1
|
Lautatzis ME, Keya FK, Al Mahmud A, Tariq U, Lam C, Morris SK, Stimec J, Zlotkin S, Ahmed T, Harrington J, Roth DE. Maternal Vitamin D Supplementation and Infantile Rickets: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial. Pediatrics 2024; 153:e2023063263. [PMID: 38726565 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2023-063263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of maternal vitamin D supplementation in the prevention of infantile rickets is unknown, particularly in low- and middle-income countries without routine infant vitamin D supplementation. Through secondary analysis of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial in Bangladesh, we examined the dose-ranging effects of maternal vitamin D supplementation on the risk of biochemical rickets at 6 to 12 months of age. METHODS Pregnant women (n = 1300) were randomized into 5 groups: placebo, or vitamin D 4200 IU/week, 16 800 IU/week, or 28 000 IU/week from second trimester to delivery and placebo until 6 months postpartum; or 28 000 IU/week prenatally and until 6 months postpartum. Infants underwent biochemical rickets screening from 6 to 12 months of age (n = 790). Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of biochemical rickets were estimated for each group versus placebo. RESULTS Overall, 39/790 (4.9%) infants had biochemical rickets. Prevalence was highest in the placebo group (7.8%), and the risk was significantly lower among infants whose mothers received combined prenatal and postpartum vitamin D at 28 000 IU/week (1.3%; RR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.03-0.72). Risks among infants whose mothers received only prenatal supplementation (4200 IU, 16 800 IU, 28 000 IU weekly) were not significantly different from placebo: 3.8% (RR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.19-1.22), 5.8% (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.33-1.69), and 5.7% (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.32-1.65), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Maternal vitamin D supplementation (28 000 IU/week) during the third trimester of pregnancy until 6 months postpartum reduced the risk of infantile biochemical rickets. Further research is needed to define optimal postpartum supplementation dosing during lactation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria-Elena Lautatzis
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- The Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Farhana K Keya
- Technical Training Unit, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Abdullah Al Mahmud
- Nutrition and Clinical Services Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Ulaina Tariq
- The Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carol Lam
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shaun K Morris
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- The Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jennifer Stimec
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stanley Zlotkin
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- The Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tahmeed Ahmed
- Centre for Nutrition and Food Security, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Jennifer Harrington
- Division of Endocrinology, Women's and Children's Health Network, North Adelaide, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Daniel E Roth
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- The Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tareke AA, Alem A, Debebe W, Bayileyegn NS, Abebe MS, Abdu H, Zerfu TA. Maternal vitamin D and growth of under-five children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational and interventional studies. Glob Health Action 2022; 15:2102712. [PMID: 36043560 PMCID: PMC9448399 DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2102712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Even though previous systematic reviews have reported on the role of prenatal vitamin D on birth outcomes, its effect on child growth is poorly understood. Objective To synthesize a systematic summary of the literature on the effect of maternal vitamin D supplementation on the linear growth of under-five children. Method This study includes studies (both observational and interventional with a control group) that evaluated the effects of prenatal vitamin D status on child linear growth. The mean child length/length for age with 95% confidence interval (CI) was pooled as the weighted mean difference using a random-effects model. A funnel plot was used to assess potential publication bias. Results A total of 45 studies and 66 reports covering a total population of 44,992 (19,683 intervention or high vitamin D group, and 25,309 control or low vitamin D group) were analyzed. Studies spanned from 1977 to 2022. The pooled weighted mean difference was 0.4 cm (95% CI: 0.15–0.65). A subgroup analysis, based on vitamin D supplementation frequency, showed that mothers who supplemented monthly or less frequently had a 0.7 cm (95% CI: 0.2–1.16 cm) longer child. Supplementation with a dose of >2000 international units increased child length at birth. The weighted mean difference was 0.35 cm (95% CI: 0.11–0.58). Conclusion The evidence from this review shows that maternal supplementation of vitamin D is associated with increased birth length. This is apparent at higher doses, low frequency (monthly or less frequent), and during the second/third trimester. It appears that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy is protective of future growth in under-five children. Clinical trials are needed to establish evidence of effectiveness for the frequency and dose of supplementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amare Abera Tareke
- Department of Biomedical Science, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia
| | - Addis Alem
- Department of Biomedical Science, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia
| | - Wondwosen Debebe
- Department of Biomedical Science, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia
| | | | - Melese Shenkut Abebe
- Department of Biomedical Science, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia
| | - Hussen Abdu
- Department of Biomedical Science, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia
| | - Taddese Alemu Zerfu
- Global Academy of Agriculture and Food security, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh (UoE), UK.,College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mardiah W, Setiabudiawan B, Mediani HS. The Role of Vitamin D in Stunting Prevention: A Literature Review. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2021. [DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2021.7584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nutritional problems in infants under the age of two can inhibit growth and development. This has a negative impact on their subsequent life, increasing the risk of stunting. Vitamins are essential micronutrients in the body’s metabolic processes and they have a multi-complex role. One of the micronutrients that affect stunting are vitamin D. It plays an important role in stunting prevention. Stunting countermeasures are carried out by fulfilling the need of adequate nutrition where both macronutrients and micronutrients are needed to avoid the risk of stunting.
AIM: The aim of this literature review was to analyze the role of vitamin D in preventing stunting.
METHODS: The articles were collected through the Google Scholar, PubMed, Proquest, and Ebsco databases using the keywords Vitamin D and Stunting, consisting of both quantitative and qualitative studies. The articles used were only articles with a full text available that were written in English and Indonesian published from 2015 to 2019. Fifteen articles were found that met the criteria.
RESULTS: The literature review results indicate that vitamin D plays an important role in the metabolism of bone formation and growth. It also has the role of increasing the level of immunity in children. Both roles contribute to stunting prevention. Vitamin D is key in regulating the immune function during pregnancy regarding the fetus-mother interaction, representing an important target. Among its non-classical actions include the emphasis of strong immunomodulators, including the induction of antibacterial responses and the modulation of T-lymphocytes to suppress inflammation and increase tolerogenesis. Vitamin D plays an important role in the innate immune function in the decidua by promoting the infection response while simultaneously preventing the excessive elaboration of immune inflammation. The research to date has focused on the potential role of vitamin D in preventing infectious diseases such as tuberculosis, as well as possibly suppressing autoimmune diseases.
CONCLUSION: Vitamin D can also affect the immune function in a manner that is not immediately related to the primary innate response. Stunting can be prevented early on through the adequate intake of macro and micronutrient nutrients. The need for micronutrients is especially important, inclusive of vitamin D as an important element in bone metabolism. It also increases the body’s defenses so as to prevent infectious diseases in children.
Collapse
|
4
|
Keats EC, Oh C, Chau T, Khalifa DS, Imdad A, Bhutta ZA. Effects of vitamin and mineral supplementation during pregnancy on maternal, birth, child health and development outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2021; 17:e1127. [PMID: 37051178 PMCID: PMC8356361 DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Background Almost two billion people who are deficient in vitamins and minerals are women and children in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). These deficiencies are worsened during pregnancy due to increased energy and nutritional demands, causing adverse outcomes in mother and child. To reduce micronutrient deficiencies, several strategies have been implemented, including diet diversification, large-scale and targeted fortification, staple crop bio-fortification and micronutrient supplementation. Objectives To evaluate and summarize the available evidence on the effects of micronutrient supplementation during pregnancy in LMIC on maternal, fetal, child health and child development outcomes. This review will assess the impact of single micronutrient supplementation (calcium, vitamin A, iron, vitamin D, iodine, zinc, vitamin B12), iron-folic acid (IFA) supplementation, multiple micronutrient (MMN) supplementation, and lipid-based nutrient supplementation (LNS) during pregnancy. Search Methods We searched papers published from 1995 to 31 October 2019 (related programmes and good quality studies pre-1995 were limited) in CAB Abstracts, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, International Initiative for Impact Evaluations, LILACS, Medline, POPLINE, Web of Science, WHOLIS, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, R4D, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Non-indexed grey literature searches were conducted using Google, Google Scholar, and web pages of key international nutrition agencies. Selection Criteria We included randomized controlled trials (individual and cluster-randomized) and quasi-experimental studies that evaluated micronutrient supplementation in healthy, pregnant women of any age and parity living in a LMIC. LMIC were defined by the World Bank Group at the time of the search for this review. While the aim was to include healthy pregnant women, it is likely that these populations had one or more micronutrient deficiencies at baseline; women were not excluded on this basis. Data Collection and Analysis Two authors independently assessed studies for inclusion and risk of bias, and conducted data extraction. Data were matched to check for accuracy. Quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Main Results A total of 314 papers across 72 studies (451,723 women) were eligible for inclusion, of which 64 studies (439,649 women) contributed to meta-analyses. Seven studies assessed iron-folic acid (IFA) supplementation versus folic acid; 34 studies assessed MMN vs. IFA; 4 studies assessed LNS vs. MMN; 13 evaluated iron; 13 assessed zinc; 9 evaluated vitamin A; 11 assessed vitamin D; and 6 assessed calcium. Several studies were eligible for inclusion in multiple types of supplementation. IFA compared to folic acid showed a large and significant (48%) reduction in the risk of maternal anaemia (average risk ratio (RR) 0.52, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.66; studies = 5; participants = 15,540; moderate-quality evidence). As well, IFA supplementation demonstrated a smaller but significant, 12% reduction in risk of low birthweight (LBW) babies (average RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.99; studies = 4; participants = 17,257; high-quality evidence). MMN supplementation was defined as any supplement that contained at least 3 micronutrients. Post-hoc analyses were conducted, where possible, comparing the differences in effect of MMN with 4+ components and MMN with 3 or 4 components. When compared to iron with or without FA, MMN supplementation reduced the risk of LBW by 15% (average RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.93; studies = 28; participants = 79,972); this effect was greater in MMN with >4 micronutrients (average RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.88; studies = 19; participants = 68,138 versus average RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.11; studies = 9; participants = 11,834). There was a small and significant reduction in the risk of stillbirths (average RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.86 to 0.98; studies = 22; participants = 96,772) and a small and significant effect on the risk of small-for-gestational age (SGA) (average RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.88 to 0.98; studies = 19; participants = 52,965). For stillbirths and SGA, the effects were greater among those provided MMN with 4+ micronutrients. Children whose mothers had been supplemented with MMN, compared to IFA, demonstrated a 16% reduced risk of diarrhea (average RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.76 to 0.92; studies = 4; participants = 3,142). LNS supplementation, compared to MMN, made no difference to any outcome; however, the evidence is limited. Iron supplementation, when compared to no iron or placebo, showed a large and significant effect on maternal anaemia, a reduction of 47% (average RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.65; studies = 6; participants = 15,737; moderate-quality evidence) and a small and significant effect on LBW (average RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.99; studies = 4; participants = 17,257; high-quality evidence). Zinc and vitamin A supplementation, each both compared to placebo, had no impact on any outcome examined with the exception of potentially improving serum/plasma zinc (mean difference (MD) 0.43 umol/L; 95% CI -0.04 to 0.89; studies = 5; participants = 1,202) and serum/plasma retinol (MD 0.13 umol/L; 95% CI -0.03 to 0.30; studies = 6; participants = 1,654), respectively. When compared to placebo, vitamin D supplementation may have reduced the risk of preterm births (average RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.40 to 1.04; studies = 7; participants = 1,262), though the upper CI just crosses the line of no effect. Similarly, calcium supplementation versus placebo may have improved rates of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia (average RR 0.45; 95% CI 0.19 to 1.06; studies = 4; participants = 9,616), though the upper CI just crosses 1. Authors' Conclusions The findings suggest that MMN and vitamin supplementation improve maternal and child health outcomes, including maternal anaemia, LBW, preterm birth, SGA, stillbirths, micronutrient deficiencies, and morbidities, including pre-eclampsia/eclampsia and diarrhea among children. MMN supplementation demonstrated a beneficial impact on the most number of outcomes. In addition, MMN with >4 micronutrients appeared to be more impactful than MMN with only 3 or 4 micronutrients included in the tablet. Very few studies conducted longitudinal analysis on longer-term health outcomes for the child, such as anthropometric measures and developmental outcomes; this may be an important area for future research. This review may provide some basis to guide continual discourse around replacing IFA supplementation with MMN along with the use of single micronutrient supplementation programs for specific outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily C. Keats
- Centre for Global Child HealthThe Hospital for Sick ChildrenTorontoCanada
| | - Christina Oh
- Centre for Global Child HealthThe Hospital for Sick ChildrenTorontoCanada
| | - Tamara Chau
- Centre for Global Child HealthThe Hospital for Sick ChildrenTorontoCanada
| | - Dina S. Khalifa
- Centre for Global Child HealthThe Hospital for Sick ChildrenTorontoCanada
| | - Aamer Imdad
- PediatricsUpstate Medical University, SyracuseNew YorkUSA
| | - Zulfiqar A. Bhutta
- Centre for Global Child HealthThe Hospital for Sick ChildrenTorontoCanada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dutra LV, Souza FISD, Konstantyner T. EFFECTS OF VITAMIN D SUPPLEMENTATION DURING PREGNANCY ON NEWBORNS AND INFANTS: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 39:e2020087. [PMID: 33978135 DOI: 10.1590/1984-0462/2021/39/2020087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 08/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify the effects of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy on newborns and infants. DATA SOURCES The present study is an integrative review of literature based on clinical trials published in journals indexed in the PubMed and Web of Science databases. Two searches were carried out, starting with the association (and) of the health term "vitamin D" with "pregnancy". In the search for information, selection criteria were established, and there was no language limitation and year of publication. DATA SYNTHESIS The final selection resulted in 44 clinical trials, most of which were randomized and double blind, which were carried out in outpatient clinics, referral hospitals and universities, mainly in Europe. The samples studied were predominantly of newborns. In these 44 trials, 23 types of different doses of vitamin D during pregnancy, with different doses, regimens and times of use, and 14 different outcomes were studied in newborns (NB) and infants. Of the 44 studies performed, 35 showed statistically significant beneficial effects of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy on newborns and infants compared to control groups. CONCLUSIONS Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy for at least three months before delivery has the potential of positively influencing calcium metabolism, physical growth and immune system development in newborns and infants. However, there is insufficient knowledge to define the optimal dose and to guarantee the absence of possible long-term adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Tulio Konstantyner
- Pediatrics Departament, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Madzorera I, Ghosh S, Wang M, Fawzi W, Isanaka S, Hertzmark E, Namirembe G, Bashaasha B, Agaba E, Turyashemererwa F, Webb P, Duggan C. Prenatal dietary diversity may influence underweight in infants in a Ugandan birth-cohort. MATERNAL AND CHILD NUTRITION 2021; 17:e13127. [PMID: 33595899 PMCID: PMC8189249 DOI: 10.1111/mcn.13127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Revised: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Growth faltering in early childhood is prevalent in many low resource countries. Poor maternal dietary diversity during pregnancy has been linked with increased risk of fetal growth failure and adverse birth outcomes but may also influence subsequent infant growth. Our aim is to assess the role of prenatal maternal dietary diversity in infant growth in rural Uganda. Data from 3291 women and infant pairs enrolled in a birth cohort from 2014 to 2016 were analysed (NCT04233944). Maternal diets were assessed using dietary recall in the second or third trimesters of pregnancy. Maternal dietary diversity scores (DDS) were calculated using the FAO Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women (MDD‐W). Cox regression models were used to evaluate associations of the DDS with the incidence of underweight, stunting and wasting in infants from 3 to 12 months, adjusting for confounding factors. The median DDS for women was low, at 3.0 (interquartile range 3.0–4.0), relative to the threshold of consuming five or more food groups daily. Infants of women in highest quartile of DDS (diverse diets) were less likely to be underweight (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.70, 95% confidence interval: 0.61, 0.80) compared with infants of women in Quartile 1 (p for trend <0.001) in models controlling for maternal factors. There was no significant association between DDS and stunting or wasting. Our findings suggest a relationship between higher maternal dietary diversity and lower risk of underweight in infancy. These findings suggest that programmes to improve infant growth could additionally consider strengthening prenatal dietary diversity to improve child outcomes globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Madzorera
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Shibani Ghosh
- Gerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,USAID Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Nutrition, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Molin Wang
- Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Wafaie Fawzi
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sheila Isanaka
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ellen Hertzmark
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Grace Namirembe
- Gerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Bernard Bashaasha
- Department of Agribusiness and Natural Resource Economics, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Edgar Agaba
- USAID Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Nutrition, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Florence Turyashemererwa
- Department of Agribusiness and Natural Resource Economics, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Patrick Webb
- Gerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,USAID Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Nutrition, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Christopher Duggan
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tan ML, Abrams SA, Osborn DA. Vitamin D supplementation for term breastfed infants to prevent vitamin D deficiency and improve bone health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 12:CD013046. [PMID: 33305822 PMCID: PMC8812278 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013046.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vitamin D deficiency is common worldwide, contributing to nutritional rickets and osteomalacia which have a major impact on health, growth, and development of infants, children and adolescents. Vitamin D levels are low in breast milk and exclusively breastfed infants are at risk of vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency. OBJECTIVES To determine the effect of vitamin D supplementation given to infants, or lactating mothers, on vitamin D deficiency, bone density and growth in healthy term breastfed infants. SEARCH METHODS We used the standard search strategy of Cochrane Neonatal to 29 May 2020 supplemented by searches of clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, and citations. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in breastfeeding mother-infant pairs comparing vitamin D supplementation given to infants or lactating mothers compared to placebo or no intervention, or sunlight, or that compare vitamin D supplementation of infants to supplementation of mothers. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias and independently extracted data. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence. MAIN RESULTS We included 19 studies with 2837 mother-infant pairs assessing vitamin D given to infants (nine studies), to lactating mothers (eight studies), and to infants versus lactating mothers (six studies). No studies compared vitamin D given to infants versus periods of infant sun exposure. Vitamin D supplementation given to infants: vitamin D at 400 IU/day may increase 25-OH vitamin D levels (MD 22.63 nmol/L, 95% CI 17.05 to 28.21; participants = 334; studies = 6; low-certainty) and may reduce the incidence of vitamin D insufficiency (25-OH vitamin D < 50 nmol/L) (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.80; participants = 274; studies = 4; low-certainty). However, there was insufficient evidence to determine if vitamin D given to the infant reduces the risk of vitamin D deficiency (25-OH vitamin D < 30 nmol/L) up till six months of age (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.05; participants = 122; studies = 2), affects bone mineral content (BMC), or the incidence of biochemical or radiological rickets (all very-low certainty). We are uncertain about adverse effects including hypercalcaemia. There were no studies of higher doses of infant vitamin D (> 400 IU/day) compared to placebo. Vitamin D supplementation given to lactating mothers: vitamin D supplementation given to lactating mothers may increase infant 25-OH vitamin D levels (MD 24.60 nmol/L, 95% CI 21.59 to 27.60; participants = 597; studies = 7; low-certainty), may reduce the incidences of vitamin D insufficiency (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.57; participants = 512; studies = 5; low-certainty), vitamin D deficiency (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.24; participants = 512; studies = 5; low-certainty) and biochemical rickets (RR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.44; participants = 229; studies = 2; low-certainty). The two studies that reported biochemical rickets used maternal dosages of oral D3 60,000 IU/day for 10 days and oral D3 60,000 IU postpartum and at 6, 10, and 14 weeks. However, infant BMC was not reported and there was insufficient evidence to determine if maternal supplementation has an effect on radiological rickets (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.18 to 3.31; participants = 536; studies = 3; very low-certainty). All studies of maternal supplementation enrolled populations at high risk of vitamin D deficiency. We are uncertain of the effects of maternal supplementation on infant growth and adverse effects including hypercalcaemia. Vitamin D supplementation given to infants compared with supplementation given to lactating mothers: infant vitamin D supplementation compared to lactating mother supplementation may increase infant 25-OH vitamin D levels (MD 14.35 nmol/L, 95% CI 9.64 to 19.06; participants = 269; studies = 4; low-certainty). Infant vitamin D supplementation may reduce the incidence of vitamin D insufficiency (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.94; participants = 334; studies = 4) and may reduce vitamin D deficiency (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.72; participants = 334; studies = 4) but the evidence is very uncertain. Infant BMC and radiological rickets were not reported and there was insufficient evidence to determine if maternal supplementation has an effect on infant biochemical rickets. All studies enrolled patient populations at high risk of vitamin D deficiency. Studies compared an infant dose of vitamin D 400 IU/day with varying maternal vitamin D doses from 400 IU/day to > 4000 IU/day. We are uncertain about adverse effects including hypercalcaemia. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS For breastfed infants, vitamin D supplementation 400 IU/day for up to six months increases 25-OH vitamin D levels and reduces vitamin D insufficiency, but there was insufficient evidence to assess its effect on vitamin D deficiency and bone health. For higher-risk infants who are breastfeeding, maternal vitamin D supplementation reduces vitamin D insufficiency and vitamin D deficiency, but there was insufficient evidence to determine an effect on bone health. In populations at higher risk of vitamin D deficiency, vitamin D supplementation of infants led to greater increases in infant 25-OH vitamin D levels, reductions in vitamin D insufficiency and vitamin D deficiency compared to supplementation of lactating mothers. However, the evidence is very uncertain for markers of bone health. Maternal higher dose supplementation (≥ 4000 IU/day) produced similar infant 25-OH vitamin D levels as infant supplementation of 400 IU/day. The certainty of evidence was graded as low to very low for all outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- May Loong Tan
- Department of Paediatrics, RCSI & UCD Malaysia Campus (formerly Penang Medical College), George Town, Malaysia
| | - Steven A Abrams
- Department of Pediatrics, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - David A Osborn
- Central Clinical School, School of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
The influence of maternal vitamin D supplementation on infant vitamin D status: A systematic review and meta-analyses. Complement Ther Med 2020; 52:102491. [PMID: 32951740 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inconsistencies exist with regard to effect of maternal vitamin D supplementation on infant vitamin D status. The inconsistencies could be attributed to numerous factors, such as duration of intervention and dosage, among others. In this work, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the influence of maternal vitamin D supplementation on infant vitamin D status. METHODS A comprehensive systematic search was performed in Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and PubMed/MEDLINE, by investigators, from database inception until November 2019, without using any restrictions. Weighted mean difference (WMD) with the 95 % CI was used for assessing the effects of maternal vitamin D supplementation on 25(OH) D levels in infants. RESULTS Overall results from 14 studies revealed a non-significant effect of maternal vitamin D administration on the level of 25(OH) D in breastfeeding infants (WMD: -0.464 ng/mL, 95 % CI: -6.68 to 5.75, p = 0.884, I2 = 98 %). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that vitamin D supplementation dosage ≥2000 IU/day (WMD: 9 ng/mL, 95 % CI: 8.19, 9.82, I2 = 99 %) and intervention duration ≥20 weeks (WMD: 16.20 ng/mL, 95 % CI: 14.89, 17.50, I2 = 99 %) significantly increased 25(OH) D. CONCLUSIONS The main results indicate a non-significant increase in infant vitamin D following maternal vitamin D supplementation. Additionally, vitamin D supplementation dosage ≥2000 IU/day and intervention duration ≥20 weeks significantly increased infant 25(OH) D.
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy may be needed to protect against adverse pregnancy outcomes. This is an update of a review that was first published in 2012 and then in 2016. OBJECTIVES To examine whether vitamin D supplementation alone or in combination with calcium or other vitamins and minerals given to women during pregnancy can safely improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. SEARCH METHODS For this update, we searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (12 July 2018), contacted relevant organisations (15 May 2018), reference lists of retrieved trials and registries at clinicaltrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (12 July 2018). Abstracts were included if they had enough information to extract the data. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised and quasi-randomised trials evaluating the effect of supplementation with vitamin D alone or in combination with other micronutrients for women during pregnancy in comparison to placebo or no intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently i) assessed the eligibility of trials against the inclusion criteria, ii) extracted data from included trials, and iii) assessed the risk of bias of the included trials. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS We included 30 trials (7033 women), excluded 60 trials, identified six as ongoing/unpublished trials and two trials are awaiting assessments.Supplementation with vitamin D alone versus placebo/no interventionA total of 22 trials involving 3725 pregnant women were included in this comparison; 19 trials were assessed as having low-to-moderate risk of bias for most domains and three trials were assessed as having high risk of bias for most domains. Supplementation with vitamin D alone during pregnancy probably reduces the risk of pre-eclampsia (risk ratio (RR) 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30 to 0.79; 4 trials, 499 women, moderate-certainty evidence) and gestational diabetes (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.97; 4 trials, 446 women, moderate-certainty evidence); and probably reduces the risk of having a baby with low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.87; 5 trials, 697 women, moderate-certainty evidence) compared to women who received placebo or no intervention. Vitamin D supplementation may make little or no difference in the risk of having a preterm birth < 37 weeks compared to no intervention or placebo (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.30; 7 trials, 1640 women, low-certainty evidence). In terms of maternal adverse events, vitamin D supplementation may reduce the risk of severe postpartum haemorrhage (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.91; 1 trial, 1134 women, low-certainty evidence). There were no cases of hypercalcaemia (1 trial, 1134 women, low-certainty evidence), and we are very uncertain as to whether vitamin D increases or decreases the risk of nephritic syndrome (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.01 to 4.06; 1 trial, 135 women, very low-certainty evidence). However, given the scarcity of data in general for maternal adverse events, no firm conclusions can be drawn.Supplementation with vitamin D and calcium versus placebo/no interventionNine trials involving 1916 pregnant women were included in this comparison; three trials were assessed as having low risk of bias for allocation and blinding, four trials were assessed as having high risk of bias and two had some components having a low risk, high risk, or unclear risk. Supplementation with vitamin D and calcium during pregnancy probably reduces the risk of pre-eclampsia (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.78; 4 trials, 1174 women, moderate-certainty evidence). The effect of the intervention is uncertain on gestational diabetes (RR 0.33,% CI 0.01 to 7.84; 1 trial, 54 women, very low-certainty evidence); and low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.10 to 4.55; 2 trials, 110 women, very low-certainty evidence) compared to women who received placebo or no intervention. Supplementation with vitamin D and calcium during pregnancy may increase the risk of preterm birth < 37 weeks in comparison to women who received placebo or no intervention (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.28; 5 trials, 942 women, low-certainty evidence). No trial in this comparison reported on maternal adverse events.Supplementation with vitamin D + calcium + other vitamins and minerals versus calcium + other vitamins and minerals (but no vitamin D)One trial in 1300 participants was included in this comparison; it was assessed as having low risk of bias. Pre-eclampsia was not assessed. Supplementation with vitamin D + other nutrients may make little or no difference in the risk of preterm birth < 37 weeks (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.59; 1 trial, 1298 women, low-certainty evidence); or low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.51; 1 trial, 1298 women, low-certainty evidence). It is unclear whether it makes any difference to the risk of gestational diabetes (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.73) or maternal adverse events (hypercalcaemia no events; hypercalciuria RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.02 to 3.97; 1 trial, 1298 women,) because the certainty of the evidence for both outcomes was found to be very low. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We included 30 trials (7033 women) across three separate comparisons. Our GRADE assessments ranged from moderate to very low, with downgrading decisions based on limitations in study design, imprecision and indirectness.Supplementing pregnant women with vitamin D alone probably reduces the risk of pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, low birthweight and may reduce the risk of severe postpartum haemorrhage. It may make little or no difference in the risk of having a preterm birth < 37 weeks' gestation. Supplementing pregnant women with vitamin D and calcium probably reduces the risk of pre-eclampsia but may increase the risk of preterm births < 37 weeks (these findings warrant further research). Supplementing pregnant women with vitamin D and other nutrients may make little or no difference in the risk of preterm birth < 37 weeks' gestation or low birthweight (less than 2500 g). Additional rigorous high quality and larger randomised trials are required to evaluate the effects of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy, particularly in relation to the risk of maternal adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Palacios
- Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International UniversityDepartment of Dietetics and Nutrition11200 SW 8th Street, AHC 5 – 323MiamiFloridaUSA33199
| | - Lia K Kostiuk
- University of Wisconsin ‐ MadisonPreventive MedicineMadisonWisconsinUSA53718
| | - Juan Pablo Peña‐Rosas
- World Health OrganizationEvidence and Programme Guidance, Department of Nutrition for Health and Development20 Avenue AppiaGenevaGESwitzerland1211
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fink C, Peters RL, Koplin JJ, Brown J, Allen KJ. Factors Affecting Vitamin D Status in Infants. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2019; 6:E7. [PMID: 30626163 PMCID: PMC6351953 DOI: 10.3390/children6010007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2018] [Revised: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 12/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Vitamin D is critical to children's skeletal development and health. Despite this, the factors which determine vitamin D concentrations during infancy remain incompletely understood. This article reviews the literature assessing the factors which can affect vitamin D status in infancy, including antenatal and postnatal vitamin D supplementation. Observational data supports that dietary intake of vitamin D, UV exposure, and geographic factors contribute significantly to infants' vitamin D status, but the relationship is unclear regarding genetic variation, ethnicity, and maternal vitamin D status. Randomised controlled trials have compared higher versus lower doses of infant vitamin D supplementation, but no studies have compared infant vitamin D supplementation to placebo and eliminated external sources of vitamin D to fully quantify its effect on vitamin D status. Knowledge gaps remain regarding the factors associated with optimal vitamin D concentrations in infants-including key factors such as ethnicity and genetic variation-and further studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Fink
- Monash University, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences; Wellington Road, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute; 50 Flemington Road, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
| | - Rachel L Peters
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute; 50 Flemington Road, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
| | - Jennifer J Koplin
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute; 50 Flemington Road, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
- University of Melbourne, School of Population and Global Health; Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.
| | - Justin Brown
- Monash University, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences; Wellington Road, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.
- Monash Children's Hospital, Department of Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes; 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia.
| | - Katrina J Allen
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute; 50 Flemington Road, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
- University of Melbourne, Department of Paediatrics; Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.
- Royal Children's Hospital, Department of Allergy and Immunology; 50 Flemington Road, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
- University of Manchester, The Institute of Inflammation and Repair; Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sotunde OF, Laliberte A, Weiler HA. Maternal risk factors and newborn infant vitamin D status: a scoping literature review. Nutr Res 2018; 63:1-20. [PMID: 30824393 DOI: 10.1016/j.nutres.2018.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2018] [Revised: 11/19/2018] [Accepted: 11/30/2018] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Low vitamin D (VitD) status is common among newborn infants, more so in temperate latitudes with evidence that maternal VitD deficiency is a major risk factor given that the neonate relies solely on maternal-fetal transfer of VitD. This scoping review was conducted to provide an overview of the latest evidence from studies regarding the impact of maternal risk factors on infant 25-hydryoxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations with a focus on studies in Canada and the United States. Several maternal risk factors that contribute to low maternal-fetal 25(OH)D concentrations have been reported over many decades, but no clear pattern has been established for multiethnic populations. For example, darker skin pigmentation and ethnicity are common risk factors for low VitD status. Studies in predominantly white women showed that supplementation of VitD during pregnancy causes significant increases in maternal serum 25(OH)D which often improves cord serum 25(OH)D values. In addition, VitD recommendations by health care professionals and adherence to supplementation by pregnant women appear to positively influence maternal and infant 25(OH)D concentrations. Conversely, winter season, obesity, lower socioeconomic status including lifestyle factors (smoking), and use of medication pose risk for lower maternal-fetal transfer of VitD. However, there is still a dearth of pertinent data on the relationship between some of the maternal risk factors and newborn 25(OH)D concentrations, for instance, relationships between gestational diabetes and neonatal VitD status. Additional research is required to determine if the same target for 25(OH)D concentrations applies for pregnant women, neonates, and infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olusola F Sotunde
- School of Human Nutrition, McGill University Ste Anne de Bellevue, Québec, Canada H9X 3V9.
| | - Alexandra Laliberte
- School of Human Nutrition, McGill University Ste Anne de Bellevue, Québec, Canada H9X 3V9.
| | - Hope A Weiler
- School of Human Nutrition, McGill University Ste Anne de Bellevue, Québec, Canada H9X 3V9.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
|
13
|
Maternal gestational vitamin D supplementation and child health: looking to the future. Public Health Nutr 2017; 20:1884-1885. [PMID: 28095937 DOI: 10.1017/s1368980016003554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|