Dépendance aux benzodiazépines et syndrome de sevrage. Revue de la littérature

Dépendance aux benzodiazépines et syndrome de sevrage. Revue de la littérature

Ce travail rapporte les résultats d'une revue de la littérature mondiale (247 publications), concernant les syndromes de sevrage et la dépendance aux benzodiazépines, réalisant ainsi une mise à jour de l'tude eifectuée par Marks (1986) pour la période 1961-1984. Quatre-vingts cas publiés individuellement et 269 cas publiés par séries ont été recensés pour la période 1984-1988 (janvier), soit en ajoutant ces chiffres à ceux de Marks (1986): 928 cas individuels et 969 cas publiés par séries, soit encore au total: 1 897 cas publiés. L'analyse détaillée de ces cas, leur signification en termes de risque sont rapportées et discutées.

Au plan pratique, il apparaît que toutes les benzodiazépines peuvent être à l'origine de syndrome de sevrage, y compris celles à demi-vie courte. Le risque de dépendance est d'autant plus important que la durée de la prescription et les posologies employées sont élevées. Il est donc nécessaire de préconiser un sevragesystématiquementprogressif, quelles que soient la molécule et la durée de prescription, d'éviter l'administration aux sujets ayant des antécédents d'abus de toxiques ou de médicaments, de réserver l'usage à long terme aux pathologies anxieuses chroniques, en réévaluant régulièrement l'indication, de prescrire le moins longtemps possible et à la dose la plus faible possible dans tous les autres cas, en faisant varier la posologie selon l'évolution de l'intensité des symptômes.

Changes in "withdrawal symptoms" following discontinuation of low-dose diazepam

The intensity of putative benzodiazepine withdrawal symptoms was evaluated as part of a double blind placebo-controlled study of benzodiazepines and behaviour therapy in the management of agoraphobia. During the first phase of that study, some subjects were switched from low dose diazepam to placebo, and others remained on diazepam. Symptoms were evaluated in long-term benzodiazepine users (n = 30) and non-users n = 32) when they first entered the study and 4 weeks later, after both groups had been randomized to either diazepam or placebo, using eight analog rating scales measuring commonly reported withdrawal symptoms. At baseline, both users and non-users reported a substantial number of symptoms, with higher levels in the more anxious patients, but no differences between groups. After the transition to either diazepam or placebo, the users switched to placebo reported significantly higher levels of symptoms than users switched to diazepam and non-users combined. Multiple regression analysis suggested that the increase in symptoms was associated with the increase in anxiety, which was higher in the withdrawing group than the other three groups. These results raise questions concerning the extent to which withdrawal symptoms uniquely characterize benzodiazepine withdrawal. They confirm the common assumption that an increase in symptoms often accompanies withdrawal from benzodiazepines, but suggest that such symptoms are not so intense as to make withdrawal excessively difficult, at least in low-dose users.

[Tetraplegia after colonoscopy: benzodiazepine withdrawal syndrome induced by flumazenil?]

A case is reported of a 68-year-old female patient who developed a flaccid tetraplegia on recovering from a colonoscopy, carried out under general anaesthesia (3 mg of midazolam, 20 mg of etomidate). During the preanaesthetic visit, she omitted to report a 15-year-addiction to lorazepam 2.5 mg every night. At the end of the procedure, 0.2 mg of flumazenil were injected. Recovery was immediate but followed by neurological signs associating general weakness, paraesthesia and tetraplegia. These symptoms discontinued spontaneously two hours later. She was discharged the same day but complained of myalgia and paraesthesia for a week. The physiopathology of this accident is unknown. The differential diagnosis and the influence of flumazenil on benzodiazepine withdrawal are discussed.

[Benefits and risks of hypnotics]

Rationalisation of the war of hypnotics has recently been under discussion in France: a review of the benefits and risks of these substances may therefore be useful. Chronic insomnia is a result of multiple factors, among which individual characteristics of the personality play an important role. Hypnotic treatment is symptomatic; its beneficial influence on sleep progressively vanishes in few weeks, while some negative residual effects on daytime functioning (mood, alertness, performance, memory impairment) may persist. The main problems posed by hypnotic treatment with benzodiazepines are related to tolerance effects during the treatment period and to rebound insomnia and withdrawal phenomena after discontinuation. Practical issues for the treatment of insomnia, based on international consensus, are presented.