Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures in an Irish tertiary referral centre for epilepsy

Multidimensional psychopathological profile differences between patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures and epileptic seizure disorders

OBJECTIVE

Early differential diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) and epileptic seizures (ES) remains difficult. Self-reported psychopathology is often elevated in patients with PNES, although relatively few studies have examined multiple measures of psychopathology simultaneously. This study aimed to identify differences in multidimensional psychopathology profiles between PNES and ES patient groups.

METHOD

This was a retrospective case-control study involving patients admitted for video-EEG monitoring (VEM) over a two-year period. Clinicodemographic variables and psychometric measures of depression, anxiety, dissociation, childhood trauma, maladaptive personality traits, and cognition were recorded. Diagnosis of PNES or ES was determined by multidisciplinary assessment and consensus opinion. General linear mixed models (GLMMs) were used to investigate profile differences between diagnostic groups across psychometric measures. A general psychopathology factor was then computed using principal components analysis (PCA) and differences between groups in this 'p' factor were investigated.

RESULTS

261 patients (77 % with ES and 23 % with PNES) were included in the study. The PNES group endorsed greater symptomatology with GLMM demonstrating a significant main effect of group (η²_p = 0.05) and group by measure interaction (η²_p = 0.03). Simple effects analysis indicated that the PNES group had particularly elevated scores for childhood trauma (β = 0.78), dissociation (β = 0.70), and depression (β = 0.60). There was a high correlation between psychopathology measures, with a single p factor generated to explain 60 % variance in the psychometric scores. The p factor was elevated in the PNES group (β = 0.61). ROC curve analysis indicated that these psychometric measures had limited usefulness when considered individually (AUC range = 0.63-0.69).

CONCLUSION

Multidimensional psychopathological profile differences exist between patients with PNES and ES. Patients with PNES report more psychopathology overall, with particular elevations in childhood trauma, dissociation, and depression. Although not suitable to be used as a standalone screening tool to differentiate PNES and ES, understanding of these profiles at a construct level might help triage patients and guide further psychiatric examination and enquiry.

Dual diagnosis of epilepsy and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: Systematic review and meta-analysis of frequency, correlates, and outcomes

Comorbid epilepsy and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) represent a serious challenge for the clinicians. However, the frequency, associations, and outcomes of dual diagnosis of epilepsy and PNES are unclear. The aim of the review was to determine the frequency, correlates, and outcomes of a dual diagnosis. A systematic review of all published observational studies (from inception to Dec. 2016) was conducted to determine the frequency, correlates, and outcomes of dual diagnosis. We included studies of individuals of any age reporting a dual diagnosis of epilepsy and PNES. All observational study designs were included with the exception of case reports and case series with fewer than 10 participants. The mean frequency of epilepsy in patients with PNES across all studies was 22% (95% confidence intervals [CI] 20 to 25%, range: 0% to 90%) while the mean frequency of PNES in patients with epilepsy was 12% (95% CI 10 to 14%, range: 1% to 62%). High heterogeneity means that these pooled estimates should be viewed with caution. A number of correlates of dual diagnosis were reported. Some studies delineated differences in semiology of seizures in patients with dual diagnosis vs. PNES or epilepsy only. However, most of the correlates were inconclusive. Only a few studies examined outcome in patients with dual diagnosis. Dual diagnosis is common in clinical practice, especially among patients referred to specialized services, and requires careful diagnosis and management.

Psychiatric and neuropsychological profiles of people with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the psychiatric and neuropsychological profiles of people with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES).

METHODS

Twenty-people who had been diagnosed with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), but not epilepsy, were recruited into this study. A healthy control group was also recruited and was matched for age and gender. All participants underwent structured psychiatric assessment and psychometric assessment. Neuropsychological assessment was carried out using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Battery (CANTAB) after participants passed the Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT) of effort.

RESULTS

One patient failed the MSVT and was excluded from the analysis. Therefore, data from 19 people with PNES and their matched healthy controls were analyzed. Compared with controls, people with PNES had significantly higher levels of depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, dissociative experiences, and alexithymic traits. In addition, people with PNES had impairments in spatial working memory and attention when compared with healthy controls.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first study to report that, compared with controls, people with PNES have abnormal cognitive functioning after controlling for effects of effort and FSIQ. People with PNES also have high levels of anxiety, depressive, and dissociative symptoms. In addition, they appear to particularly focus on health problems and show evidence of chronic emotional dysregulation. Further studies are required to replicate our results and to help clarify the pathogenic mechanisms underlying PNES.