. Consequently, adaptive pathways may increase the risk of exposing patients to ineffective or unsafe medicines. We have already seen medicines approved conventionally that subsequently proved ineffective or unsafe amongst a wider, more co-morbid population as well as medicines that could have been considered for approval under MAPPs but subsequently proved ineffective or unsafe in Phase III trials and were never licensed. Thirdly, MAPPs also put high demands on payers. Routine collection of patient level data is difficult with high transaction costs. It is not clear who will fund these. Other challenges for payers include shifts in the risk governance framework, implications for evaluation and HTA, increased complexity of setting prices, difficulty with ensuring equity in the allocation of resources, definition of responsibility and liability and implementation of stratified use. Exit strategies also need to be agreed in advance, including price reductions, rebates, or reimbursement withdrawals when price premiums are not justified. These issues and concerns will be discussed in detail including potential ways forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Ermisch
- Pharmaceuticals Department, National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Funds Berlin, Germany
| | - Anna Bucsics
- Department of Finance, University of Vienna Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Francis Arickx
- National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance Bruxelles, Belgium
| | | | - Tomasz Bochenek
- Department of Drug Management, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College Krakow, Poland
| | | | - Eduardo Diogene
- Clinical Pharmacology Service, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Fundació Institut Català de Farmacologia Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jurij Fürst
- Medicinal Products Department, Health Insurance Institute of Slovenia Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Kristina Garuolienė
- Department of Pathology, Forensic Medicine and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius UniversityVilnius, Lithuania; Medicines Reimbursement Department, National Health Insurance FundVilnius, Lithuania
| | | | - Jolanta Gulbinovič
- Department of Pathology, Forensic Medicine and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius UniversityVilnius, Lithuania; State Medicines Control AgencyVilnius, Lithuania
| | - Alan Haycox
- Health Economics Centre, University of Liverpool Management School Liverpool, UK
| | - Jan Jones
- Scottish Medicines Consortium Glasgow, UK
| | - Roberta Joppi
- Pharmaceutical Drug Department, Azienda Sanitaria Locale of Verona Verona, Italy
| | - Ott Laius
- State Agency of Medicines Tartu, Estonia
| | - Irene Langner
- Wissenschaftliches Institut der AOK (WIdO) Berlin, Germany
| | - Antony P Martin
- Health Economics Centre, University of Liverpool Management School Liverpool, UK
| | - Vanda Markovic-Pekovic
- Ministry of Health and Social WelfareBanja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina; Department of Social Pharmacy, Medical Faculty, University Banja LukaBanja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Laura McCullagh
- Pharmacoeconomics and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
| | - Einar Magnusson
- Department of Health Services, Ministry of Health Reykjavík, Iceland
| | | | - Gisbert Selke
- Wissenschaftliches Institut der AOK (WIdO) Berlin, Germany
| | - Catherine Sermet
- Institut de Recherche et Documentation en Economie de la Santé (IRDES) Paris, France
| | - Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven Leuven, Belgium
| | - Robert Sauermann
- Department of Pharmaceutical Affairs, Main Association of Austrian Social Insurance Institutions Vienna, Austria
| | - Ad Schuurman
- National Health Care Institute Diemen, Netherlands
| | - Ricardo Ramos
- Health Technology Assessment, Prices and Reimbursement Department, INFARMED - National Authority of Medicines and Health Products, I. P., Parque de Saúde de Lisboa Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Corinne Zara
- Barcelona Health Region, Catalan Health Service Barcelona, Spain
| | - Brian Godman
- Health Economics Centre, University of Liverpool Management SchoolLiverpool, UK; Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of StrathclydeGlasgow, UK; Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital HuddingeStockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fuchs S, Olberg B, Panteli D, Perleth M, Busse R. HTA of medical devices: Challenges and ideas for the future from a European perspective. Health Policy 2016; 121:215-229. [PMID: 27751533 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2016] [Revised: 08/13/2016] [Accepted: 08/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Health Technology Assessment (HTA) of Medical devices (MDs) and MD-based procedures can be challenging due to the unique features and particularities of this group of technologies, such as device-operator interaction. The aim of this study was to (1) clarify, and supplement earlier findings on European HTA institutions' structural, procedural and methodological characteristics with regard to the assessment of MDs and to (2) capture the institutions' perceptions regarding challenges and future trends. METHODS Semi-structured telephone interviews with 16 representatives from leading European HTA institutions were performed between April and July 2015. Summative and directed content analysis was used for the analysis, which is reported according to the COREQ checklist. RESULTS Findings from the analysis of the interviews were manifold and partially confirmed what has been noted in the literature (e.g. scarce evidence; identifying relevant studies challenging due to more incremental innovations). Additional themes emerged that can be important for future considerations by HTA institutions and policy-makers alike (e.g. areas for future research; need for specific tools). CONCLUSIONS The collective opinion of 16 European HTA institutions on MD evaluation could provide ideas to ameliorate the current regulatory situation beyond the modified EU regulation and start broader, more in-depth methodological discussions around the issue. Interviewed experts seem to agree that new approaches such as coverage with evidence development as some countries already introduced could help to overcome the problem with scarce evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Fuchs
- Department of Health Care Management, Berlin University of Technology, Germany.
| | - Britta Olberg
- Department of Health Care Management, Berlin University of Technology, Germany; Medical Consultancy Department, Federal Joint Committee (G-BA), Germany
| | - Dimitra Panteli
- Department of Health Care Management, Berlin University of Technology, Germany
| | - Matthias Perleth
- Department of Health Care Management, Berlin University of Technology, Germany; Medical Consultancy Department, Federal Joint Committee (G-BA), Germany
| | - Reinhard Busse
- Department of Health Care Management, Berlin University of Technology, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Eichler H, Baird LG, Barker R, Bloechl‐Daum B, Børlum‐Kristensen F, Brown J, Chua R, Del Signore S, Dugan U, Ferguson J, Garner S, Goettsch W, Haigh J, Honig P, Hoos A, Huckle P, Kondo T, Le Cam Y, Leufkens H, Lim R, Longson C, Lumpkin M, Maraganore J, O'Rourke B, Oye K, Pezalla E, Pignatti F, Raine J, Rasi G, Salmonson T, Samaha D, Schneeweiss S, Siviero PD, Skinner M, Teagarden JR, Tominaga T, Trusheim MR, Tunis S, Unger TF, Vamvakas S, Hirsch G. From adaptive licensing to adaptive pathways: delivering a flexible life-span approach to bring new drugs to patients. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2015; 97:234-46. [PMID: 25669457 PMCID: PMC6706805 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.59] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2014] [Accepted: 12/04/2014] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The concept of adaptive licensing (AL) has met with considerable interest. Yet some remain skeptical about its feasibility. Others argue that the focus and name of AL should be broadened. Against this background of ongoing debate, we examine the environmental changes that will likely make adaptive pathways the preferred approach in the future. The key drivers include: growing patient demand for timely access to promising therapies, emerging science leading to fragmentation of treatment populations, rising payer influence on product accessibility, and pressure on pharma/investors to ensure sustainability of drug development. We also discuss a number of environmental changes that will enable an adaptive paradigm. A life-span approach to bringing innovation to patients is expected to help address the perceived access vs. evidence trade-off, help de-risk drug development, and lead to better outcomes for patients.
Collapse
|