Clinical, radiological, pathological and prognostic aspects of intraventricular oligodendroglioma: comparison with central neurocytoma.
J Neurooncol 2017;
135:57-65. [PMID:
28900829 DOI:
10.1007/s11060-017-2490-0]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2016] [Accepted: 05/14/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Studies comparing intraventricular oligodendroglioma (IVO) and central neurocytoma (CN) in terms of their clinical, radiological and pathological features are scarce. We, therefore, investigated the similarities and differences between these types of tumors to get a better understanding of how they may be more properly diagnosed and treated. The clinical manifestations, CT/MRI findings, pathological characteristics and clinical outcomes of 8 cases of IVOs and 12 cases of CNs were analyzed retrospectively. Both IVO and CN occurred most commonly in young adults and manifested with symptoms of increased intracranial pressure secondary to obstructive hydrocephalus. However, they were radiologically different in location (p = 0.007), diffusion-weighted imaging (p = 0.001), "scalloping" appearance (p = 0.006), flow void sign (p = 0.006) and ventricular wall invasion (p = 0.000). Histologically, significant differences in mitotic count (p = 0.008) and parenchymal infiltration (p = 0.01) were noted. Immunohistochemically, significant differences in the expression of Olig2 (p = 0.000), Syn (p = 0.01) and NeuN (p = 0.000) were observed. In addition, MIB-1 labeling index (p = 0.035) and case fatality rate (p = 0.021) of IVO were much higher than those of CN, while survival rate of IVO was much lower than that of CN (p = 0.028). IVO and CN are similar in onset age and clinical manifestations, but have different imaging and pathological features. Patients with IVOs may have a relatively poorer prognosis compared to those with CNs.
Collapse