MODEL-BASED COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF CONVENTIONAL AND INNOVATIVE CHEMO-RADIATION IN LUNG CANCER

Cone beam CT-guided navigation bronchoscopy: a cost-effective alternative to CT-guided transthoracic biopsy for diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary nodules

Objectives

To determine if cone beam CT-guided navigation bronchoscopy (CBCT-NB) is a cost-effective diagnostic procedure in patients with a pulmonary nodule (PN) with an intermediate risk for lung cancer.

Materials and methods

Two decision analytical models were developed to compare the long-term costs, survival and quality of life. In the first model, CBCT-NB was compared with CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy (TTNB) in TTNB eligible patients. In the second model, CBCT-NB was compared with direct treatment (without pathology proven lung cancer) in patients for whom TTNB is not suitable. Input data were gathered in-house, from literature and expert opinion. Effects were expressed in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Sensitivity analyses were used to assess uncertainty.

Results

CBCT-NB can be cost-effective in TTNB eligible patients with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €18 416 in an expert setting. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that in 69% and 90% of iterations CBCT-NB remained cost-effective assuming a willingness to pay (WTP) of €20 000 and €80 000 per QALY. CBCT-NB dominated in the treatment strategy in which TTNB is not suitable. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that in 95% of iterations CBCT-NB remained the dominant strategy, and CBCT-NB remained cost-effective in 100% of iterations assuming a WTP limit of €20 000. In the comparison between CBCT NB and TTNB, the deterministic sensitivity analysis showed that the diagnostic properties and costs of both procedures have a large impact on the outcome.

Conclusions

CBCT-NB seems a cost-effective procedure when compared with TTNB and when compared with a direct treatment strategy in patients with an intermediate risk PN.

Economic Evaluation of Budesonide Orodispersible Tablets for the Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Cost-Utility Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Budesonide orodispersible tablets (BOT) have been approved in Europe and Canada for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), a rare and chronic disease. The objective of this study was to assess the economic impact of BOT on both the induction and maintenance of clinico-pathological remission of EoE by performing a cost-utility analysis (CUA).

METHODS

For both the induction and maintenance settings, BOT was compared to no treatment in a target population of adult patients with EoE non-responsive to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment. Markov models were developed for the induction and maintenance settings over 52-week and life-time horizons, respectively. Analyses were performed from both a Canadian Ministry of Health (MoH) and societal perspective. The resulting incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs) were compared to a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $50,000 Canadian dollars/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Sensitivity and scenario analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the base-case results.

RESULTS

In the base-case probabilistic analysis, BOT compared to no treatment resulted in an ICUR of $1073/QALY and $30,555/QALY from a MoH perspective in the induction and maintenance settings, respectively. BOT was a cost-effective option for both induction and maintenance in > 99% of Monte Carlo simulations. In the scenario analyses, the deterministic ICUR of BOT compared to no treatment varied from $682/QALY to $8510/QALY in the induction setting and $21,005/QALY to $55,157/QALY in the maintenance setting.

CONCLUSION

BOT was cost-effective compared to no treatment for both the induction and maintenance of clinico-pathological remission of EoE in patients non-responsive to PPIs.

Development of an isotoxic decision support system integrating genetic markers of toxicity for the implantation of a rectum spacer

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies revealed that dose escalated radiotherapy for prostate cancer patients leads to higher tumor control probabilities (TCP) but also to higher rectal toxicities. An isotoxic model was developed to maximize the given dose while controlling the toxicity level. This was applied to analyze the effect of an implantable rectum spacer (IRS) and extended with a genetic test of normal tissue radio-sensitivity. A virtual IRS (V-IRS) was tested using this method. We hypothesized that the patients with increased risk of toxicity would benefit more from an IRS.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixteen localized prostate cancer patients implanted with an IRS were included in the study. Treatment planning was performed on computed tomography (CT) images before and after the placement of the IRS and with a V-IRS. The normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) was calculated using a QUANTEC reviewed model for Grade > =2 late rectal bleeding and the number of fractions of the plans were adjusted until the NTCP value was under 5%. The resulting treatment plans were used to calculate the TCP before and after placement of an IRS. This was extended by adding the effect of two published genetic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP's) for late rectal bleeding.

RESULTS

The median TCP resulting from the optimized plans in patients before the IRS was 75.1% [32.6-90.5%]. With IRS, the median TCP is significantly higher: 98.9% [80.8-99.9%] (p < .01). The difference in TCP between the V-IRS and the real IRS was 1.8% [0.0-18.0%]. Placing an IRS in the patients with SNP's improved the TCP from 49.0% [16.1-80.8%] and 48.9% [16.0-72.8%] to 96.3% [67.0-99.5%] and 90.1% [49.0-99.5%] (p < .01) respectively for either SNP.

CONCLUSION

This study was a proof-of-concept for an isotoxic model with genetic biomarkers with a V-IRS as a multifactorial decision support system for the decision of a placement of an IRS.