Slam Bam, Thank you, Ma’am : The Challenges of Advance Care Planning Engagement in Long-Term Care

A Qualitative Study of Nursing Home Staff Lived Experience With Advance Care Planning

OBJECTIVE

Advance care planning (ACP) within nursing homes (NHs) is an integral component of resident-centered care yet remains an ongoing area for improvement. This study explored health care providers' experiences when facilitating ACP discussions with residents and their families.

DESIGN

Interpretive description was used to explore meanings and generate knowledge that is applicable for clinical contexts.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A purposive sample of 27 staff members (2 directors of care, 3 assistant directors of care, 1 nurse practitioner, 11 registered nurses, 3 registered practical nurses, and 7 social workers) from 29 NHs located across 3 Canadian provinces that participated in cluster-randomized intervention study to improve ACP.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews were conducted between January and July 2020. Interpretive description methods were used for analysis.

RESULTS

Three themes were identified. "Navigating Relational Tensions During ACP with Families" captures the relational tensions that participants experienced while navigating ACP processes with residents and their families. The second theme, "Where's the Doctor?" highlights the general lack of physician involvement in ACP discussions and the subsequent pressures faced by participants when supporting residents and families. The last theme, "Crises Change the Best Laid Plans," illustrates the challenges participants face when trying to adhere to existing care plans during residents' medical crises.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Participants' experiences indicate that current ACP processes in NHs do not meet the needs of residents, families, or care teams. Additional support from physicians and changes to structural processes are needed to support resident-centered end-of-life planning within this care context.

Chart based data as a resource for tracking and improving a person-centred palliative approach in long-term care

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To enhance the practice of a person-centred palliative approach in long-term care.

BACKGROUND

Implementing a person-centred palliative approach in long-term care entails placing residents at the centre of care planning that attends to the 'whole' person, rather than prioritising biomedical needs.

DESIGN

We conducted a four-stage directed content analysis of long-term care progress notes to meet our study aims and applied the EQUATOR guidelines for qualitative research publication (COREQ).

METHODS

We qualitatively analysed 78 resident charts across three long-term care homes in southern Ontario to capture the extent to which person-centred care was absent, initiated or implemented in different types of documented care interactions.

RESULTS

Most residents had interactions related to daily care activities (65/78, 83%), social concerns (65/78, 83%) and treatment decisions (53/78, 68%). By contrast, interactions around pain and discomfort (34/78, 44%) and spirituality (27/78, 35%) were documented for less than half of the residents. Almost all (92%) residents had at least one progress note where staff initiated person-centred care by documenting their preference for a certain type of care, but only a third had at least one progress note that suggested their preference was implemented (35%).

CONCLUSIONS

While person-centred care is often initiated by nurses and other allied health professionals, changes to care plans to address resident preferences are implemented less often. Nurses and other allied health professionals should be encouraged to elicit care preferences crucial for holistic care planning and equipped with the skills and support to enact collaborative care planning.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Collaborative care planning appears relatively absent in charted progress notes, constraining the full implementation of a person-centred palliative approach to care.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

An advisory group consisting of long-term care resident and staff representatives informed the overall study design and dissemination of the results.