Mechanistic modeling of vertebrate spatial contrast sensitivity and acuity at low luminance

Breaking constraints: The development and evolution of extreme fin morphology in the Bramidae

The developmental process establishes the foundation upon which natural selection may act. In that same sense, it is inundated with numerous constraints that work to limit the directions in which a phenotype may respond to selective pressures. Extreme phenotypes have been used in the past to identify tradeoffs and constraints and may aid in recognizing how alterations to the Baupläne can influence the trajectories of lineages. The Bramidae, a family of Scombriformes consisting of 20 extant species, are unique in that five species greatly deviate from the stout, ovaloid bodies that typify the bramids. The Ptericlinae, or fanfishes, are instead characterized by relatively elongated body plans and extreme modifications to their medial fins. Here, we explore the development of Bramidae morphologies and examine them through a phylogenetic lens to investigate the concepts of developmental and evolutionary constraints. Contrary to our predictions that the fanfishes had been constrained by inherited properties of an ancestral state, we find that the fanfishes exhibit both increased rates of trait evolution and differ substantially from the other bramids in their developmental trajectories. Conversely, the remaining bramid genera differ little, both among one another and in comparison, to the sister family Caristiidae. In all, our data suggest that the fanfishes have broken constraints, thereby allowing them to mitigate trade-offs on distinctive aspects of morphology.

Contrast discrimination in images of natural scenes

Contrast discrimination determines the threshold contrast required to distinguish between two suprathreshold visual stimuli. It is typically measured using sine-wave gratings. We first present a modification to Barten's semi-mechanistic contrast discrimination model to account for spatial frequency effects and demonstrate how the model can successfully predict visual thresholds obtained from published classical contrast discrimination studies. Contrast discrimination functions are then measured from images of natural scenes, using a psychophysical paradigm based on that employed in our previous study of contrast detection sensitivity. The proposed discrimination model modification is shown to successfully predict discrimination thresholds for structurally very different types of natural image stimuli. A comparison of results shows that, for normal contrast levels in natural scene viewing, contextual contrast detection and discrimination are approximately the same and almost independent of spatial frequency within the range of 1-20 c/deg. At higher frequencies, both sensitivities decrease in magnitude due to optical limitations of the eye. The results are discussed in relation to current image quality models.

Comparison of spherical and aspherical intraocular lenses with decentration and tilt error using a physical model of human contrast vision and an image quality metric

PURPOSE

In this study, two intraocular lenses (spherical IOL SA60AT and aspherical IOL SN60WF) are examined in an eye model under conditions of misalignment (defocus, decentration and tilt). The lenses are rated using the contrast sensitivity function (CSF) based on Barten's physical model. The square root integral (SQRI) method is used as a quality criterion comparable to the subjective image quality assessment of the human eye.

METHODS

The IOLs to be tested are decentered from 0 to 1mm and tilted from -5 to +5 degrees in the Navarro eye model (optimized for far-point 6m and pupil aperture 3mm). The defocus of the IOLs is ±0.1mm at the anterior chamber depth (ACD). The optical modulation transfer function (MTF) is simulated with a ray tracing program. The SQRI is calculated using this MTF and the Barten CSF model (for in-focus at aperture 3 and 4.5mm and for defocus at 3mm).

RESULTS

With increasing decentration, the spherical IOL shows a significantly smaller loss of quality for both apertures compared to the aspherical lens. With an aperture of 4.5mm, the image quality of the aspherical IOL is better for small decentration and tilt. The loss of quality of the spherical IOL increases with increasing tilt in both directions. In contrast, the image quality of the aspherical IOL is reduced under decentration for certain tilt values. For ACD-0.1mm, both IOLs behave similarly to the in-focus situation. For ACD+0.1mm, the influence of tilt without decentration is small for both IOLs. With increasing decentration, the quality loss of the aspherical IOL is similar to that in-focus and greater than that of the spherical lens.

CONCLUSION

In general, under the same conditions the spherical SA60AT displays a lower tolerance in loss of quality of subjective vision with lens alignment errors, in comparison to the aspherical SN60WF, limited by certain combinations of decentration and tilt according to this study. This study shows a way to evaluate IOLs based on the subjective visual performance of the eye.