Long-Term use of rivastigmine in patients with dementia with Lewy bodies: an open-label trial

Efficacy and safety of donepezil in patients with dementia with Lewy bodies: results from a 12-week multicentre, randomised, double-blind, and placebo-controlled phase IV study

BACKGROUND

Donepezil has been approved in Japan for the treatment of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) based on clinical trials showing its beneficial effects on cognitive impairment. This phase IV study evaluated the efficacy of donepezil by focusing on global clinical status during a 12-week double-blind phase.

METHODS

Patients with probable DLB were randomly assigned to the placebo (n = 79) or 10 mg donepezil (n = 81) groups. The primary endpoint was changes in global clinical status, assessed using the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change plus Caregiver Input (CIBIC-plus). We also assessed four CIBIC-plus domains (general condition, cognitive function, behaviour, and activities of daily living) and changes in cognitive impairment and behavioural and neuropsychiatric symptoms measured using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), respectively.

RESULTS

Although donepezil's superiority was not shown in the global clinical status, a significant favourable effect was detected in the cognitive domain (P = 0.006). MMSE scores improved in the donepezil group after adjustments in post hoc analysis (MMSE mean difference, 1.4 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.42-2.30), P = 0.004). Improvements in NPIs were similar between the groups (NPI-2: -0.2 (95% CI, -1.48 to 1.01), P = 0.710; NPI-10: 0.1 (95% CI, -3.28 to 3.55), P = 0.937).

CONCLUSION

The results support the observation that the efficacy of 10 mg donepezil in improving cognitive function is clinically meaningful in DLB patients. The evaluation of global clinical status might be affected by mild to moderate DLB patients enrolled in this study. No new safety concerns were detected.

Systematic review of pharmacological interventions for people with Lewy body dementia

OBJECTIVE

Lewy body dementia (LBD) is the second most common neurodegenerative dementia, and it causes earlier mortality and more morbidity than Alzheimer's disease. Reviewing current evidence on its pharmacological management is essential for developing evidence-based clinical guidelines, and for improving the quality of its clinical care. Hence, we systematically reviewed all studies that investigated the efficacy of any medication for managing various symptoms of LBD.

METHOD

We identified eligible studies by searching 15 databases comprehensively. We completed quality assessment, extracted relevant data, and performed GRADE assessment of available evidence. We conducted meta-analyses when appropriate (PROSPERO:CRD42020182166).

RESULTS

We screened 18,884 papers and included 135 studies. Our meta-analyses confirmed level-1 evidence for Donepezil's efficacy of managing cognitive symptoms of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) (SMD = 0.63; p < 0.001) and Parkinson's Disease Dementia (PDD) (SMD = 0.43; p < 0.01), and managing hallucinations in DLB (SMD=-0.52; p = 0.02). Rivastigmine and Memantine have level-2 evidence for managing cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms of DLB. Olanzapine and Yokukansan have similar evidence for managing DLB neuropsychiatric symptoms. Level-2 evidence support the efficacy of Rivastigmine and Galantamine for managing cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms of PDD.

CONCLUSION

We list evidence-based recommendations for the pharmacological management of DLB and PDD, and propose specific clinical guidelines for improving their clinical management.

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2022.2032601 .

Outcome Measures for Dementia With Lewy Body Clinical Trials: A Review

BACKGROUND

Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is one of the most common degenerative dementias. Clinical trials for individuals with DLB are increasing. We aimed to identify commonly used outcome measures for trials in DLB.

METHODS

A pragmatic literature search of PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov identified interventional studies including populations with DLB. Studies were included if they enrolled participants with DLB and met the National Institutes of Health criteria for a clinical trial. Data were collected using standardized forms. Outcome measures were categorized according to core and supportive features of DLB.

RESULTS

After de-duplication, 58 trials were identified. The most common cognitive outcome measures were the Mini Mental State Examination (n=24) and Cognitive Drug Research computerized Assessment System (n=5). The Clinician's Assessment of Fluctuations was the most commonly used measure for fluctuations (n=4). Over half of studies used the Neuropsychiatric Inventory to assess behavioral symptoms (n=31). The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale was frequently used for motor assessment (n=23).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Clinical trial outcomes used in DLB are rarely validated in this population and some lack face validity. There is a need to validate existing scales in DLB and develop DLB-specific outcome measures.

Acute response to cholinergic challenge predicts long-term response to galantamine treatment in patients with Alzheimer's Disease

BACKGROUND

Cholinesterase inhibitors (CEIs) have been shown to improve cognitive functioning in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) patients, but are associated with multiple side effects and only 20-40% of the patients clinically improve. In this study, we aimed to investigate the acute pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of a single dose administration of galantamine on CNS functioning in mild to moderate AD patients and its potential to predict long-term treatment response.

METHODS

This study consisted of a challenge and treatment phase. In the challenge phase, a single dose of 16 mg galantamine was administered to 50 mild to moderate AD patients in a double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over fashion. Acute PD effects were monitored up to 5 hours after administration with use of the NeuroCart CNS test battery and safety and pharmacokinetics were assessed. In the treatment phase, patients were treated with open-label galantamine according to regular clinical care. After 6 months of galantamine treatment, patients were categorized as either responder or as non-responder based on their MMSE, NPI and DAD scores. An analysis of covariance was performed to study the difference in acute PD effects during the challenge phase between responders and non-responders.

RESULTS

A single dose of galantamine significantly reduced saccadic reaction time (-0.0099; 95%CI=-0.0195,-0.0003; p=.0430), absolute frontal EEG parameters in alpha (-14.9; 95%CI=-21.0,-8.3; p=.0002), beta (-12.6; 95%CI=-19.4,-5.3; p=.0019) and theta (-17.9; 95%CI=-25.0,-10.0; p=.0001) frequencies. Relative frontal (-1.669; 95%CI=-2.999,-0.339; p=.0156) and occipital (-1.856; 95%CI=-3.339,-0.372; p=.0166) EEG power in theta frequency and relative occipital EEG power in the gamma frequency (1.316; 95%CI=0.158,2.475; p=.0273) also increased significantly compared to placebo. Acute decreases of absolute frontal alpha (-20.4; 95%CI=-31.6,-7.47; p=.0046), beta (-15.7; 95% CI=-28.3,-0.93; p=.0390) and theta (-25.9; 95%CI=-38.4,-10.9; p=.0024) EEG parameters and of relative frontal theta power (-3.27%; 95%CI=-5.96,-0.58; p=.0187) on EEG significantly distinguished responders (n=11) from non-responders (n=32) after 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that acute PD effects after single dose of galantamine are correlated with long-term treatment effects and that patients who demonstrate a reduction in EEG power in the alpha and theta frequency after a single administration of galantamine 16 mg will most likely respond to treatment.

Use of Cholinesterase Inhibitors in Non-Alzheimer's Dementias

Non-Alzheimer's dementias constitute 30% of all dementias and present with major cognitive and behavioral disturbances. Cholinesterase inhibitors improve memory by increasing brain acetylcholine levels and are approved symptomatic therapies for Alzheimer's disease (AD). They have also been investigated in other types of dementias with potential cholinergic dysfunction. There is compelling evidence for a profound cholinergic deficit in Lewy Body dementia (LBD) and Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD), even to a greater extent than AD. However, this deficit is difficult to objectivize in vascular dementia (VaD) given the increased comorbidity with AD. Furthermore, there is minimal to no evidence for cholinergic loss in frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Although cholinesterase inhibitors showed significant improvement in cognitive, behavioral, and functional measures in both LBD and PDD clinical trials, only rivastigmine is approved for PDD, due to the heterogeneity of the scales used, the duration of trials, and the limited sample sizes impacting data interpretation. Similarly, the interpretation of findings in VaD trials are limited by the lack of pre-defined inclusion criteria for 'pure VaD' and the wide heterogeneity of patients enrolled with respect to location and extent of cerebrovascular disease. In FTD patients, cholinesterase inhibitors were mostly associated with worsening of cognitive and behavioral symptoms. In non-AD dementias, cholinesterase inhibitors were well tolerated, with increased reports of mild to moderate cholinergic side effects and a non-significant trend for increased cardio and cerebrovascular events with rivastigmine in VaD, justifying their cautious use on a case-by-case basis, especially when there is evidence for cholinergic deficit.

Clinical drug development for dementia with Lewy bodies: past and present

Introduction: Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is an under-researched area despite being the second most common type of degenerative dementia after Alzheimer's disease. It is an area of unmet need with no approved symptomatic or disease-modifying therapies. The pharmacological management of DLB is complex and challenging because early trials of drugs for DLB have resulted in no demonstrable efficacy. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the DLB population have only recently been initiated. Understanding results from previous and current clinical trials in DLB can provide insights for future research and development.Areas covered: We provide an overview of the DLB drug development landscape and the current treatment strategies. We reviewed ClinicalTrials.gov to identify all clinical trials for the treatment of DLB.Expert opinion: DLB drug development has significantly improved in recent years with eight agents now in clinical trials. However, more rigorous RCTs are urgently needed. Diagnostic criteria must be optimized to accurately diagnose patients for clinical trials and care. New biomarker strategies are necessary to improve diagnostic capabilities and trial designs, and novel drug targets should be identified to develop DLB specific disease-modifying therapies. Evaluating the current drug development landscape can provide insight into how best to optimize development practices.

Pretreatment Cognitive Profile Likely to Benefit from Donepezil Treatment in Dementia with Lewy Bodies: Pooled Analyses of Two Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Based on Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) subitem scores, in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), we aimed to delineate features of cognitive impairment, identify cognitive domains improved by donepezil, and define a pretreatment cognitive profile likely to benefit from donepezil.

METHODS

Pooled data were used from two randomized controlled trials of donepezil in DLB (n = 235). Baseline MMSE subitem scores were calculated for all patients. Mean changes in subitem scores at week 12 were compared between the placebo and the active group. Finally, the subgroup identification based on differential effect search (SIDES) method was applied.

RESULTS

Baseline subitem scores were relatively low for serial 7's, delayed recall, and copying. Significant improvement by donepezil was found for orientation, serial 7's, repetition, 3-step command, and copying. The subgroup with pretreatment scores of serial 7's = 1, 2, or 3, delayed recall ≥1, and copying = 0 were the best responders. MMSE change in subgroups increased as more of these three conditions were fulfilled.

CONCLUSION

Cognitive domains characteristically impaired in DLB are particularly improved by donepezil. The number of fulfilled conditions for serial 7's = 1, 2, or 3, delayed recall ≥1, and copying = 0 (likely to benefit score) may predict the response to donepezil in DLB patients.

Synaptic pathology: A shared mechanism in neurological disease

Synaptic proteomes have evolved a rich and complex diversity to allow the exquisite control of neuronal communication and information transfer. It is therefore not surprising that many neurological disorders are associated with alterations in synaptic function. As technology has advanced, our ability to study the anatomical and physiological function of synapses in greater detail has revealed a critical role for both central and peripheral synapses in neurodegenerative disease. Synapse loss has a devastating effect on cellular communication, leading to wide ranging effects such as network disruption within central neural systems and muscle wastage in the periphery. These devastating effects link synaptic pathology to a diverse range of neurological disorders, spanning Alzheimer's disease to multiple sclerosis. This review will highlight some of the current literature on synaptic integrity in animal models of disease and human post-mortem studies. Synaptic changes in normal brain ageing will also be discussed and finally the current and prospective treatments for neurodegenerative disorders will be summarised.

Increased plasma donepezil concentration improves cognitive function in patients with dementia with Lewy bodies: An exploratory pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis in a phase 3 randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether increasing plasma donepezil concentration further improves cognitive function and neuropsychiatric symptoms without compromising safety in patients with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB).

METHODS

We analyzed data from a 12-week phase 3 trial of donepezil (5 and 10mg/day) in patients with DLB. The contribution of factors affecting plasma donepezil concentration was evaluated using multivariate regression analysis. The relationships between plasma donepezil concentration and efficacy (cognitive function as measured by the Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE], hallucinations and cognitive fluctuation), or safety (blood pressure, pulse rate, body weight, and parkinsonism as measured by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III) were assessed by scatterplots and Pearson correlation.

RESULTS

The data of 87 patients were used in the analyses. Plasma donepezil concentration increased proportionally with increasing dose from 5 to 10mg/day. The dose (contribution rate: 0.39, p<0.0001) and age (contribution rate: 0.12, p=0.0003) were statistically significant contributing factors affecting plasma donepezil concentration. Plasma donepezil concentration correlated significantly with improvement of MMSE score (p=0.040), but no significant correlations were found with the change in other tested parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma donepezil concentration correlated positively with change in cognitive function without affecting safety, and was affected mainly by dose and to a lesser extent by age. Therefore, for patients in whom safety concerns are not found at donepezil 5mg/day, increasing the dose to 10mg/day to increase plasma concentration is worthwhile to further improve cognitive function.

Rivastigmine: Dementia with Lewy Bodies

This Hospital Pharmacy feature is extracted from Off-Label Drug Facts, a publication available from Wolters Kluwer Health. Off-Label Drug Facts is a practitioner-oriented resource for information about specific drug uses that are unapproved by the US Food and Drug Administration. This new guide to the literature enables the health care professional or clinician to quickly identify published studies on off-label uses and determine if a specific use is rational in a patient care scenario. References direct the reader to the full literature for more comprehensive information before patient care decisions are made. Direct questions or comments regarding Off-Label Drug Uses to jgeneral@ku.edu .

Dementia With Lew Body: Impacts of Surgery

Patients who have dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and undergo surgery may develop aggravated postoperative cognitive dysfunction or postoperative delirium. Many patients with DLB respond poorly to surgery and anesthesia, and their conditions may worsen if they have other medical complications along with dementia. They may also face high risk of prolonged hospital stay, increased medical problems and/or mortality, causing significant physical, psychosocial, and financial burdens on individuals, family members, and society. Anesthesia, pain medications, old age, and surgery-related stresses are usually held responsible for the complications; however, the exact causes are still not fully understood. Literature on surgery-related complications for patients with DLB appears to be inadequate, and hence the topic merits detailed and systematic research. This article reviews postoperative complications and various surgery-related risk factors for DLB in light of other dementias such as Alzheimer's disease, as their neuropathologic features overlap with those of DLB.

Effects of Donepezil on Extrapyramidal Symptoms in Patients with Dementia with Lewy Bodies: A Secondary Pooled Analysis of Two Randomized-Controlled and Two Open-Label Long-Term Extension Studies

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The aim of this study was to clarify the effects of donepezil on extrapyramidal symptoms in patients with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB).

METHODS

Using pooled datasets from phase 2 and 3, 12-week randomized, placebo-controlled trials (RCT, n = 281) and 52-week open-label long-term extension trials (OLE, n = 241) of donepezil in DLB, the effects of donepezil on the incidence of extrapyramidal adverse events (AEs) and on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III were assessed, and potential baseline factors affecting the AEs were explored.

RESULTS

The RCT analysis did not show significant differences between the placebo and active (3, 5, and 10 mg donepezil) groups in extrapyramidal AE incidence (3.8 and 6.5%, p = 0.569) and change in the UPDRS (mean ± SD: -0.2 ± 4.3 and -0.6 ± 6.5, p = 0.562). In the OLE analysis (5 and 10 mg donepezil), the incidence did not increase chronologically; all AEs leading to a dose reduction or discontinuation except one were relieved. The UPDRS was unchanged for 52 weeks. An exploratory multivariate logistic regression analysis of the RCTs revealed that donepezil treatment was not a significant factor affecting the AEs. Baseline severity of parkinsonism was a predisposing factor for worsening of parkinsonism without significant interactions between donepezil and baseline severity.

CONCLUSION

DLB can safely be treated with donepezil without relevant worsening of extrapyramidal symptoms, but treatment requires careful attention to symptom progression when administered to patients with relatively severe parkinsonism.

Ethynylphenyl carbonates and carbamates as dual-action acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and anti-inflammatory agents

Novel ethynylphenyl carbonates and carbamates containing carbon- and silicon-based choline mimics were synthesized from their respective phenol and aniline precursors and screened for anticholinesterase and anti-inflammatory activities. All molecules were micromolar inhibitors of acetylcholinesterase (AChE), with IC50s of 28-86 μM; the carbamates were two-fold more potent than the carbonates. Two of the most potent AChE inhibitors suppressed 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA)-induced inflammation by 40%. Furthermore, these molecules have physicochemical properties in the range of other CNS drugs. These molecules have the potential to treat inflammation; they could also dually target Alzheimer's disease through restoration of cholinergic balance and inflammation suppression.

The monoaminergic footprint of depression and psychosis in dementia with Lewy bodies compared to Alzheimer's disease

Introduction

Depression and psychosis are two of the most severe neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Both NPS have negative effects on cognitive performance and life expectancy. The current study aimed to investigate and compare monoaminergic etiologies between both neurodegenerative conditions, given the lack of an efficient pharmacological treatment until present.

Methods

Eleven behaviorally relevant brain regions of the left frozen hemisphere of 10 neuropathologically confirmed AD patients with/without depression (AD + D/-D; 5 were psychotic within AD + D), 10 confirmed DLB patients, all of whom were depressed (DLB + D; 5 psychotic patients), and, finally, 10 confirmed control subjects were regionally dissected. All patients were retrospectively assessed before death using the Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer’s Disease Rating Scale (Behave-AD) and Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia amongst others. The concentrations of dopamine (DA), serotonin (5-HT), (nor)adrenaline and respective metabolites, i.e. 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and homovanillic acid (HVA), 5-hydroxy-3-indoleacetic acid (5-HIAA), and, 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol (MHPG), were determined using reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection.

Results

DLB subjects had the overall lowest monoamine and metabolite concentrations regarding 33 out of 41 significant monoaminergic group alterations. Moreover, MHPG levels were significantly decreased in almost 8 out of 11 brain regions of DLB- compared to AD patients. We also observed the lowest 5-HT and 5-HIAA levels, and 5-HIAA/5-HT turnover ratios in DLB + D compared to AD + D subjects. Additionally, a 4- and 7-fold increase of DOPAC/DA and HVA/DA turnover ratios, and, a 10-fold decrease of thalamic DA levels in DLB + D compared to AD + D patients and control subjects was noticed. Regarding psychosis, hippocampal DA levels in the overall DLB group significantly correlated with Behave-AD AB scores. In the total AD group, DA levels and HVA/DA ratios in the amygdala significantly correlated with Behave-AD AB scores instead.

Conclusions

Monoaminergic neurotransmitter alterations contribute differently to the pathophysiology of depression and psychosis in DLB as opposed to AD, with a severely decreased serotonergic neurotransmission as the main monoaminergic etiology of depression in DLB. Similarly, psychosis in DLB might, in part, be etiologically explained by dopaminergic alterations in the hippocampus, whereas in AD, the amygdala might be involved.

Long-term donepezil use for dementia with Lewy bodies: results from an open-label extension of Phase III trial

Introduction

The long-term efficacy and safety of donepezil 10 mg in patients with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) were investigated in a 52-week Phase 3 trial.

Methods

This 52-week study consisted of 16-week randomized placebo-controlled (RCT) and 36-week open-label extension phases. Of 142 DLB patients enrolled in the RCT phase (three arms: placebo, 5 mg, and 10 mg), 110 entered the extension phase. The placebo group of the RCT phase initiated active treatment at week 16, and the active groups maintained allocated treatment and dosages until week 24. After week 24, all patients received 10 mg. Dose reduction to 5 mg for safety concerns was allowed. Efficacy measures included Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for cognitive function and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) for behavioral symptoms. Safety evaluations included adverse events (AEs) and the unified Parkinson disease rating scale.

Results

In total, 100 subjects completed the study. Cognitive function improvement was sustained for 52 weeks (MMSE at week 52 in 10 mg: 2.8 ± 3.5 (mean ± standard deviation); P <0.001, Student paired t test)). Those who received placebo in the RCT phase showed an improvement after starting active treatment. NPI improved in all the groups throughout the study, including the placebo period. In the subgroup of the 5 mg group without remarkable cognitive or behavioral improvement at week 24, further improvement was observed after a dose increase to 10 mg. After week 24, 21 patients experienced dose reduction. The incidence of any AEs did not increase over time.

Conclusions

The long-term administration of donepezil at 10 mg/day improved cognitive function for up to 52 weeks in patients with DLB without increasing the risk of clinically significant safety events.

Trial registration

NCT01278407. Trial registration date: January 14, 2011.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13195-014-0081-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Clinical Trials in Parkinson's Disease Dementia and Dementia with Lewy Bodies

Parkinson's disease with dementia (PDD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) are pathological overlapping and important causes of dementia for which clinical trials are in their infancy. Cholinesterase inhibitors may be of benefit in DLB and PDD, as suggested by placebo-controlled clinical trials of rivastigmine and donepezil. The anti-psychotic agent clozapine has been of benefit in PD and PDD, but other agents, such as quetiapine, require adequate assessment. Barriers to trials include pathological overlap that can lead to inaccuracies in clinical diagnosis, unavailability of a consensus definition for PDD, unanswered questions regarding natural history and the paucity of validated outcome measures. Motor impairment must be considered in patients with PDD and DLB; conversely, cognitive impairment should be assessed in trials targeting motor impairment in advanced PD. Potential targets for treatment include onset of dementia, cognitive impairment, behavioral impairment, functional decline, falls, nursing home placement, mortality, quality of life and economic impact. Biomarkers including neuroimaging and cerebrospinal fluid markers are not currently established. At present PDD and DLB are distinct entities by definition. Future studies, including clinical trials and biomarker studies, will help to further define the clinical and therapeutic implications of this distinction.

Cholinesterase inhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease:: getting on and staying on

BACKGROUND

Cholinesterase (ChE) inhibitors currently used in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) are the acetylcholinesterase (AChE)-selective inhibitors, donepezil and galantamine, and the dual AChE and butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE) inhibitor, rivastigmine. In addition to differences in selectivity for AChE and BuChE, ChE inhibitors also differ in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, and these differences could significantly impact on safety, tolerability, and efficacy.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article was to provide an overview of the ChE inhibitors widely used in AD, focusing on key pharmacologic differences among agents and how these may translate into important differences in safety, tolerability, and efficacy in clinical practice.

METHODS

Using published literature collected over time by the author, a review was conducted, focusing on the pharmacology and clinical data of donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine.

RESULTS

All ChE inhibitors have the potential to induce centrally mediated cholinergic adverse events (AEs), such as nausea and vomiting, if the dose is increased too rapidly or in increments that are too large. These AEs, which are most likely to occur during the "getting on," or dose-escalation, phase of treatment, may result in patients discontinuing treatment early without achieving optimum therapeutic benefit. To reduce the incidence of these AEs, a slow dose-escalation schedule has been established in clinical practice, consisting of a "start low, go slow" procedure with a minimum of 4 weeks between dose increases. After "getting on" treatment, maintaining treatment in the long term, or "staying on," may be achieved with good safety, tolerability, and sustained symptomatic efficacy across the key symptom domains (activities of daily living, behavior, and cognition).

CONCLUSIONS

ChE inhibitors provide symptomatic benefit in AD across key symptom domains. Factors influencing the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of these agents in clinical practice include ChE enzymes inhibited, brain and brain-region ChE selectivity, and metabolism route. Class-specific cholinergic AEs can be minimized using slow, flexible dose escalation.

Long-term safety and efficacy of donepezil in patients with dementia with Lewy bodies: results from a 52-week, open-label, multicenter extension study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To investigate the safety and efficacy of long-term administration (52 weeks) of donepezil in patients with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB).

METHODS

This was a 52-week, multicenter, open-label extension study. Up to 8 weeks after the completion of the preceding randomized, placebo-controlled trial (RCT), patients started treatment with 3 mg of donepezil daily for 2 weeks, followed by 5 mg daily for the remaining 50 weeks. Cognitive function, behavioral and psychiatric symptoms, cognitive fluctuations, and caregiver burden were assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, Cognitive Fluctuation Inventory, and the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview, respectively. Safety parameters were monitored throughout.

RESULTS

In total, 108 patients were enrolled in the study. Cognitive function and dementia-related behavioral symptoms, including cognitive fluctuations, were improved after the start of donepezil treatment, and improvement was maintained for 52 weeks. Reduction in caregiver burden observed in the preceding RCT returned to the baseline level at 52 weeks. There was no significant imbalance in the incidence of adverse events (AEs) by onset time, and delayed AE onset induced by the long-term administration of donepezil was unlikely to appear.

CONCLUSION

The long-term administration of donepezil at 5 mg/day was well tolerated in patients with DLB and is expected to exhibit lasting effects, improving impaired cognitive function and psychiatric symptoms up to 52 weeks.

Clinical features of dementia with lewy bodies in 35 Chinese patients

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical features of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) in a Chinese population.

METHODS

Computer-based online searches through China Biology Medicine disc and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were performed to collect case reports of DLB published between 1980 and 2012. Clinical characteristics were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 18 studies comprising 35 patients (26 males and 9 females) were included. The mean age at onset was 67.2 ± 9.8 years. Onset was characterized by memory impairment and accounted for 58.8% of all cases, followed by parkinsonism (11.8%), visual hallucinations (8.8%), and compulsive personality disorder (2.9%). The other patients (17.6%) presented two of the three core features of DLB at onset. With disease progression, parkinsonism was reported in 100% of cases, followed by visual hallucinations (97.1%), psychiatric symptoms (85.7%), severe neuroleptic sensitivity (81.8%), fluctuating cognition (68.6%), repeated falls (40.0%), sleep disorders (22.9%), and transient loss of consciousness (17.1%). 26 patients who were subjected to Mini-Mental State Examination scored ≤ 24. 10 patients presented relative preservation of hippocampus and medial temporal lobe structures on CT/MRI scan. Occipital hypometabolism occurred in 2 of 3 patients who underwent SPECT/PET perfusion scan. 12 patients showed an increasing of slow frequency activity on EEG, prominently in frontal and temporal lobes.

CONCLUSIONS

DLB often strikes elderly individuals. Its clinical core features are dementia, fluctuating cognition, recurrent visual hallucinations and spontaneous features of parkinsonism. Neuropsychological, neuroimaging and EEG examinations may improve the diagnostic accuracy and discriminate DLB from other dementias.

Dementia with lewy bodies: diagnosis and management for primary care providers

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review is to aid primary care providers in distinguishing dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) from Alzheimer's disease and from Parkinson's disease with dementia. Differentiating these entities has important treatment implications.

DATA SOURCES

A PubMed search was undertaken using the keywords Lewy body dementia, dementia with Lewy bodies, and Lewy body disease. There were no date restrictions. Only articles in the English language were reviewed. References of selected articles were reviewed for additional sources.

DATA SELECTION AND EXTRACTION

Initially, 2,967 articles were retrieved. All 3 authors participated in data selection and extraction. Articles were further selected for content specific to epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic studies, treatment, and prognosis. For articles with repetitive information, the most current article was used. This resulted in a total of 62 articles included in the review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Dementia with Lewy bodies is the second leading cause of dementia after Alzheimer's disease. The core symptoms of DLB, including cognitive fluctuations, visual hallucinations, and parkinsonism, may not always be present as a triad, and clinicians may be unaware of associated symptoms. Thus, this diagnosis is frequently missed by primary care providers. Often, DLB is misdiagnosed as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, or a primary psychiatric illness. Treatments for DLB include cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists. Antipsychotics should be avoided or used with caution.

CONCLUSIONS

Dementia with Lewy bodies is an often missed diagnosis. Symptoms are often attributed to other disorders. A high clinical suspicion is helpful in accurate diagnosis, and presence of any of the core symptoms should initiate clinical suspicion of DLB. Distinguishing DLB from other disorders has important treatment implications.

Donepezil for dementia with Lewy bodies: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Objective: Because cholinergic deficits are prominent in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), we investigated the effects of a cholinesterase inhibitor, donepezil, in such patients in a randomized, double-bilnd- placebo-controlled exploratory phase 2 trial.

Methods: One-hundred forty patients with DLB, recruited from 48 specialty centers in Japan, were randomly assigned to receive placebo or 3, 5, or 10mg of donepezil hydrochloride daily for 12 weeks (n = 35, 35, 33, and 37, respectively). Effects on cognitive function were assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and several domain-specific neuropsychological tests. Changes in behavior were evaluated using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory, caregiver burden using the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview, and global function using the Clinician’s Interview-Based Impression of Change-plus Caregiver Input (CIBIC-plus). Safety measures included the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale part III.

Results: Donepezil at 5 and 10mg/day was significantly superior to placebo on both the MMSE (5mg: mean difference, 3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-5.3; p < 0.001; 10 mg: mean difference, 2.4; 95% CI, 0.9-3.9; p = 0.001) and CIBIC-plus (p < 0.001 for each); 3mg/day was significantly superior to placebo on CIBIC-plus (p < 0.001), but not on the MMSE (p = 0.017). Significant improvements were found also in behavioral measures (p < 0.001) at 5 and 10mg/day and caregiver burden (p = 0.004) at 10 mg/day. The safety results were consistent with the known profile of donepezil and similar among groups.

Interpretation: Donepezil at 5 and 10mg/day produces significant cognitive, behavioral, and global improvements that last at least 12 weeks in DLB patients, reducing caregiver burden at the highest dose. Donepezil is safe and well tolerated.

Dementia with Lewy bodies

Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is the second most common cause of neurodegenerative dementia in older people, accounting for 10% to 15% of all cases, it occupies part of a spectrum that includes Parkinson's disease and primary autonomic failure. All these diseases share a neuritic pathology based upon abnormal aggregation of the synaptic protein α-synuciein. It is important to identify DLB patients accurately because they have specific symptoms, impairments, and functional disabilities thai differ from other common dementia syndromes such as Alzheimer's disease, vascular cognitive impairment, and frontotemporal dementia. Clinical diagnostic criteria for DLB have been validated against autopsy, but fail to detect a substantial minority of cases with atypical presentations that are often due to the presence of mixed pathology. DLB patients frequently have severe neuroleptic sensitivity reactions, which are associated with significantly increased morbidity and mortality. Cholinesterase inhibitor treatment is usually well tolerated and substantially improves cognitive and neuropsychiatrie symptoms. Although virtually unrecognized 20 years ago, DLB could within this decade become one of the most treatable neurodegenerative disorders of late life.

Clinical practice with anti-dementia drugs: a revised (second) consensus statement from the British Association for Psychopharmacology

The British Association for Psychopharmacology (BAP) coordinated a meeting of experts to review and revise its first (2006) Guidelines for clinical practice with anti-dementia drugs. As before, levels of evidence were rated using accepted standards which were then translated into grades of recommendation A to D, with A having the strongest evidence base (from randomized controlled trials) and D the weakest (case studies or expert opinion). Current clinical diagnostic criteria for dementia have sufficient accuracy to be applied in clinical practice (B) and brain imaging can improve diagnostic accuracy (B). Cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine) are effective for mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (A) and memantine for moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease (A). Until further evidence is available other drugs, including statins, anti-inflammatory drugs, vitamin E and Ginkgo biloba, cannot be recommended either for the treatment or prevention of Alzheimer's disease (A). Neither cholinesterase inhibitors nor memantine are effective in those with mild cognitive impairment (A). Cholinesterase inhibitors are not effective in frontotemporal dementia and may cause agitation (A), though selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors may help behavioural (but not cognitive) features (B). Cholinesterase inhibitors should be used for the treatment of people with Lewy body dementias (Parkinson's disease dementia and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB)), especially for neuropsychiatric symptoms (A). Cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine can produce cognitive improvements in DLB (A). There is no clear evidence that any intervention can prevent or delay the onset of dementia. Although the consensus statement focuses on medication, psychological interventions can be effective in addition to pharmacotherapy, both for cognitive and non-cognitive symptoms. Many novel pharmacological approaches involving strategies to reduce amyloid and/or tau deposition are in progress. Although results of pivotal studies are awaited, results to date have been equivocal and no disease-modifying agents are either licensed or can be currently recommended for clinical use.

Distinguishing Lewy body dementias from Alzheimer's disease

Lewy body dementia (LBD) is the second most common dementia after Alzheimer's disease (AD). LBD is characterized clinically by visual hallucinations, extrapyramidal symptoms, cognitive fluctuations and neuroleptic sensitivity. LBD and AD share many common features in pathology, genetics and biochemical alterations; however, correct clinical distinction between these disorders has prognostic and therapeutic implications. There are currently no definitive radiological or biological markers for LBD, but studies suggest that premorbid differences in cognitive domains and personality traits, differences in clinical presentation, and alterations in autonomic function and sleep may improve diagnosis. Cholinergic dysfunction plays a major role in both AD and LBD; however, dysfunction is greater in LBD. This may account for the more prominent hallucinations, and offers the possibility of a greater response to cholinesterase inhibitors in LBD. The treatment of LBD is symptomatic and is based on a limited number of clinical trials and extension of results from trials in AD. Current research is focused on the role of synuclein aggregation with possible roles for synuclein-derived peptides as aggregation inhibitors. Other approaches target amyloid, neuroinflammation, oxidative injury, proteolysis, lipid peroxidation and immunotherapies with variable results. Improved understanding of disease mechanisms may open new therapeutic avenues for LBD in the future.

A systematic review of the effectiveness of rivastigmine for the treatment of behavioral disturbances in dementia and other neurological disorders

BACKGROUND

Dementia is frequently associated with behavioral disturbances, some of which have a significant impact on patient quality of life and the likelihood of institutionalization. Cholinergic systems, among other neurotransmitters in the brain, appear to be involved with different behaviors, such as psychosis, depression, agitation, and personality changes.

SCOPE

This paper reviews the clinical data on the effectiveness of rivastigmine, a dual inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase, in ameliorating behavioral disturbances in different patient populations. Relevant articles were identified through MEDLINE searches with no date restrictions.

FINDINGS

In particular, rivastigmine has shown efficacy in treating behavioral disturbances in patients with a wide range of dementias - Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, fronto-temporal dementia, mixed dementia, Lewy body dementia, Parkinson's disease with dementia, and schizophrenia with dementia. Most of the studies have been open-label clinical trials with behavior as a secondary endpoint. The behavior domains that most consistently showed improvement were apathy/indifference, anxiety, delusions (psychosis), and hallucinations. The major limitation of this review is that the effects on behavioral symptoms were usually secondary endpoints in clinical trials.

CONCLUSION

The efficacious effects of treatment with rivastigmine on various behavioral disturbances provide supporting evidence that cholinergic mechanisms, among other neurotransmitters, are involved in the manifestation of some behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia.

Dementia with Lewy bodies

The advent of new immunostains have improved the ability to detect limbic and cortical Lewy bodies, and it is evident that dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is the second most common neurodegenerative dementia, after Alzheimer's disease (AD). Distinguishing DLB from AD has important implications for treatment, in terms of substances that may worsen symptoms and those that may improve them. Neurocognitive patterns, psychiatric features, extrapyramidal signs, and sleep disturbance are helpful in differentiating DLB from AD early in the disease course. Differences in the severity of cholinergic depletion and type/distribution of neuropathology contribute to these clinical differences.

Behandlung der Demenz bei Parkinson-Syndromen

In parkinsonian syndromes dementia frequently occurs in the disease progress. The cholinergic system has been proposed as playing a key role in cognitive disturbances. Therefore the application of cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEI) is also hotly argued for dementia associated with parkinsonian syndromes. This review focuses on the specific symptoms of dementia in Parkinson's disease (PDD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), and corticobasal degeneration (CBD). The effect of cholinergic treatment on cognition and behaviour is reported and critically discussed. There is evidence that medication with some ChEIs reduces cognitive disturbances and to a lesser extent improves activities of daily living in PDD. Behavioural symptoms also seem to be positively influenced by treatment with ChEIs in both PDD and DLB. The effect of treatment with cholinesterase inhibitors in PSP and CBD warrants more carefully designed studies including sufficient numbers of patients.

Treatment of dementia in parkinsonian syndromes with cholinesterase inhibitors

In Parkinsonian syndromes behavioural symptoms and dementia can be even more debilitating than motor symptoms and are an important predictor for nursing home placement and mortality. Neuropathologically, dementia seems to be primarily related to cortical changes rather than to subcortical alterations. Concerning neurotransmitter systems, the cholinergic system has been proposed to play a key role in cognitive disturbances. Based on studies with patients with Alzheimer disease, the application of cholinesterase inhibitors is vividly discussed also for dementia associated with parkinsonian syndromes. This review focuses on the specific symptoms of dementia in different parkinsonian syndromes and critically questions the effect of cholinergic treatment on cognitive functions in patients with extrapyramidal syndromes and dementia. There is evidence that medication with some cholinesterase inhibitors can enhance cognition as well as activities of daily living in dementia with Parkinson's disease and seems to reduce behavioural disturbances in both dementia with Parkinson's disease and dementia with Lewy bodies. The effect of treatment with cholinesterase inhibitors in progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal degeneration warrants carefully designed studies including a sufficient number of patients and symptom-adopted dementia scales.

The management of psychosis in movement disorder patients

Psychosis may be seen with several movement disorders. As pharmacological treatments can sometimes worsen movement disorders, psychosis in these situations can be complex for clinicians to manage. This review covers the management of psychosis in three different movement disorders: Parkinson's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies and Huntington's disease.

Cognitive and psychopathologic response to rivastigmine in dementia with Lewy bodies compared to Alzheimer's disease: a case control study

Cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) are effective in improving cognition and behavior in patients affected by Alzheimer's disease (AD) as well as by Lewy bodies dementia (DLB). The authors compared the effect of rivastigmine in the treatment of cognitive impairment and behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) in 30 AD and in 30 DLB patients. At baseline, DLB compared to AD patients showed a greater number of extrapyramidal symptoms (P < .005) and were similar regarding cognitive symptoms and BPSD. After treatment, both groups showed a comparable cognitive and psycho-behavioral improvement. A significant difference between AD and DLB patients was found for hallucinations (P < .002). Rivastigmine produces comparable cognitive benefits in patients with DLB and AD and also a significant improvement of behavioral disorders. These findings support the view that ChEIs should be considered a first-line treatment of the cognitive and psycho-behavioral symptoms of both AD and DLB.

Dementia with lewy bodies: therapeutic opportunities and pitfalls

OBJECTIVE

To review diagnoses and challenges of treating patients with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), commonly considered the second most common form of dementia.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Web of Science, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts databases were searched in January 2006 for clinical studies, case series, case studies, letters, and review articles on the treatment of DLB. Search terms included: aripiprazole, cholinesterase inhibitors, clozapine, dementia with Lewy bodies, donepezil, galantamine, Lewy body dementia, neuroleptics, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, rivastigmine, tacrine, ziprasidone. Applicable articles in the English language were reviewed. The bibliographies of these articles provided additional references.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles describing studies, case series, and case studies are included in this review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

DLB is commonly considered the second most common form of dementia, although some experts believe vascular dementia to be the second most common form. DLB is often under-diagnosed and misdiagnosed as Alzheimer's disease or Parkinson's related dementia. The core features of dementia with Lewy bodies are cognitive decline plus at least one of the following: fluctuations in cognition, visual hallucinations, and parkinsonism. Other supportive features include: neuroleptic sensitivity, repeated falls, syncope, transient loss of consciousness, REM sleep disturbances, depression, delusions, and nonvisual hallucinations.

CONCLUSION

Increased prudence with the use of neuroleptic agents is essential in DLBs because the use of these agents is associated with physical and cognitive decline and increased mortality. While neuroleptic sensitivity has been reported with the use of both typical and atypical antipsychotic medications, these medications are often necessary for the treatment of psychotic symptoms. Decreases in neuroleptic sensitivity can often be achieved by dose reductions, although neuroleptic discontinuation is sometimes necessary. Cholinesterase inhibitors may be especially useful in the treatment of DLB. Cholinergic deficits are associated with visual hallucinations, and cholinesterase inhibitors often result in resolution of hallucinations, improved cognition, and decreased behavioral disturbances.

Clinical practice with anti-dementia drugs: a consensus statement from British Association for Psychopharmacology

The British Association for Psychopharmacology (BAP) coordinated a meeting of experts to review the evidence on the drug treatment for dementia. The level of evidence (types) was rated using a standard system: Types 1a and 1b (evidence from meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials or at least one controlled trial respectively); types 2a and 2b (one well-designed study or one other type of quasi experimental study respectively); type 3 (non-experimental descriptive studies); and type 4 (expert opinion). There is type 1a evidence for cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine) for mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease; memantine for moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease; and for the use of bright light therapy and aromatherapy. There is type 1a evidence of no effect of anti inflammatory drugs or statins. There is conflicting evidence regarding oestrogens, with type 2a evidence of a protective effect of oestrogens but 1b evidence of a harmful effect. Type 1a evidence for any effect of B12 and folate will be forthcoming when current trials report. There is type 1b evidence for gingko biloba in producing a modest benefit of cognitive function; cholinesterase inhibitors for the treatment of people with Lewy body disease (particularly neuropsychiatric symptoms); cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine in treatment cognitive impairment associated with vascular dementia; and the effect of metal collating agents (although these should not be prescribed until more data on safety and efficacy are available). There is type 1b evidence to show that neither cholinesterase inhibitors nor vitamin E reduce the risk of developing Alzheimer's disease in people with mild cognitive impairment; and there is no evidence that there is any intervention that can prevent the onset of dementia. There is type 1b evidence for the beneficial effects of adding memantine to cholinesterase inhibitors, and type 2b evidence of positive switching outcomes from one cholinesterase inhibitor to another. There is type 2a evidence for a positive effect of reminiscence therapy, and type 2a evidence that cognitive training does not work. There is type 3 evidence to support the use of psychological interventions in dementia. There is type 2 evidence that a clinical diagnosis of dementia can be made accurately and that brain imaging increases that accuracy. Although the consensus statement dealt largely with medication, the role of dementia care in secondary services (geriatric medicine and old age psychiatry) and primary care, along with health economics, was discussed. There is ample evidence that there are effective treatments for people with dementia, and Alzheimer's disease in particular. Patients, their carers, and clinicians deserve to be optimistic in a field which often attracts therapeutic nihilism.

Rivastigmine for Alzheimer's disease

Alzheimer's disease is the most common form of neurodegenerative dementia and poses considerable health challenges to both patients and their families. Rivastigmine is a powerful slow-reversible, noncompetitive carbamate cholinesterase inhibitor that is approved for the treatment of mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of up to 6 months duration have shown beneficial effects of rivastigmine compared with placebo in measures of cognition and global functioning. Less rigorous but growing data suggest that the beneficial effects may endure for up to 5 years, extend to more advanced stages of Alzheimer's disease and may occur in noncognitive domains, such as activities of daily living and the behavioral symptoms of Alzheimer's disease. Evidence from controlled studies also supports the use of rivastigmine for cognitive and behavioral symptoms in Alzheimer's disease associated with vascular risk factors, dementia with Lewy bodies and Parkinson's disease dementia. Early and continued treatment of Alzheimer's disease with rivastigmine maximizes the observed beneficial effects. The most prominent adverse effect of rivastigmine is centrally mediated cholinergic gastrointestinal events, which can be minimized by slower dose-escalation intervals and administration with a full meal. Therapeutic dosing is 6-12 mg/day given twice daily, with higher doses having the potential for greater benefits.

Update on dementia with Lewy bodies

Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) presents to a range of specialists and involves a number of management challenges. The nosologic status of the disorder is controversial, especially its clinical overlap with Parkinson's disease-related dementia and its pathologic distinction from Alzheimer's disease. This article considers some of the controversies surrounding DLB with reference to recent literature. Emphasis is given to clinical topics, including the clinical phenomenology, differential diagnosis, and the treatment of core features of the disease.

PD-related psychosis: pathophysiology with therapeutical strategies

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a chronic, neurodegenerative disease with degeneration of the central dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra, leading to a depletion of dopamine (DA) in the striatum. This depletion causes the clinical hallmarks of this disease: bradykinesia, hypokinesia, rigidity, tremor and postural instability. Besides these well known motor symptoms, non-motor symptoms may develop, such as hyposmia, sleep disorders, autonomic disturbances, depression, cognitive impairment and psychosis. Pathophysiological mechanisms underlying these symptoms not only comprise Lewy body pathology in the central dopaminergic system, but also in the noradrenergic, serotinergic and cholinergic transmittersystems. Indeed, in Parkinson's disease, about 30-40% of the patients suffers fluctuating psychotic symptoms, mainly paranoid delusions and/or visual or acoustic hallucinations, symptoms considered to represent major contributors to patient and caregiver distress and nursing home placement. Endogenous (related to the disease process itself) as well as exogenous (related to therapeutical interventions) psychotogenic factors may contribute to the development of psychotic symptoms in PD. Therapeutical strategies, therefore, are aimed to reduce both endogenous and exogenous factors. To reduce endogenous psychotogenic factors, cholinesterase inhibitors, suggested to reduce cognitive deterioration, now seem to be the drugs of choice. In exogenously induced psychotic symptoms, atypical antipsychotics are considered the most effective. However, as psychotic symptoms in PD are often influenced by both endogenous and exogenous factors, a combination of both strategies may be preferred.

Response to rivastigmine or donepezil in Alzheimer's patients with symptoms suggestive of concomitant Lewy body pathology

BACKGROUND

A double-blind randomized trial evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of rivastigmine and donepezil in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) over 2 years. Baseline data indicated that some patients had symptoms suggestive of concomitant Lewy body disease. This retrospective analysis investigated whether AD patients with and without symptoms suggesting concomitant Lewy body pathology demonstrated different responses to therapy.

METHODS

AD patients were divided by the presence/absence of symptoms suggestive of concomitant Lewy body disease. These were identified by a concomitant diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies and/or use of anti-parkinsonian medication at baseline. Baseline characteristics, demographics, changes on efficacy parameters and adverse event (AE) frequencies were calculated for rivastigmine- and donepezil-treated patients. Efficacy parameters were the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Global Deterioration Scale (GDS), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) and AD Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living scale (ADCS-ADL). Main efficacy analyses were based on an intent-to-treat last observation carried forward (ITT-LOCF) population.

RESULTS

Both populations reached mean doses of rivastigmine and donepezil that were within therapeutic ranges. Nine hundred and ninety-four AD patients received study drug, of whom 49 (4.9%) had symptoms suggestive of concomitant Lewy body disease (25 rivastigmine, 24 donepezil). In this subpopulation, changes from baseline after 2 years of treatment with rivastigmine were significantly better than those seen with donepezil on the SIB, MMSE and ADCS-ADL (ANCOVA or Wilcoxon analyses, p < 0.05, ITT-LOCF). Statistical significance was not maintained in non-ITT-LOCF analyses, except for EP analyses on the SIB and ADCS-ADL (both p < 0.05). Rivastigmine also provided significantly better functioning than donepezil in patients without Lewy body pathology, as shown by a significant treatment difference at endpoint on the ADCS-ADL (p < 0.05, ITT-LOCF; not maintained in non-ITT-LOCF analyses). NPI changes from baseline did not differ significantly between treatment groups. AD patients with symptoms suggestive of concomitant Lewy body disease receiving rivastigmine or donepezil experienced fewer gastrointestinal side effects, leading to fewer discontinuations due to AEs, compared with patients without Lewy body pathology.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective analysis, AD patients who had symptoms suggestive of concomitant Lewy body disease appeared to show greater treatment responses to rivastigmine than to donepezil, and experienced fewer adverse events under either drug, compared with patients without Lewy body pathology.

Prise en charge thérapeutique de la démence à corps de Lewy

Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is known for its partial resistance and hypersensitivity to some treatments, but DLB is treatable with cholinesterase inhibitors, sometimes better than in Alzheimer's disease. Cholinesterase inhibitors have a symptomatic effect on cognition and behavior. Nevertheless, new antipsychotics are sometimes also useful to manage psychotic symptoms. Although DLB patients respond less well to levodopa than patients with Parkinson's disease, 75 percent of DLB patients improve with levodopa, which is the best-tolerated dopaminergic agent. Nonpharmacological strategies include speech therapy, physiotherapy, psychotherapy, and educational support groups for care givers.

The neurochemical and behavioral effects of the novel cholinesterase-monoamine oxidase inhibitor, ladostigil, in response to L-dopa and L-tryptophan, in rats

The novel drugs, ladostigil (TV3326) and TV3279, are R and S isomers, respectively, derived from a combination of the carbamate cholinesterase (ChE) inhibitor, rivastigmine, and the pharmacophore of the monoamine oxidase (MAO) B inhibitor, rasagiline. They were developed for the treatment of comorbidity of dementia with Parkinsonism. In the present study, we determined the effects of these drugs on both aminergic neurotransmitter levels and motor behavioral activity in naïve and in L-dopa- or L-tryptophan-induced rats. Chronic treatment of rats with ladostigil (52 mg kg(-1) for 21 days) inhibited hippocampal and striatal MAO A and B activities by >90%, increased striatal levels of dopamine and serotonin, and inhibited striatal ChE activity by approximately 50%. Chronic TV3279 (26 mg kg(-1) for 21 days) similarly inhibited approximately 50% of striatal ChE activity, but did not affect MAO activity or amine levels. In sharp contrast to the inductive effect of the MAO A/B inhibitor, tranylcypromine (TCP), on stereotyped hyperactivity in response to L-dopa (50 mg kg(-1)) or L-tryptophan (100 mg kg(-1)), ladostigil completely inhibited these behavioral hyperactivity syndromes. Accordingly, acute rivastigmine (2 mg kg(-1)) and chronic TV3279 abolished the ability of TCP to initiate L-dopa-induced hyperactivity, while scopolamine (0.5 mg kg(-1)) reversed the inhibitory effect of chronic ladostigil on L-dopa-induced hyperactivity, suggesting that ladostigil may attenuate successive locomotion by activating central cholinergic muscarinic receptors.Finally, while chronic ladostigil administration to naïve rats resulted in preserved spontaneous motor behavior, acute treatment with ladostigil decreased motor performance, compared to control animals. In contrast, chronic as well as acute treatments with TV3279 reduced spontaneous motor activity. Thus, the aminergic potentiation by ladostigil may counteract its cholinergic inhibitory effect on spontaneous motor behavior. Our results suggest that potentiation of both aminergic and cholinergic transmission systems by ladostigil contributes equally to motor behavior performance, which is substantially impaired in comorbidity of dementia with Parkinsonism including dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB).

Effect of rivastigmine in the treatment of behavioral disturbances associated with dementia: review of neuropsychiatric impairment in Alzheimer's disease

Cognitive decline is conventionally regarded as the defining clinical symptom of Alzheimer's disease (AD), but behavioral and neuropsychiatric symptoms are also present throughout the course of the disease. In fact, behavioral symptoms may appear before cognitive decline is diagnosed. The presence of these symptoms may predict an increasing need for community-based services or even nursing home placement. The characteristic behavioral and neuropsychiatric symptoms associated with AD may be related to the same pathophysiology that underlies the cognitive abnormalities. AD is characterized by a loss of cholinergic neurons as well as by the presence of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) and senile plaques in brain regions with cholinergic deficits, resulting in a deficiency in acetylcholine (ACh) in areas of the brain that modulate cognition, behavior, and emotion. Cholinesterase inhibitors are thought to augment or maximize the concentration of ACh in the synaptic cleft. Rivastigmine is a dual inhibitor of both acetylcholin esterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE), enzymes involved in hydrolysis of ACh. Literature searches using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were performed to identify studies of rivastigmine (through August 2005) that assessed neuropsychiatric aspects of AD. Rivastigmine has been demonstrated to be safe and effective in stabilizing or improving the cognitive symptoms of AD in 3 large, well-controlled, randomized clinical trials, which also demonstrated that rivastig mine improves overall global functioning. Smaller studies and meta-analyses of pooled data from the 3 large trials have suggested that rivastigmine may improve the behavioral and neuropsychiatric symptoms associated with AD.

A comparison of the efficacy of donepezil in Parkinson's disease with dementia and dementia with Lewy bodies

BACKGROUND

Parkinson's disease with dementia (PDD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) overlap in phenomenology and neurochemical deficits. We hypothesised they would not differ in their response to the cholinesterase inhibitor donepezil.

METHODS

We recruited 70 subjects, 30 DLB and 40 PDD, in an open label study to compare the efficacy of donepezil in these two patient groups. They were assessed at baseline, 4, 12 and 20 weeks. The main outcome measures were the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) and motor sub-section of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS III).

RESULTS

PDD patients were younger than DLB and had more severe parkinsonism at baseline. The groups were similar on all other variables of interest. By 20 weeks the mean MMSE score increased by 3.9 points in the DLB group and by 3.2 points in PDD. The mean NPI score reduced by 14.6 points for DLB and 12.0 points for PDD. These treatment effects were all significant compared to baseline (p < 0.001) but there were no significant between-group treatment differences (MMSE p = 0.56, NPI p = 0.39). UPDRS III motor scores did not change significantly from baseline values in either group. Although adverse effects were common (69%) they were usually mild and 64 patients (91%) completed the study. The four patients who did withdraw with adverse effects all had a PDD diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Donepezil produced similar improvements in cognition and behaviour in DLB and PDD. This supports the hypothesis that the two disorders are closely related clinically and neurobiologically. Larger scale, placebo controlled clinical trials are needed to provide an evidence base to guide the clinical use of cholinesterase inhibitors in Lewy body disease.

Rivastigmine and donepezil treatment in moderate to moderately-severe Alzheimer's disease over a 2-year period

OBJECTIVES

Randomised controlled trials that directly compare cholinesterase inhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease have been characterised by significant methodological limitations. As a consequence, they have failed to establish whether there are differences between agents in this class. To help address this question, a double-blind, randomised, controlled, multicentre trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of cholinesterase inhibitor treatment in patients with moderate to moderately-severe Alzheimer's disease over a 2-year period.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to rivastigmine 3-12 mg/day or donepezil 5-10 mg/day. Efficacy measures comprised assessments of cognition, activities of daily living, global functioning and behavioural symptoms. Safety and tolerability assessments included adverse events and measurement of vital signs.

RESULTS

In total, 994 patients received cholinesterase inhibitor treatment (rivastigmine, n = 495; donepezil, n = 499), and 57.9% of patients completed the study. The most frequent reason for premature discontinuation in both treatment groups was adverse events, primarily gastrointestinal. Adverse events were more frequent in the rivastigmine group during the titration phase, but similar in the maintenance phase. Serious adverse events were reported by 31.7% of rivastigmine- and 32.5% of donepezil-treated patients, respectively. Rivastigmine and donepezil had similar effects on measures of cognition and behaviour, but rivastigmine showed a statistically significant advantage on measures of activities of daily living and global functioning in the ITT-LOCF population. However, this was not maintained in the non-ITT-LOCF populations. In secondary subgroup analyses, AD patients who had genotypes that encoded for full expression of the butyrylcholinesterase enzyme (BuChE wt/wt; n = 226/340), who were < 75 years of age (n = 362/994) or who had symptoms suggestive of concomitant Lewy body disease (n = 49/994) showed significantly greater benefits from rivastigmine treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Cholinesterase inhibitor treatment may offer continued therapeutic benefit for up to 2 years in patients with moderate AD. Although both drugs performed similarly on cognition and behaviour, rivastigmine may provide greater benefit in activities of daily living and global functioning.