Comparison of contrast sensitivity in macaque monkeys and humans

Neuronal composition of processing modules in human V1: laminar density for neuronal and non-neuronal populations and a comparison with macaque

The neuronal composition of homologous brain regions in different primates is important for understanding their processing capacities. Primary visual cortex (V1) has been widely studied in different members of the catarrhines. Neuronal density is considered to be central in defining the structure-function relationship. In human, there are large variations in the reported neuronal density from prior studies. We found the neuronal density in human V1 was 79,000 neurons/mm3, which is 35% of the neuronal density previously determined in macaque V1. Laminar density was proportionally similar between human and macaque. In V1, the ocular dominance column (ODC) contains the circuits for the emergence of orientation preference and spatial processing of a point image in many mammalian species. Analysis of the total neurons in an ODC and of the full number of neurons in macular vision (the central 15°) indicates that humans have 1.3× more neurons than macaques even though the density of neurons in macaque is 3× the density in human V1. We propose that the number of neurons in a functional processing unit rather than the number of neurons under a mm2 of cortex is more appropriate for cortical comparisons across species.

A natural history of vertebrate vision loss: Insight from mammalian vision for human visual function

Research on the origin of vision and vision loss in naturally "blind" animal species can reveal the tasks that vision fulfills and the brain's role in visual experience. Models that incorporate evolutionary history, natural variation in visual ability, and experimental manipulations can help disentangle visual ability at a superficial level from behaviors linked to vision but not solely reliant upon it, and could assist the translation of ophthalmological research in animal models to human treatments. To unravel the similarities between blind individuals and blind species, we review concepts of 'blindness' and its behavioral correlates across a range of species. We explore the ancestral emergence of vision in vertebrates, and the loss of vision in blind species with reference to an evolution-based classification scheme. We applied phylogenetic comparative methods to a mammalian tree to explore the evolution of visual acuity using ancestral state estimations. Future research into the natural history of vision loss could help elucidate the function of vision and inspire innovations in how to address vision loss in humans.

Contrast Sensitivity in Early to Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)

PURPOSE

Previous studies indicated that advanced age-related macular degeneration (AMD) affects contrast sensitivity (CS) in humans. The CS results for early/intermediate AMD patients are contradictory. The purpose of this study was to determine if CS testing discriminates early/intermediate AMD patients with normal acuity from normal patients.

METHODS

Forty-nine subjects (25 control and 24 early/intermediate AMD patients) were chosen for this project. The age (p = .16) and acuity (p = .34) was not significantly different between the groups. The average simplified AREDS AMD grade for the AMD patients was 2.75 ± 1.03. Three CS functions employing a descending method of limits were measured at the fovea (1. stationary stimulus and, 2. 16 Hz counter-phase stimulus under photopic conditions and 3. the stationary stimulus viewed through a 2 log unit neutral density filter (mesopic condition, background luminance of 1 cd/m²)) and at 4 deg right or left of the fovea with a horizontally oriented sine wave grating (5 deg diameter) viewed on a VPixx monitor (luminance of 100 cd/m²).

RESULTS

The early AMD patients were no different from the control patients for any test condition. The intermediate AMD patients were significantly different from the control patients for the mesopic CS function (p = .05). Post-hoc 2-sample t-tests for the intermediate AMD patients were significantly different from the control patients under the stationary photopic and mesopic conditions for the 1.5 cycle per degree stimulus.

CONCLUSIONS

Group differences in CS were only found in intermediate AMD patients. The loss in CS increased for the intermediate AMD patients under low light levels. Thus, CS may not be the optimal test to discriminate early AMD from control patients so other tests measured under dark adapted conditions should be investigated.