Prolactin responses to im haloperidol in drug-naive and drug-experienced schizophrenic patients

Hormone profile in acute psychotic disorders: A cross-sectional comparison of serum hormone concentrations in treated and untreated male patients with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic drugs for the treatment of schizophrenia provide effective treatment of psychotic symptoms but might lead to neuroendocrine abnormalities.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis function by comparing serum hormone profiles of newly admitted patients with psychotic disorders who were receiving antipsychotic drugs with those who were antipsychotic-drug-free during the preceding 6 months.

METHODS

Adult male patients admitted during a 1-year period (December 1999 to December 2000) to 1 of 2 Brazilian public psychiatric inpatient units that provide care for severely ill patients were eligible for this cross-sectional study if they had a diagnosis of schizophrenia based on the criteria given in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, and a score >24 on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. On the morning after admission, serum concentrations of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), prolactin, free testosterone (FT), and total testosterone (TT) were determined. A commercial laboratory provided the normal serum hormone concentrations of healthy Brazilian men in the same age range as that of the study patients.

RESULTS

Sixty-three adult male patients, aged 18 to 55, were included in the study. Forty-eight (76.2%) patients (mean [SD] age, 30.6 [8.9] years) were receiving antipsychotic drugs (treated). Fifteen (23.8%) patients (mean [SD] age, 36.5 [9.8] years) were antipsychotic-drug-free for 6 months before admission (untreated). The only significant between-group difference was for disease duration (treated, 7.6 [8.1] years vs untreated, 12.3 [9.7] years; P = 0.044). Treated patients were more likely to have higher dispersed serum hormone concentrations than the untreated patients. Serum concentration of FSH was numerically higher in the treated patients than in the untreated patients, although the difference was not statistically significant. Compared with the control group (1436 men and women for prolactin; 226 men for LH; 207 for FSH; 128 for TT; 128 for FT; and 128 for SHBG), patients in the treated group had significantly different mean [SD] serum concentrations of all hormones (treated vs control: prolactin, 24.3 [23.7] μg/L vs 6.8 [0.12] μg/L, P < 0.001; LH, 4.9 [3.4] U/L vs 3.3 [0.13] U/L, P = 0.001; FSH, 4.4 [3.9] U/L vs 3.0 [0.06] U/L, P = 0.025; TT, 17.5 [7.8] nmol/L vs 20.1 [1.64] nmol/L, P = 0.004; FT, 0.056 [0.08] nmol/L vs 0.06 [0.003] nmol/L, P < 0.001; and SHBG, 33.3 [18.9] nmol/L vs 48.4 [1.45] nmol/L, P= 0.002). Compared with the control group, patients in the untreated group had significantly different mean (SD) serum concentrations of all hormones except FSH and TT (untreated vs control: prolactin, 19.9 [12.8] μg/L vs 6.8 [0.12] μg/L, P = 0.001; LH, 6.0 [1.9] U/L vs 3.3 [0.13] U/L, P = 0.002; FT, 0.08 [0.04] nmol/L vs 0.06 [0.003] nmol/L, P= 0.001; and SHBG, 26.6 [11.6] nmol/L vs 48.4 [1.45] nmol/L, P < 0.001). No differences were found between the TT distribution curve of the control group and that of the untreated patients.

CONCLUSION

This study supports further investigation of a potential difference in the HPG axis among treated and untreated patients with schizophrenia and those who do not have that condition.

Dopamine receptor responsivity in schizophrenic patients in a drug-free state and after treatment with olanzapine

1. Olanzapine is a novel atypical antipsychotic with affinity for a number of neurotransmitter receptors including dopamine D1, D2, D4, serotonin 5HT2A, 5HT2C, histamine H1, a1-adrenergic, and muscarinic receptors. 2. A neuroendocrinological method to check the degree of dopamine receptor blocking is by measuring the prolactin (PRL) responses to acute (i.m.) administration of haloperidol (HAL). The authors applied this test in a group of male patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia in the drug-free state. The patients were subsequently treated with olanzapine (OLZ) (mean daily dose: 22.5+/-5.8) and the test was repeated six weeks later. For the HAL-test, 5mg HAL were injected i.m. and blood samples were taken at times 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes. Fourteen patients enrolled in the study. Psychopathology was assessed by means of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). 3. Six weeks treatment with OLZ resulted in significant decreases in the total BPRS score and on the score of its subscales for positive, negative, and general psychopathology. Comparison of the PRL response patterns, after HAL administration by analysis of variance for repeated measures (ANOVAR) for drug treatment and time, revealed a highly significant time effect (F=28.98, p=0.000) and a significant treatment by time interaction (F=8.27, p=0.000008). Namely, in the drug-free state significant increases were found in the PRL levels after i.m. HAL administration which were significantly reduced during treatment with OLZ, indicating moderate receptor blockade.

Prolactin secretion in response to haloperidol challenge in delusional (psychotic) and non-delusional depression

Certain studies on measures related to central neurotransmitter activity have demonstrated that in delusional (psychotic) depression there is a dopaminergic dysregulation which distinguishes it from non-psychotic depression. A neuroendocrinologic method to check the degree of DA receptor responsivity is by measuring the prolactin responses to acute intramuscular administration of haloperidol. We studied this possibility by applying the haloperidol test in seven delusional and ten non-delusional depressed patients. All patients met DSM-IV criteria for a major depressive episode, single or recurrent, with or without psychotic features. After a three-week washout period, 5 mg of haloperidol were injected i.m. and blood samples were taken at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes. In both trials, significant time effects were observed (elevated prolactin levels, F = 11.36, P = 0.000). However, the prolactin responses to haloperidol did not differ significantly between the two patient groups (F = 0.12, P = 0.97). These data do not show a difference in D(2) receptor responsivity, at least at the hypothalamus-pituitary level, between psychotic and non-psychotic depression.

Dopamine receptor responsivity in alcoholic patients before and after detoxification

OBJECTIVE

To assess central dopamine receptor responsivity in alcoholic patients during their usual alcohol consumption and after detoxification.

METHOD

Plasma prolactin levels were measured at 0, 30, 60, and 90 min after administration of 5 mg haloperidol i.m. in 21 hospitalized male alcoholic patients during usual alcohol consumption, and 13 days later (mean, range 7-17 days), after detoxification. The test was also performed in seven healthy male volunteers. The patterns of prolactin responses were compared using repeated measures analysis of variance.

RESULTS

The prolactin responses to haloperidol increased significantly after detoxification compared to those during usual alcohol consumption (state x time interaction P < 0.01; planned comparisons for times 0 and 90 min between states P = 0.03). Compared to controls, the responses of the patients before detoxification were lower (group-time interaction P = 0.001), and the difference was not significant after detoxification (P = 0.19). The magnitude of plasma prolactin (PRL) responses were not related to duration of alcohol abuse, score in the Brief Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (BMAST) scale, or family history of alcoholism.

CONCLUSIONS

Alcohol detoxification is accompanied by a normalization of the low responsivity of central dopaminergic receptors during alcohol abuse. The data support the hypothesis of a participation of the central dopaminergic system in alcohol dependence.