Vocally disruptive behavior in the elderly: a systematic review

Effects of Nonpharmacological Interventions on Disruptive Vocalisation in Nursing Home Patients With Dementia—A Systematic Review

Background

Vocally disruptive behaviour is a common and difficult to treat condition in older residents with dementia. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy of nonpharmacological interventions in its management in persons with dementia residing in a nursing home.

Methodology

A systematic search was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases and reference lists from relevant publications on various nonpharmacological approaches to manage vocally disruptive behaviour in nursing home residents. The method of appraisal was through the National Institutes of Health scoring for the Quality Assessment of controlled intervention studies. Inclusion criteria included residents of nursing homes over the age of 65 with dementia and disruptive vocalisation. Only randomised controlled trials published in English were included.

Results

A total of 5,606 articles were identified, which cover 501 trials, of which 23 were selected. There were fourteen studies observed to have an impact of clinical and statistical significance with interventions including (i) a multidimensional approach with different nonpharmacological interventions, (ii) multisensory stimulation, (iii) staff education and training, (iv) personalised bathing, and (v) pain recognition and appropriate management. Seven studies demonstrated no observable effect whereas two showed worsening in vocally disruptive behaviour.

Conclusions

Many aspects of vocally disruptive behaviour management are poorly understood. Limited empirical evidence supports the use of several nonpharmacological interventions to reduce it. There is more robust evidence to support the use of a tailored approach to management over the universal approach.

[Sleep disorders in patients with a neurocognitive disorder]

INTRODUCTION

Sleep disorders are prevalent in patients with a neurocognitive disorder, and diagnosis and treatment in these patients remain challenging in clinical practice.

METHODS

This narrative review offers a systematic approach to diagnose and treat sleep disorders in neurocognitive disorders.

RESULTS

Alzheimer's disease is often associated with circadian rhythm disorders, chronic insomnia, and sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome. Alpha-synucleinopathies (e.g., Parkinson's disease and Lewy body dementia) are often associated with a rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder, restless legs syndrome, chronic insomnia, and sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome. A focused history allows to diagnose most sleep disorders. Clinicians should ensure to gather the following information in all patients with a neurocognitive disorder: (1) the presence of difficulties falling asleep or staying asleep, (2) the impact of sleep disturbances on daily functioning (fatigue, sleepiness and other daytime consequences), and (3) abnormal movements in sleep. Sleep diaries and questionnaires can assist clinicians in screening for specific sleep disorders. Polysomnography is recommended if a rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder or a sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome are suspected. Sleep complaints should prompt clinicians to ensure that comorbidities interfering with sleep are properly managed. The main treatment for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome remains continuous positive airway pressure, as its efficacy has been demonstrated in patients with neurocognitive disorders. Medications should also be reviewed, and time of administration should be optimized (diuretics and stimulating medications in the morning, sedating medications in the evening). Importantly, cholinesterase inhibitors (especially donepezil) may trigger insomnia. Switching to morning dosing or to an alternative drug may help. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia is indicated to treat chronic insomnia in neurocognitive disorders. False beliefs regarding sleep should be addressed with the patient and their caregiver. The sleep environment should be optimized (decrease light exposure at night, minimize noise, avoid taking vital signs, etc.). Sleep restriction can be considered as patients with a neurocognitive disorder often spend too much time in bed. The need for naps should be assessed case by case as naps may contribute to insomnia in some patients but allow others to complete their diurnal activities. Trazodone (50mg) may also be used under certain circumstances in chronic insomnia. Recent evidence does not support a role for exogenous melatonin in patients with a neucognitive disorder and insomnia. Patients in long-term care facilities are often deprived of an adequate diurnal exposure to light. Increasing daytime exposure to light may improve sleep and mood. Patients with circadian rhythm disorders can also benefit from light therapy (morning bright light therapy in case of phase delay and evening bright light therapy in case of phase advance). Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder can lead to violent behaviors, and the sleeping environment should be secured (e.g., mattress on the floor, remove surrounding objects). Medication exacerbating this disorder should be stopped if possible. High dose melatonin (6 to 18mg) or low dose clonazepam (0.125-0.25mg) at bedtime may be used to reduce symptoms. Melatonin is preferred in first-line as it is generally well tolerated with few side effects. Patients with restless legs syndrome should be investigated for iron deficiency. Medication decreasing dopaminergic activity should be reduced or stopped if possible. Behavioral strategies such as exercise and leg massages may be beneficial. Low-dose dopamine agonists (such as pramipexole 0.125mg two hours before bedtime) can be used to treat the condition, but a prolonged treatment may paradoxically worsen the symptoms. Alpha-2-delta calcium channel ligands can also be used while monitoring for the risk of falls.

CONCLUSION

Multiple and sustained nonpharmacological approaches are recommended for the treatment of sleep disturbances in patients with neurocognitive disorder. Pharmacological indications remain limited, and further randomized clinical trials integrating a multimodal approach are warranted to evaluate the treatment of sleep disorders in specific neurocognitive disorders.

Very frequent physical aggression and vocalizations in nursing home residents with dementia

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the 2-week prevalence and correlates of very frequent physical aggression (PA) and vocalizations in nursing home (NH)-residents with dementia.

METHOD/DESIGN

This cross-sectional study used combined data of 2074 NH-residents from four studies, collected from 119 dementia special care units in 26 Dutch NH. Very frequent PA was defined as scoring 6 or 7 on the items 'hitting', pushing', 'biting' and 'kicking' of the Cohen Mansfield Agitation Inventory; very frequent vocalizations as scoring 6 or 7 on 'screaming' and 'making strange noises'. We compared NH-residents with very frequent PA or vocalizations with residents with less frequent PA or vocalizations, assessing correlates using univariate and multivariate multilevel logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

We found a 2-week prevalence of 2.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.63-2.89) of very frequent PA and 11.5% of very frequent vocalizations (95% CI: 10.23-12.98). Very frequent PA was only associated with apathy (odds ratio (OR)=1.93, 95% CI: 1.04-3.61). Correlates of very frequent vocalizations were age (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.951-0.998), dementia severity (overall p-value 0.020), antipsychotic drug use (OR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.08-2.26), antiepileptic drug use (OR = 2.75, 95% CI: 1.34-5.68) and euphoria (OR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.22-3.31).

CONCLUSION

Characteristics of NH-residents with very frequent PA or very frequent vocalizations differ from those of NH-residents with less frequent PA or vocalizations. Frontal lobe damage, boredom, pain and/or external factors may explain several of the found associations, but further research is necessary. Our findings may contribute to better care for these residents and thereby to improving their quality of life.

Vocally disruptive behaviour in nursing home residents in Ireland: a descriptive study

BACKGROUND

Vocally disruptive behaviour (VDB) is relatively common in nursing home residents but difficult to treat. There is limited study on prevalence and treatment of VDB. We hypothesise that VDB is a result of complex interaction between patient factors and environmental contributors.

METHODS

Residents of nursing homes in south Dublin were the target population for this study. Inclusion criteria were that the residents were 65 years or over and exhibited VDB significant enough for consideration in the resident's care plan. Information on typology and frequency of VDB, Interventions employed and their efficacy, diagnoses, Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory scores, Mini-Mental State Examination scores, and Barthel Index scores were obtained.

RESULTS

Eight percent of nursing home residents were reported to display VDB, most commonly screaming (in 39.4% of vocally disruptive residents). VDB was associated with physical agitation and dementia; together, these two factors accounted for almost two-thirds of the variation in VDB between residents. One-to-one attention, engaging in conversation, redirecting behaviour, and use of psychotropic medication were reported by nurses as the most useful interventions. Analgesics were the medications most commonly used (65.7%) followed by quetiapine (62.9%), and these were reportedly effective in 82.6% and 77.2% of residents respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

VDB is common, challenging, and difficult to manage. The study of VDB is limited by a variety of factors that both contribute to this behaviour and make its treatment challenging. Issues relating to capacity and ethics make it difficult to conduct randomised controlled trials of treatments for VDB in the population affected.

'Socialised care futility' in the care of older people in hospital who call out repetitively: An ethnographic study

BACKGROUND

People living with dementia may call out repetitively, sometimes called disruptive vocalisation, or verbal agitation. In literature and policy, patients who call out repetitively are assumed to be expressing an unmet need, which should be met. Yet there has been little systematic study of this patient group in an acute hospital setting.

OBJECTIVES

To better understand patients who call out repetitively and to identify what care looks like in an acute hospital setting.

DESIGN

Ethnography.

SETTINGS

Ten acute geriatric medical wards in two hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

30 cognitively impaired patients who were calling out repetitively, and 15 members of hospital staff.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews with hospital staff, 150 h of ward observations and informal conversations with staff, scrutiny of medical and nursing documentation, and measures of patient health status.

RESULTS

Patients who called out were moderately or severely cognitively impaired, often had delirium, were very physically disabled, and many were approaching the end of life. Most hospital staff were found to hold contradictory views: that calling out represents distress or unmet need, but that nothing can be done to alleviate the calling out. During informal conversations, most staff also tended to say that they intuitively recognised when intervening was likely to alleviate calling out. During observations, many staff appeared to and spoke of the ability to 'block' calling out. As a result we argue that social, emotional and physical needs may get overlooked. We argue that some calling out is due to a need that is unmeetable. We also found that while staff would talk about strategies for identifying need, observations and hospital documentation did not support evidence of systematic attempts to identify potential need.

CONCLUSION

Calling out repetitively within a hospital setting is difficult for staff to understand and to respond to. This is because many of these patients are severely cognitively impaired, often immobile and dependent on their professional carers. We argue that a form of socialised care futility is communicated between staff and is used to rationalise becoming unresponsive to calling-out. We explain this phenomenon as resulting from two protective mechanisms: defence of staff's professional identity as competent practitioners; and defence of staff as having personal morality. Socialised care futility risks good quality care, therefore systematic strategies to assess and manage possible need should be developed, even if calling out remains irresolvable in some cases.

The Effects of Hand Massage on Stress and Agitation Among People with Dementia in a Hospital Setting: A Pilot Study

Agitation in people with dementia is a growing concern as it causes distress for both patients and their nurses and may contribute to relational disorders. Previous studies involving patients with dementia living in long-term care facilities have reported decreased agitation following massage. The objective of this pilot study was to investigate the effect of hand massage on agitation and biological markers of stress in patients with dementia hospitalized in an acute geriatric psychiatry service. In this randomized controlled trial we included 40 agitated patients with dementia with an intervention group and a control group. The study is designed to test the effect of seven hand massages over three continuous weeks on agitation and levels of salivary cortisol (sC) and alpha-amylase (sAA). Compared to the control group, the intervention group exhibited larger increases in sC and sAA at week 1 from before to after the massage, but larger decreases at week 2 and 3, with a significant group effect for sAA at week 2. Agitation scores were not significantly different between the groups but tended to decrease more in the intervention group than the control group. This study provides first encouraging results suggesting that hand massage might have beneficial effects on stress and agitation in hospitalized patients with dementia. It also highlights the challenges associated with conducting such studies with this complex patient population. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and the benefits of hand massage as part of routine care for patients with dementia.

Phenomenological contribution to understanding of vocally disruptive behaviour: A clinical case study in a patient with dementia

BACKGROUND

Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) cause great suffering in patients and their families. Phenomenology can help clarify the diagnosis and propose some new therapeutic responses using Daseinsanalyse. Separation issues understood using the phenomenological description of the melancholic type (MT) by Tellenbach may further shed light on our understanding of depression in dementia.

SUBJECT AND METHODS

In a 90-year-old woman presenting with advanced (Clinical Dementia Rating 3) mixed dementia and BPSD in the form of vocally disruptive behaviour (VDB), we discuss separation anxiety as the aetiopathogenic hypothesis. Depression and BPSD were assessed using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory, Cornell scale, and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale to confirm our second phenomenological diagnostic hypothesis, ie, melancholy. The Big Five Inventory scale filled in by a proxy was also used to evaluate the patient's premorbid personality. We then propose an explanatory frame of VDB and depression through the standard phenomenological assessment of its relation to time, space, self, and other.

RESULTS

Confirming MT, we found an inhibited temperament and low openness to experience in the patient, as well as a symbiotic relationship with a close relative (the other).

CONCLUSION

Separation anxiety may well explain the patient's MT expressed by VDB. Melancholic type and her symbiotic relationship led to a situation unbearable to the patient and her close relative unable to delegate care to a specialized team.

RUNNING HEAD

Phenomenology in vocally disruptive behaviour in dementia. We have found new explanations in similar clinical cases in dementia as follows. A patient presenting with vocally disruptive behaviour has a melancholic type, a behavioural-inhibited temperament, and marital violence in the past. Phenomenology may help explain this profile with neurobiological disorders. The life trajectory, from childhood into older age, must be taken into account to understand behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia.

Vocally disruptive behavior: A case report and literature review

Vocally disruptive behavior (VDB) is a common and particularly difficult symptom to manage in dementia. VDB is usually considered collectively with agitation and aggression as a component of behavioral and psychological symptoms in dementia and is therefore poorly understood as an individual symptom. A review of the literature is described where VDB as a challenging behavior has been individually examined as a symptom. A case of VDB occurring in patient with dementia is described where the patient's repetitive vocalizations responded to treatment with pregabalin. This has not been previously reported in the literature. The prevalence of VDB, the factors associated with it and the current management guidelines for clinicians are outlined with a review of the drug treatment strategies for VDB. Pregabalin with its unique pharmacological profile and excellent tolerability should be considered as a possible treatment for VDB where drug treatment is indicated.

Taking Another Look: Thoughts on Behavioral Symptoms in Dementia and Their Measurement

This article proposes taking another look at behavioral symptoms of dementia (BSDs) both from a theoretical perspective that informs research and practice and from a measurement perspective. We discuss why this rethinking of behaviors impacts current models of care and our ability to better detect outcomes from interventions. We propose that BSDs be viewed from a pattern perspective and provide some suggestions for how to identify and measure these patterns that can influence the timing and type of intervention. Evidence suggests that BSDs are complex, sequential, patterned clusters of behavior recurring repeatedly in the same individual and escalate significantly without timely intervention. However, BSDs are frequently viewed as separate behaviors rather than patterns or clusters of behaviors, a view that affects current research questions as well as the choice, timing, and outcomes of interventions. These symptoms cause immense distress to persons with the disease and their caregivers, trigger hospitalizations and nursing home placement, and are associated with increased care costs. Despite their universality and that symptoms manifest across disease etiologies and stages, behaviors tend to be underrecognized, undertreated, and overmanaged by pharmacological treatments that may pose more harm than benefit.

[Shouting in dementia]

Shouting in dementia is a frequent manifestation in institution and is often considered to be extremely disruptive. It remains the most misunderstood behavioral disorder. Shouting or screaming is not a necessarily pejorative qualifier as defined by public authorities and institutions. It can take a multitude of meanings and be characterized alternately as a "reflex", a "behavior", a "language", an "aggression". Shouting has a multifactorial causation. It can translate organic or somatic disorders, but also psychological, cognitive and/or environmental disturbances that clinicians should look for. The 5W method is a reliable and easy to use method in clinical practice to allow analysis of shouting in dementia. There is still too early and massive use of pharmacological approach in taking charge of the repetitive shouts in dementia. Instead, it is necessary to use a first-line non-pharmacological approach based on patient-centered, environment-centered and/or entourage-centered interventions after careful multidisciplinary assessment of this behaviour by the healthcare team.

The effect of a lollipop on vocally disruptive behavior in a patient with frontotemporal dementia: a case-study

A problematic and disturbing behavior which can develop in people with dementia, is vocally disruptive behavior (VDB). To date, the study of VDB is underdeveloped and with only a limited knowledge base. Medications commonly used in VDB have limited benefits and specific risks in patients with dementia. This report details the case of a patient with frontotemporal dementia with VDB, which responded very well by providing a lollipop. Subsequently, we pose theory-based hypotheses in order to try to explain the beneficial effect of this intervention. This may contribute to a better understanding of VDB and possible treatment strategies.

A follow-up intervention in severely demented patients after discharge from a special Alzheimer acute care unit: impact on early emergency room re-hospitalization rate

BACKGROUND

Emergency room (ER) re-hospitalizations are prevalent in severe Alzheimer's disease affected older patients.

DESIGN

Quasi-experimental before and after study.

SETTING

Discharge of severely demented patients from a Special Alzheimer Acute Care Unit.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 390 patients hospitalized in the unit from 2007 through 2009, with at least one of the following characteristics: severe disruptive behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) (agitation, aggressiveness, and psychotic symptoms), change of living arrangement related to BPSD, exhaustion of the principal caregiver, and discharge of a subject with anosognosia living alone in the community.

INTERVENTION

The intervention consisted of an individualized care plan, targeting the problems observed during the hospital stay, implemented by the means of regular telephone contacts (in the first week after discharge, before the end of the first month, and then at 3 and 6 months) between a geriatric team and the patient's caregiver. Information was gathered on functional decline, BPSD, change of living arrangement and treatment. The calls were followed by a telephone intervention providing advice, support, and information to the caregiver. When required, these calls were followed by a consultation with a physician or psychologist, or by a consultation in the patient's home.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome measure was the ER re-hospitalization rate, defined as occurring within 31 days of discharge.

RESULTS

The early ER re-hospitalization rate was 8.39% in 2007 versus 8.02% in 2008 (p = 0.818) and 7.47% in 2009 (p = 0.563). Vocal disruptive behavior are more prevalent in re-hospitalized patients (9.64% versus 3.97%, p = 0.05) than in non re-hospitalized patients.

CONCLUSION

We found a nonsignificant decrease of early ER re-hospitalization rate at 1 month after discharge. Interventions addressing severe dementia affected patients with BPSD are needed, as this is a major issue in the organization of health care systems.

Nursing Staff’s Understanding Expressions of People With Advanced Dementia Disease

People with advanced dementia disease (ADD) are known to have communication difficulties and thus it presents a challenge in understanding the expressions of these people. Because successful communication presupposes cooperation at least between 2 individuals, both individual’s actions must be acknowledged. The aim of this study is to describe nursing staff’s ways of understanding the expressions of people with ADD when communicating with them. Interviews from 8 nursing staff were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Two themes were constructed: “Being in communication” and “Doing communication.” Being in communication means that nursing staff perceive people with ADD as being capable of communication. Doing communication means that nursing staff attempt different individualized strategies to understand what people with ADD communicate. Good care of people with ADD presupposes nursing staff that are willing and able to relate to other people and to maintain good care for people with ADD continuous education and supervision are needed.

Reducing verbal agitation in people with dementia: evaluation of an intervention based on the satisfaction of basic needs

OBJECTIVES

Positive results have been reported with psychosocial interventions used to reduce verbal agitation (VA) in people with dementia, but there is no clear information regarding the proportion of persons who demonstrate significant behavioural improvement with such treatments. The main objectives of this pilot study are (a) to identify the proportion of persons with dementia who demonstrate significant behavioural improvement with a need-based intervention to reduce VA and (b) to further evaluate the effectiveness of this type of intervention.

METHOD

A single-group repeated measures design was used (N = 26). An individualized multicomponent intervention addressing needs for comfort, social interaction and sensory stimulation was applied by a therapist during 30 min sessions during the time of day when VA was most severe. The frequency and duration of VA were measured through computer-assisted direct observation several times before, during and after the intervention.

RESULTS

A statistically significant reduction of the duration of VA during the intervention phase relative to other phases of the protocol was found. This effect was limited to the period during which the treatment is being applied. Half of the participants (54%) demonstrated considerable behavioural improvement during the intervention (50% reduction of symptoms) and those whose functioning is best preserved showed the best response to the intervention.

CONCLUSION

This need-based intervention appears promising for improving the behaviour of a considerable proportion of patients.

Factors associated with problematic vocalizations in nursing home residents with dementia

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

Problematic vocalizations (PVs) are the most frequent and persistent disruptive behaviors exhibited by nursing home residents with dementia. Understanding factors associated with these behaviors are important to prevent or reduce them. We used the Need-Driven Dementia-Compromised Behavior model to identify the characteristics of persons with dementia who are likely to display nonaggressive and aggressive PVs and the conditions under which these behaviors are likely to occur and persist.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This multisite descriptive study included 138 residents of 17 nursing homes, and approximately half had a history of PVs. Background data were gathered through interviews, chart reviews, and administration of physical and neuropsychological assessments. Proximal data were obtained from observations and videotapes.

RESULTS

When the 2 subscales of the Verbal Behavior Scale were used as the dependent variables, agreeableness and conscientiousness, positive affect, and discomfort were associated with nonaggressive vocalizations, and general health state (GHS), age, and negative and positive affect were associated with aggressive vocalizations. When the verbally agitated (nonaggressive) section of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory was the dependent variable, the background factors of gender, agreeableness, GHS, and age remained predictors, as did the proximal factors of affect and discomfort.

IMPLICATIONS

We identified 5 background factors and 3 proximal factors as risk factors for PVs in persons with dementia, with variation between nonaggressive or aggressive PVs. These data provide direction for caregiving for persons with dementia and design of interventions to prevent or reduce PVs.

The meanings of screams in older people living with dementia in a nursing home

BACKGROUND

Screaming is common among older persons living with dementia in nursing homes. Research on this population has not provided a useful basis for understanding such behavior that could help determine appropriate interventions. The purpose of this study was to explore the meanings of screams in older people living with dementia and their influencing factors.

METHODS

Critical ethnography was selected as the research design. Seven triads, each composed of an older person living with dementia who screamed, a primary family caregiver, and one or two formal caregivers, were recruited in a nursing home. Various data collection methods and Spradley's (1979) ethnographic analysis were used.

RESULTS

Screaming is related to vulnerability, suffering, and loss of meaning experienced by older persons. This singular behavior also expresses various final outcomes that can be differentiated through modulation criteria. The meanings of screams are influenced by stability and flexibility in the nursing care organization and reciprocal effects between older persons who scream and others in the nursing home environment. Each person's screams constitute a unique language that can be learned. Other influencing factors include respect for the older person's wishes, needs, and personality, shifts in power relations within the triad, and feelings of powerlessness and guilt in family and formal caregivers.

CONCLUSIONS

This study advances knowledge of the meanings of screams in older persons living with dementia. It has implications for and offers insight on culturally congruent care for older persons living with dementia and the people around them.

Psychosocial interventions for dementia patients in long-term care

BACKGROUND

Psychosocial interventions in long-term care have the potential to improve the quality of care and quality of life of persons with dementia. Our aim is to explore the evidence and consensus on psychosocial interventions for persons with dementia in long-term care.

METHODS

This study comprises an appraisal of research reviews and of European, U.S. and Canadian dementia guidelines.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight reviews related to long-term care psychosocial interventions were selected. Behavioral management techniques (such as behavior therapy), cognitive stimulation, and physical activities (such as walking) were shown positively to affect behavior or physical condition, or to reduce depression. There are many other promising interventions, but methodological weaknesses did not allow conclusions to be drawn. The consensus presented in the guidelines emphasized the importance of care tailored to the needs and capabilities of persons with dementia and consideration of the individual's life context.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term care offers the possibility for planned care through individualized care plans, and consideration of the needs of persons with dementia and the individual life context. While using recommendations based on evidence and consensus is important to shape future long-term care, further well-designed research is needed on psychosocial interventions in long-term care to strengthen the evidence base for such care.

The importance of getting back to nature for people with dementia

As people age, the ability to interact with the outdoors may lessen. Frailty and mobility problems create barriers to engaging in outdoor activities or even experiencing the outdoors. The barriers are greater for people with dementia. As the disease worsens to the point of institutionalization, access to the outdoors may be completely barred and opportunities relinquished to the determination of facility personnel. This article will review current literature and some older seminal works on nature and nature-based stimuli for people with dementia, especially those living in nursing homes.

Top cited papers in International Psychogeriatrics: 6b. Behavioral disorders and caregivers' reaction in Taiwanese patients with Alzheimer's disease

The behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are common and serious problems that affect the quality of life of the patients who experience such symptoms as well as their caregivers (Matsui et al., 2006). BPSD present a major challenge in the medical management of cognitively impaired patients. Our paper entitled “Behavioral disorders and caregivers’ reaction in Taiwanese patients with Alzheimer's disease” (hereafter referred to as the “paper”) (Fuh et al., 2001) has been cited widely, reflecting the importance of these clinical issues and the growing international interest in studies of BPSD.