Cost-effectiveness of adding ezetimibe and/or PCSK9 inhibitors to high-dose statins for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in Chinese adults

Therapeutic Management of LDL-C: Efficacy and Economic Impact Assessment

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is one of the largest global disease burdens. Despite guidelines and recommendations and the proven advantages of lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) in preventing CVD, achieving treatment targets remains disappointing. A key barrier to optimal LLT is therapy discontinuation. To be widely adopted in clinical practice, new lipid-lowering therapies must both prevent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and exhibit cost effectiveness to ensure widespread utilization by patients, physicians, and insurers. While non-statin LLTs have shown cardiovascular value, their cost effectiveness is controversial. This review highlights the LLTs that are currently widely adopted and summarizes the available evidence on their cost effectiveness.

Efficacy and safety of PCSK9 inhibitors, potent statins, and their combinations for reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in hyperlipidemia patients: a systematic network meta-analysis

Background

The objective of this study is to assess the relative efficacy of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, such as alirocumab, evolocumab, and inclisiran, in conjunction with potent statins like atorvastatin and rosuvastatin, in patients presenting with hyperlipidemia or heightened cardiovascular risk attributable to elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C).

Methods

A systematic search was conducted across databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to explore lipid-lowering therapies in hyperlipidemia from their inception to 7 November 2023. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted via Stata 17 software, with two authors independently conducting the search, screening, and data abstraction.

Results

A total of 68 clinical studies involving 21,288 patients with hyperlipidemia were incorporated into the NMA. PSCK9 inhibitors and potent statins significantly reduced LDL-C levels from baseline vs. placebo regardless of background therapy. Regarding the efficacy of lipid reduction, four principal medications were evaluated: evolocumab and atorvastatin [mean standard deviation (MD) -3.41, 95% CI -4.81 to -2.00] and evolocumab with rosuvastatin (MD -3.44, 95% CI -5.10 to -1.78) vs. placebo; alirocumab combined with rosuvastatin (MD -2.91, 95% CI -3.95 to -1.88) and alirocumab with atorvastatin (MD -2.90, 95% CI -3.97 to -1.84) vs. placebo. Meanwhile, compared with placebo, evolocumab (MD -1.89, 95% CI -2.27 to -1.50), alirocumab (MD -1.83, 95% CI -2.09 to -1.57), rosuvastatin (MD -1.93, 95% CI -2.30 to -1.56), inclisiran (MD -1.68, 95% CI -2.10 to -1.27), and atorvastatin (MD -1.68, 95% CI -2.04 to -1.31) could also play a role in the treatment of LDL-C reduction. Moreover, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar to that observed in the control group, which included both placebo and potent statin groups, with no significant differences identified in our study (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

The combination of PCSK9 inhibitors with robust statins like rosuvastatin and atorvastatin markedly decreases LDL-C levels in patients with hyperlipidemia when compared to placebo or monotherapy. Notably, the pairing of evolocumab and atorvastatin exhibited exceptional efficacy in this investigation. In the interim, the combination of PCSK9 inhibitors and potent statins demonstrates a notable safety profile when contrasted with the control group.

Efficacy and safety of inclisiran versus PCSK9 inhibitor versus statin plus ezetimibe therapy in hyperlipidemia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Hyperlipidemia plays a crucial role in increasing the risk of cardiovascular diseases such as atherosclerosis. Recent studies have established that inclisiran positively influences lipid regulation. Nevertheless, its effectiveness in comparison to conventional treatments is still questionable. Hence, a methodical assessment of its effectiveness and safety is required. This research evaluates the efficacy and safety of inclisiran, PCSK9 inhibitors, and the combination of statins with ezetimibe in the treatment of hyperlipidemia via a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

We performed an extensive search of English-language publications in the PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases until April 2024. We conducted a web-based meta-analysis and reported in accordance with the guidelines. We selected the percentage change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) as efficacy evaluation metrics and the incidence of adverse events as safety evaluation metrics for analysis and comparison.

RESULT

We incorporated 33 studies involving 23,375 patients, evaluating three interventions regarding their effects on LDL-C, TC, TG, HDL-C, and adverse events. All treatments improved metrics over placebo. Inclisiran significantly reduced LDL-C compared to statins (mean - 15.21, 95% CI [-25.19, -5.23]) but showed no significant difference from statin + ezetimibe. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) rankings placed inclisiran highest for LDL-C reduction (26.2%). The combination of statin and ezetimibe was the most efficacious for triglyceride reduction (mean 17.2, 95% CI [10.22, 24.19]; mean 15.61, 95% CI [16.87, 24.35]). The safety profiles were comparable across treatments.

CONCLUSION

Inclisiran with its superior LDL-C reduction and low frequency of administration, appears promising for hyperlipidemia treatment, particularly for patients with adherence issues or side effects from other medications.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

CRD42024550852.

Impact of early initiation of ezetimibe in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Scant data is available on the efficacy and safety of adding ezetimibe to high-intensity statin therapy for early and rapid reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) within 4-12 weeks of an acute-event in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We undertook this meta-analysis to address this knowledge-gap.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for RCTs involving patients with ACS receiving ezetimibe in intervention arm, and placebo/active comparator in control arm. Primary outcome was to evaluate changes in LDL-C levels post-ACS. Secondary outcomes were to evaluate alterations in other lipid parameters and adverse events.

RESULTS

From initially screened 4561 articles, data from 11 studies (20,291 patients) were analyzed. Compared to controls, patients receiving ezetimibe had significantly lower LDL-C at 7-days [MD -19.55 mg/dl(95 %CI:-36.46 to -2.63);P = 0.02;I2 = 91 %], 1-month [MD-24.67 mg/dl (95 %CI:-34.59 to -14.76);P < 0.001;I2 = 81 %], 3-months [MD -18.01 mg/dl(95 %CI:-24.11 to -11.90);P < 0.001;I2 = 92 %] and 10-12 months [MD -16.90 mg/dl (95 % CI: -17.67 to -16.12); P < 0.001; I2 = 0 %] of treatment. Compared to controls, patients receiving ezetimibe had significantly lower total cholesterol at 7-days [MD-21.05 mg/dl(95 %CI:-26.73 to -15.37);P < 0.001;I2 = 0 %], 1-month [MD-25.56 mg/dl(95 %CI:-38.29 to -12.83);P < 0.001;I2 = 85 %], 3-months [MD-22.54 mg/dl(95 %CI:-36.90 to -8.19);P = 0.002;I2 = 22 %] and 12-months [MD-19.68 mg/dl(95 %CI:-20.78 to -18.59);P < 0.001;I2 = 0 %] of treatment. Death from any cause, ACS and non-fatal stroke [OR0.89(95 %CI:0.83-0.96);P = 0.002;I2 = 0 %], non-fatal myocardial infarction [OR0.86(95 %CI:0.79-0.94);P = 0.001;I2 = 0 %] and ischemic stroke [OR0.80(95 %CI:0.68-0.94);P = 0.009;I2 = 0 %] was significantly reduced in patients receiving ezetimibe.

CONCLUSION

Addition of ezetimibe to high-intensity statin therapy at the time of ACS event is associated with significantly better cholesterol reduction at day-7,1-month, 3- months and 1-year of follow-up, which translates into a significantly lower recurrent cardiovascular events post an index event of ACS.

CONCISE SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

Addition of ezetimibe to high-intensity statin therapy at the time of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) index event is associated with significantly better low density lipoprotein cholesterol and total cholesterol reduction at day-7, 1-month, 3-months and 1-year of follow-up, which translates into a significantly lower recurrent cardiovascular events (death from any cause, major ACS, non-fatal stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke) post an index event of ACS.

Are We Using Ezetimibe As Much As We Should?

Lipid-lowering therapies, particularly non-statin regimens, are underutilized as ~2/3 of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD) are not optimally managed, and do not attain target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations, despite statin treatment. Statins have been the mainstay of hypolipidemic therapies; however, they are plagued by adverse effects, which have partly hindered their more widespread use. Ezetimibe is often the first added mode of treatment to attain LDL-C goals as it is efficacious and also allows the use of a smaller dose of statin, while the need for more expensive therapies is obviated. We herein provide a comprehensive review of the effects of ezetimibe in lipid lowering and reducing CV events and improving outcomes. Of the hypolipidemic therapies, oral ezetimibe, in contrast to newer agents, is the most convenient and/or affordable regimen to be utilized as mono- or combined therapy supported by data from CV outcomes studies attesting to its efficacy in reducing CVD risk and events. When combined with a statin, the statin dose could be lower, thus curtailing side-effects, while the hypolipidemic effect is enhanced (by ~20%) as the percentage of patients with target level LDL-C (<70 mg/dL) is higher with combined treatment versus a high-intensity statin. Ezetimibe could also serve as an alternative treatment in cases of statin intolerance. In conclusion, ezetimibe has an excellent safety/tolerability profile; it is the first added treatment to a statin that can attain LDL-C targets. In the combined therapy, the hypolipidemic effect is enhanced while the dose of statin could be lower, thus limiting the occurrence of side-effects. Ezetimibe could also serve as an alternative mode of treatment in cases of statin intolerance.