DOSAGE AND DURATION OF ETANERCEPT THERAPY FOR ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS: A META-ANALYSIS

Disease activity guided stepwise tapering or discontinuation of rhTNFR:Fc, an etanercept biosimilar, in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicentric study

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate disease-activity-guided stepwise tapering or discontinuation of rhTNFR:Fc, an etanercept biosimilar, in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicentric study.

Methods

Active AS patients with AS disease activity score (ASDAS) ⩾2.1 recruited from 10 hospitals were treated with rhTNFR:Fc 50 mg weekly for 12 weeks, and further randomized into different tapering or discontinuation groups according to ASDAS at week 12. Patients who achieved clinical remission (ASDAS < 1.3) were assigned randomly to stepwise tapering group or discontinuation group. Patients who achieved low disease activity (LDA, 1.3⩽ASDAS < 2.1) were assigned randomly to stepwise tapering, delayed tapering, or discontinuation group. All patients were evaluated every 12 weeks until week 48. The primary endpoint was cumulative flare rates in different groups at week 48.

Results

A total of 311 patients were enrolled with an average ASDAS of 3.6 ± 1.0, and 259 completed 12 weeks of rhTNFR:Fc induction therapy, with 148 patients (57.1%) achieved clinical remission, 100 (38.6%) achieved LDA, and 11 (4.3%) remained as high disease activity (ASDAS⩾2.1). In patients who achieved clinical remission at week 12, stepwise tapering of rhTNFR:Fc demonstrated significantly lower flare rates at each evaluation compared with discontinuation. In patients who achieved LDA, there was no significant difference of flare rates between stepwise tapering, delayed tapering, and discontinuation. With stepwise tapering of rhTNFR:Fc, flare rates were comparable in AS patients, irrespective of initial ASDAS before tapering.

Conclusion

Stepwise tapering of rhTNFR:Fc when patients achieved clinical remission was able to maintain favorable low flare rates in 48 weeks. LDA was an alternative therapeutic target, as well as an viable timing for initiation of rhTNFR:Fc tapering. rhTNFR:Fc 25 mg monthly maintained flare-free status in a considerable number of patients. However, abrupt discontinuation of rhTNFR:Fc even if patients achieved clinical remission should be avoided.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03880968,URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03880968.

Health state utility values of osteoporotic fractures among Korean women

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate health state utility values in eight health states related to osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures using time trade-off (TTO) technique among postmenopausal Korean women.Methods: Scenarios describing eight health states including osteoporosis and hip, vertebral, post-hip, post-vertebral, ankle, humerus, and wrist fractures were developed and presented to 500 female participants aged 45 to 59 years who were selected with probability proportionate to age group and region for this investigation. Each health states valuation was derived using the trade-off (TTO) technique. Ten years of a given health state was traded off with a shorter length of time in full health.Results: Mean scores of each state were calculated. Osteoporosis scored the highest (0.669 ± 0.155), followed by wrist fracture (0.656 ± 0.151). Hip (0.298 ± 0.158) and vertebral (0.298 ± 0.160) fractures were found to be the worst health states. Post-hip (0.446 ± 0.159) and post-vertebral fractures (0.455 ± 0.160) were also considered undesirable states. All fractures were associated with disutilities, ranging from a mean of -0.013 to -0.371. These values were statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Hip and vertebral fractures are among the most serious consequences of osteoporotic fractures.Conclusions: The vertebral and hip fractures marked the lowest utility scores among post-menopausal women in Korea.

Estimation of Health Utilities Based on the Response to Treatment in Atopic Dermatitis: a Population-based Study

PURPOSE

This study estimated utility weights based on the response to treatment for atopic dermatitis in the general population.

METHODS

The Korean general population aged 20-60 years was stratified by using a random sampling method based on age and sex. Two hypothetical health states of atopic dermatitis were developed: response to treatment and no response to treatment. Health utility values were estimated by using time trade-off (TTO) based on a period of 10 years, TTO based on life expectancy, and EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) including a visual analog scale (VAS). The mean utility value and 95% CI were derived, and comparisons of subgroups using the t test and ANOVA were performed. We conducted a multilevel analysis after controlling the sociodemographic variables to consider repeated measures.

FINDINGS

A total of 155 participants were included in the survey. Their mean age was 39.7 years; 58.7% of participants were women. The mean health utility values for response and no response using TTO based on 10 years were 0.847 and 0.380, respectively. The estimated health utility values of response and no response were 0.865 and 0.476 using TTO based on life expectancy, and 0.814 and 0.279 using EQ-5D. For VAS, the response and no response were 0.744 and 0.322. After controlling the covariates, the important factors that affected utility values were response and no response to treatment (P < 0.001).

IMPLICATIONS

This study showed that the utility weights of people with no response to atopic dermatitis treatment were lower compared with response from the general population. Health care providers should therefore consider symptom control as an important factor affecting the quality of life of those with atopic dermatitis.

Clinical and MRI response to dose reduction of an etanercept-biosimilar for hip arthritis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: an observational, retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Hip arthritis plays a critical role in the prognosis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Dose reduction of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors preserves general improvement of AS, so this study attempted to examine the equivalence between Yisaipu® tapering and conventional therapy for hip arthritis in AS patients, using clinical parameters and magnetic resonance image (MRI).

METHODS

AS patients received this etanercept-biosimilar injections (50 mg/week) in the first 12 weeks. Participants in the tapering group were treated with this reagent 50 mg every other week from week 13 to week 24, while the control group kept undergoing full-dose therapy. Clinical and laboratory parameters were assessed at baseline, week 12 and week 24. MRI examination of hip was performed at baseline and week 24.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-six patients were enrolled, and 80 of them were in the tapering group. Linear mixed model revealed that main effects of tapering group with control group as reference in disease activity parameters were insignificant (p > 0.05). Main effects of baseline with week 24 as reference were significant (p < 0.05), but main effects of week 12 with week 24 as reference were not (p > 0.05). Prevalence of acute inflammatory change in MRI significantly decreased in the tapering group (76.88% vs 20.00%, p < 0.05) and control group (76.79% vs 19.64%, p < 0.05). Influence of both treatments on acute inflammatory change was equivalent (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Efficacy of Yisaipu® tapering treatment is comparable to the full-dose therapy for hip arthritis in AS patients. Both treatments maintain remission of hip arthritis after patients achieved low disease activity.