Bipolar spectrum disorder masquerading as treatment resistant unipolar depression

Outpatient Management of Bipolar Disorder in Older Adults

PURPOSEOF REVIEW

Old age bipolar disorder (OABD), increasingly common as the population ages, presents unique diagnostic and treatment challenges. This selective review focuses on issues especially relevant to outpatient management.

RECENT FINDINGS

People with OABD may have similar frequency and severity of mood episodes compared to younger adults. Depression predominates, and mixed symptoms in both depressive and manic episodes are common. Comorbidity and excess mortality are high, with a particular bidirectional association with cerebrovascular disease. Lithium may outperform valproic acid and second-generation antipsychotics in efficacy. Tolerability and long-term safety can be improved with relatively lower target drug therapeutic levels. Outpatient clinicians treating OABD should take an active role in the recognition and management of medical comorbidities. A careful history and examination might reveal subtle signs of bipolar disorder or mixed features and change treatment. A primary target for treatment is to reduce polypharmacy when appropriate. Further trials are needed to make specific and clear recommendations in OABD.

Hypomanic symptoms in major depressive disorder: Prognostic impact and treatment issues

BACKGROUND

Mixed depression (MXD), defined as (hypo)manic symptoms occurring within major depressive episodes, is common in both bipolar and unipolar disorders, but its prognostic and treatment implications remain unclear. This study aimed to examine the relationship between hypomanic symptoms, treatment response and remission of suicidal thoughts.

METHODS

We analyzed 1243 adults with major depressive disorder (MDD), recruited for a naturalistic study on treatment-resistant depression. Data were gathered cross-sectionally and retrospectively through structured interviews and clinical rating scales including the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS); statistical analyses were performed using univariate and multivariate methods.

RESULTS

Hypomanic symptoms were present in 651 patients (45 %), while 307 patients (25 %) responded to treatment. Both treatment responders (p < 0.0001) and those who achieved remission from suicide ideation (p = 0.0085) showed lower hypomanic (YMRS) scores. Multivariate analysis showed that hypomanic symptoms were negatively linked to treatment response (O.R. 0.71-0.87), while bipolar spectrum markers such as age at illness onset (O.R. 1.00-1.03) and MDD recurrence (O.R. 0.47-0.89) predicted remission from suicidal thoughts. Medications commonly used to treat bipolar disorder showed some benefits, with dopamine/serotonin antagonists improving suicide ideation (p < 0.0001) and mood stabilizers being associated with reduced hypomanic symptoms (p = 0.0003).

LIMITATIONS

The study lacked prospective clinical assessments and treatment randomization.

CONCLUSION

Hypomanic symptoms are common in unipolar depression; their assessment is essential to identify challenging-to-treat cases and select the best pharmacological options.

Clinical distinctions in symptomatology and psychiatric comorbidities between misdiagnosed bipolar I and bipolar II disorder versus major depressive disorder

BACKGROUND

To explore the demographic and clinical features of current depressive episode that discriminate patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) from those with bipolar I (BP-I) and bipolar II (BP-II) disorder who were misdiagnosed as having MDD .

METHODS

The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) assessment was performed to establish DSM-IV diagnoses of MDD, and BP-I and BP-II, previously being misdiagnosed as MDD. Demographics, depressive symptoms and psychiatric comorbidities were compared between 1463 patients with BP-I, BP-II and MDD from 8 psychiatric settings in mainland China. A multinomial logistic regression model was performed to assess clinical correlates of diagnoses.

RESULTS

A total of 14.5% of the enrolled patients initially diagnosed with MDD were eventually diagnosed with BP. Broad illness characteristics including younger age, higher prevalence of recurrence, concurrent dysthymia, suicidal attempts, agitation, psychotic features and psychiatric comorbidities, as well as lower prevalence of insomnia, weight loss and somatic symptoms were featured by patients with BP-I and/or BP-I, compared to those with MDD. Comparisons between BP-I and BP-II versus MDD indicated distinct symptom profiles and comorbidity patterns with more differences being observed between BP-II and MDD, than between BP-I and MDD .

CONCLUSION

The results provide evidence of clinically distinguishing characteristics between misdiagnosed BP-I and BP- II versus MDD. The findings have implications for guiding more accurate diagnoses of bipolar disorders.

Disease progression to bipolar disorder among adolescents and young adults with antidepressant-resistant and antidepressant-responsive depression: Does antidepressant class matter?

Studies have demonstrated a positive relationship between antidepressant resistance and the progression of bipolar disorder. However, the influence of antidepressant classes such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) in this context has yet to be investigated. A total of 5,285 adolescents and young adults with antidepressant-resistant depression and 21,140 with antidepressant-responsive depression were recruited in the present study. The antidepressant-resistant depression group was divided into two subgroups: only resistant to SSRIs (n = 2,242, 42.4%) and additionally resistant to non-SSRIs (n = 3,043, 57.6%) groups. The status of bipolar disorder progression was monitored from the date of depression diagnosis to the end of 2011. Patients with antidepressant-resistant depression were more likely to develop bipolar disorder during the follow-up (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.67-3.09) than those with antidepressant-responsive depression. Furthermore, the group that was additionally resistant to non-SSRIs were at the highest risk of bipolar disorder (HR: 3.02, 95% CI: 2.76-3.29), followed by the group that was only resistant to SSRIs (2.70, 2.44-2.98). Adolescents and young adults with antidepressant-resistant depression, especially those who responded poorly to both SSRIs and SNRIs, were at increased risk of subsequent bipolar disorder compared with those with antidepressant-responsive depression. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the molecular pathomechanisms underlying the resistance to SSRIs and SNRIs and subsequent bipolar disorder.