Is it worth it to cryopreserve embryos with blastulation delay at day 5?

Social Freezing: Pressing Pause on Fertility

Increasing numbers of women are undergoing oocyte or tissue cryopreservation for medical or social reasons to increase their chances of having genetic children. Social egg freezing (SEF) allows women to preserve their fertility in anticipation of age-related fertility decline and ineffective fertility treatments at older ages. The purpose of this study was to summarize recent findings focusing on the challenges of elective egg freezing. We performed a systematic literature review on social egg freezing published during the last ten years. From the systematically screened literature, we identified and analyzed five main topics of interest during the last decade: (a) different fertility preservation techniques, (b) safety of freezing, (c) usage rate of frozen oocytes, (d) ethical considerations, and (e) cost-effectiveness of SEF. Fertility can be preserved for non-medical reasons through oocyte, embryos, or ovarian tissue cryopreservation, with oocyte vitrification being a new and optimal approach. Elective oocyte cryopreservation is better accepted, supports social gender equality, and enhances women's reproductive autonomy. Despite controversies, planned oocyte cryopreservation appears as a chosen strategy against age-related infertility and may allow women to feel that they are more socially, psychologically, and financially stable before motherhood.

Competence of embryos showing transient developmental arrest during in vitro culture

PURPOSE

In vitro developing embryos may apparently show no developmental progress during 24 h and resume their development up to the blastocyst stage. The present study was conducted to assess their ability to implant and to give rise to a live birth when replaced at day 5 (fresh or vitrified/warmed) as compared to continuously developing embryos.

METHODS

Embryo development follow-up and grade were prospectively recorded in a photo database. The studied period was from April 2011 to July 2017. The studied embryos included transient arrested embryos (TAE) that showed the same developmental stage at two subsequent observations, i.e. between day 2 and day 3 (d2 and d3), between day 3 and day 4 (d3 and d4) and between day 4 and day 5 (d4 and d5). TAE were compared to continuously developing embryos (CDE). Elective day 5 embryo transfers were performed.

RESULTS

Woman age was higher in TAE (34.3±3.9) than in CDE (32.9±4.8) (p<0.01). TAE were more frequently (63.1%) observed after ICSI than after conventional IVF (55.9%) (p<0.01). Implantation rate was reduced in TAE as compared to CDE, after both fresh (10.0% vs 23.8% [p<0.01]) and vitrified/warmed (12.9% vs 19.0% [p<0.01]) embryo transfers. Delivery rate was also lower after the transfer of fresh (8.3% vs 19.4% [p<0.01]) and vitrified/warmed (8.5% vs 14.1% [p<0.01]) TAE as compared to CDE. Implantation and delivery rates were not statistically different whether embryo arrested between day 2 and day 3 (d2 and d3), between day 3 and day 4 (d3 and d4) or between day 4 and day 5 (d4 and d5).

CONCLUSION

TAE may be considered for transfer at a lower priority than CDE and associated with inferior prognosis than CDE.