Peritoneal catheters in neonates undergoing complex cardiac surgery: a multi-centre descriptive study

An evaluation of the outcomes associated with peritoneal catheter use in neonates undergoing cardiac surgery: A multicenter study

Objective

The study objective was to determine if intraoperative peritoneal catheter placement is associated with improved outcomes in neonates undergoing high-risk cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

Methods

This propensity score-matched retrospective study used data from 22 academic pediatric cardiac intensive care units. Consecutive neonates undergoing Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery category 3 to 5 cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass at centers participating in the NEonatal and Pediatric Heart Renal Outcomes Network collaborative were studied to determine the association of the use of an intraoperative placed peritoneal catheter for dialysis or passive drainage with clinical outcomes, including the duration of mechanical ventilation.

Results

Among 1490 eligible neonates in the NEonatal and Pediatric Heart Renal Outcomes Network dataset, a propensity-matched analysis was used to compare 395 patients with peritoneal catheter placement with 628 patients without peritoneal catheter placement. Time to extubation and most clinical outcomes were similar. Postoperative length of stay was 5 days longer in the peritoneal catheter placement cohort (17 vs 22 days, P = .001). There was a 50% higher incidence of moderate to severe acute kidney injury in the no-peritoneal catheter cohort (12% vs 18%, P = .02). Subgroup analyses between specific treatments and in highest risk patients yielded similar associations.

Conclusions

This study does not demonstrate improved outcomes among neonates with placement of a peritoneal catheter during cardiac surgery. Outcomes were similar apart from longer hospital stay in the peritoneal catheter cohort. The no-peritoneal catheter cohort had a 50% higher incidence of moderate to severe acute kidney injury (12% vs 18%). This analysis does not support indiscriminate peritoneal catheter use, although it may support the utility for postoperative fluid removal among neonates at risk for acute kidney injury. A multicenter controlled trial may better elucidate peritoneal catheter effects.

Recent Advances in Kidney Replacement Therapy in Infants: A Review

Kidney replacement therapy (KRT) is used to treat children and adults with acute kidney injury (AKI), fluid overload, kidney failure, inborn errors of metabolism, and severe electrolyte abnormalities. Peritoneal dialysis and extracorporeal hemodialysis/filtration can be performed for different durations (intermittent, prolonged intermittent, and continuous) through either adaptation of adult devices or use of infant-specific devices. Each of these modalities have advantages and disadvantages, and often multiple modalities are used depending on the scenario and patient-specific needs. Traditionally, these therapies have been challenging to deliver in infants due the lack of infant-specific devices, small patient size, required extracorporeal volumes, and the risk of hemodynamic stability during the initiation of KRT. In this review, we discuss challenges, recent advancements, and optimal approaches to provide KRT in hospitalized infants, including a discussion of peritoneal dialysis and extracorporeal therapies. We discuss each specific KRT modality, review newer infant-specific devices, and highlight the benefits and limitations of each modality. We also discuss the ethical implications for the care of infants who need KRT and areas for future research.