Cervico-Oculo-Acoustic Syndrome in a Male with Consanguineous Parents

Xq26.3 microdeletion in a male with Wildervanck Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Wildervanck Syndrome (WS; cervico-oculo-acoustic syndrome) consists of Duane retraction syndrome (DRS), the Klippel-Feil anomaly, and congenital deafness. It is much more common in females than males and could be due to an X-linked mutation that is lethal to hemizygous males. We present the genetic evaluation of a male with WS and his family.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical evaluation and neuroimaging, sequencing of candidate genes, and array comparative genomic hybridization.

RESULTS

The patient had bilateral type 1 DRS, fusion of almost the entire cervical spine, and bilateral severe sensorineural hearing loss due to bilateral cochlear dysplasia; he also had congenital heart disease requiring surgery. His parents were unrelated, and he had eight unaffected siblings. The patient had no mutation found by Sanger sequencing of HOXA1, KIF21A, SALL4, and CHN1. He had a 3kB deletion in the X-chromosome at Xq26.3 that was not found in his mother, one unaffected sibling, or 56 healthy controls of matching ethnicity. This deletion encompassed only one gene, Fibroblast Growth Factor Homologous Factor 13 (FGF13), which encodes a 216-amino acid protein that acts intracellularly in neurons throughout brain development.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of this patient's phenotype and genotype open the possibility that X-chromosome deletions may be a cause of WS with larger deletions being lethal to males and that FGF13 mutations may be a cause of WS.

Saethre-Chotzen Syndrome, Pro136His TWIST Mutation, Hearing Loss, and External and Middle Ear Structural Anomalies: Report on a Brazilian Family

Objective

To describe the clinical, speech, hearing, and imaging findings in three members of a Brazilian family with Saethre-Chotzen syndrome (SCS) who presented some unusual characteristics within the spectrum of the syndrome.

Design

Clinical evaluation was performed by a multidisciplinary team. Direct sequencing of the polymerase chain reaction–amplified coding region of the TWIST1 gene, routine and electrophysiological hearing evaluation, speech evaluation, and imaging studies through computed tomography (CT) scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed.

Results

TWIST1 gene analysis revealed a Pro136His mutation in all patients. Hearing evaluation showed peripherial and mixed hearing loss in two of the patients, one of them with severe unilateral microtia. Computed tomography scan showed structural middle ear anomalies, and MRI showed distortion of the skull contour as well as some of the brain structures.

Conclusions

We report a previously undescribed TWIST1 gene mutation in patients with SCS. There is evidence that indicates hearing loss (conductive and mixed) can be related both with middle ear (microtia, high jugular bulb, and enlarged vestibules) as well as with brain stem anomalies. Here we discuss the relationship between the gene mutation and the clinical, imaging, speech, and hearing findings.

Non-syndromic supernumerary caruncles causing ocular irritation after cataract surgery: a critical review of caruncular dysgeneses

PURPOSE

To describe a patient with 2 ipsilateral supernumerary caruncles and to determine if they are predictive of associated abnormalities.

DESIGN

Retrospective and interventional clinicopathologic study with a critical review of the literature over the past 100 years.

METHODS

Assessment of clinical features and histopathologic findings in paraffin-embedded tissue sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin, Masson trichrome, periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) reaction with and without diastase, and Ziehl-Neelsen method.

RESULTS

Two placoid lesions causing ocular irritation after routine phacoemulsification were discovered in the inferomedial palpebral conjunctiva. They were totally separate from a normal caruncle. Their surface was studded with yellowish micronodules with projecting white vellus hairs. There were no associated local ophthalmic or systemic abnormalities. Microscopically, they were covered by a goblet cell-rich, nonkeratinizing squamous epithelium with subadjacent pilosebaceous units, the hairs of which were highlighted by the Masson trichrome and Ziehl-Neelsen stains, and small lobules of lacrimal gland tissue. The ocular irritation has not returned after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

A literature review confirms that supernumerary (extra) caruncles coexisting with a normal caruncle are always unilateral and unassociated with any other ocular anomalies, as in the current case. They may, however, cause ocular irritation. They must be distinguished from ectopic (topographically displaced) or dysplastic caruncles that are generally bilateral and often associated with ocular adnexal abnormalities or Goldenhar syndrome. Ectopic or dysplastic caruncles, but not supernumerary ones, are characteristically accompanied by plical abnormalities or its absence. Well-documented supernumerary and ectopic caruncles have always been located in the inferior palpebral conjunctiva.