Efficacy of landiolol for the treatment of junctional ectopic tachycardia resulting from sepsis

Safety and Efficacy of Landiolol Hydrochloride in Children with Tachyarrhythmia of Various Etiologies

The safety and efficacy of landiolol have not been fully elucidated in pediatric patients. This study aimed to clarify the safety and efficacy of landiolol in a pediatric cohort. We retrospectively assessed the clinical features of 21 pediatric patients who were administered landiolol at our hospital. We also investigated the rates of sinus rhythm conversion and heart rate response. The median patient age was 7 months (interquartile range 1-13 months). The etiology of tachyarrhythmia was junctional ectopic tachycardia in 10 patients (47.6%), atrial tachycardia in 10 patients (47.6%), and ventricular tachycardia in 1 patient (4.8%). Of the 21 children, 18 (85.7%) had congenital heart defects, including 14 (77.8%) in whom a landiolol infusion was performed perioperatively. The landiolol infusion was effective in 18 pediatric patients (85.7%), as measured by the conversion to sinus rhythm or a reduced heart rate. Atrial tachycardia in the perioperative period was terminated in all patients. Of 7 patients with tachyarrhythmias unrelated to the perioperative period, landiolol was effective in 5. No adverse effects were reported in any patient. Landiolol infusion is effective and safe in pediatric patients with tachyarrhythmia of various etiologies, especially those with atrial tachyarrhythmia during the perioperative period.

Landiolol for managing atrial fibrillation in intensive care

Landiolol is an injectable ultrashort acting beta-blocker with high beta1 selectivity indicated for heart rate control of atrial fibrillation in the emergency and critical care setting. Accordingly, landiolol is associated with a significantly reduced risk of arterial hypotension and negative inotropic effects. Based on this particular profile along with the clinical experience in Japan for more than a decade landiolol represents a promising agent for the management of elevated heart rate and atrial fibrillation in intensive care patients even with catecholamine requirements. This article provides a review and perspective of landiolol for heart rate control in intensive care patients based on the current literature.

Management of postoperative junctional ectopic tachycardia in pediatric patients: a survey of 30 centers in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland

Postoperative junctional ectopic tachycardia (JET) is a frequent complication after pediatric cardiac surgery. Current recommendations on how and when to treat JET are inconsistent. We evaluated the management strategies of postoperative JET in German-speaking countries. We sent an online survey to 30 centers of pediatric cardiology that perform surgery for congenital heart defects in Germany (24), Austria (4), and Switzerland (2). The survey asked 18 questions about how and in what treatment sequence postoperative JET was managed. All 30 centers completed the survey (100% return rate). There was general agreement that the management of JET is based on administration of antiarrhythmic drugs, body surface cooling, and temporary pacing. Many centers presented treatment algorithms based on published literature, all centers named amiodarone as the first drug of choice. Significant disagreement was found concerning the timing and sequential order of additional therapeutic measures and particularly about the dosing of amiodarone and the role of R-wave synchronized atrial pacing.

CONCLUSION

This survey reveals that from center to center, the treatment of postoperative JET may vary substantially. Future work should focus on those treatment modalities where a high rate of variation is found. Such studies may be of value to achieve commonly adopted treatment recommendations. What is known: • Treatment of postoperative junctional ectopic tachycardia is predominantly based on administration of antiarrhythmic drugs, therapeutic cooling, and temporary pacing. • Amiodarone is the antiarrhythmic drug of choice in this context. What is new: • Dosing and duration of administration of amiodarone differ relevantly from center to center. • The sequential order of drug administration, therapeutic cooling, and pacing is not consistent.