1
|
Romero-Gallardo L, Roldan Reoyo O, Castro-Piñero J, May LE, Ocón-Hernández O, Mottola MF, Aparicio VA, Soriano-Maldonado A. Assessment of physical fitness during pregnancy: validity and reliability of fitness tests, and relationship with maternal and neonatal health - a systematic review. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2022; 8:e001318. [PMID: 36172399 PMCID: PMC9511659 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2022-001318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To systematically review studies evaluating one or more components of physical fitness (PF) in pregnant women, to answer two research questions: (1) What tests have been employed to assess PF in pregnant women? and (2) What is the validity and reliability of these tests and their relationship with maternal and neonatal health? Design A systematic review. Data sources PubMed and Web of Science. Eligibility criteria Original English or Spanish full-text articles in a group of healthy pregnant women which at least one component of PF was assessed (field based or laboratory tests). Results A total of 149 articles containing a sum of 191 fitness tests were included. Among the 191 fitness tests, 99 (ie, 52%) assessed cardiorespiratory fitness through 75 different protocols, 28 (15%) assessed muscular fitness through 16 different protocols, 14 (7%) assessed flexibility through 13 different protocols, 45 (24%) assessed balance through 40 different protocols, 2 assessed speed with the same protocol and 3 were multidimensional tests using one protocol. A total of 19 articles with 23 tests (13%) assessed either validity (n=4), reliability (n=6) or the relationship of PF with maternal and neonatal health (n=16). Conclusion Physical fitness has been assessed through a wide variety of protocols, mostly lacking validity and reliability data, and no consensus exists on the most suitable fitness tests to be performed during pregnancy. PROSPERO registration number CRD42018117554.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lidia Romero-Gallardo
- Department of Physical Education and Sport, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.,Sport and Health University Research Centre, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Olga Roldan Reoyo
- Applied Sports Technology Exercise and Medicine Research Centre, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.,Sport Science Department, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Jose Castro-Piñero
- GALENO Research Group, Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Education Sciences, Universidad de Cadiz, Cadiz, Spain.,The Biomedical Research and Innovation Institute of Cadiz (INiBICA), Cádiz, España
| | - Linda E May
- Kinesiology, East Carolina University College of Health and Human Performance, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.,Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA
| | - Olga Ocón-Hernández
- Gynaecology and Obstetrics Unit, 'San Cecilio' University Hospital, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.,The Biosanitary Research Institute of Granada.ibs, Granada, Spain
| | - Michelle F Mottola
- R. Samuel McLaughlin Foundation- Exercise and Pregnancy Lab, School of Kinesiology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Virginia A Aparicio
- Sport and Health University Research Centre, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.,Department of Physiology, Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology and Biomedical Research Centre, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Alberto Soriano-Maldonado
- Department of Education, Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Almería, Almería, Spain.,SPORT Research Group (CTS-1024), CERNEP Research Center, University of Almería, Almería, Spain
| |
Collapse
|