1
|
Simões Corrêa Galendi J, Yeo SY, Grüll H, Bratke G, Akuamoa-Boateng D, Baues C, Bos C, Verkooijen HM, Shukri A, Stock S, Müller D. Early economic modeling of magnetic resonance image-guided high intensity focused ultrasound compared to radiotherapy for pain palliation of bone metastases. Front Oncol 2022; 12:987546. [PMID: 36212449 PMCID: PMC9537476 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.987546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Magnetic Resonance Image-guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MR-HIFU) is a non-invasive treatment option for palliative patients with painful bone metastases. Early evidence suggests that MR-HIFU is associated with similar overall treatment response, but more rapid pain palliation compared to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). This modelling study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of MR-HIFU as an alternative treatment option for painful bone metastases from the perspective of the German Statutory Health Insurance (SHI). Materials and methods A microsimulation model with lifelong time horizon and one-month cycle length was developed. To calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), strategy A (MR-HIFU as first-line treatment or as retreatment option in case of persistent pain or only partial pain relief after EBRT) was compared to strategy B (EBRT alone) for patients with bone metastases due to breast, prostate, or lung cancer. Input parameters used for the model were extracted from the literature. Results were expressed as EUR per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and EUR per pain response (i.e., months spent with complete or partial pain response). Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed to test the robustness of results, and a value of information analysis was conducted. Results Compared to strategy B, strategy A resulted in additional costs (EUR 399) and benefits (0.02 QALYs and 0.95 months with pain response). In the base case, the resulting ICERs (strategy A vs. strategy B) are EUR 19,845/QALY and EUR 421 per pain response. Offering all patients MR-HIFU as first-line treatment would increase the ICER by 50% (31,048 EUR/QALY). PSA showed that at a (hypothetical) willingness to pay of EUR 20,000/QALY, the probability of MR-HIFU being cost-effective was 52%. The expected value of perfect information (EVPI) for the benefit population in Germany is approximately EUR 190 Mio. Conclusion Although there is considerable uncertainty, the results demonstrate that introducing MR-HIFU as a treatment alternative for painful bone metastases might be cost-effective for the German SHI. The high EVPI indicate that further studies to reduce uncertainty would be worthwhile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Simões Corrêa Galendi
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sin Yuin Yeo
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Holger Grüll
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Grischa Bratke
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dennis Akuamoa-Boateng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Clemens Bos
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Helena M. Verkooijen
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Arim Shukri
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stock
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dirk Müller
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Minimally Invasive Interventional Procedures for Metastatic Bone Disease: A Comprehensive Review. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:4155-4177. [PMID: 35735441 PMCID: PMC9221897 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29060332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Metastases are the main type of malignancy involving bone, which is the third most frequent site of metastatic carcinoma, after lung and liver. Skeletal-related events such as intractable pain, spinal cord compression, and pathologic fractures pose a serious burden on patients’ quality of life. For this reason, mini-invasive treatments for the management of bone metastases were developed with the goal of pain relief and functional status improvement. These techniques include embolization, thermal ablation, electrochemotherapy, cementoplasty, and MRI-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound. In order to achieve durable pain palliation and disease control, mini-invasive procedures are combined with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgery, or analgesics. The purpose of this review is to summarize the recently published literature regarding interventional radiology procedures in the treatment of cancer patients with bone metastases, focusing on the efficacy, complications, local disease control and recurrence rate.
Collapse
|
3
|
Simões Corrêa Galendi J, Yeo SY, Simic D, Grüll H, Stock S, Müller D. A time-driven activity-based costing approach of magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound for cancer-induced bone pain. Int J Hyperthermia 2022; 39:173-180. [PMID: 35021942 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2021.2023768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine resource consumption and total costs for providing magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) treatment to a patient with cancer-induced bone pain (CIBP). METHODS We conducted a time-driven activity-based costing (TD-ABC) of MR-HIFU treatments for CIBP from a hospital perspective. A European care-pathway (including a macro-, meso-, and micro-level) was designed to incorporate the care-delivery value chain. Time estimates were obtained from medical records and from prospective direct observations. To calculate the capacity cost rate, data from the controlling department of a German university hospital were allocated to the modules of the care pathway. Best- and worst-case scenarios were calculated by applying lower and upper bounds of time measurements. RESULTS The macro-level care pathway consisted of eight modules (i.e., outpatient consultations, pretreatment imaging, preparation, optimization, sonication, post-treatment, recovery, and anesthesia). The total cost of an MR-HIFU treatment amounted to €5147 per patient. Best- and worst-case scenarios yielded a total cost of €4092 and to €5876. According to cost categories, costs due to equipment accounted for 41% of total costs, followed by costs with personnel (32%), overhead (16%) and materials (11%). CONCLUSION MR-HIFU is an emerging noninvasive treatment for alleviating CIBP, with increasing evidence on treatment efficacy. This costing study can support MR-HIFU reimbursement negotiations and facilitate the adoption of MR-HIFU as first-line treatment for CIBP. The present TD-ABC model creates the opportunity of benchmarking the provision of MR-HIFU to bone tumor.Key pointsMagnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) is an emerging noninvasive treatment modality for alleviating cancer-induced bone pain (CIBP).From a hospital perspective, the total cost of MR-HIFU amounted to €5147 per treatment.This time-driven activity-based costing model creates the opportunity of benchmarking the provision of MR-HIFU to bone tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Simões Corrêa Galendi
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sin Yuin Yeo
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dusan Simic
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Holger Grüll
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stock
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dirk Müller
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|