Case report and review of the literature: the utilisation of a ventricular assist device as bridge to recovery for anthracycline-induced ventricular dysfunction

Anthracycline-Induced Cardiomyopathy in Cancer Survivors: Management and Long-Term Implications

Recent advancements in personalized treatments, such as anthracycline chemotherapy, coupled with timely diagnoses, have contributed to a decrease in cancer-specific mortality rates and an improvement in cancer prognosis. Anthracyclines, a potent class of antibiotics, are extensively used as anticancer medications to treat a broad spectrum of tumors. Despite these advancements, a considerable number of cancer survivors face increased risks of treatment complications, particularly the cardiotoxic effects of chemotherapeutic drugs like anthracyclines. These effects can range from subclinical manifestations to severe consequences such as irreversible heart failure and death, highlighting the need for effective management of chemotherapy side effects for improved cancer care outcomes. Given the lack of specific treatments, early detection of subclinical cardiac events post-anthracycline therapy and the implementation of preventive strategies are vital. An interdisciplinary approach involving cardiovascular teams is crucial for the prevention and efficient management of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. Various factors, such as age, gender, duration of treatment, and comorbidities, should be considered significant risk factors for developing chemotherapy-related cardiotoxicity. Tools such as electrocardiography, echocardiography, nuclear imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, histopathologic evaluations, and serum biomarkers should be appropriately used for the early detection of anthracycline-related cardiotoxicity. Furthermore, understanding the underlying biological mechanisms is key to developing preventive measures and personalized treatment strategies to mitigate anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. Exploring specific cardiotoxic mechanisms and identifying genetic variations can offer fresh perspectives on innovative, personalized treatments. This chapter aims to discuss cardiomyopathy following anthracycline therapy, with a focus on molecular mechanisms, preventive strategies, and emerging treatments.

Cardio-oncology for Pediatric and Adolescent/Young Adult Patients

OPINION STATEMENT

As chemotherapy continues to improve the lives of patients with cancer, understanding the effects of these drugs on other organ systems, and the cardiovascular system in particular, has become increasingly important. The effects of chemotherapy on the cardiovascular system are a major determinant of morbidity and mortality in these survivors. Although echocardiography continues to be the most widely used modality for assessing cardiotoxicity, newer imaging modalities and biomarker concentrations may detect subclinical cardiotoxicity earlier. Dexrazoxane continues to be the most effective therapy for preventing anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy. Neurohormonal modulating drugs have not prevented cardiotoxicity, so their widespread, long-term use for all patients is currently not recommended. Advanced cardiac therapies, including heart transplant, have been successful in cancer survivors with end-stage HF and should be considered for these patients. Research on new targets, especially genetic associations, may produce treatments that help reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Novel Therapeutics for Anthracycline Induced Cardiotoxicity

Anthracyclines remain an essential component of the treatment of many hematologic and solid organ malignancies, but has important implications on cardiovascular disease. Anthracycline induced cardiotoxicity (AIC) ranges from asymptomatic LV dysfunction to highly morbid end- stage heart failure. As cancer survivorship improves, the detection and treatment of AIC becomes more crucial to improve patient outcomes. Current treatment modalities for AIC have been largely extrapolated from treatment of conventional heart failure, but developing effective therapies specific to AIC is an area of growing research interest. This review summarizes the current evidence behind the use of neurohormonal agents, dexrazoxane, and resynchronization therapy in AIC, evaluates the clinical outcomes of advanced therapy and heart transplantation in AIC, and explores future horizons for treatment utilizing gene therapy, stem cell therapy, and mechanism-specific targets.

Current State of Pediatric Cardio-Oncology: A Review

The landscape of pediatric oncology has dramatically changed over the course of the past several decades with five-year survival rates surpassing 80%. Anthracycline therapy has been the cornerstone of many chemotherapy regimens for pediatric patients since its introduction in the 1960s, and recent improved survival has been in large part due to advancements in chemotherapy, refinement of supportive care treatments, and development of novel therapeutics such as small molecule inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Unfortunately, many cancer-targeted therapies can lead to acute and chronic cardiovascular pathologies. The range of cardiotoxicity can vary but includes symptomatic or asymptotic heart failure, arrhythmias, coronary artery disease, valvar disease, pericardial disease, hypertension, and peripheral vascular disease. There is lack of data guiding primary prevention and treatment strategies in the pediatric population, which leads to substantial practice variability. Several important future research directions have been identified, including as they relate to cardiac disease, prevention strategies, management of cardiovascular risk factors, risk prediction, early detection, and the role of genetic susceptibility in development of cardiotoxicity. Continued collaborative research will be key in advancing the field. The ideal model for pediatric cardio-oncology is a proactive partnership between pediatric cardiologists and oncologists in order to better understand, treat, and ideally prevent cardiac disease in pediatric oncology patients.

Ventricular Assist Devices and Their Usage as a Bridge to Recovery in Patients With Acute Cardiotoxicity and Cardiomyopathy

Cardiotoxicity can reduce the heart's function temporarily and is most commonly caused by radiation, immune reactions, and certain medications. Using a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a bridging therapy while waiting for cardiac recovery has been popular lately in patients who have a reduced ejection fraction after significant cardiac injury. Here we analyze the use of LVAD as a bridging therapy in three cases with chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity, acute myocarditis, and postpartum cardiac failure. Although LVADs are infamous for their device-related complications, the ejection fraction can increase up to 50% within days to months of usage without any complications in acute cardiotoxic patients that have no underlying significant risk factors or co-morbidities. Hence LVADs are excellent supportive devices while waiting for cardiac recovery, both in maintaining cardiac function and improving the associated organ failures.

Perioperative Cardiothoracic and Vascular Risk in Childhood Cancer and its Survivors

CHILDREN with cancer and survivors of childhood cancer have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, and this risk in the perioperative period must be understood. During diagnosis and treatment of pediatric cancer, multiple acute cardiovascular morbidities are possible, including anterior mediastinal mass, tamponade, hypertension, cardiomyopathy,and heart failure. Childhood cancer survivors reaching late childhood and adulthood experience substantially increased rates of cardiomyopathy, heart failure, valvular disease, pericardiac disease, ischemia, and arrhythmias. Despite considerable advances in the understanding and therapeutic options of pediatric malignancies, cardiac disease remains the most common treatment-related, noncancer cause of death in childhood cancer survivors. Increasingly, molecularly targeted agents, including small molecule inhibitors, are being incorporated into pediatric oncology. The acute and chronic risks associated with these newer therapeutic options in children are not yet well-described, which poses challenges for clinicians caring for these patients. In the present review, the unique risks factors, prevention strategies, and treatment of cardiovascular toxicities of the child with cancer and the childhood cancer survivor are examined, with an emphasis on the perioperative period.

Heart transplantation in survivors of childhood cancer

There are approximately 450,000 survivors of childhood cancer due, in large part, to successes of therapeutic regimens. With this success comes an increase in the number of patients developing cardiotoxicity as a result of cancer therapies. In certain cases, this includes heart failure recalcitrant to medical therapy, and consideration for heart transplantation may be necessary. However, this group of patients has unique comorbidities that may affect outcomes. Despite this, available data show that complications and overall survival are similar for patients transplanted for anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy compared to those with other cardiomyopathies, demonstrating that this is a viable treatment option for this population. As other cancer therapies become more common, new cardiovascular toxicities are recognized. Whether heart transplantation will be appropriate for all patients with cancer-therapy related cardiotoxicity (CTRC) will require demonstration of similarly good outcomes to ensure proper allocation of organs.

A Rising Hope of an Artificial Heart: Left Ventricular Assisted Device - Outcome, Convenience, and Quality of Life

With the introduction of mechanical circulatory support, mainly continuous-flow left ventricular assisted devices (CF-LVAD), prolonging survival in end-stage heart failure patients can be seen in a new light. We also anticipate its use as a definitive therapy to overcome the limited donor organ resources for cardiac transplant. However, LVADs also have undesirable device-related complications and questionable improvement in the quality of life. In this review, we searched published articles using PubMed and Google Scholar to identify the complications and outcome of post-LVAD patients from 2014 to 2019. The studies we used included all study design types and a wide range of demographic variables focusing on age, sex, choice of LVAD as a bridge to cardiac transplant, or definitive therapy. For patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III B or IV or heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with maximal medication therapy, there is a significant increase in mean ejection fraction from 4% to 6%. For patients with drug-induced cardiac toxicity or other causes of cardiac toxicity, with no significant risk factors, the ejection fraction increased to nearly 50% within 10-25 days of LVAD usage. There is also a substantial improvement in the quality of life in this literature review comparing to the pre-LVAD stage, as long as complications are taken into account. Data is limited for making an accurate judgment on the quality of life and functional capacity of LVADs. We found that the use of LVADs is not fully cost-effective, but still less financially burdening than a cardiac transplant. Although data from worldwide is limited and restricted to studies having a range of one to two years of follow-up, we conclude that LVADs are promising in improving cardiac function and the best bridging therapy available for patients waiting on a transplant.