Conditioned feeding responses of sheep towards flavoured foods associated with casein administration: the rôle of long delay learning

The volatile organic compounds and palatability of mixed ensilage of marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) crop residues

With increasing acreage of cash crops, the use of their by-products as supplements for livestock feed becomes an important factor. Marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) account for more than half of the world's loose flower production. However, there is no precedent for the abundantly available marigold crop residue (MCR) being used as feed in agricultural production, probably because of its strong pungent taste. This study aimed to evaluate the biotransformation of the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) of MCR by mixed ensilage and assess its palatability by cattle. Caryophyllene, the most prevalent VOC in MCR, decreased by 29.11% (P < 0.05), 38.85% (P < 0.05), 37.15% (P < 0.05), and 28.36% (P < 0.05) ensilage with corn meal (CM), bran (BR), crop corn (CC), and straw (ST), respectively. The acetic acid content increased by 686.05% (P < 0.05), 1337.21% (P < 0.05), 1244.19% (P < 0.05), and 1795.34% (P < 0.05) after mixed ensilage with CM, BR, CC, and ST, respectively. The total amount of alcoholic VOCs followed an overall increasing trend during mixed storage and 10 new alcohols were obtained. Over seven days, feed intake of mixed ensilage MCR by cattle differed significantly (P < 0.05) among treatments compared with MCR and was highest in MCRCM. Combined with palatability trials, the best MCR feed intake was achieved with MCRCM. The findings shed light on how feed odor can be improved and how degradation of terpenes can be enhanced in practical applications by mixed ensilage.

Conditioned feeding responses of sheep towards flavoured foods associated with the administration of ruminally degradable and/or undegradable protein sources

The main objective of the experiment was to investigate the conditioned responses of sheep towards food flavours associated with the administration of ruminally degradable protein (RDP) and ruminally undegradable, but readily digestible protein (DUP) sources given either alone or in combination. The experiment consisted of three consecutive periods during which sheep were conditioned to associate a flavoured food with a nutritive stimulus (or water, W). Two foods (basal and novel test) with different crude protein (CP; 92 and 64 g/kg dry matter (DM) respectively) and similar metabolizable energy (≊ 9 MJ/kg DM) contents were used on a total of 48 Texel ✕ Greyface female sheep. The basal food was offered during non-experimental (rest) days whereas the test food was used in combination with two flavours, orange and aniseed, during experimental days. Food was presented for 8 h (09:00 to 17:00 h) daily throughout the experiment. Two nutritive stimuli (casein, C, and formaldehyde treated casein, FC) were chosen such as to provide major contrasts in their RDP and DUP contents, on an isonitrogenous basis. Each dose (50 g) of a particular nutritive stimulus was administered by gavage through a stomach tube twice daily (at 10:00 and 14:00 h). Sheep were randomly assigned to one of four (C v . W, FC v . W , C v . FC, C v . FC + C) treatments (no. = 12 per treatment). For the first 2 days (days 1 + 2) of each conditioning period half of the sheep within each treatment were offered one flavoured food paired with the administration of C (treatments C v . W , C v . FC and C v. FC + C) or FC (treatment FC v. W). The other half were offered the opposite flavoured food paired with the administration of water (treatments C v . W and FC v . W), FC (treatment C v . FC) or C + FC (treatment C v . FC + C). There followed 2 days (days 3 + 4) of rest and for the 2 days subsequently (days 5 and 6) received the opposite flavoured food and the opposite stimuli to that received earlier. In the morning of day 7 sheep were offered a choice between the two flavoured foods for 20 min. After the completion of the preference test sheep were offered the basal food. The same procedure was followed for each of three conditioning periods (i.e. each animal followed the same flavour/stimulus association throughout the experiment). The design was balanced for order of flavour and stimulus presentation. Sheep preferred the flavoured food associated with C (P < 0·05) or FC (P < 0·01) over the opposite flavoured food associated with water in C v . W and FC v . W treatments respectively. In the C v . FC treatment sheep showed a strong preference for food flavours associated with the administration of FC to those associated with C (P < 0·05). In the C v. FC + C treatment sheep showed equal preference towards the food flavours associated with either stimuli. These results: (i) support the view that sheep are able to form learned preferences for food flavours associated with the administration of protein, and (ii) suggest that sheep are able to distinguish between food flavours associated with the administration of both RDP and DUP sources. Sheep preferred flavours associated with DUP administration only over flavours associated with RDP administration only; however, such preferences did not develop when DUP was administered concurrently with RDP. Given the learned responses of sheep towards flavours associated with RDP and DUP the expectation is that they may be able to select their diet on the basis of these qualities when they are offered a choice.

Food sensory characteristics: their unconsidered roles in the feeding behaviour of domestic ruminants

When domestic ruminants are faced with food diversity, they can use pre-ingestive information (i.e. food sensory characteristics perceived by the animal before swallowing the food) and post-ingestive information (i.e. digestive and metabolic consequences, experienced by the animal after swallowing the food) to evaluate the food and make decisions to select a suitable diet. The concept of palatability is essential to understand how pre- and post-ingestive information are interrelated. It refers to the hedonic value of the food without any immediate effect of post-ingestive consequences and environmental factors, but with the influence of individual characteristics, such as animal's genetic background, internal state and previous experiences. In the literature, the post-ingestive consequences are commonly considered as the main force that influences feeding behaviour whereas food sensory characteristics are only used as discriminatory agents. This discriminatory role is indeed important for animals to be aware of their feeding environment, and ruminants are able to use their different senses either singly or in combination to discriminate between different foods. However, numerous studies on ruminants' feeding behaviour demonstrate that the role of food sensory characteristics has been underestimated or simplified; they could play at least two other roles. First, some sensory characteristics also possess a hedonic value which influences ruminants' intake, preferences and food learning independently of any immediate post-ingestive consequences. Further, diversity of food sensory characteristics has a hedonic value, as animals prefer an absence of monotony in food sensory characteristics at similar post-ingestive consequences. Second, some of these food sensory characteristics become an indicator of post-ingestive consequences after their initial hedonic value has acquired a positive or a negative value via previous individual food learning or evolutionary processes. These food sensory characteristics thus represent cues that could help ruminants to anticipate the post-ingestive consequences of a food and to improve their learning efficiency, especially in complex environments. This review then suggests that food sensory characteristics could be of importance to provide pleasure to animals, to increase palatability of a food and to help them learn in complex feeding situations which could improve animal welfare and productivity.

A Theory of Associating Food Types with Their Postingestive Consequences

Animals often face complex and changing food environments. While such environments are challenging, an animal should make an association between a food type and its properties (such as the presence of a nutrient or toxin). We use information theory concepts, such as mutual information, to establish a theory for the development of these associations. In this theory, associations are assumed to maximize the mutual information between foods and their consequences. We show that associations are invariably imperfect. An association's accuracy increases with the length of a feeding session and the relative frequency of a food type but decreases as time delay between consumption and postingestive consequence increases. Surprisingly, the accuracy of an association is independent of the number of additional food types in the environment. The rate of information transfer between novel foods and a forager depends on the forager's diet. In light of this theory, an animal's diet may have two competing goals: first, the provision of an appropriate balance of nutrients, and second, the ability to quickly and accurately learn the properties of novel foods. We discuss the ecological and behavioral implications of making associational errors and contrast the timescale and mechanisms of our theory with those of existing theory.

Consequences of feeding for future feeding

The intake of food has physiological consequences via physical (e.g. distension) and chemical (e.g. glucose) stimulation of receptors in the viscera and, in the longer term, by changes in signals from adipose tissue (e.g. leptin), integrated by the CNS. These consequences are associated with the sensory properties of the food such that repeated exposure to a food generates a conditioned acceptance or rejection reflex with the physiological consequences of eating as the unconditioned stimulus (US) and the sensory characteristics of the food as the conditioned stimulus (CS). Such learnt preferences and aversions occur throughout the animal kingdom, from nematodes to human beings, with much of the research being carried out with insects, laboratory animals and farm animals. Preferences for and aversions to particular foods are manifested in non-random choices between two or more foods on offer but also influence the quantity eaten when only one food is available. These considerations have been developed into a theory of Minimal Total Discomfort which proposes that an animal experiments with the amount eaten per day, and its selection between different foods, until the total of the signals generated from excesses or deficiencies of food components is minimised. Changes in food composition and/or nutrient requirements can therefore be matched by appropriate changes in intake and selection.