C-reactive protein and albumin kinetics before community-acquired bloodstream infections - a Danish population-based cohort study

The utility of temporal trends of blood biomarkers as predictors for bloodstream infections in left ventricular assist device recipients

BACKGROUND

Temporal trends of routinely obtained parameters may provide valuable information for predicting BSIs, but this association has not yet been established in LVAD patients.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included data from 347 consecutive recipients of three rotary LVAD types. Study endpoints included the incidence of BSI, the association of temporal trends of routinely obtained blood biomarkers with the development of BSIs, the incidence of BSIs, and survival on LVAD support.

RESULTS

During follow-up, 47.8% (n = 166) of the patients developed BSI. In multivariate analyses, the development of BSI was a significant predictor of mortality (HR 5.78, 95% CI 4.08-8.19, p < 0.0001). In univariate analyses, after adjusting for potential confounders, albumin (SHR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.97, p < 0.00010), creatinine (SHR 1.49, 95% CI 1.03-2.15, p = 0.033), and C-reactive protein (SHR 1.19, 95% CI 1.08-1.32, p = 0.0007) significantly predicted the development of BSIs during LVAD support. Notably, the strength of the association of parameter changes with the prediction of BSIs demonstrated a time-dependent correlation in the cases of albumin (p = 0.045) and creatinine (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Bloodstream infections are highly prevalent among LVAD recipients and are independent predictors of mortality. Temporal biomarker trends significantly predict the development of BSIs. These findings suggest opportunities for interventions aiming to reduce the incidence of BSIs.

Risk factors for progression to bacteremia among patients with nosocomial carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia in the Intensive Care Unit

Antibiotic-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) is a common cause of hospital-acquired infections. This study aimed to identify independent factors associated with progression from nosocomial pneumonia to bacteremia in patients infected with carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CR-AB). From 2019 to 2021, we conducted a retrospective anaylsis of the medical records of 159 nosocomial CR-AB pneumonia patients in our Intensive Care Unit (ICU). We employed both univariate and multivariable logistic regression models to identify factors associated with the progression of nosocomial CR-AB pneumonia to bacteremia. Among the 159 patients with nosocomial CR-AB pneumonia, 40 experienced progression to bacteremia and 38 died within 28 days following diagnosis. Patients who developed bacteremia had a significantly higher 28-day mortality rate compared to those without bloodstream infection (47.50% vs. 15.97%). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that higher levels of C-Reactive protein (CRP) (OR = 1.01) and the use of continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) treatment (OR = 2.93) were independently associated with an elevated risk of developing bacteremia. Among patients who developed bloodstream infection, those who died within 28 days exhibited significantly higher level of interleukin-6 (IL-6), a greater frequency of antifungal drugs usage, and a longer duration of machanical ventilation compared to survivors. Furthermore, the use of antifungal drugs was the only factor that associated with 28-day mortality (OR = 4.70). In ICU patients with central venous catheters who have CR-AB pneumonia and are on mechanical ventilation, higher CRP levels and CVVH treatment are risk factors for developing bacteremia. Among patients with bacteremia, the use of antifungal drugs is associated with 28-day mortality.

Interpretations of the Role of Plasma Albumin in Prognostic Indices: A Literature Review

This review assesses how publications interpret factors that influence the serum or plasma albumin (PA) level in prognostic indices, focusing on inflammation and nutrition. On PubMed, a search for "albumin AND prognosis" yielded 23,919 results. From these records, prognostic indices were retrieved, and their names were used as search strings on PubMed. Indices found in 10 or more original research articles were included. The same search strings, restricted to "Review" or "Systematic review", retrieved yielded on the indices. The data comprised the 10 latest original research articles and up to 10 of the latest reviews. Thirty indices had 294 original research articles (6 covering two indices) and 131 reviews, most of which were from recent years. A total of 106 articles related the PA level to inflammation, and 136 related the PA level to nutrition. For the reviews, the equivalent numbers were 54 and 65. In conclusion, more publications mention the PA level as a marker of nutrition rather than inflammation. This is in contrast to several general reviews on albumin and nutritional guidelines, which state that the PA level is a marker of inflammation but not nutrition. Hypoalbuminemia should prompt clinicians to focus on the inflammatory aspects in their patients.

How to use biomarkers of infection or sepsis at the bedside: guide to clinicians

Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. In this context, biomarkers could be considered as indicators of either infection or dysregulated host response or response to treatment and/or aid clinicians to prognosticate patient risk. More than 250 biomarkers have been identified and evaluated over the last few decades, but no biomarker accurately differentiates between sepsis and sepsis-like syndrome. Published data support the use of biomarkers for pathogen identification, clinical diagnosis, and optimization of antibiotic treatment. In this narrative review, we highlight how clinicians could improve the use of pathogen-specific and of the most used host-response biomarkers, procalcitonin and C-reactive protein, to improve the clinical care of patients with sepsis. Biomarker kinetics are more useful than single values in predicting sepsis, when making the diagnosis and assessing the response to antibiotic therapy. Finally, integrated biomarker-guided algorithms may hold promise to improve both the diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis. Herein, we provide current data on the clinical utility of pathogen-specific and host-response biomarkers, offer guidance on how to optimize their use, and propose the needs for future research.

Pancreatic Stone Protein: Review of a New Biomarker in Sepsis

Sepsis is a life-threatening syndrome characterized by a dysregulated host response to an infection that may evolve rapidly into septic shock and multiple organ failure. Management of sepsis relies on the early recognition and diagnosis of infection and the providing of adequate and prompt antibiotic therapy and organ support. A novel protein biomarker, the pancreatic stone protein (PSP), has recently been studied as a biomarker of sepsis and the available evidence suggests that it has a higher diagnostic performance for the identification of infection than the most used available biomarkers and adds prognostic value. This review summarizes the clinical evidence available for PSP in the diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis.

Which Biomarkers Can Be Used as Diagnostic Tools for Infection in Suspected Sepsis?

The diagnosis of infection in patients with suspected sepsis is frequently difficult to achieve with a reasonable degree of certainty. Currently, the diagnosis of infection still relies on a combination of systemic manifestations, manifestations of organ dysfunction, and microbiological documentation. In addition, the microbiologic confirmation of infection is obtained only after 2 to 3 days of empiric antibiotic therapy. These criteria are far from perfect being at least in part responsible for the overuse and misuse of antibiotics, in the community and in hospital, and probably the main drive for antibiotic resistance. Biomarkers have been studied and used in several clinical settings as surrogate markers of infection to improve their diagnostic accuracy as well as in the assessment of response to antibiotics and in antibiotic stewardship programs. The aim of this review is to provide a clear overview of the current evidence of usefulness of biomarkers in several clinical scenarios, namely, to diagnose infection to prescribe antibiotics, to exclude infection to withhold antibiotics, and to identify the causative pathogen to target antimicrobial treatment. In recent years, new evidence with "old" biomarkers, like C-reactive protein and procalcitonin, as well as new biomarkers and molecular tests, as breathomics or bacterial DNA identification by polymerase chain reaction, increased markedly in different areas adding useful information for clinical decision making at the bedside when adequately used. The recent evidence shows that the information given by biomarkers can support the suspicion of infection and pathogen identification but also, and not less important, can exclude its diagnosis. Although the ideal biomarker has not yet been found, there are various promising biomarkers that represent true evolutions in the diagnosis of infection in patients with suspected sepsis.