1
|
Gilmartin T, Dipnall JF, Gurvich C, Sharp G. Identifying overcontrol and undercontrol personality types among young people using the five factor model, and the relationship with disordered eating behaviour, anxiety and depression. J Eat Disord 2024; 12:16. [PMID: 38267972 PMCID: PMC10809654 DOI: 10.1186/s40337-024-00967-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Overcontrol and undercontrol personality types have been associated with an increase in eating pathology, depression and anxiety. The aim of the research was to explore whether latent overcontrol and undercontrol personality types could be identified using cluster analysis of the facets of the five factor model (FFM). We further aimed to understand how these personality types were associated with eating pathology, depressed mood and anxiety. METHODS A total of 561 participants (394 women and 167 men), aged 16-30 years in Australia completed a survey designed to assess disordered eating, FFM personality traits, anxiety, depression and stress. A systematic four-step process using hierarchical, k-means, and random forest cluster analyses were used to identify a meaningful 3-cluster solution. RESULTS The results revealed a cluster solution that represented overcontrol, undercontrol and resilient personality types, and highlighted facets of the FFM that were associated with each type. Both overcontrol and undercontrol personality types were associated with increased clinical symptoms compared to the resilient types. CONCLUSIONS It was concluded that FFM facets may potentially be more meaningful than broad domains in identifying personality types, and that both overcontrol and undercontrol personality types are likely associated with increased clinical symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanya Gilmartin
- Department of Neuroscience, Monash University and the Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Joanna F Dipnall
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, 3004, Australia
- Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, 3220, Australia
| | - Caroline Gurvich
- Department of Psychiatry, HER CENTRE Australia, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Gemma Sharp
- Department of Neuroscience, Monash University and the Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fumagalli G, Margola D. Is personality the key in cognitive-behavioural therapy for eating disorders? A review. Clin Psychol Psychother 2021; 29:164-177. [PMID: 34110647 DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Revised: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The efficacy of individual cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) for eating disorders can be assessed by investigating the potential predictors, mediators and moderators of treatment. The present review focused on personality since its crucial role has been emphasized both by research and practice. Sixteen studies were collected, and data were extracted through a highly operationalized coding system. Overall, personality disorders were the most investigated construct; however, their influence was somewhat contradictory. A more cogent result occurred for borderline personality disorder (BPD) when considered as a moderator (not a predictor nor a mediator). Patients with a more disturbed borderline personality benefited to a greater extent from treatments including booster modules on affects, interpersonal relationships and mood intolerance, rather than symptoms exclusively. Nine additional personality dimensions, beyond BPD, were investigated sparsely, and results regarding them were barely indicative in this review. However, some of these dimensions (e.g., affective lability and stimulus-seeking behaviours) could be traced back to BPD, thereby strengthening evidence of the role of borderline disorder as a moderator. Although research on the relationship between personality and eating disorders needs to be increased and methodologically improved, personality, taken as a whole, emerged as a promising variable for enhancing the efficacy of CBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Davide Margola
- Faculty of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Weissman RS, Becker AE, Bulik CM, Frank GKW, Klump KL, Steiger H, Strober M, Thomas J, Waller G, Walsh BT. Speaking of That: Terms to Avoid or Reconsider in the Eating Disorders Field. Int J Eat Disord 2016; 49:349-53. [PMID: 27084795 DOI: 10.1002/eat.22528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/04/2016] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Inspired by an article on 50 terms that, in the interest of clarity in scientific reasoning and communication in psychology, psychiatry, and allied fields, "should be avoided or at most be used sparingly and only with explicit caveats,"(1) we propose a list of terms to avoid or think twice about before using when writing for the International Journal of Eating Disorders (IJED). Drawing upon our experience as reviewers or editors for the IJED, we generated an abridged list of such terms. For each term, we explain why it made our list and what alternatives we recommend. We hope that our list will contribute to improved clarity in scientific thinking about eating disorders, and that it will stimulate discussion of terms that may need to be reconsidered in our field's vocabulary to ensure the use of language that is respectful and sensitive to individuals who experience an eating disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth S Weissman
- Department of Psychology, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut
| | - Anne E Becker
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Eating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Cynthia M Bulik
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Guido K W Frank
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Denver, Colorado.,Department of Neuroscience, University of Colorado Denver, Colorado
| | - Kelly L Klump
- Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan
| | - Howard Steiger
- Douglas University Institute and Psychiatry Department, Eating Disorders Continuum, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Michael Strober
- Jane & Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience & Human Behavior, Stewart & Lynda Resnick Neuropsychiatric Hospital, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jennifer Thomas
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Eating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Glenn Waller
- Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - B Timothy Walsh
- New York State Psychiatric Institute and Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|